Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Actual vs. Avg ShifterCable Pull

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Actual vs. Avg ShifterCable Pull

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-15, 10:16 AM
  #1  
70sSanO
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
70sSanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times in 1,323 Posts
Actual vs. Avg ShifterCable Pull

Some background... I have been running 7 speed drivetrains for years. Until recently all of my road wheels and my wife's road bike wheels were freewheel 126mm OLD. My wife has used index downtube shifting since the 80's and I have just changed from friction a couple of months ago. My wife got a newer bike with 130mm and I have spread her old steel frame to 130mm.

I have decided to bite the bullet and get some new wheels with DA 7700 hubs. I can squeeze the 130mm into my Cannondale drop outs and I have a couple of ideas to shave a mm or 2 off the OLD on the hubs. I have already discovered the joy of running 38/48 chainrings and a max 32t. Regardless of what I end up with I anticipate going with 8 speeds or 9 speeds max (maybe 8 of 9) cassette. At my age and how I ride, I see no value in 1 tooth cog differences to even entertain going with 10 speed. I will probably go with brifters, but the current choices are: lower end Shimano (or hard to find expensive NOS/decent used), or Campagnolo not as low end (or not as hard to find but not "cheap" decent used).

So here is where this is going...

I understand that published shifter cable pulls are the average pull, i.e.; Shimano 8 is 2.8mm, Shimano 9 is 2.5mm, Campagnolo 10 is 2.8, Campagnolo 11 is 2.6mm. I have also read that Campagnolo shifter pull of 2.8mm is really an average and that the actual pull is 2.5mm (1st-6th), 3.0mm (7th & 8th), 3.5 (9th & 10th).

Is this true? Does Shimano have the a similar variable pull or is it just Campagnolo?

I am asking because I will probably go with a cassette without a spider and gain some grams, but I can make whatever spacing I need whether constant or variable.

Thanks!

John

Last edited by 70sSanO; 05-13-15 at 10:19 AM.
70sSanO is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 11:23 AM
  #2  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times in 866 Posts
It would be great if we had a reliable source of data for all of these examples of indexing motion.

It seems like with 10 and 11 speed, fewer people are kluging different brands together as in the past, probably because the narrower spacings are more sensitive to slight differences between brands and to any of the sort of non-linearity that your source implies.

I read in Velo News, one reader reported that Shimano 11 and Campagnolo 11 rear derailers are interchangeable, but to what standards of accuracy was not specified.

I am myself wondering if Campagnolo 10 and 11 speed rear derailers have exactly the same actuation ratio.
In Shimano's case, the actuation ratio was actually changed in the switch from 10 to 11 speed for the road gruppos, decreasing the derailer's actuation ratio toward the Campagnolo specification.

You are right that cog spacers can be altered to compensate for any minor indexing discrepancy. I used to modify Shimano cassettes for use with 7s Accushift Command shifters, to good effect!

I have myself noticed that using the next-narrower width of chain makes indexing discrepancies much less critical in actual use.
dddd is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 12:19 PM
  #3  
icepick_trotsky 
Aspiring curmudgeon
 
icepick_trotsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 2,486

Bikes: Guerciotti, Serotta, Gaulzetti

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
7 speed brifters are available if you'd rather avoid the headache.
__________________
"Party on comrades" -- Lenin, probably
icepick_trotsky is offline  
Old 05-14-15, 01:05 PM
  #4  
70sSanO
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
70sSanO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,806

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times in 1,323 Posts
I actually have a set of Shimano ST2300 brifters that werre on my wife's old road bike that I am converting to a flat bar. Since my road bike is a bike I have cherished for a long time, I really would like to get little higher quality shifters. Most higher end Shimano 8 speed brifters that are available are used and may or may not function very well, or, very expensive NOS for 90's vintage brifters. That is why I think Campagnolo 10 speed may be a better way to go.

John
70sSanO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
adlai
Bicycle Mechanics
17
12-23-17 11:22 AM
waynesulak
Tandem Cycling
2
09-20-13 12:51 PM
jyl
Bicycle Mechanics
7
05-22-13 07:42 AM
Barrettscv
Bicycle Mechanics
5
03-13-11 06:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.