Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Number one reason to stop at a stop sign.

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Number one reason to stop at a stop sign.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-10, 05:08 PM
  #26  
degnaw
Senior Member
 
degnaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It's not just a matter of kinetic energy - another factor is that the entire kinetic energy of the cyclist is going into the collision, whereas most of the car's kinetic energy will (hopefully) be dissipated by its brakes.
degnaw is offline  
Old 10-05-10, 05:09 PM
  #27  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by EKW in DC
Bottom line, I think Idaho stops are OK, but we should remember that other vehicles already at the intersection have right of way and that we should be vigilant for inattentive drivers since we don't have tons of steel wrapped around us. Best case scenario we're riding on top of 7-8 pounds of steel plus components.
Exactly ... and it sounds like this has more to do with staying aware of your situation, than anything else.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 10-05-10, 05:35 PM
  #28  
habals
noob
 
habals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 115

Bikes: Cyclocross 5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The impact damage is different from Kinetic energy.
F = mv/t

So bicycle can't do that much damage to the car.
habals is offline  
Old 10-06-10, 09:45 AM
  #29  
|3iker
Alfredo Contador
 
|3iker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where everybody knows my name
Posts: 431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you want to play, pay. Everybody should observe traffic rules.

This ******bag really gave us cyclist a black stain. Thanks Mr. Mayor for solidifying the perception of us by motorists!

https://www.theprovince.com/business/...537/story.html
|3iker is offline  
Old 10-06-10, 10:11 AM
  #30  
SactoDoug
eMail Sold to Spammers
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 522
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeshoup
What if I don't stop, slow down to say, 5-ish mph, can see far enough down the road that no vehicles are approaching and go? Without ever reducing my speed to 0 mph?

And of course, if I do see vehicles approaching, I slow down and stop if that's what it takes to wait for the approaching vehicles to clear?

This is what I do. I think it is very reasonable. The spirit of the law is to ensure that the intersection is observed and that people take turns crossing the intersection if there is more than one person stopping.
SactoDoug is offline  
Old 10-06-10, 03:23 PM
  #31  
itsthewoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 392

Bikes: Trek SU100, Surly Cross Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikeshoup
F = ma. They would both carry the same force if they're at a constant velocity. (That's zero newtons)

Kinetic Energy otoh, is a 100kg cyclist travelling 50mph carries a substantial more amount of kinetic energy than a 1500kg car travelling 5mph.

KE = 0.5mv^2

KE bike = 0.5*100kg*(50mi/hr)^2 = 125000 kg*(mi/hr)^2 (which is the strangest unit for energy ever, but valid none the less)
KE car = 0.5*1500kg*(5mi/hr)^2 = 18750 kg*(mi/hr)^2

KE bike / KE car = 6.67.

The bike carries 6.67 times more kinetic energy than the car.

Its okay, high school physics was a long time ago for me as well.
While the bike would have most of the energy, the force of the collision will be the same on both the cyclist and the car (Newton's third law), and you could get a (really) rough estimate by doing the change in the rider's momentum over the very small time period. The difference is that the driver is protected by a ****-ton of metal, and the rider is, at most, protected by an inch of styrofoam on his or her head.
itsthewoo is offline  
Old 10-06-10, 03:41 PM
  #32  
jharte
Long Live Long Rides
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: KCMO
Posts: 718

Bikes: 1988 Specialized Rockhopper Comp, converted for touring/commuting. 1984 Raleigh Team USA road bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rex_kramer
I figure if I stop, that's one more thing I'm doing right that no one can complain about.
+1
I'm with you on this one. Most of the time on my commute in the morning I'll 'touch toe' at a stop sign. I do come to a complete stop but it's really only for a second (if that). I do it mainly because of the lurking police hidden in shadows watching. I'm about it as far as traffic at 4:30am...except for the police.

And yes...they do complain. I hear it every day.

Jerry H
jharte is offline  
Old 10-06-10, 06:01 PM
  #33  
trekker pete
pedalphile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 1,034

Bikes: trek 1200, 520, Giant ATX 970, Raleigh Talon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the fact that cagers routinely drive like morons is all the more reason to NOT stop at a stop sign.

if you stop and drop a foot, you are susceptible to being steamrolled from behind. also, and more importantly, the longer you are in the intersection, the longer you are at risk. there is also the fact that it may take a few seconds to get clipped back in and your attention will be diverted at this time.

most intersections have good enough site lines that you can roll them at 5-10 mph and still have ample time to stop if you realize someone else has the right of way or may blow through without stopping and crush you.

joeybrooks gives a better explanation of why blowing through stop signs/lights is safer than stopping. i highly recommend his videos to anyone that has to deal with traffic on a bike.
trekker pete is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Biker395
Fifty Plus (50+)
32
04-07-15 02:55 PM
xStaticS
Advocacy & Safety
41
09-01-14 04:37 PM
JamisJeff
Road Cycling
109
06-12-13 04:14 PM
xiyangshen
Advocacy & Safety
89
10-12-10 08:42 PM
mkane77g
Fifty Plus (50+)
53
03-26-10 01:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.