Carbon Bikes
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11
Bikes: Scott Addict 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carbon Bikes
I've been thinking about replacing my Specialized Allez (23.2 pounds) with a Trek Emonda SL 6 (16.6 pounds) to improve my climbing ability. Anyone have any feedback on the Emonda itself or how significant weight is on hilly routes? Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,634
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,034 Times
in
1,428 Posts
It would probably makes much less difference than you would imagine. According to an article in Bicycling, if you weigh 180 pounds...on a 6 mile climb of 3% grade, losing 5 pounds will put you at the top of the hill about 30 seconds faster.
-Matt
-Matt
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,634
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,034 Times
in
1,428 Posts
Yeah...Bike Calculator
Enter, say 200 for watts. Then enter your weight, the bike weight, distance and grade. Look at the estimated speed in the top right box. Then lower the bike weight and notice the effect on speed.
If you use Strava, you can plug in the info for a given segment and see how the lighter bike would affect your time, for the same effort.
-Matt
Enter, say 200 for watts. Then enter your weight, the bike weight, distance and grade. Look at the estimated speed in the top right box. Then lower the bike weight and notice the effect on speed.
If you use Strava, you can plug in the info for a given segment and see how the lighter bike would affect your time, for the same effort.
-Matt
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 303
Bikes: Road, Commuter, Mountain, Tandem and a couple others
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 87 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times
in
27 Posts
If you want to improve your climbing ability, the best way to do that is by climbing more hills.
If you want a new bike because the new bike looks cool or makes you want to ride more, then go for it.
You will feel the difference between the two bikes, but like others have said, you won't be exactly flying up the hills - but it might be a more enjoyable experience.
I say if you can afford it then go for it. Blessings (or anything, really) from these forums is worth what you pay.
I decided after riding my bike 20,000 miles that I wanted a new bike, so I got one. There is nothing wrong with my old bike. My new bike is way nicer than I need, but so what?
If you want a new bike because the new bike looks cool or makes you want to ride more, then go for it.
You will feel the difference between the two bikes, but like others have said, you won't be exactly flying up the hills - but it might be a more enjoyable experience.
I say if you can afford it then go for it. Blessings (or anything, really) from these forums is worth what you pay.
I decided after riding my bike 20,000 miles that I wanted a new bike, so I got one. There is nothing wrong with my old bike. My new bike is way nicer than I need, but so what?
#5
Senior Member
Yep. Buy the new bike if you want to. I bought a Domane at the beginning of the summer and love it.
#6
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
Regularly riding up grades will do more for your climbing ability than just buying upgrades.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 523
Bikes: Trek Domane, Surly Disc Trucker
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 170 Post(s)
Liked 103 Times
in
68 Posts
My unprofessional opinion is that the bigger factors improving hill climbing are:
1) As other noted, just riding more hills
2) gearing
I say gearing from my own anecdotal experience with a Trek Domane (don't know the weight but probably in the ballpark of the Emonda) and a Surly Disc Trucker - steel frame with fenders and racks. The Surly with all the 'stuff' on it is probably around 30 pounds, maybe evet more. But it's got a triple crank with the lowest granny gear ratio of 26/32. While I don't fly up hills (I'm 65 and speed isn't a high priority for me) as I'll usually go into just about the lowest gear on steeper hills, for my purposes in riding, both bikes feel fine. So, I'd say, if you're looking for a new bike and found one you like, great. Not sure if you'll find a substantial improvement in hill climbing all other things being equal.
1) As other noted, just riding more hills
2) gearing
I say gearing from my own anecdotal experience with a Trek Domane (don't know the weight but probably in the ballpark of the Emonda) and a Surly Disc Trucker - steel frame with fenders and racks. The Surly with all the 'stuff' on it is probably around 30 pounds, maybe evet more. But it's got a triple crank with the lowest granny gear ratio of 26/32. While I don't fly up hills (I'm 65 and speed isn't a high priority for me) as I'll usually go into just about the lowest gear on steeper hills, for my purposes in riding, both bikes feel fine. So, I'd say, if you're looking for a new bike and found one you like, great. Not sure if you'll find a substantial improvement in hill climbing all other things being equal.
#8
Senior Member
No question a lighter bike is unlikely to afford big gains. Super light wheels will make a bigger difference than a light frame. I adopted lower gears and learned how to spin them when standing as well as sitting. This made a huge difference, and it seems the pros do the same.
#9
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
Riding more is the most effective means of improving your cycling strength and abilities. If getting a new carbon bike means you will be more likely to increase your time in the saddle, then that's the way to improve your cycling strength and abilities.
#10
Senior Member
As to the weight, I think it does make a difference. I have a regular route that has a 2 mile climb, 4% average over the whole climb but theres a good 1/3 mile on this climb in the 10% range. My fastest time ever was on my 16.5lb bike in 10:49.
Today I hit it pretty hard with my 21lb bike (one of my better attemps and I thought Id come close to beatng my PR) but Strava said I finished in 12:13. Both bikes are carbon with Ultegra (50/34), this bike is 11-30, my lighter bike was geared at 12-25. This heavier bike has 33c multi surface tires, the other corsa evos.
While the weight is noticable, there are a lot of things that tie into the differnce in my times. Both bikes are a completely different fit. One is more aggressive road and the other more for endurance. The tires certainly play a part. The weather was certainly a factor (it was raining today).
All that being said, Im looking at getting a new bike next year but primarily for fit. I think if you are going to get a lighter bike, spend the money on a good fit and find what changes to your bike will get you the most power transfrer for each turn of the pedal. Having your new lightweight bike properly set up might make more difference then just the weight itself.
#11
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Providence
Posts: 732
Bikes: Specialized tarmac sl2 giant tcx zero
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 319 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The allez is a great all rounder , but an emonda is a beast , top of the line world class title winning monster , get it, get two , get 3 . !!!
The bike you choose is stationary , reliable performance ,
you can always loose weight or gain muscle abililty but you need a solid base ,.
bike/part choice plus kit choice will be the foundations you build your physical performance ability on..
The bike you choose is stationary , reliable performance ,
you can always loose weight or gain muscle abililty but you need a solid base ,.
bike/part choice plus kit choice will be the foundations you build your physical performance ability on..
#12
Senior Member
I think another factor in climbing hills is the stiffness of the frame. After buying a new carbon bike I really noticed the way it accelerated far more briskly than the old one. It weighs around 2kg less than my old bike; add on my 76kg and the total difference in weight comes to less than 3%. I seriously doubt I would notice a 3% reduction in weight when accelerating. However, the new bike is also far stiffer, meaning that it's delivering a far greater percentage of my power to the road and I believe that is what I'm noticing.
By the way, I'm 62 and I still love getting PRs on Strava. I get a lot of joy zooming by youngsters on my route and whenever someone passes me I can take comfort from the fact that I'm probably old enough to be their father. I commute 18 miles to work more days than not and I live roughly 600ft higher than where I work so I've put in a lot of hill climbing - nearly 4 Everests so far this year. It does get easier and it definitely gets faster.
By the way, I'm 62 and I still love getting PRs on Strava. I get a lot of joy zooming by youngsters on my route and whenever someone passes me I can take comfort from the fact that I'm probably old enough to be their father. I commute 18 miles to work more days than not and I live roughly 600ft higher than where I work so I've put in a lot of hill climbing - nearly 4 Everests so far this year. It does get easier and it definitely gets faster.
#13
Senior Member
I think another factor in climbing hills is the stiffness of the frame. After buying a new carbon bike I really noticed the way it accelerated far more briskly than the old one. It weighs around 2kg less than my old bike; add on my 76kg and the total difference in weight comes to less than 3%. I seriously doubt I would notice a 3% reduction in weight when accelerating. However, the new bike is also far stiffer, meaning that it's delivering a far greater percentage of my power to the road and I believe that is what I'm noticing.
https://thebicycleacademy.org/blogs/...lex-gcn-tech-1
IMO, unless you're riding an alpine stage in the Tour, aerodynamics trumps weight all day if you want to go fast. The most important factors with aerodynamics are body position and clothing. Fitness trumps all by a country mile, though. As Eddy said when asked how to succeed in bike racing: "ride lots".
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,204
Bikes: ...a few.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
234 Posts
Buy the Emonda just because riding a lighter bike is just more fun. Nothing else matters unless you are a professional racer.
#15
Senior Member
Not to spark yet another debate on this topic, but this is a controversial opinion at best. Bottom bracket stiffness likely has nothing to do with "power transfer". It may feel "faster" or "more efficient", but there's no real world evidence it actually is faster or more efficient. Some people actively disagree, resulting in the concept of "planing". Here's an article on the subject, make of what you will:
https://thebicycleacademy.org/blogs/...lex-gcn-tech-1
IMO, unless you're riding an alpine stage in the Tour, aerodynamics trumps weight all day if you want to go fast. The most important factors with aerodynamics are body position and clothing. Fitness trumps all by a country mile, though. As Eddy said when asked how to succeed in bike racing: "ride lots".
https://thebicycleacademy.org/blogs/...lex-gcn-tech-1
IMO, unless you're riding an alpine stage in the Tour, aerodynamics trumps weight all day if you want to go fast. The most important factors with aerodynamics are body position and clothing. Fitness trumps all by a country mile, though. As Eddy said when asked how to succeed in bike racing: "ride lots".
Regardless, all I can say is that my new bike feels a lot more responsive. I'd also have to say that aerodynamics really don't come in to play on some of the hills I ride on my way home; there's one in particular which is short but pretty sharp and the new bike seems to go up it much more readily. It could all be in my head, of course. I've not ridden it enough yet to get any real data for comparison. Since the previous bike was built in 1993, though, it would be surprising if frame design hadn't moved on substantially in that time.
#16
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
While the calculators showing very minor reductions in climbing times for a few pounds difference in weight are likely 100% accurate, what they fail to take into account is a very important factor: The Placebo Effect. Fancy high dollar equipment will likely cause you to push harder because you just "know" it has great value on performance. So go for it!
Make sure any new bike you get is a color you love for extra performance gains.
Make sure any new bike you get is a color you love for extra performance gains.
#17
Senior Member
That's an interesting article ... however, I fail to see how a frame returning to it's neutral position is applying any rotational energy to the crank. I'd be interested to see a more controlled experiment taking place - although just how you'd do that I'm not sure.
Regardless, all I can say is that my new bike feels a lot more responsive. I'd also have to say that aerodynamics really don't come in to play on some of the hills I ride on my way home; there's one in particular which is short but pretty sharp and the new bike seems to go up it much more readily. It could all be in my head, of course. I've not ridden it enough yet to get any real data for comparison. Since the previous bike was built in 1993, though, it would be surprising if frame design hadn't moved on substantially in that time.
Regardless, all I can say is that my new bike feels a lot more responsive. I'd also have to say that aerodynamics really don't come in to play on some of the hills I ride on my way home; there's one in particular which is short but pretty sharp and the new bike seems to go up it much more readily. It could all be in my head, of course. I've not ridden it enough yet to get any real data for comparison. Since the previous bike was built in 1993, though, it would be surprising if frame design hadn't moved on substantially in that time.
Not 100% controlled but they make a good point that the energy needs to go somewhere.
#19
Senior Member
"It may feel "faster" or "more efficient", but there's no real world evidence it actually is faster or more efficient. Some people actively disagree, resulting in the concept of "planing"
In the 80's-90's there was this company called SlingShot. Instead of a down tube it had a cable and the frame was designed to flex using a hinge plate in the top tube just before the seat tube. I remember racing against two brothers in the Midwest that rode the SlingShot and they sprinted so darned fast that it was really tough to stay on their wheels. I firmly believe frame stiffness is highly overrated. Those two guys were tough competitors and their bikes certainly did not hold them back.
On the other hand, wheel stiffness is super important as I have played with spoke tension and various rim designs over the years and found that a stiff wheel out accelerates a more flexible wheel by a considerable margin. My guess is that with lighter bikes comes better constructed wheels and this is where the "feeling" of instant acceleration is coming from.
In the 80's-90's there was this company called SlingShot. Instead of a down tube it had a cable and the frame was designed to flex using a hinge plate in the top tube just before the seat tube. I remember racing against two brothers in the Midwest that rode the SlingShot and they sprinted so darned fast that it was really tough to stay on their wheels. I firmly believe frame stiffness is highly overrated. Those two guys were tough competitors and their bikes certainly did not hold them back.
On the other hand, wheel stiffness is super important as I have played with spoke tension and various rim designs over the years and found that a stiff wheel out accelerates a more flexible wheel by a considerable margin. My guess is that with lighter bikes comes better constructed wheels and this is where the "feeling" of instant acceleration is coming from.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11
Bikes: Scott Addict 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the excellent feedback guys. Lots of food for thought. Overall I think I will enjoy cycling more on an Emonda than on my Allez for both subjective and objective reasons. Like jgwilliams, I'm considerably older (I'm 76) than everyone I ride with and enjoy the fact that I can keep up with most of them and get to the top of a long climb sooner than some of them. Where I live, most of the climbs are over two miles and generally between 6 and 10% with some 12-14% sections a few hundred yards long. All things equal (my fitness, my weight, etc) I can't imagine a 6-pound difference between my Allez and an Emonda NOT having a pleasant effect. And hey, my wife gave me the green light to buy it...
#22
SuperGimp
#23
Senior Member
One more thing to make clear. Gearing will make or break you in a 2 mile climb at 10% grade. Make sure you get that right on your new bike or that 6 pound lighter weight will feel like 50 pounds of extra weight!
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 1,221
Bikes: '13 Diamondback Hybrid Commuter, '17 Spec Roubaix Di2, '17 Spec Camber 29'er, '19 CDale Topstone Gravel
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 590 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times
in
260 Posts
Don't buy upgrades. Ride up grades.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,857
Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 298 Times
in
214 Posts
My move to a carbon supersix from an alloy Synapse was a huge difference,
because I went di2 and disc I added weight 17 lbs, but still I also wasn't 23 on the Synapse either more like 22 with pedals.
I truly enjoy riding a rocket!!!!!
It goes without saying the more you ride hills the stronger you get, that will be true with any bike.
yet for no matter the amount you ride, you will always be faster on the Emonda than you will the Allez!
If you can afford the upgrade... do it!
because I went di2 and disc I added weight 17 lbs, but still I also wasn't 23 on the Synapse either more like 22 with pedals.
I truly enjoy riding a rocket!!!!!
It goes without saying the more you ride hills the stronger you get, that will be true with any bike.
yet for no matter the amount you ride, you will always be faster on the Emonda than you will the Allez!
If you can afford the upgrade... do it!