Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

This thing is a rocket.

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

This thing is a rocket.

Old 08-17-19, 09:38 PM
  #1  
sloar 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Elwood Indiana
Posts: 7,560

Bikes: they change so much I'm tired of updating this

Mentioned: 168 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1211 Post(s)
Liked 1,120 Times in 421 Posts
This thing is a rocket.

Had an issue with my fork on my Ironman. So i
swapped the 600 group over to a Cannondale frame I had
hanging in my shop. I forgot how much fun these are to ride.
Crazy fast bikes.



__________________
Semper fi
sloar is offline  
Likes For sloar:
Old 08-17-19, 09:47 PM
  #2  
Sir_Name 
Senior Member
 
Sir_Name's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,456

Bikes: are fun!

Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 466 Post(s)
Liked 852 Times in 271 Posts
Yep, looks like a blast, enjoy!
Sir_Name is offline  
Old 08-17-19, 10:51 PM
  #3  
Pcampeau
Senior Member
 
Pcampeau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 933

Bikes: 1968 Raleigh Super Course, 1972 Raleigh Professional, 1975 Raleigh International, 1978 Raleigh Professional, 1985 Raleigh Prestige, 1972 Schwinn Paramount, 1980 Schwinn Voyageur 11.8, 1960 Carlton Franco Suisse Peugeot PX10, 1972 Motobecane Le Champ

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times in 349 Posts
Great looking color on that rocket!
Pcampeau is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 01:06 AM
  #4  
Bad Lag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
If it were red, it would go even faster.

I cannot seem to go slow on my bike. No, really, I have tried. I say to myself, let's just go for a nice slow ride today. Then, as soon as I get on, it's like starting an engine. It just GOES!

I remember lusting over the Kleins and Cannondales when they first came out but I never really needed one, so I kept my money in my pocket.

By the way, what is the length of the arms on that crank set?
Bad Lag is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 04:41 AM
  #5  
Gary Fountain
Senior Member
 
Gary Fountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,925

Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 196 Times in 122 Posts
Oooh it's nice sloar.
Gary Fountain is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 05:00 AM
  #6  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,672

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,743 Times in 934 Posts
I have been lucky enough to own one rocket. A Quintanna Roo that I have bought three times, given away two times and lost once. I DO NOT like the bike but it is one of the fastest, if not the fastest, that I have ever owned. I still have it - again - and can't decide to strip and pitch or paint and restore...
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 05:04 AM
  #7  
horatio 
Hump, what hump?
 
horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,937

Bikes: See signature

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times in 145 Posts
Looks great. I have an R900, but it’s as slow as all my other bikes. Perhaps the motor needs an overhaul.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports


horatio is offline  
Likes For horatio:
Old 08-18-19, 05:13 AM
  #8  
audiomagnate
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Omaha, the most bike unfriendly city in the Midwest!
Posts: 157

Bikes: Cannondale Six 5, 89 Trek race bike

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 19 Posts
I sold mine and replaced it with a twenty one year newer Cannondale Six. It turns out the old bike was a few seconds faster on short steep climbs and sprints, despite weighing two pounds more than my new bike. You're right, those bikes are stupid fast.
audiomagnate is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 06:56 AM
  #9  
sloar 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Elwood Indiana
Posts: 7,560

Bikes: they change so much I'm tired of updating this

Mentioned: 168 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1211 Post(s)
Liked 1,120 Times in 421 Posts
Originally Posted by bad lag
if it were red, it would go even faster.

i cannot seem to go slow on my bike. No, really, i have tried. I say to myself, let's just go for a nice slow ride today. Then, as soon as i get on, it's like starting an engine. It just goes!

i remember lusting over the kleins and cannondales when they first came out but i never really needed one, so i kept my money in my pocket.

by the way, what is the length of the arms on that crank set?
172.5
__________________
Semper fi
sloar is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 07:21 AM
  #10  
clubman 
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,829

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2287 Post(s)
Liked 2,028 Times in 1,244 Posts
Originally Posted by sloar
I forgot how much fun these are to ride.
Crazy fast bikes.
They are that. My R500 had the stock alu fork and I found it to be a jarring ride. Shoulda tried swapping in a Kinesis before giving it away to a friend.
clubman is offline  
Likes For clubman:
Old 08-18-19, 07:23 AM
  #11  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,672

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,743 Times in 934 Posts
OK, I'll bite. What makes a bike faster besides the motor?

In my book, fit is faster, weight is faster, and component choice can be faster, gearing design and ratio can be faster. Is this the sort of thing that we are talking about?

Believe it or not, I can recall getting and thinking that the Quintanna Roo was too big for me and that I would never be able to push a 55 tooth big ring, especially considering the tight cog set...


But I was surprised. Was it the 650c wheels that made the difference or was it the 175 cranks or both? The bike is very light, when compared to anything else in my stable, now or in days gone bye.

Anyway, I should start a thread about what makes a bike faster. The one thing I do know for sure that it ain't me:-(
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 08:14 AM
  #12  
sloar 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Elwood Indiana
Posts: 7,560

Bikes: they change so much I'm tired of updating this

Mentioned: 168 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1211 Post(s)
Liked 1,120 Times in 421 Posts
Good question Randy, and I certainly do not know the answer. But I have noticed some bikes just take less effort in going faster. Maybe some bikes just make you want to ride harder. I had the exact setup on my Ironman and the Cannondales average speed is faster.
__________________
Semper fi
sloar is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 08:15 AM
  #13  
sloar 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Elwood Indiana
Posts: 7,560

Bikes: they change so much I'm tired of updating this

Mentioned: 168 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1211 Post(s)
Liked 1,120 Times in 421 Posts
I have a 600 crank that’s 175 in the bin, wonder if I can get a bit more speed.
__________________
Semper fi
sloar is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 08:22 AM
  #14  
top506
Death fork? Naaaah!!
 
top506's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Posts: 5,313

Bikes: Seriously downsizing.

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 555 Post(s)
Liked 615 Times in 275 Posts
Last week I did the season's personel best on my R600.

Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.

(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
top506 is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 08:26 AM
  #15  
due ruote 
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,707
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 903 Post(s)
Liked 524 Times in 318 Posts
I have always assumed that the quickness everyone talks about must come from stiffness. Nowhere else for power to go but forward. But that’s coming from someone who has never ridden a Cannondale, so it’s worth what you paid for it.
due ruote is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 08:38 AM
  #16  
iab
Senior Member
 
iab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,153
Mentioned: 200 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2992 Post(s)
Liked 3,704 Times in 1,392 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
I have always assumed that the quickness everyone talks about must come from stiffness.
Bad assumption.

If you feel like trolling the 41, start a thread asking for evidence that stiffer=faster.
iab is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 08:54 AM
  #17  
Last ride 76 
1/2 as far in 2x the time
 
Last ride 76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,935

Bikes: Yes, Please.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 285 Times in 222 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
I have always assumed that the quickness everyone talks about must come from stiffness. Nowhere else for power to go but forward. But that’s coming from someone who has never ridden a Cannondale, so it’s worth what you paid for it.
+1 Either stiffness, (as more efficient power transmission) or an unrecognized aero factor change. That's after accounting for the red shift, of course. Nope, never had a Cannondale either, opinion worth, same, I guess.
Last ride 76 is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 09:46 AM
  #18  
clubman 
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,829

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2287 Post(s)
Liked 2,028 Times in 1,244 Posts
Originally Posted by sloar
I have a 600 crank that’s 175 in the bin, wonder if I can get a bit more speed.
That would totally depend on your physiology. I've always had limited knee bend and rather short and muscular femurs. Zero setback seat posts and 165 cranks were my jam.
clubman is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 09:48 AM
  #19  
sdn40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 645

Bikes: 88 Cannondale Criterium

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 291 Post(s)
Liked 146 Times in 91 Posts
Originally Posted by randyjawa
I have been lucky enough to own one rocket. A Quintanna Roo that I have bought three times, given away two times and lost once. I DO NOT like the bike but it is one of the fastest, if not the fastest, that I have ever owned. I still have it - again - and can't decide to strip and pitch or paint and restore...
I think it's cool as is. What don't you like about it ? Strip and sell the frame to me

Last edited by sdn40; 08-18-19 at 09:52 AM.
sdn40 is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 12:23 PM
  #20  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
What's the evidence that this bike is faster than the other one? It feels faster? Strava records? Races won?
rhm is offline  
Likes For rhm:
Old 08-18-19, 12:39 PM
  #21  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,852
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2151 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times in 1,198 Posts
We all know that not all bikes peoduce the same speed from the same effort- for all of the reasons mentioned above.

I'd say that roughly a half dozen of the bikes in my collection are 'fast': The Mooney, Merckx Century, Schwinn Prologue, Cinelli Mens Sana, Miyata 1200, the Canton, and of course the Cannondale SR500. Similar gearing (usually from about 32 to 100 gear inches) but different groups on them (105 6,7 and 11 speed, Dura Ace, Shimano 6208 and 6402). Some are freewheel, others freehub. Tire brand & size are pretty much all the same. But I have other bikes with the same or similar gearing/tire setups that are not as fast.

A fast bike surprises me when I look at the cycle computer and see that I'm traveling at a rate a mile or two faster than usual or expected. My fast bikes consistently turn 32 mile O Loop times - a ride I do three or more times per week- in the 1:55 range, while similar, slower bikes may be as slow as 2:05. Lots of hills on that training loop, but have the same experience on the 42 mile W&OD trail which is faster (fast = 2:30 or less) but much flatter.

Nope, I can't explain it. Some are just faster than others.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is offline  
Likes For rccardr:
Old 08-18-19, 12:58 PM
  #22  
horatio 
Hump, what hump?
 
horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,937

Bikes: See signature

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times in 145 Posts
I’ll take the R900 when I do speed drills this week. Maybe I’ll be faster.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports


horatio is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 01:32 PM
  #23  
sloar 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Elwood Indiana
Posts: 7,560

Bikes: they change so much I'm tired of updating this

Mentioned: 168 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1211 Post(s)
Liked 1,120 Times in 421 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
What's the evidence that this bike is faster than the other one? It feels faster? Strava records? Races won?
My speedo with average speed mode, same course, same wheels and tires, same rider. And my non expert opinion.
__________________
Semper fi
sloar is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 01:50 PM
  #24  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by sloar
My speedo with average speed mode, same course, same wheels and tires, same rider. And my non expert opinion.
Okay, that makes this interesting!

Let's just stipulate that weather conditions, rider's breakfast, etc, had nothing to do with the difference.

So then the question is, what makes the one bike more efficient than the other?
It could be energy transfer (because one frame flexes more than the other, one frame transfers more power to the wheels than the other... but which?), or it could be ergonomics (rider's position on one bike allows for more efficient pedaling) or aerodynamics...

Dunno, myself! But it is interesting....
rhm is offline  
Old 08-18-19, 02:03 PM
  #25  
horatio 
Hump, what hump?
 
horatio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SC midlands
Posts: 1,937

Bikes: See signature

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times in 145 Posts
It’s got to be the short chainstays.
__________________
2010 AB T1X ** 2010 Cannondale SIX-5 ** 1993 Cannondale RS900 ** 1988 Bottecchia Team Record ** 1989 Bianchi Brava ** 1988 Nishiki Olympic ** 1987 Centurion Ironman Expert(2) ** 1985 DeRosa Professional SLX ** 1982 Colnago Super ** 1982 Basso Gap ** 198? Ciocc Competition SL ** 19?? Roberts Audax ** 198? Brian Rourke ** 1982 Mercian Olympic ** 1970 Raleigh Professional MK I ** 1952 Raleigh Sports


horatio is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.