Cannondale Road Bike from 1990
#1
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Cannondale Road Bike from 1990
Could anyone help me in identifying this bike? Not surprisingly, the owner doesn't know one single thing about this Cannondale he is selling. He wants $350 CAD for it. Claims that it is a 26.5" frame. Does Cannondale even make anything in this size?
#2
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4365 Post(s)
Liked 4,006 Times
in
2,675 Posts
You might look in the C&V appraisals sub-forum and also see if you can get the serial number. It looks like an old Crackandfail road bike I don't know enough about them to tell what model but we had one in recently that looked similar with those ugly dropouts. The rest of the frames look nice it was sad they phoned it in at the way back.
#3
Senior Member
Could be a 66cm size frame which was offered in some years in the Criterium Series. Frameset only in this size for some years, so components would be varying. Maybe painted similar to the Black Lightning.
Serial number could be on the chainstay or bottom bracket. # will help you decode size and year.
Serial number could be on the chainstay or bottom bracket. # will help you decode size and year.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,893
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6974 Post(s)
Liked 10,975 Times
in
4,695 Posts
If you pay $350 CAD for that thing, let me know. I've got a bridge in Brooklyn that I'm looking to sell.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,003 Times
in
488 Posts
Likes For DorkDisk:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,383
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2490 Post(s)
Liked 2,961 Times
in
1,682 Posts
Back around 1985, I sold a very tall Cannondale to a very tall weightlifter who told me that all the (steel) bikes he'd owned rode like overcooked spaghetti. He came back for the 30-day tune-up and said, "You get any other big guys in here, you tell them to buy a Cannondale."
#7
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,517
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
2,058 Posts
#9
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Back around 1985, I sold a very tall Cannondale to a very tall weightlifter who told me that all the (steel) bikes he'd owned rode like overcooked spaghetti. He came back for the 30-day tune-up and said, "You get any other big guys in here, you tell them to buy a Cannondale."
How much do you have to weigh to make any good steel frame flex though..?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Pretty interesting in that Gary Klein basically used oversized tubes developed in the 70’s, so he lost his patent infringement on the oversized tubes. However, as I recall, the oval seat stays was maintained as a Klein development that was copied by Cannondale. Not sure exactly when settled, I had read somewhere that Cannondale had to pay $5 per frame, but haven’t seen anything to corroborate that. I also read that Gary Klein had a penchant to file for patents/patent suits in the 90’s and Trek got tired of it. Haven’t read anything to corroborate that either, but by 1997 the cantilever dropouts were gone.
John
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sin City, Nevada
Posts: 2,886
Bikes: Catrike 700, Greenspeed GTO trike, , Linear LWB recumbent, Haluzak Horizon SWB recumbent, Balance 450 MTB, Cannondale SM800 Beast of the East
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 523 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 230 Times
in
182 Posts
Have him verify the frame size by actually measuring the distance between the top of the seat tube and the center of the crank in cm. That's the normal way to measure frame size on road bikes. The 1990 Cannondale catalog shows 63 cm as the largest frame. If you wish to verify the year it was made, an easy way is to look at the two letter date code (year/month) on the inside of the Shimano crank arms and decode it from the list shown here: Date of Manufacture of Bicycle Components can be used to date a bike: component dating. The letter "O" is the code for 1990. A-L represent the months. The cranks would have been made within months of the date the bike was made.
#12
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,517
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
2,058 Posts
. If you wish to verify the year it was made, an easy way is to look at the two letter date code (year/month) on the inside of the Shimano crank arms and decode it from the list shown here: Date of Manufacture of Bicycle Components can be used to date a bike: component dating. The letter "O" is the code for 1990. A-L represent the months. The cranks would have been made within months of the date the bike was made.
#13
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4365 Post(s)
Liked 4,006 Times
in
2,675 Posts
Not phoned in, Klein lawsuit. Cannondale won everything but the oval seat stays. Cannondale’s response was the cantilever shortened seat stays. It has been a long time since I read about the case.
Pretty interesting in that Gary Klein basically used oversized tubes developed in the 70’s, so he lost his patent infringement on the oversized tubes. However, as I recall, the oval seat stays was maintained as a Klein development that was copied by Cannondale. Not sure exactly when settled, I had read somewhere that Cannondale had to pay $5 per frame, but haven’t seen anything to corroborate that. I also read that Gary Klein had a penchant to file for patents/patent suits in the 90’s and Trek got tired of it. Haven’t read anything to corroborate that either, but by 1997 the cantilever dropouts were gone.
John
Pretty interesting in that Gary Klein basically used oversized tubes developed in the 70’s, so he lost his patent infringement on the oversized tubes. However, as I recall, the oval seat stays was maintained as a Klein development that was copied by Cannondale. Not sure exactly when settled, I had read somewhere that Cannondale had to pay $5 per frame, but haven’t seen anything to corroborate that. I also read that Gary Klein had a penchant to file for patents/patent suits in the 90’s and Trek got tired of it. Haven’t read anything to corroborate that either, but by 1997 the cantilever dropouts were gone.
John
#14
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
The parts on this bike are not original. Doesn't have the original suntour derailers or sugino cranks. Also a shame. Also, $350 is a bit high and he won't budge. He initially wanted $500 which is insane. I do like how the bike is aluminum just to keep things interesting versus my current chromoly/hi tensile mix. However, if it is indeed the 63cm size like I'm assuming, looks like the standover clearance will be too high. Im including another picture he took of the rear derailer. Anyone know anything about the Shimano 600 groupset?
it looks to be an SR600 black edition, according to the 1990's vintage cannondale article thing. I can't believe I had to give the seller info on the very bike he was trying to sell..
I cant make out what it says on the crank arm. All I know, is that its not original parts, and not worth $350.
it looks to be an SR600 black edition, according to the 1990's vintage cannondale article thing. I can't believe I had to give the seller info on the very bike he was trying to sell..
I cant make out what it says on the crank arm. All I know, is that its not original parts, and not worth $350.
#15
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
It says shimano E ... something. No idea.
What do you guys think?
In one ad he claimed 1987, when I texted him he said "all I know is that its a 1992.." Claimed it was a trade in.
What do you guys think?
In one ad he claimed 1987, when I texted him he said "all I know is that its a 1992.." Claimed it was a trade in.
#17
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times
in
216 Posts
Those cranks and derailleur are shimano 600 ‘tri colour’ from the early 90s. Ultegra quality.
It’s a very good bike for a very tall person if it’s in good condition. I am 195cm and I think it would be a little too big for me. It is also very old and may have seen a hard life.
It’s a very good bike for a very tall person if it’s in good condition. I am 195cm and I think it would be a little too big for me. It is also very old and may have seen a hard life.
Likes For Wilfred Laurier:
#18
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Those cranks and derailleur are shimano 600 ‘tri colour’ from the early 90s. Ultegra quality.
It’s a very good bike for a very tall person if it’s in good condition. I am 195cm and I think it would be a little too big for me. It is also very old and may have seen a hard life.
It’s a very good bike for a very tall person if it’s in good condition. I am 195cm and I think it would be a little too big for me. It is also very old and may have seen a hard life.
I am around 188cm. I currently ride a 64cm frame. Its got a short reach and top tube which is exactly what I want. I would prefer a taller stack but I am able to compensate by using a taller quill stem. However, I am within 2mm or so of full maxing out my standover clearance.
I am currently about 200lb, but I have long legs which results in me always feeling like I am leaning over the axle of every bike I try riding. My only option to feel comfortable is by opting for a very tall bike with a short top tube length (road bike) , converting to flat bars, and on top of that using a close reach stem. In the future I'm hoping I can find a bike with a similar standover height and top tube length, maybe a slightly shorter reach and as tall of a stack as I can possibly find if going the threadless stem route. My inseam is about 34.5 . Considering that you are taller than me, unless you have short legs, you should not have any issues fitting on a 66cm frame. My current bike(pictured below) is 63.5cm and definetly just about perfect in terms of fit.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,496
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,485 Times
in
1,840 Posts
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/S...ulatorBike.jsp
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/d...l/road-fit.pdf
https://www.jensonusa.com/bike-fit-calculator
I guess the pickings are slim out where you are .... but you tend to buy some ..... interesting bikes.
I don't know anything about the prices out where you live .... but that sounds like an awful lot of money for a beat-up 30-year-old bike.
If you like buying old bikes ... go for it. if you need another bike and this is the one you want, go for it. If you need the old, tired parts for some reason, go for it.
if yo have a good, working bike which you enjoy riding ... save up for a Better bike, not another worn-out old bike.
It depends on what you want ... and also, what shape the C'dale is actually in. How's the headset? The BB, the wheel bearings? How worn are the parts generally?
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/d...l/road-fit.pdf
https://www.jensonusa.com/bike-fit-calculator
I guess the pickings are slim out where you are .... but you tend to buy some ..... interesting bikes.
I don't know anything about the prices out where you live .... but that sounds like an awful lot of money for a beat-up 30-year-old bike.
If you like buying old bikes ... go for it. if you need another bike and this is the one you want, go for it. If you need the old, tired parts for some reason, go for it.
if yo have a good, working bike which you enjoy riding ... save up for a Better bike, not another worn-out old bike.
It depends on what you want ... and also, what shape the C'dale is actually in. How's the headset? The BB, the wheel bearings? How worn are the parts generally?
#20
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/S...ulatorBike.jsp
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/d...l/road-fit.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kaH7g7YVvI
https://www.jensonusa.com/bike-fit-calculator
I guess the pickings are slim out where you are .... but you tend to buy some ..... interesting bikes.
I don't know anything about the prices out where you live .... but that sounds like an awful lot of money for a beat-up 30-year-old bike.
If you like buying old bikes ... go for it. if you need another bike and this is the one you want, go for it. If you need the old, tired parts for some reason, go for it.
if yo have a good, working bike which you enjoy riding ... save up for a Better bike, not another worn-out old bike.
It depends on what you want ... and also, what shape the C'dale is actually in. How's the headset? The BB, the wheel bearings? How worn are the parts generally?
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/d...l/road-fit.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kaH7g7YVvI
https://www.jensonusa.com/bike-fit-calculator
I guess the pickings are slim out where you are .... but you tend to buy some ..... interesting bikes.
I don't know anything about the prices out where you live .... but that sounds like an awful lot of money for a beat-up 30-year-old bike.
If you like buying old bikes ... go for it. if you need another bike and this is the one you want, go for it. If you need the old, tired parts for some reason, go for it.
if yo have a good, working bike which you enjoy riding ... save up for a Better bike, not another worn-out old bike.
It depends on what you want ... and also, what shape the C'dale is actually in. How's the headset? The BB, the wheel bearings? How worn are the parts generally?
I haven't seen the bike and have no idea how things are looking inside either way but she doesn't look to have been ridden all that much just from looking at it. Especially not compared to my Monterey which was in sorry shape despite having so much more life left in her. The parts look to be recently replaced and in fair condition.
I think I'll take your advice on waiting until the right bike pops up. But i have to admit this cannondale is tempting me with the geomtery of that aluminum frame.
Everyone is asking insane prices on the classifieds for their crappy old worn out road bikes.
#21
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times
in
216 Posts
So good parts? I don't think they are better than what originally came on the bike.
I am around 188cm. I currently ride a 64cm frame. Its got a short reach and top tube which is exactly what I want. I would prefer a taller stack but I am able to compensate by using a taller quill stem. However, I am within 2mm or so of full maxing out my standover clearance.
I am currently about 200lb, but I have long legs which results in me always feeling like I am leaning over the axle of every bike I try riding. My only option to feel comfortable is by opting for a very tall bike with a short top tube length (road bike) , converting to flat bars, and on top of that using a close reach stem. In the future I'm hoping I can find a bike with a similar standover height and top tube length, maybe a slightly shorter reach and as tall of a stack as I can possibly find if going the threadless stem route. My inseam is about 34.5 . Considering that you are taller than me, unless you have short legs, you should not have any issues fitting on a 66cm frame. My current bike(pictured below) is 63.5cm and definetly just about perfect in terms of fit.
I am around 188cm. I currently ride a 64cm frame. Its got a short reach and top tube which is exactly what I want. I would prefer a taller stack but I am able to compensate by using a taller quill stem. However, I am within 2mm or so of full maxing out my standover clearance.
I am currently about 200lb, but I have long legs which results in me always feeling like I am leaning over the axle of every bike I try riding. My only option to feel comfortable is by opting for a very tall bike with a short top tube length (road bike) , converting to flat bars, and on top of that using a close reach stem. In the future I'm hoping I can find a bike with a similar standover height and top tube length, maybe a slightly shorter reach and as tall of a stack as I can possibly find if going the threadless stem route. My inseam is about 34.5 . Considering that you are taller than me, unless you have short legs, you should not have any issues fitting on a 66cm frame. My current bike(pictured below) is 63.5cm and definetly just about perfect in terms of fit.
But the bike is also too big for you.
Likes For Wilfred Laurier:
#22
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,618
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10971 Post(s)
Liked 7,498 Times
in
4,194 Posts
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,496
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,485 Times
in
1,840 Posts
I have a 1983 Cannondale in Extra-Huge---came with a rear derailleur which Cannondale only used for a year because it was the smoothest-shifting and least reliable ever made. Had Sugino half-step triple rings as I recall. I replaced the derailleur when it broke ... and when the replacement broke again, I went with Shimano.
The Shimano stuff is easily replaceable. Not better or worse necessarily .... but preferable for me. It looks like you have 700c wheels and 130mm dropouts .... 1990 model should---so whatever is on there can be replaced easily if ti breaks .... but if it is old and beat up, why buy the bike? A $250 bike needing $250 in repair (tires/cables/derailleur at least) is no bargain unless it is a $2000 bike.
If the running gear is sound and sturdy---and I'd expect DT friction shifters and old Shimano to be pretty much bulletproof--then whatever the bike originally had is irrelevant. What the bike has now will work.
The real concern is the size. That is a fairly gigantic frame. Even at 6'2" it might be too big, depending on your proportions and flexibility.
Have you done extensive test-riding?
The Shimano stuff is easily replaceable. Not better or worse necessarily .... but preferable for me. It looks like you have 700c wheels and 130mm dropouts .... 1990 model should---so whatever is on there can be replaced easily if ti breaks .... but if it is old and beat up, why buy the bike? A $250 bike needing $250 in repair (tires/cables/derailleur at least) is no bargain unless it is a $2000 bike.
If the running gear is sound and sturdy---and I'd expect DT friction shifters and old Shimano to be pretty much bulletproof--then whatever the bike originally had is irrelevant. What the bike has now will work.
The real concern is the size. That is a fairly gigantic frame. Even at 6'2" it might be too big, depending on your proportions and flexibility.
Have you done extensive test-riding?
#24
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
I have a 1983 Cannondale in Extra-Huge---came with a rear derailleur which Cannondale only used for a year because it was the smoothest-shifting and least reliable ever made. Had Sugino half-step triple rings as I recall. I replaced the derailleur when it broke ... and when the replacement broke again, I went with Shimano.
The Shimano stuff is easily replaceable. Not better or worse necessarily .... but preferable for me. It looks like you have 700c wheels and 130mm dropouts .... 1990 model should---so whatever is on there can be replaced easily if ti breaks .... but if it is old and beat up, why buy the bike? A $250 bike needing $250 in repair (tires/cables/derailleur at least) is no bargain unless it is a $2000 bike.
If the running gear is sound and sturdy---and I'd expect DT friction shifters and old Shimano to be pretty much bulletproof--then whatever the bike originally had is irrelevant. What the bike has now will work.
The real concern is the size. That is a fairly gigantic frame. Even at 6'2" it might be too big, depending on your proportions and flexibility.
Have you done extensive test-riding?
The Shimano stuff is easily replaceable. Not better or worse necessarily .... but preferable for me. It looks like you have 700c wheels and 130mm dropouts .... 1990 model should---so whatever is on there can be replaced easily if ti breaks .... but if it is old and beat up, why buy the bike? A $250 bike needing $250 in repair (tires/cables/derailleur at least) is no bargain unless it is a $2000 bike.
If the running gear is sound and sturdy---and I'd expect DT friction shifters and old Shimano to be pretty much bulletproof--then whatever the bike originally had is irrelevant. What the bike has now will work.
The real concern is the size. That is a fairly gigantic frame. Even at 6'2" it might be too big, depending on your proportions and flexibility.
Have you done extensive test-riding?
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,496
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,485 Times
in
1,840 Posts
I suggest you take test rides wherever you can ... or not. Really, come on .... if you ask about some bike component with which I happen to be familiar, I will try to help, but ... where to test-ride? On the Bike!!!
I don't know where you live, nor do I want to. I trust you can figure out where to ride .... and if you want to buy a bike without riding, at least put it in a stand or something and check it out ... shifting, brakes, wheels, BB, headset .... shake, rattle, and roll.
Test-ride it wherever you can. Maybe there is at least a cleared parking lot around? (Assuming you are in a snow-zone .... )
If not ... do what you can or do what you want.
Sorry if I seem a bit testy ... but hey, I could have told you to ship the bike to Hawaii and test it there.
I don't know where you live, nor do I want to. I trust you can figure out where to ride .... and if you want to buy a bike without riding, at least put it in a stand or something and check it out ... shifting, brakes, wheels, BB, headset .... shake, rattle, and roll.
Test-ride it wherever you can. Maybe there is at least a cleared parking lot around? (Assuming you are in a snow-zone .... )
If not ... do what you can or do what you want.
Sorry if I seem a bit testy ... but hey, I could have told you to ship the bike to Hawaii and test it there.