Downhill, sitting on the top tube
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Downhill, sitting on the top tube
While watching the Grand Tours on TV this summer, I noticed many pro's using a different aero position on downhills. They are sitting on the top tube butt up aginst the seat post and hands together near the stem. It seems like it would reduce frontal area fairly well.
On my commute I have a steep decent where I usually hit about 45 to 50 mph depending on the wind.
This morning as I started down the hill, I decided to give the position a try. First off I noticed that it really seems to shift your weight forward, when you think about it no surprise there.
As I got close to 50mph, the bike started a slow weave from the front. Now this was interesting. Not wanting to upset the bike with sudden movements, I sat up a little and slowly shifted my hands away from the stem. I found you can't sit up much before your back hits the nose of the saddle . Moving my hands out helped a little, but the bike still really wanted to weave. I decided at that point to move back to the seat. To get my butt out from under the seat, I had to move forward even more, BIG WEAVE .
As soon as my butt hit the saddle, bam, rock solid straight ahead as usual. I don't think my bike likes that riding position.
Next time I think I will try out someting new in smaller steps
Has any one else tried that position? Experiences?
On my commute I have a steep decent where I usually hit about 45 to 50 mph depending on the wind.
This morning as I started down the hill, I decided to give the position a try. First off I noticed that it really seems to shift your weight forward, when you think about it no surprise there.
As I got close to 50mph, the bike started a slow weave from the front. Now this was interesting. Not wanting to upset the bike with sudden movements, I sat up a little and slowly shifted my hands away from the stem. I found you can't sit up much before your back hits the nose of the saddle . Moving my hands out helped a little, but the bike still really wanted to weave. I decided at that point to move back to the seat. To get my butt out from under the seat, I had to move forward even more, BIG WEAVE .
As soon as my butt hit the saddle, bam, rock solid straight ahead as usual. I don't think my bike likes that riding position.
Next time I think I will try out someting new in smaller steps
Has any one else tried that position? Experiences?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
While watching the Grand Tours on TV this summer, I noticed many pro's using a different aero position on downhills. They are sitting on the top tube butt up aginst the seat post and hands together near the stem. It seems like it would reduce frontal area fairly well.
Has any one else tried that position? Experiences?
Has any one else tried that position? Experiences?
It also gives your lower back a bit of a release/rest.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Probably the most dangerous position there is on a bike. Pros do it because they get paid to take risks and their risk is less than the typical "enthusiast" because ;
1. They have pro wrenches that check the bike for soundness before every race/stage - particularly, in this case, the wheels and head set
2. They typically weigh less than the average joe and so put less weight on the front wheel ( the probable cause of your weave). When you watched them on TV you might have noticed it's mostly the smaller/lighter guys who do this in hopes that the extra-aero position will make up for the weight advantage the heavier guys have going down hill.
3. They have excellent cores - they can use their abs, etc. to hold back much of their weight from the front end ( i.e. do a sort of crunch to pull the upper body back)
1. They have pro wrenches that check the bike for soundness before every race/stage - particularly, in this case, the wheels and head set
2. They typically weigh less than the average joe and so put less weight on the front wheel ( the probable cause of your weave). When you watched them on TV you might have noticed it's mostly the smaller/lighter guys who do this in hopes that the extra-aero position will make up for the weight advantage the heavier guys have going down hill.
3. They have excellent cores - they can use their abs, etc. to hold back much of their weight from the front end ( i.e. do a sort of crunch to pull the upper body back)
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 693
Bikes: CAAD 10, Cervelo P2 SL, Focus RG-700, Quintana Roo #101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Done this many times. Never had the bike weave though. Did almost have the fork hit my legs once though when trying to turn in that position, not a good idea
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Riverside
Posts: 829
Bikes: Orbea Orca m10, Spec Venge Elite, Felt TK2, Orbea Ordu M30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i do it all the time on descents, it just takes some practice
i sit on the top tube with hands in the drops and chest basically resting on the stem
pretty much this
it's very easy transitioning between the positions if you keep your hands in the drops instead of on top near the stem since you can push yourself up a lot more easily and still stay stable
you have to grip your headtube/downtube or fork with your knees to keep from sliding off the front and look for bumps so you know when to lift your chest off the stem
btw i weigh 180lb so anybody can do it easily with practice
i sit on the top tube with hands in the drops and chest basically resting on the stem
pretty much this
it's very easy transitioning between the positions if you keep your hands in the drops instead of on top near the stem since you can push yourself up a lot more easily and still stay stable
you have to grip your headtube/downtube or fork with your knees to keep from sliding off the front and look for bumps so you know when to lift your chest off the stem
btw i weigh 180lb so anybody can do it easily with practice
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
i do it all the time on descents, it just takes some practice
i sit on the top tube with hands in the drops and chest basically resting on the stem
pretty much this
it's very easy transitioning between the positions if you keep your hands in the drops instead of on top near the stem since you can push yourself up a lot more easily and still stay stable
you have to grip your headtube/downtube or fork with your knees to keep from sliding off the front and look for bumps so you know when to lift your chest off the stem
btw i weigh 180lb so anybody can do it easily with practice
i sit on the top tube with hands in the drops and chest basically resting on the stem
pretty much this
it's very easy transitioning between the positions if you keep your hands in the drops instead of on top near the stem since you can push yourself up a lot more easily and still stay stable
you have to grip your headtube/downtube or fork with your knees to keep from sliding off the front and look for bumps so you know when to lift your chest off the stem
btw i weigh 180lb so anybody can do it easily with practice
It will be interesting to see if there is a consistent difference in speed that way.
#7
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,927 Times
in
4,160 Posts
#8
Underwhelming
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Mississippi
Posts: 1,263
Bikes: Lynskey R330 Ti, Dean El Vado Ti, Trek 4300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
moth -----> flame
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,916
Bikes: 11 CAAD 10-4, 07 Specialized Roubaix Comp, 98 Peugeot Horizon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Probably the most dangerous position there is on a bike. Pros do it because they get paid to take risks and their risk is less than the typical "enthusiast" because ;
1. They have pro wrenches that check the bike for soundness before every race/stage - particularly, in this case, the wheels and head set
2. They typically weigh less than the average joe and so put less weight on the front wheel ( the probable cause of your weave). When you watched them on TV you might have noticed it's mostly the smaller/lighter guys who do this in hopes that the extra-aero position will make up for the weight advantage the heavier guys have going down hill.
3. They have excellent cores - they can use their abs, etc. to hold back much of their weight from the front end ( i.e. do a sort of crunch to pull the upper body back)
1. They have pro wrenches that check the bike for soundness before every race/stage - particularly, in this case, the wheels and head set
2. They typically weigh less than the average joe and so put less weight on the front wheel ( the probable cause of your weave). When you watched them on TV you might have noticed it's mostly the smaller/lighter guys who do this in hopes that the extra-aero position will make up for the weight advantage the heavier guys have going down hill.
3. They have excellent cores - they can use their abs, etc. to hold back much of their weight from the front end ( i.e. do a sort of crunch to pull the upper body back)
4. They have no traffic to deal with.
__________________
BF, in a nutshell
BF, in a nutshell
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 659
Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Hi-Mod / Scott Spark 930 / Scott Sportster 20 / Jamis Allegro 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From looking at the pic in the post from Zitter I take my "Yep" back. I misunderstood. I've never done that. I don't think I'd fit in that position on my bike!
#12
Iconoclast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California
Posts: 3,176
Bikes: Colnago Super, Fuji Opus III, Specialized Rockhopper, Specialized Sirrus (road)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 356
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
2 Posts
Hopefully you are looking ahead of the road and you can get back to the drops to slow down. I did this position (hands next to stem) in a race yesterday on a straight downhill. Not brave enough to hold that position in a turn.
Last edited by Perp; 09-19-11 at 03:25 PM. Reason: spelling
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
My tops are (sometimes) good for climbing, but not for descending.
#16
Senior Member
For the OP - if you start weaving when doing the top tube sit thing, you're letting the bars move too much. It may be that you're steering with the bars in general, rather than with your hips. Ultimately it's more stable to steer from the hips.
The top tube tuck allows the rider to rest the legs. It's also more aero for taller riders than other tucks. Taylor Phinney and other tall riders will typically use the top tube tuck in time trials and such. Shorter riders (I would ride size S Giant; my bike has a 40 cm seat tube) like me work well with a face-over-front-tire, hands-at-center-of-tops, chest-almost-on-bars tuck. I've burnt my chin on my front tire before (once).
This is kind of like the whole tailgating thing when driving. I don't tailgate unless protecting a spot in heavy traffic but generally speaking I'm closer than 120 feet at 60 mph, maybe more like 60-80 feet. Most cars, including mine, won't stop from 60 mph in 120 feet. But unless someone drops a huge concrete block in front of the car I'm following, I'll have some time to react.
Also, I'm not staring at the car in front of mine's bumper - I'm looking around.
It takes a half second to go from a full hands-on-tops-next-to-stem to the drops and braking. Seriously. After multiple posts about safety of a downhill tuck I tried it to see exactly how "risky" it is. It doesn't feel risky at all. It takes me maybe 40-50 feet? without panicking.
I can do a full tuck in close quarters if in a group of reasonably skilled riders (racers or ex racers or experienced group riders). I do the compromise tuck (hands on drops) when around riders I don't fully trust (i.e. local shop group ride).
In real turns you can't use a tuck, but for curves and such you can.
Holding the bars next to the stop on the tops are the absolutely most stable position when going really fast or when riding one handed. It doesn't mean you can do anything else, but as far as stability goes, it's the most stable. It reduces any rider input to a minimum.
The drops are best for all-out control, i.e. braking, steering, and over massively rough pavement.
The tops are good, one handed, at over 50 mph on rough terrain.
The top tube tuck allows the rider to rest the legs. It's also more aero for taller riders than other tucks. Taylor Phinney and other tall riders will typically use the top tube tuck in time trials and such. Shorter riders (I would ride size S Giant; my bike has a 40 cm seat tube) like me work well with a face-over-front-tire, hands-at-center-of-tops, chest-almost-on-bars tuck. I've burnt my chin on my front tire before (once).
Also, I'm not staring at the car in front of mine's bumper - I'm looking around.
It takes a half second to go from a full hands-on-tops-next-to-stem to the drops and braking. Seriously. After multiple posts about safety of a downhill tuck I tried it to see exactly how "risky" it is. It doesn't feel risky at all. It takes me maybe 40-50 feet? without panicking.
I can do a full tuck in close quarters if in a group of reasonably skilled riders (racers or ex racers or experienced group riders). I do the compromise tuck (hands on drops) when around riders I don't fully trust (i.e. local shop group ride).
The drops are best for all-out control, i.e. braking, steering, and over massively rough pavement.
The tops are good, one handed, at over 50 mph on rough terrain.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Downey, CA.
Posts: 1,166
Bikes: Litespeed Classic (55cm), Specialized Tarmac Pro (56cm)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
By the way, I'm awear who this is and in no way imply or infere or anything else that riding in this position is either safe or dangerous. I'm simply responding to the OP with a different point of view to his question.
__________________
Litespeed, lasts a lifetime.
Specialized Tarmac, lasts a lifetime, or until it breaks.
Litespeed, lasts a lifetime.
Specialized Tarmac, lasts a lifetime, or until it breaks.