How to know if you have cross threaded bottom bracket?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
How to know if you have cross threaded bottom bracket?
Hello everyone,
Thanks for any information provided in advance.
I recently installed a new bottom bracket into my bike and it seemed to go well but I am wondering if there would be anything observable that would suggest that I did any cross threading.
the reason I ask is because of all the warnings I have read online about cross threading and I am looking for some clarity that I did not actually do this. The threads went in smooth for about 4 turns then they required more force on the non-drive side. Is this normal?
Thanks for any information provided in advance.
I recently installed a new bottom bracket into my bike and it seemed to go well but I am wondering if there would be anything observable that would suggest that I did any cross threading.
the reason I ask is because of all the warnings I have read online about cross threading and I am looking for some clarity that I did not actually do this. The threads went in smooth for about 4 turns then they required more force on the non-drive side. Is this normal?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,095
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4210 Post(s)
Liked 3,875 Times
in
2,315 Posts
Differing amounts of thread cutting/chasing and grit/grime build up can be common enough reasons to feel different efforts on either side.
What brand/type of BB did you install? Some have plastic non drive side cups that have fairly rough molded threads, some cups have a thread locking compound that makes their insertion harder. Some cups have longer/deeper skirts that thread deeper into the shell than the previous one did.
Usually a cross threaded cup will look (and be able to be measured) askew WRT the BB face. Either measuring the face to cup feature (like its end or flange) or tracking the threads as they enter the shell should show cross threading. Andy
What brand/type of BB did you install? Some have plastic non drive side cups that have fairly rough molded threads, some cups have a thread locking compound that makes their insertion harder. Some cups have longer/deeper skirts that thread deeper into the shell than the previous one did.
Usually a cross threaded cup will look (and be able to be measured) askew WRT the BB face. Either measuring the face to cup feature (like its end or flange) or tracking the threads as they enter the shell should show cross threading. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#3
Senior Member
I installed a new hollowtech II style crank with external bearings, and they were difficult to get started. So I put the drive-side bearing on the shaft, put the shaft through the BB shell and placed the non-drive-side bearing on the shaft, held the bearings against their respective threads, and got each started without problem; The shaft kept both bearings in much better alignment, for easier starting and less chance of cross-threading.
I recommend silver (aluminum) anti-seize on bottom bracket threads; It's doesn't change friction and torque as much as grease, but will prevent the bearing housings from freezing in place in the BB shell, whether steel, aluminum, titanium, or carbon, though I'd check to see if carbon requires anything special. With proper torque on the BB of whatever style, the anti-seize should not cause it to loosen. The threading direction also is intended to help in this regard, intended to tighten and not loosen each side, but it's counterintuitive; Left side is right-hand-thread, right side is left-hand-thread. This is opposite from pedal rotation. I can't recall the geometric term (EDIT: Precession*), but on the right side, as you pedal forward (right-hand), because the bearing is not perfectly tight in the shell threads, it will "roll" inside the shell, slowly, in reverse direction (left hand).
* https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession_(mechanical)
I recommend silver (aluminum) anti-seize on bottom bracket threads; It's doesn't change friction and torque as much as grease, but will prevent the bearing housings from freezing in place in the BB shell, whether steel, aluminum, titanium, or carbon, though I'd check to see if carbon requires anything special. With proper torque on the BB of whatever style, the anti-seize should not cause it to loosen. The threading direction also is intended to help in this regard, intended to tighten and not loosen each side, but it's counterintuitive; Left side is right-hand-thread, right side is left-hand-thread. This is opposite from pedal rotation. I can't recall the geometric term (EDIT: Precession*), but on the right side, as you pedal forward (right-hand), because the bearing is not perfectly tight in the shell threads, it will "roll" inside the shell, slowly, in reverse direction (left hand).
* https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession_(mechanical)
Last edited by Duragrouch; 03-06-24 at 02:32 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,236
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 501 Post(s)
Liked 435 Times
in
334 Posts
I installed a new hollowtech II style crank with external bearings, and they were difficult to get started. So I put the drive-side bearing on the shaft, put the shaft through the BB shell and placed the non-drive-side bearing on the shaft, held the bearings against their respective threads, and got each started without problem; The shaft kept both bearings in much better alignment, for easier starting and less chance of cross-threading.
#5
aged to perfection
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PacNW
Posts: 1,817
Bikes: Dinucci Allez 2.0, Richard Sachs, Alex Singer, Serotta, Masi GC, Raleigh Pro Mk.1, Hetchins, etc
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 839 Post(s)
Liked 1,258 Times
in
663 Posts
if it went in 3-4 turns smoothly and then seemed to tighten up then it's pretty likely not cross threaded, but you may have some crud in the threads.
I'd suggest take the cups out and wire brush the threads, make sure everything is as clean as you can get it.
There are a few older Raleighs that have a BB thread that will not take a 1.370X24 cup (I think it is 26 tpi ?) but that's an edge case.
/markp
I'd suggest take the cups out and wire brush the threads, make sure everything is as clean as you can get it.
There are a few older Raleighs that have a BB thread that will not take a 1.370X24 cup (I think it is 26 tpi ?) but that's an edge case.
/markp
Likes For mpetry912:
#6
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
If you aren't having issues, I wouldn't worry about it till the next time you have to change the BB. If that ever happens during the time you have the bike.
While you can take it apart and check, sometimes the damage done makes the fix worse than just living with the cross threaded BB that so far is working properly enough not to cause you noticeable issues.
What you describe for threading the BB in isn't unusual for things that aren't precision built. Bicycles are not the precision built machines some want to believe they are.
While you can take it apart and check, sometimes the damage done makes the fix worse than just living with the cross threaded BB that so far is working properly enough not to cause you noticeable issues.
What you describe for threading the BB in isn't unusual for things that aren't precision built. Bicycles are not the precision built machines some want to believe they are.
Last edited by Iride01; 03-06-24 at 08:52 AM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 571
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 366 Post(s)
Liked 273 Times
in
175 Posts
If you aren't having issues, I wouldn't worry about it till the next time you have to change the BB. If that ever happens during the time you have the bike.
While you can take it apart and check, sometimes the damage done makes the fix worse than just living with the cross threaded BB that so far is working properly enough not to cause you noticeable issues.
What you describe for threading the BB in isn't unusual for things that aren't precision built. Bicycles are not the precision built machines some want to believe they are.
While you can take it apart and check, sometimes the damage done makes the fix worse than just living with the cross threaded BB that so far is working properly enough not to cause you noticeable issues.
What you describe for threading the BB in isn't unusual for things that aren't precision built. Bicycles are not the precision built machines some want to believe they are.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 982
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 506 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 639 Times
in
357 Posts
I like this perspective. Iride01 is saying that your original question doesn't matter. If it works, it works - whether it is cross threaded or not. The threads are not necessarily made to the highest precision. Attempting a fix might make things worse. You can always try again down the road when you re-replace the bottom bracket.
#9
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
Are we really worried about a 18 - $25 BB that might wear out at 20,000 miles instead of 25,000 miles? (sure I pulled those out of my you know where!)
How many vintage bikes have we taken apart with tens of thousands of miles on them and found the BB shell faces are not quite square to each other?
But I do agree that from how the OP describes the installation, it sounds like cross-threading isn't even a concern.
How many vintage bikes have we taken apart with tens of thousands of miles on them and found the BB shell faces are not quite square to each other?
But I do agree that from how the OP describes the installation, it sounds like cross-threading isn't even a concern.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5792 Post(s)
Liked 2,582 Times
in
1,432 Posts
If you got it on and it's working, that's compelling evidence that it's not cross threaded.
Anyway, whatever damage might have be done already has been done. Since it's working enjoy the bike until it's not, and deal with it then.
Anyway, whatever damage might have be done already has been done. Since it's working enjoy the bike until it's not, and deal with it then.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Likes For FBinNY:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5792 Post(s)
Liked 2,582 Times
in
1,432 Posts
FWIW, given the length of thread involved, it's highly unlikely that you could thread a cross threaded cup in more than a few turns, and EXTREMELY unlikely you could ever turn it in all the way is. If by some miracle you did manage to get it all the way in, there would be a wedge shaped gap running from about 1mm at the widest point.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#13
Senior Member
That's the way to do it. With the axle and cups aligned, turn the cup backwards while maintaining gentle inward pressure until you feel it drop into the start of the bbkt shell thread, then you should be able to start screwing it in by hand. Once it's started, check alignment visually (it may help to place a straight edge against the face of the bbkt shell to sight against the cup) before you start winding it in hard. With cartridge bearings the threads are a lot less stressed than they were with CCB bearings so you don't need as much metal to hold them in place - if you cross-thread a bbkt you can often just chase it out and use it without any remedial work beyond a splash of thread-locking compound
Regarding some saying could simply be "lack of precision" in the bottom bracket shell, I sort of disagree; The main reason for ease of cross-threading is a very fine thread pitch with respect to diameter, that makes it easier to misalign, because being one thread off is a smaller angle of misalignment, so harder to see by eye. BB shells are threaded fairly precisely, I would imagine the thread axis is very square with respect to the shell end faces, as I bet they were threaded and faced on the same lathe, or subsequent lathe stages, not using a large tap. If there is any "imprecision", my guess it would be slightly out of round, ovalized, due to distortion from welding heat, and that could manifest as increasing tightness when screwing in. But if the end cap is dead flat on the BB end face, or partly screwed in but absolutely equal in distance from the cap underside to the BB end face (within 0.1mm, that's 0.0039", which is 1/10 of the thread pitch (one thread)), it's screwed in straight. If it's off, it'll be by at least 1mm, which you will see visually.
Last edited by Duragrouch; 03-06-24 at 08:03 PM.
Likes For Duragrouch:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 682 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times
in
338 Posts
CCB? I assume you mean old-style invidual parts? A search online says Constant Contact Bearing? Not sure I see the mechanical difference between a cartridge and individual parts in that regard. Do tell please, I'm getting tired of describing old style as "individual parts".
#16
Senior Member
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,814
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 501 Post(s)
Liked 631 Times
in
373 Posts
FWIW, given the length of thread involved, it's highly unlikely that you could thread a cross threaded cup in more than a few turns, and EXTREMELY unlikely you could ever turn it in all the way is. If by some miracle you did manage to get it all the way in, there would be a wedge shaped gap running from about 1mm at the widest point.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: socal
Posts: 4,265
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 883 Post(s)
Liked 824 Times
in
623 Posts
If the system seems tight and the parts don't mesh smoothly, have a good bike shop chase the threads, clean and lubricate the parts and reinstall.
Likes For 2old:
#20
Senior Member
For economy of rebuild and parts if not labor, CCB can't be beat, and I'll bet in parts of the world where there is not a local bike shop, amazon, nor much money, I'll bet CCB still rules.
For external BB bearings, what impresses me is not just the great function, but that they were able to make it retrofittable in a standard BSA (English) threaded shell, just fitting between the shell and the crank arms. That was a real stroke of genius. Anybody can make an entire new assembly design. But backward compatibility, that's something.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,236
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 501 Post(s)
Liked 435 Times
in
334 Posts
For external BB bearings, what impresses me is not just the great function, but that they were able to make it retrofittable in a standard BSA (English) threaded shell, just fitting between the shell and the crank arms. That was a real stroke of genius. Anybody can make an entire new assembly design. But backward compatibility, that's something.
#22
Senior Member
I hate proprietary non-standard interfaces between parts. I'd love for a common standard, but there will be arguments about which one. Under the current market, probably one will tend to dominate and that will become the de facto standard. Hopefully, one using threads that can be installed with a cup wrench, and not pressed in, requiring a press or expensive hand tool to insert and remove. I suppose a press-fit could use standard industrial cartridge bearings, but the current ISO External threaded ones are same quality and dirt cheap, an aluminum housing containing a pressed-in cartridge bearing.
The current hollowtech II style in BSA threading and 24mm(?) shaft, has so far worked pretty darned good for me in smoothness, stiffness, durability, though I'm not a racer and it's not an e-bike. But for now, I'm just super happy with it. I'm a grouch for durability and standardized availability, took a lot to take me from square-taper, but this is something newfangled that works better and has stood the test of time. Other new stuff like carbon fiber, tubeless tires, brifters, electronic shifting, bikepacking seat racks, wheels with few spokes, I'm not yet sold on, for consumer bikes.
#24
Senior Member
Regarding the external bottom bracket, the issue isn't precision, but simply the creativity for someone to think of the design, that fits within existing envelopes. And it wasn't essential, the older designs worked. But this was better. Someone had the drive and creativity to think of that. Aheadset; Better design, compatible with existing bikes (though needed a longer steer tube on the fork). Adaptors to allow use of quick-release axles on thru-axle wheels (I found a huge deal on such wheels at the LBS, $5 each, gave to a friend, fit to his QR bike).
Last edited by Duragrouch; 03-09-24 at 06:12 PM.