Is my brain getting addled with old age or is DT awesome for hills?
#1
Portland Fred
Thread Starter
Is my brain getting addled with old age or is DT awesome for hills?
I've been running STI since 9 speed systems were the big thing. I'm a huge fan and have used various Shimano and SRAM levels on my bikes over the years.
However, I've found the occasional failures (usually every 20-25K miles at some inopportune time) to be a pain because all the field fixes wind you limping home with a lot less gear selection that you'd like and an expensive purchase to look forward to.
The last time my Rival lever broke (3rd failure for that type) a few years ago on my workhorse commuter, I decided I was tired of buying levers and switched that bike back to DT. I live in a city and work on a steep hill and found that 1 tooth clicks really weren't optimum for commuting at uneven speeds or for hills as I found a huge percentage of my shifts required skipping cogs.
I'm finding that for at least that sort of riding, I prefer DT to integrated shifting. Taking a hand off the bar is a minus but the actual shift is faster than STI, I've never thrown a chain or missed a shift, and the reliability is bombproof. I still run Ultegra on my race bike which I still prefer for environments where my effort and speed are more consistent.
I'm wondering if I'm the only one who actually thinks DT is a superior way to shift for certain types of riding, or if I'm sliding toward retrogrouchiness?
However, I've found the occasional failures (usually every 20-25K miles at some inopportune time) to be a pain because all the field fixes wind you limping home with a lot less gear selection that you'd like and an expensive purchase to look forward to.
The last time my Rival lever broke (3rd failure for that type) a few years ago on my workhorse commuter, I decided I was tired of buying levers and switched that bike back to DT. I live in a city and work on a steep hill and found that 1 tooth clicks really weren't optimum for commuting at uneven speeds or for hills as I found a huge percentage of my shifts required skipping cogs.
I'm finding that for at least that sort of riding, I prefer DT to integrated shifting. Taking a hand off the bar is a minus but the actual shift is faster than STI, I've never thrown a chain or missed a shift, and the reliability is bombproof. I still run Ultegra on my race bike which I still prefer for environments where my effort and speed are more consistent.
I'm wondering if I'm the only one who actually thinks DT is a superior way to shift for certain types of riding, or if I'm sliding toward retrogrouchiness?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 2,076
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
At first I thought you were talking about double tap and then had a good laugh and realized that no sane person would ever say "superior way to shift" about double tap and I reread your post.
#3
Junior Member
DT shifting really is underrated! Good enough for most cyclists. I've even done some racing with them recently and they work fine, as long as the parts are of good quality. Indexing is great, but not a must have with a 5-9 speed system.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504
Bikes: Speedvagen Steel
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 248 Times
in
156 Posts
Yeah, I think you're bonkers
Don't get me wrong, when I used down tube shifters oh so long ago, I took pride at the skill it took to double shift on the fly and used to show this off to all my teenage friends, especially before indexed levers came out. But the moment I was able to get my hands on the first Shimano 600 "STI" (Shimano Total Integration for those young folks) levers (before someone coined the awesome term brifters) I scooped those suckers up. I think they cost me something like $350 cost price since I worked at a bike shop at the time. Somewhere around 1990 or thereabouts.
I see all these vintage bikes that I'm pretty sure had downtube shifting at that time but people have dressed them up in somewhat age appropriate componentry that generally includes brifters. I couldn't imagine going back much as I loved it.
Now... if you really want to help your shifting while climbing, get yourself the electronic group of your choice along with a remote bar top shifter oh mama that's nice!
Don't get me wrong, when I used down tube shifters oh so long ago, I took pride at the skill it took to double shift on the fly and used to show this off to all my teenage friends, especially before indexed levers came out. But the moment I was able to get my hands on the first Shimano 600 "STI" (Shimano Total Integration for those young folks) levers (before someone coined the awesome term brifters) I scooped those suckers up. I think they cost me something like $350 cost price since I worked at a bike shop at the time. Somewhere around 1990 or thereabouts.
I see all these vintage bikes that I'm pretty sure had downtube shifting at that time but people have dressed them up in somewhat age appropriate componentry that generally includes brifters. I couldn't imagine going back much as I loved it.
Now... if you really want to help your shifting while climbing, get yourself the electronic group of your choice along with a remote bar top shifter oh mama that's nice!
#5
Portland Fred
Thread Starter
The shifting itself is very nice when adjusted properly (which some riders appear not to do) -- for starters, autotrim and shifting rings is excellent. If I go down that path, it will first be on my LWB recumbent highracer as there's no way to get that kind of precision with such long cables and housings.
#6
Portland Fred
Thread Starter
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
191 Posts
Been there, done that, never going back to that clunky location. May as well give up indexed shifting, as well and go back to straight friction levers.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504
Bikes: Speedvagen Steel
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 248 Times
in
156 Posts
I've tried electronic shifting but between philosophical qualms and cheapskatedness, conversion will not happen soon.
The shifting itself is very nice when adjusted properly (which some riders appear not to do) -- for starters, autotrim and shifting rings is excellent. If I go down that path, it will first be on my LWB recumbent highracer as there's no way to get that kind of precision with such long cables and housings.
The shifting itself is very nice when adjusted properly (which some riders appear not to do) -- for starters, autotrim and shifting rings is excellent. If I go down that path, it will first be on my LWB recumbent highracer as there's no way to get that kind of precision with such long cables and housings.
I'm always surprised when people don't have their electronic shifting adjusted properly, it's so easy to get it right, although to be fair I've never had to adjust it despite using different wheelsets in 4 years and recently I've had to make adjustments on the fly, seemingly when going from an older Ultegra cassette 11-32 to the wheels with a new Ultegra 11-30 cassette. New chain from this year as well. Been kinda strange, but the adjustment is as easy as turning the cable adjuster on a regular set up.
Going back to your DT eureka moment. I do still wax longingly about my old Suntour ratchet levers that cost me a grand total of about $20 in 1986!
#9
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,613
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10959 Post(s)
Liked 7,487 Times
in
4,188 Posts
My frames are on the larger side of things and reaching down that much is overrated. Its significantly more reach than on a 52 or 54cm frame, and the longer arms don’t offset the longer reach.
Something breaking every 20,000 miles doesn’t seem like much of an issue for most- that takes a lot of people a long time to accomplish.
I would use bar end shifters or Gevenalle shifters if I wanted to get away from STIs. And look at that- I do use both! Bar ends on my touring bike and Gevenalle on my gravel.
Shifts are fast, the front derailleur is infinitely trimmable, and hands stay on the bars.
Something breaking every 20,000 miles doesn’t seem like much of an issue for most- that takes a lot of people a long time to accomplish.
I would use bar end shifters or Gevenalle shifters if I wanted to get away from STIs. And look at that- I do use both! Bar ends on my touring bike and Gevenalle on my gravel.
Shifts are fast, the front derailleur is infinitely trimmable, and hands stay on the bars.
#10
Portland Fred
Thread Starter
In all fairness, I ride that bike at a more relaxed pace which is reflected in the way I shift so indexing doesn't play the same role as it does on my other bikes. DT (especially friction) isn't great when standing or for making frequent minor adjustments in response to wind or terrain variations.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,904
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
I've been on the path of "if it works, don't fix it" for the past several decades. Since DTs worked quite well when I raced 4 decades ago, I stayed with it. (I did dabble in SunTour Command on the Mooney for quite a few years but that bike drifted into near obscurity as I set up newer bikes and old-style race bikes or commuters with DT.)
The new curse is that the best, most available freewheels have ll this fancy shifting stuff on the teeth and promote shifts way too easily for good DT performance. (Shimano Ultra and Hyper Glide) The old SunTour FWs were a joy ot shift as is the Sachs I still have. Even SunRace is better (but their cog choices can be odd).
9-speed Campy cassette with a Campy Mirage RD and triple front and SunTour top-mounted DT shifters (those ones that sit in a box on top of the DT) is a dream to shift. We would have thought we had gone to heaven if we had anything remotely as good when I was racing. Fast, easy, smooth, no accidental shifts and the big dump or upshift is just as easy as going one cog.
It still works. And I am still not changing. (Just keeping my eyes open for a new 28t 7-speed FW with no shift assist.)
Ben
The new curse is that the best, most available freewheels have ll this fancy shifting stuff on the teeth and promote shifts way too easily for good DT performance. (Shimano Ultra and Hyper Glide) The old SunTour FWs were a joy ot shift as is the Sachs I still have. Even SunRace is better (but their cog choices can be odd).
9-speed Campy cassette with a Campy Mirage RD and triple front and SunTour top-mounted DT shifters (those ones that sit in a box on top of the DT) is a dream to shift. We would have thought we had gone to heaven if we had anything remotely as good when I was racing. Fast, easy, smooth, no accidental shifts and the big dump or upshift is just as easy as going one cog.
It still works. And I am still not changing. (Just keeping my eyes open for a new 28t 7-speed FW with no shift assist.)
Ben
#12
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,592
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1252 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
708 Posts
That being said, my winter/foul weather bike has DT shifters.
But I've also never broken an STI lever -- nor even a shifter cable -- in over 60,000 miles of year-round road riding. So I don't quite get the appeal of the DT lever as "insurance" against mechanical catastrophe.
#13
Senior Member
The simplicity and lack of friction in DT setups is compelling. However, I've found STI to be extremely reliable and shifting from the hoods is definitely superior.
#14
~>~
Still have DT controls on the Vitus 979, it was built w/ 7 cog indexing and raced that way for years.
It now sports 10 cog DT indexing and works predictably just fine as ever, although no longer ridden in pacelines.
FG, AW, friction/indexed DT, barcons or 'brifters it all works just fine for me.
-Bandera
It now sports 10 cog DT indexing and works predictably just fine as ever, although no longer ridden in pacelines.
FG, AW, friction/indexed DT, barcons or 'brifters it all works just fine for me.
-Bandera
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848
Bikes: Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times
in
422 Posts
I'm still using DT.. one friction 7sp the other index 8sp.
I have a problem with pushing a brake lever to change a gear... not going to happen.
I guess the rest of you need to learn to ride a bike with no hands. Afraid?
I have a problem with pushing a brake lever to change a gear... not going to happen.
I guess the rest of you need to learn to ride a bike with no hands. Afraid?
#16
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
I have indexed downtube shifters on my foul weather bike - not because of hills, but because the brifters I had on there before would get gunked up in the rain and frozen in the cold. You can't beat DT for reliability.
#17
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
865 Posts
I ride both systems, DT and STI, and can't say that either one is much of a problem.
STI has the ability to shift while out of the saddle, which became possible once Shimano had developed HG cogs/chains for mountainbikes. You wouldn't want any slippage while banging gears out of the saddle!
For racing, STI offers some competitive advantage, but shifting STI levers is not always ergonomic in my experience and can at times be awkward, as when riding in the drops while out of the saddle.
There is a technique to using DT shifters effectively, and friction shifting adds another dimension to this. But I enjoy a variety of spirited/competitive rides just as much regardless of which system I use.
I believe that I won a CX race due to my use of DT levers on one occasion (the only time that I raced that bike), since I had to commit to one gear choice before heading through a lengthy sand feature. I gapped the field right there, on the last lap, when I was the only rider to power through without dismounting.
Cross-shifting both levers to achieve a modest change in gearing when the front derailer is used is something that I find particularly entertaining, especially when conditions of rapidly-changing grade make it more challenging to do this more quickly.
With a single cross-shift, this old 5x2 DT friction setup provides seven sequential ratios over a decent range that aren't too gappy for my legs to handle while staying in touch with a motivated paceline. The Simplex changers move the HG-style 9s chain over 13-24t UG cogs and 36-52t steel rings with pretty amazing speed and accuracy, so my gearing and performance is not much left lacking.
STI has the ability to shift while out of the saddle, which became possible once Shimano had developed HG cogs/chains for mountainbikes. You wouldn't want any slippage while banging gears out of the saddle!
For racing, STI offers some competitive advantage, but shifting STI levers is not always ergonomic in my experience and can at times be awkward, as when riding in the drops while out of the saddle.
There is a technique to using DT shifters effectively, and friction shifting adds another dimension to this. But I enjoy a variety of spirited/competitive rides just as much regardless of which system I use.
I believe that I won a CX race due to my use of DT levers on one occasion (the only time that I raced that bike), since I had to commit to one gear choice before heading through a lengthy sand feature. I gapped the field right there, on the last lap, when I was the only rider to power through without dismounting.
Cross-shifting both levers to achieve a modest change in gearing when the front derailer is used is something that I find particularly entertaining, especially when conditions of rapidly-changing grade make it more challenging to do this more quickly.
With a single cross-shift, this old 5x2 DT friction setup provides seven sequential ratios over a decent range that aren't too gappy for my legs to handle while staying in touch with a motivated paceline. The Simplex changers move the HG-style 9s chain over 13-24t UG cogs and 36-52t steel rings with pretty amazing speed and accuracy, so my gearing and performance is not much left lacking.
Last edited by dddd; 01-16-18 at 05:32 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Richmond VA area
Posts: 2,618
Bikes: '00 Koga Miyata Full Pro Oval Road bike.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I prefer DT shifting over all others - it's simple, easy to use, lasts forever. Is lighter too, I would argue. I've also never cared for where the weight is shifted to with brifters - the worst place imo, right on the bars where you steer.
I always laugh when I hear some people post how hard DT shifters are to use, makes me think they probably shouldnt be riding a bike if they're that uncoordinated.
All that said though I understand the attraction of brifters, they're definitely safer.
I always laugh when I hear some people post how hard DT shifters are to use, makes me think they probably shouldnt be riding a bike if they're that uncoordinated.
All that said though I understand the attraction of brifters, they're definitely safer.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,671
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,988 Times
in
1,776 Posts
I don't know that I find anyone system superior to the other when climbing. It comes down to which is tuned up properly and working well. I think the old friction mavic DT levers on my mid 80's Orbea shift magically over the current Campagnolo 10 speed cassette on the bike. I'm using an Ultegra 9 speed RD and I think the play on the jockey wheel really makes this work so well.
When climbing on any given bike of mine I may consider the gearing based on what MT I'm heading up, and the brakes, but I don't usually worry about if that bike has brifters or DT shifters.
When climbing on any given bike of mine I may consider the gearing based on what MT I'm heading up, and the brakes, but I don't usually worry about if that bike has brifters or DT shifters.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,904
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Ben
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,811
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,018 Times
in
571 Posts
DT just seems more natural to me. I suppose because I took a few decades off, so it was what I was used to from back in the day. Tried STI when I started riding again, but DTs just feel better to me.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 854
Bikes: All 80s Schwinns: 88Prologue, 88Circuit, 88Ontare, 88KOM, 86SS, 88Tempo, 88V'ger, 80V'ger, 88LeTour, 82LTLuxeMixte, 87 Cimarron, 86H.Sierra, 92Paramount9c
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't get to excited about one vs the other. I've used em all, doesn't matter much to me. It is somewhat satisfying to crest a big hill and reach down and drop from the biggest to the smallest rear cog in on swipe. That being said a few clicks on an ergo is hardly an inconvenience. Most of my stuff is 80's and while some have been updated to brifter I still have more DTs than anything else and like em just fine.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18374 Post(s)
Liked 4,509 Times
in
3,351 Posts
I still do friction shifting. I was out today with my stem shifters
But, the old bike has vintage Campy friction shifters.
I agree, I do like the quick throw of the lever to approximately where one wants it. Or, occasionally reaching down to feel about what gear one is in.
My Campy Brifters allow jumping about 3 cogs at a time, I think, but still, I'm often dumping quite a few gears at a time on my ascents, and going the other way on the descents. However, one difference I've noticed is that I tend to trim up or down one sprocket a lot more when using the brifters. With the DT shifters, I'll frequently pedal for quite some time without hardly changing gears, perhaps standing for small hills.
Of course, it is handy to be able to shift anytime one wishes with the brifters. I think even standing.
But, the old bike has vintage Campy friction shifters.
I agree, I do like the quick throw of the lever to approximately where one wants it. Or, occasionally reaching down to feel about what gear one is in.
My Campy Brifters allow jumping about 3 cogs at a time, I think, but still, I'm often dumping quite a few gears at a time on my ascents, and going the other way on the descents. However, one difference I've noticed is that I tend to trim up or down one sprocket a lot more when using the brifters. With the DT shifters, I'll frequently pedal for quite some time without hardly changing gears, perhaps standing for small hills.
Of course, it is handy to be able to shift anytime one wishes with the brifters. I think even standing.
#25
Senior Member