Fixie for toddler > coaster brake to fixie?
#26
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Being able to read and write is one thing. You can do it, if not "correctly". As an adult, you should know plenty of adults do NOT read OR write correctly. Grammar mistakes are common, even in the professional world and most adults have illegible handwriting.
And yes, in school, you are taught to write "correctly". When I was learning to read and write, we learned the Zaner-Bloser and D'nealian styles of writing although we did not know this at the time. This is what would be considered "correct" writing technique. You don't just hand your kids paper, pencil, and a newspaper and say "make it look like this". In fact, teachers discourage kids from writing cursive at all until they have proper education.
And yes, in school, you are taught to write "correctly". When I was learning to read and write, we learned the Zaner-Bloser and D'nealian styles of writing although we did not know this at the time. This is what would be considered "correct" writing technique. You don't just hand your kids paper, pencil, and a newspaper and say "make it look like this". In fact, teachers discourage kids from writing cursive at all until they have proper education.
And your argument of entanglement, how are you any less likely to let your foot fall off a bigwheel/trike than you are a fixed gear?
EDIT: And it's not like you start teaching your kid by saying "Son, today you will learn proper pedaling technique.". You just make sure they can ride safely. And being on a fixed gear does have the benefit of incidentally encouraging good pedaling technique passively. This has nothing to do with the parent's teaching them.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,382
Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Pro, Schwinn Le Tour Conversion, Free Spirit polo beater, Cervelo P2T, aluminum tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was making the point that reading and writing "correctly" AREN'T essential. Most adults have mediocre handwriting and grammar. Anyhow, the geometry is different, but the possibility of your foot coming off is no different. And if your foot comes off a big wheel, pretty sure it is going to hit the GROUND actually.
Like I said before, and I will say it again, simply giving them a fixed gear isn't overbearing. Parents make decisions on behalf of their kids all the time. What they wear, where they go to school, what sports they play ... deciding what kind of bike Johnny gets for his birthday is not controlling.
Like I said before, and I will say it again, simply giving them a fixed gear isn't overbearing. Parents make decisions on behalf of their kids all the time. What they wear, where they go to school, what sports they play ... deciding what kind of bike Johnny gets for his birthday is not controlling.
#28
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The extent of how a proper riding technique is taught is largely irrelevant, but the core is still there: an insistence that the child is doing something wrong on the bike and this must be corrected in order to please his/her parents and be a better child. What is relevant is fun. Like I said before, turning bicycles into the next violin or piano lesson is one sure way to squash the fun out of riding bikes. How many people were taken to violin or piano lessons as a child and how many people still play violin or piano to this day? How many people rode bikes as a child and how many people still ride bikes today? Or, how many people remember having fun during violin or piano lessons? How many people remember having fun while riding bikes as a child?
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,382
Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Pro, Schwinn Le Tour Conversion, Free Spirit polo beater, Cervelo P2T, aluminum tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your comparisons make no sense. How is giving your kid a fixed gear bike vs a bike with a coaster brake somehow "taking the fun out of biking"?
It's a bike. Your kid is going to like it regardless of what kind of bike it is.
Ironically, most people ride fixed gears because they think they are more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes.
It's a bike. Your kid is going to like it regardless of what kind of bike it is.
Ironically, most people ride fixed gears because they think they are more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes.
#30
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anyhow, the geometry is different, but the possibility of your foot coming off is no different. And if your foot comes off a big wheel, pretty sure it is going to hit the GROUND actually.
Like I said before, and I will say it again, simply giving them a fixed gear isn't overbearing. Parents make decisions on behalf of their kids all the time. What they wear, where they go to school, what sports they play ... deciding what kind of bike Johnny gets for his birthday is not controlling.
#31
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ironically, most people ride fixed gears because they think they are more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,382
Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Pro, Schwinn Le Tour Conversion, Free Spirit polo beater, Cervelo P2T, aluminum tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think I can respond by saying riding a fixed gear bicycle is no more unnatural than the act of riding a bicycle in general.
Most kids ASK for bikes for their birthdays before they are given one. At least, that is how it worked for my friends and I growing up, if we were lucky enough to get what we asked for. It's not like the kid is forced to ride the bike. Again, you're comparing apples to oranges. Most kids don't ask for a violin for Christmas.
About the safety issue: I've talked to many older cyclists who have told me their first bike was a fixed gear. If they were able to do it in their youth safely, the kids of tomorrow can do it also.
No one said push proper technique verbally on your kid. All I said was that fixed gear bikes INTRINSICALLY encourage this. Again, I quote:
I don't have any statistics for you but I guarantee the survey says "Because It's Fun" as a top reason people ride fixed as opposed to free.
Most kids ASK for bikes for their birthdays before they are given one. At least, that is how it worked for my friends and I growing up, if we were lucky enough to get what we asked for. It's not like the kid is forced to ride the bike. Again, you're comparing apples to oranges. Most kids don't ask for a violin for Christmas.
About the safety issue: I've talked to many older cyclists who have told me their first bike was a fixed gear. If they were able to do it in their youth safely, the kids of tomorrow can do it also.
I don't have any statistics for you but I guarantee the survey says "Because It's Fun" as a top reason people ride fixed as opposed to free.
#33
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most kids ASK for bikes for their birthdays before they are given one. At least, that is how it worked for my friends and I growing up, if we were lucky enough to get what we asked for. It's not like the kid is forced to ride the bike. Again, you're comparing apples to oranges. Most kids don't ask for a violin for Christmas.
About the safety issue: I've talked to many older cyclists who have told me their first bike was a fixed gear. If they were able to do it in their youth safely, the kids of tomorrow can do it also.
No one said push proper technique verbally on your kid. All I said was that fixed gear bikes INTRINSICALLY encourage this.
I don't have any statistics for you but I guarantee the survey says "Because It's Fun" as a top reason people ride fixed as opposed to free.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,382
Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Pro, Schwinn Le Tour Conversion, Free Spirit polo beater, Cervelo P2T, aluminum tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1) As stated for the 4th or 5th time, no one is saying give your kid a lesson on pedaling technique. I said, give your kid a fixed gear and s/he will learn it passively without the parent saying a damn thing.
2) If you are so concerned about drivetrain safety, put a chain guard on it. Many kids bikes (regardless of whether it's free/fixed) have these anyhow.
3) My very first post implied it. I said "[it] seems a great way to get your technique down right early in life". If that does not imply that the bike itself inherently teaches the lesson, you do not comprehend English. The statement above in no way implies that the parent is giving any sort of "proper pedaling" lessons. The parent's role beyond providing the equipment is not discussed in any way.
4) I am talking about people who ALREADY prefer riding fixed gears. I am not saying fixed gear riding is inherently more fun. Obviously that is ENTIRELY subjective. What I am saying - and if you re-read what I said, you will see this is stated lucidly - those people who DO ride fixed gears ... many of them would tell you they do it because "it is fun".
2) If you are so concerned about drivetrain safety, put a chain guard on it. Many kids bikes (regardless of whether it's free/fixed) have these anyhow.
3) My very first post implied it. I said "[it] seems a great way to get your technique down right early in life". If that does not imply that the bike itself inherently teaches the lesson, you do not comprehend English. The statement above in no way implies that the parent is giving any sort of "proper pedaling" lessons. The parent's role beyond providing the equipment is not discussed in any way.
4) I am talking about people who ALREADY prefer riding fixed gears. I am not saying fixed gear riding is inherently more fun. Obviously that is ENTIRELY subjective. What I am saying - and if you re-read what I said, you will see this is stated lucidly - those people who DO ride fixed gears ... many of them would tell you they do it because "it is fun".
#35
Pants are for suckaz
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mt. Airy, MD
Posts: 2,578
Bikes: Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Idea: Instead of bickering about who's a good/bad parent; lets discuss fixed gear bicycles!
I still think some well placed epoxy could be used to seize the freewheel of a standard childrens bike.
I still think some well placed epoxy could be used to seize the freewheel of a standard childrens bike.
#36
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1) As stated for the 4th or 5th time, no one is saying give your kid a lesson on pedaling technique. I said, give your kid a fixed gear and s/he will learn it passively without the parent saying a damn thing.
2) If you are so concerned about drivetrain safety, put a chain guard on it. Many kids bikes (regardless of whether it's free/fixed) have these anyhow.
3) My very first post implied it. I said "[it] seems a great way to get your technique down right early in life". If that does not imply that the bike itself inherently teaches the lesson, you do not comprehend English. The statement above in no way implies that the parent is giving any sort of "proper pedaling" lessons. The parent's role beyond providing the equipment is not discussed in any way.
4) I am talking about people who ALREADY prefer riding fixed gears. I am not saying fixed gear riding is inherently more fun. Obviously that is ENTIRELY subjective. What I am saying - and if you re-read what I said, you will see this is stated lucidly - those people who DO ride fixed gears ... many of them would tell you they do it because "it is fun".
2) If you are so concerned about drivetrain safety, put a chain guard on it. Many kids bikes (regardless of whether it's free/fixed) have these anyhow.
3) My very first post implied it. I said "[it] seems a great way to get your technique down right early in life". If that does not imply that the bike itself inherently teaches the lesson, you do not comprehend English. The statement above in no way implies that the parent is giving any sort of "proper pedaling" lessons. The parent's role beyond providing the equipment is not discussed in any way.
4) I am talking about people who ALREADY prefer riding fixed gears. I am not saying fixed gear riding is inherently more fun. Obviously that is ENTIRELY subjective. What I am saying - and if you re-read what I said, you will see this is stated lucidly - those people who DO ride fixed gears ... many of them would tell you they do it because "it is fun".
2) a chainguard would not stop a child's legs from being entangled in the fast moving pedals.
3) Well, I must not comprehend English. You have attached a separate meaning and value to your earlier statement after the fact. I do believe that is called "back pedaling" -- no pun intended.
4) And people that predominately ride geared bicycles would say they have more fun on their geared bicycle (or they'd say "I ride my bike because it's fun" if a list of reasons were to be complied). If this is the case, then your point is entirely moot because everyone generally has fun on bike and people ride what they consider the most fun. Here is what you said: Ironically, most people ride fixed gears because they think they are more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes.
#37
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,382
Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Pro, Schwinn Le Tour Conversion, Free Spirit polo beater, Cervelo P2T, aluminum tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
SB on FG bikes:
"When you descend, you can't coast, but the gear is too low. This forces you to pedal at a faster cadence than you would choose on a multi-speed bicycle. High-cadence pedaling improves the suppleness of you legs. High rpm's force you to learn to pedal in a smooth manner--if you don't, you will bounce up and down in the saddle. Most cyclists coast far too much. Riding a fixed-gear bike will break this pernicious habit. Coasting breaks up your rhythm and allows your legs to stiffen up. Keeping your legs in motion keeps the muscles supple, and promotes good circulation."
Just a few (of many more) benefits of FG that SB mentions. I'm sure we have ALL read this.
2) The chainguard prevents clothing or body parts from being entangled in the drivetrain. That is why I suggested that. I don't see how legs get entangled in the cranks, but if they did, there are brakes. Personally it sounds worse to have your legs trailing against the ground when they come off the pedals, than to have them simply dangling, allowing you to brake.
3) I didn't assign ANY value to a previous statement. READ it, dude. Seriously. It says NOTHING about parents teaching kids proper technique in ANYTHING. This is extremely frustrating that you don't understand this. All it says is that FGs encourage proper riding technique. Do I need to do a sentence diagram for you? Seriously. The subject of the sentence is "fixed gears". The predicate of the sentence is "seem like a great way to learn proper technique". Nowhere is parents or parents teaching kids to ride bikes mentioned.
4) I am talking about "reasons people like to ride fixed gears". For example:
- It's healthy!
- It promotes good cycling technique!
- The bike requires less tuning!
- I feel connected to the road!
I guarantee "it's fun" is on this list near the top for most people. And yes, you quoted me correctly: "Ironically, most people ride fixed gears because they think they are more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes."
Let me break this sentence down for you to understand.
Subject: Why people who ride fixed gears ride fixed gears.
Predicate: Because they feel it is more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes.
Is it all really so hard to understand or are you just being contrary???
"When you descend, you can't coast, but the gear is too low. This forces you to pedal at a faster cadence than you would choose on a multi-speed bicycle. High-cadence pedaling improves the suppleness of you legs. High rpm's force you to learn to pedal in a smooth manner--if you don't, you will bounce up and down in the saddle. Most cyclists coast far too much. Riding a fixed-gear bike will break this pernicious habit. Coasting breaks up your rhythm and allows your legs to stiffen up. Keeping your legs in motion keeps the muscles supple, and promotes good circulation."
Just a few (of many more) benefits of FG that SB mentions. I'm sure we have ALL read this.
2) The chainguard prevents clothing or body parts from being entangled in the drivetrain. That is why I suggested that. I don't see how legs get entangled in the cranks, but if they did, there are brakes. Personally it sounds worse to have your legs trailing against the ground when they come off the pedals, than to have them simply dangling, allowing you to brake.
3) I didn't assign ANY value to a previous statement. READ it, dude. Seriously. It says NOTHING about parents teaching kids proper technique in ANYTHING. This is extremely frustrating that you don't understand this. All it says is that FGs encourage proper riding technique. Do I need to do a sentence diagram for you? Seriously. The subject of the sentence is "fixed gears". The predicate of the sentence is "seem like a great way to learn proper technique". Nowhere is parents or parents teaching kids to ride bikes mentioned.
4) I am talking about "reasons people like to ride fixed gears". For example:
- It's healthy!
- It promotes good cycling technique!
- The bike requires less tuning!
- I feel connected to the road!
I guarantee "it's fun" is on this list near the top for most people. And yes, you quoted me correctly: "Ironically, most people ride fixed gears because they think they are more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes."
Let me break this sentence down for you to understand.
Subject: Why people who ride fixed gears ride fixed gears.
Predicate: Because they feel it is more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes.
Is it all really so hard to understand or are you just being contrary???
#40
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For a childrens bike, you can likely figure out a way to seize the freewheeling mechanism in the rear hub of an off-the-rack SS kids bike. Personally, I'd weld it in place, but pumping it full of epoxy or something should work similarly well if you don't have access to welding equipment...
#41
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
SB on FG bikes:
"When you descend, you can't coast, but the gear is too low. This forces you to pedal at a faster cadence than you would choose on a multi-speed bicycle. High-cadence pedaling improves the suppleness of you legs. High rpm's force you to learn to pedal in a smooth manner--if you don't, you will bounce up and down in the saddle. Most cyclists coast far too much. Riding a fixed-gear bike will break this pernicious habit. Coasting breaks up your rhythm and allows your legs to stiffen up. Keeping your legs in motion keeps the muscles supple, and promotes good circulation."
Just a few (of many more) benefits of FG that SB mentions. I'm sure we have ALL read this.
"When you descend, you can't coast, but the gear is too low. This forces you to pedal at a faster cadence than you would choose on a multi-speed bicycle. High-cadence pedaling improves the suppleness of you legs. High rpm's force you to learn to pedal in a smooth manner--if you don't, you will bounce up and down in the saddle. Most cyclists coast far too much. Riding a fixed-gear bike will break this pernicious habit. Coasting breaks up your rhythm and allows your legs to stiffen up. Keeping your legs in motion keeps the muscles supple, and promotes good circulation."
Just a few (of many more) benefits of FG that SB mentions. I'm sure we have ALL read this.
2) The chainguard prevents clothing or body parts from being entangled in the drivetrain. That is why I suggested that. I don't see how legs get entangled in the cranks, but if they did, there are brakes. Personally it sounds worse to have your legs trailing against the ground when they come off the pedals, than to have them simply dangling, allowing you to brake.
Do you think any big-box retailer would ever consider selling a children's fixed gear bicycle? I am curious to your thoughts why this would never happen (or happen, if you're as dense as you sound).
3) I didn't assign ANY value to a previous statement. READ it, dude. Seriously. It says NOTHING about parents teaching kids proper technique in ANYTHING. This is extremely frustrating that you don't understand this. All it says is that FGs encourage proper riding technique. Do I need to do a sentence diagram for you? Seriously. The subject of the sentence is "fixed gears". The predicate of the sentence is "seem like a great way to learn proper technique". Nowhere is parents or parents teaching kids to ride bikes mentioned.
4) I am talking about "reasons people like to ride fixed gears". For example:
- It's healthy!
- It promotes good cycling technique!
- The bike requires less tuning!
- I feel connected to the road!
I guarantee "it's fun" is on this list near the top for most people. And yes, you quoted me correctly: "Ironically, most people ride fixed gears because they think they are more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes."
Let me break this sentence down for you to understand.
Subject: Why people who ride fixed gears ride fixed gears.
Predicate: Because they feel it is more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes.
- It's healthy!
- It promotes good cycling technique!
- The bike requires less tuning!
- I feel connected to the road!
I guarantee "it's fun" is on this list near the top for most people. And yes, you quoted me correctly: "Ironically, most people ride fixed gears because they think they are more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes."
Let me break this sentence down for you to understand.
Subject: Why people who ride fixed gears ride fixed gears.
Predicate: Because they feel it is more "fun" than free-wheeled bikes.
Your point is moot. Who cares?
Is it all really so hard to understand or are you just being contrary???
Last edited by psirue; 06-18-09 at 01:43 PM.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,382
Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Pro, Schwinn Le Tour Conversion, Free Spirit polo beater, Cervelo P2T, aluminum tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1) I think SB clearly illustrates that fixed gear riding promotes good cycling technique. If HE can't make that argument to you, certainly I cannot. All you've said is "not all fixed gear cyclists have good technique". Sure. Whatever. That doesn't change the fact that fixed gear riding promotes good cycling technique.
2) "A foot slips off the pedal. the pedal comes around and smacks the back of the leg. with enough force, the bike will endo." - There are about 10000000000000000 ways a kid can fall off a bike, and this is possibly one of the most contrived I've ever heard. You are completely disregarding the fact that at any point the brakes can be engaged. In all my years of cycling, I've never heard of this as a common way of falling off one's bike.
3) You say "proper technique is taught via coaching and instruction". What I said is completely contrary to this. I said that riding fixed gears promote good cycling technique. This is exactly what SB says and in fact YOU agree with. So why are you arguing??? You say a child can't spin right? You are totally underestimating what a kid can and cannot do. The kid is ALREADY riding the bike. Of COURSE they are fully capable of spinning correctly. You have COMPLETELY loaded my statement with outrageous inferences. All I said, for the 10th or 11th time now, was that fixed gears THEMSELVES promote good technique.
4) I disagree. I think many road riders would say it is fun, but not fun specifically because it has a freewheel. MOST bikes have a freewheel. This differs from people who ride fixed gears because of the fixed wheel. I think many of them think it is fun explicitly because it is fixed.
2) "A foot slips off the pedal. the pedal comes around and smacks the back of the leg. with enough force, the bike will endo." - There are about 10000000000000000 ways a kid can fall off a bike, and this is possibly one of the most contrived I've ever heard. You are completely disregarding the fact that at any point the brakes can be engaged. In all my years of cycling, I've never heard of this as a common way of falling off one's bike.
3) You say "proper technique is taught via coaching and instruction". What I said is completely contrary to this. I said that riding fixed gears promote good cycling technique. This is exactly what SB says and in fact YOU agree with. So why are you arguing??? You say a child can't spin right? You are totally underestimating what a kid can and cannot do. The kid is ALREADY riding the bike. Of COURSE they are fully capable of spinning correctly. You have COMPLETELY loaded my statement with outrageous inferences. All I said, for the 10th or 11th time now, was that fixed gears THEMSELVES promote good technique.
4) I disagree. I think many road riders would say it is fun, but not fun specifically because it has a freewheel. MOST bikes have a freewheel. This differs from people who ride fixed gears because of the fixed wheel. I think many of them think it is fun explicitly because it is fixed.
#43
imhotcuzimfly
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 52
Bikes: I got the one that is "unbranded" and cheap as hell. holding up so far
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I can see a kid messing up his/her hand on a fixed gear bike.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,382
Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Pro, Schwinn Le Tour Conversion, Free Spirit polo beater, Cervelo P2T, aluminum tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If anything, I think this is easily the #1 danger a fixed gear poses to a small child.
EDIT: Incidentally, I do think a mini BMX bike would be a great choice. Also incidentally, I think you could probably epoxy a rear cog, like HandsomeRyan said.
EDIT: Incidentally, I do think a mini BMX bike would be a great choice. Also incidentally, I think you could probably epoxy a rear cog, like HandsomeRyan said.
Last edited by devilshaircut; 06-18-09 at 02:09 PM.
#45
imhotcuzimfly
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 52
Bikes: I got the one that is "unbranded" and cheap as hell. holding up so far
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I remember when i was young i used to think that turning my bike upside down and pedaling with my hands to get the back tire going really fast and see how long it spins for was the coolest thing to do ever.
anyone else do this?
anyone else do this?
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,382
Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Pro, Schwinn Le Tour Conversion, Free Spirit polo beater, Cervelo P2T, aluminum tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Me, cept I wouldn't spin it by the pedals, I would spin it by the tire, pretending it was Wheel of Fortune or something. I was strange.
#47
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1) I think SB clearly illustrates that fixed gear riding promotes good cycling technique. If HE can't make that argument to you, certainly I cannot. All you've said is "not all fixed gear cyclists have good technique". Sure. Whatever. That doesn't change the fact that fixed gear riding promotes good cycling technique.
2) "A foot slips off the pedal. the pedal comes around and smacks the back of the leg. with enough force, the bike will endo." - There are about 10000000000000000 ways a kid can fall off a bike, and this is possibly one of the most contrived I've ever heard. You are completely disregarding the fact that at any point the brakes can be engaged. In all my years of cycling, I've never heard of this as a common way of falling off one's bike.
3) You say "proper technique is taught via coaching and instruction". What I said is completely contrary to this. I said that riding fixed gears promote good cycling technique. This is exactly what SB says and in fact YOU agree with. So why are you arguing??? You say a child can't spin right? You are totally underestimating what a kid can and cannot do. The kid is ALREADY riding the bike. Of COURSE they are fully capable of spinning correctly. You have COMPLETELY loaded my statement with outrageous inferences. All I said, for the 10th or 11th time now, was that fixed gears THEMSELVES promote good technique.
If a fixed-gear gives a rider good cycling techniques, why are there so many crappy fixed-gear riders? My answer is because they lack decent training and understanding of the method. Without such instruction and practice and pedal-awareness, there is little benefit. They simply ride the bike, just as a child would.
And since when is this kid doing one-legged and dowel drills?
4) I disagree. I think many road riders would say it is fun, but not fun specifically because it has a freewheel. MOST bikes have a freewheel. This differs from people who ride fixed gears because of the fixed wheel. I think many of them think it is fun explicitly because it is fixed.
Face it -- fun is entirely subjective and each rider you sample will say they have more fun on their preferred bicycle. To say that a fixed-gear is objectively "more fun" than a geared/freewheel equipped bicycle is simple-minded conclusion. And the method of fun can vary, but fun is still generally the top outcome no matter what hardware used.
Last edited by psirue; 06-18-09 at 03:42 PM.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,382
Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Pro, Schwinn Le Tour Conversion, Free Spirit polo beater, Cervelo P2T, aluminum tandem.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1) Who care if the kid realizes s/he is getting a benefit from riding fixed? It makes zero difference that it is happening. The kid is learning to ride without excessive coasting, like SB states, and keeping his/her legs in motion. These are passive benefits to FG riding. They are unavoidable.
2) Dude, I know what foot retention is. I ride a FG bike after all. But foot retention mainly helps you from losing your pedals when you are spinning really fast. And let's face it. The kid isn't going to be riding THAT fast. And even then, there are brakes. Brake, then put feet back on. It's not even something that has to be taught. It is instinctual. What I am saying is there a gazillion ways to fall off a bike, and I don't think FG riding is one of them.
3) Why are there crappy FG riders? Because there are people who suck at doing anything it is possible to suck at. If they were riding road bikes they'd suck too. Point is, they are probably better than they would be if they were riding freewheels. Riding FG promotes good cycling practices. I don't see how this is debatable. You don't need to get extensive instructions on FG to ride one properly. Same goes for any bike. The idea that the FG is this exotic and dangerous thing is an attitude inexplicably fixated upon by the media. I don't get the fascination.
4) I disagree. Obviously only a statistical analysis would solve this, but frankly, if you read BF enough, you'd realize "because it is fun" is one of the main banalities us FG riders will offer when asked why we ride. You don't really get that in the roadie forum. You hear that phrase tossed around a lot more here. Probably because unlike roadies, FG riders are forced to justify their bike choice in personal ways. Roadies can always explain why their bikes are more versatile, effective, or practical.
Anyhow, you just want to argue with anything I say. The point is, FG isn't really that dangerous for a kid. I've heard of plenty of kids falling on their bikes. I did when I was little. It is inevitable. It's how we learn. There is nothing prohibitively dangerous about FGs as opposed to freewheels that parents should be concerned about. Especially since trikes and bigwheels are technically FGs. It's probably a more natural transition if anything. Just make sure the kid doesn't put his/her fingers in the drivetrain.
2) Dude, I know what foot retention is. I ride a FG bike after all. But foot retention mainly helps you from losing your pedals when you are spinning really fast. And let's face it. The kid isn't going to be riding THAT fast. And even then, there are brakes. Brake, then put feet back on. It's not even something that has to be taught. It is instinctual. What I am saying is there a gazillion ways to fall off a bike, and I don't think FG riding is one of them.
3) Why are there crappy FG riders? Because there are people who suck at doing anything it is possible to suck at. If they were riding road bikes they'd suck too. Point is, they are probably better than they would be if they were riding freewheels. Riding FG promotes good cycling practices. I don't see how this is debatable. You don't need to get extensive instructions on FG to ride one properly. Same goes for any bike. The idea that the FG is this exotic and dangerous thing is an attitude inexplicably fixated upon by the media. I don't get the fascination.
4) I disagree. Obviously only a statistical analysis would solve this, but frankly, if you read BF enough, you'd realize "because it is fun" is one of the main banalities us FG riders will offer when asked why we ride. You don't really get that in the roadie forum. You hear that phrase tossed around a lot more here. Probably because unlike roadies, FG riders are forced to justify their bike choice in personal ways. Roadies can always explain why their bikes are more versatile, effective, or practical.
Anyhow, you just want to argue with anything I say. The point is, FG isn't really that dangerous for a kid. I've heard of plenty of kids falling on their bikes. I did when I was little. It is inevitable. It's how we learn. There is nothing prohibitively dangerous about FGs as opposed to freewheels that parents should be concerned about. Especially since trikes and bigwheels are technically FGs. It's probably a more natural transition if anything. Just make sure the kid doesn't put his/her fingers in the drivetrain.
Last edited by devilshaircut; 06-18-09 at 04:01 PM.
#49
Pants are for suckaz
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mt. Airy, MD
Posts: 2,578
Bikes: Hardtail MTB, Fixed gear, and Commuter bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
• Not having to buy a new hub, and spokes ($$$).
• Not having to have a custom 12" or 16" wheel built. (it seems 95% of the people who post here cant/dont build their own wheels)
• Cost is only about $2 + a donor bicycle.
• the satisfaction of doing it yourself.
Problems:
• Figuring out how/where to put epoxy so you don't ruin the entire hub.
Feel free to add to either side of this list as I'm sure I have not thought of everything.
#50
curmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1) Who care if the kid realizes s/he is getting a benefit from riding fixed? It makes zero difference that it is happening. The kid is learning to ride without excessive coasting, like SB states, and keeping his/her legs in motion. These are passive benefits to FG riding. They are unavoidable.
2) Dude, I know what foot retention is. I ride a FG bike after all. But foot retention mainly helps you from losing your pedals when you are spinning really fast. And let's face it. The kid isn't going to be riding THAT fast. And even then, there are brakes. Brake, then put feet back on. It's not even something that has to be taught. It is instinctual. What I am saying is there a gazillion ways to fall off a bike, and I don't think FG riding is one of them.
And you obviously have never accidentally unclipped. I have and it is not a matter of "putting your foot back on" -- ask anyone who has unclipped and they'll tell you how a faceplant feels or how long it takes a broken collarbone to heal.
Again, what is the great benefit that outweighs such danger?
3) Why are there crappy FG riders? Because there are people who suck at doing anything it is possible to suck at. If they were riding road bikes they'd suck too. Point is, they are probably better than they would be if they were riding freewheels. Riding FG promotes good cycling practices. I don't see how this is debatable. You don't need to get extensive instructions on FG to ride one properly. Same goes for any bike. The idea that the FG is this exotic and dangerous thing is an attitude inexplicably fixated upon by the media. I don't get the fascination.
If anything, you seem to be a fixed-gear ideologue. You seem to propose that a fixed-gear bicycle is the perfect tool for everyone and argue against the sanity that says "use the right tool for particular job." In this case, the right tool for the job would be a freewheeled bmx with a handbrake.
A crappy fixed-gear cyclist will just mash down and let the drive-train pull the pedal back around to be mashed down again. and again. and again. That is no different from a freewheel mechanism. If one were to practice a decent and smooth spin and develop the memory for such efficiency, the benefit of a fixed-gear would be realized. If not, there is no benefit.
4) I disagree. Obviously only a statistical analysis would solve this, but frankly, if you read BF enough, you'd realize "because it is fun" is one of the main banalities us FG riders will offer when asked why we ride. You don't really get that in the roadie forum. You hear that phrased tossed around a lot more here. Probably because unlike roadies, FG riders are forced to justify their bike choice in personal ways. Roadies can always explain why their bikes are more versatile, effective, or practical.
Anyhow, you just want to argue with anything I say. The point is, FG isn't really that dangerous for a kid. I've heard of plenty of kids falling on their bikes. I did when I was little. It is inevitable. It's how we learn. There is nothing prohibitively dangerous about FGs as opposed to freewheels that parents should be concerned about. Especially since trikes and bigwheels are technically FGs. It's probably a more natural transition if anything. Just make sure the kid doesn't put his/her fingers in the drivetrain.
Last edited by psirue; 06-18-09 at 04:20 PM.