Heavy Bikes are better !
10-20-20, 10:35 AM
#26
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,971
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 644 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
I disagree. For me, it is counterproductive to deliberately change a bike to make it harder to ride while getting no benefit out of the change.
I already ride cheap, heavy steel frames from the 80s. Still, as drop bar bikes, necessary speed to even begin to get my HR up is a bit more than I want on our various trails.
I switched to touring bars which shifts to a different range of body angles that increase wind surface area coefficient and reduce aerodynamic efficiency. That helps give me a good workout while going a few mph slower.
But it also improves ride comfort for long rides, and I’m actually doing longer rides (was already the trend since returning to SS.). It makes riding more fun and more weight bearing because I can comfortably stand up for a much larger fraction of the ride.
Just riding some heavy ponderous bike would simply cause me to switch to walking or running. YMMV.
Otto
I already ride cheap, heavy steel frames from the 80s. Still, as drop bar bikes, necessary speed to even begin to get my HR up is a bit more than I want on our various trails.
I switched to touring bars which shifts to a different range of body angles that increase wind surface area coefficient and reduce aerodynamic efficiency. That helps give me a good workout while going a few mph slower.
But it also improves ride comfort for long rides, and I’m actually doing longer rides (was already the trend since returning to SS.). It makes riding more fun and more weight bearing because I can comfortably stand up for a much larger fraction of the ride.
Just riding some heavy ponderous bike would simply cause me to switch to walking or running. YMMV.
Otto
Likes For ofajen:
10-20-20, 10:56 AM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,891
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2594 Post(s)
Liked 1,922 Times
in
1,206 Posts
If you're 12 feet high and 8 feet wide, like a freight train, maybe. But you'd probably want a heavy bike to carry your massive (bicycling) engine.
10-20-20, 10:58 AM
#28
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 4
Bikes: 2003 Trek 1000 Aluminum/Sora
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I am new to forums; did this reply make it onto thread?
Hi, ABout to buy a road bike and need some advice. are their expert road cyclists online here ?
Likes For mack_turtle:
10-20-20, 11:13 AM
#31
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 4
Bikes: 2003 Trek 1000 Aluminum/Sora
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
ABout to buy a 2006 Trek Madone 5.2. All Carbon. Ultegra all through except Dura Ace front DeRailler. Zipp 303 and 404 wheels. Looks in good shape. Seller is asking $900. Can anyone give me an idea of how much to pay?
Likes For TonyVi:
10-20-20, 11:35 AM
#32
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
Not in this thread!
10-20-20, 11:41 AM
#33
Cheerfully low end
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,971
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 644 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
667 Posts
Otto
10-20-20, 12:02 PM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
421 Posts
I suspect troll thread, but taking it at face value...
There are some questionable assumptions here.
Is there really any evidence that heavier bikes are more rugged / reliable? In my view, most high quality bikes are a lot less delicate than they look, and can give you endless trouble-free miles if you maintain the consumable parts such as tires and brake pads. And a heavyweight bike can be made by combining a heavy frame with things like inferior wheels, which probably do affect durability.
Are lighter bikes even necessarily newer? I have a 22 pound bike that is on average about 35 years old, and was not cutting edge in its day.
Is this really driven by the industry brainwashing us? How would I know if I've been brainwashed?
There are some questionable assumptions here.
Is there really any evidence that heavier bikes are more rugged / reliable? In my view, most high quality bikes are a lot less delicate than they look, and can give you endless trouble-free miles if you maintain the consumable parts such as tires and brake pads. And a heavyweight bike can be made by combining a heavy frame with things like inferior wheels, which probably do affect durability.
Are lighter bikes even necessarily newer? I have a 22 pound bike that is on average about 35 years old, and was not cutting edge in its day.
Is this really driven by the industry brainwashing us? How would I know if I've been brainwashed?
Likes For Gresp15C:
10-20-20, 01:14 PM
#36
Senior Member
That's obvious. But it's not like it's going to make a lot of difference in making you stronger. My old mountain bike is 10 pounds heavier than my hybrid. Not a lot, really. For example, if you do weight training, 10 pounds isn't a huge difference and you should be able to add 10 lbs of weight within a couple of months but it won't be long before your body adapts and then you have to increase the weight. I think when it comes to getting a better workout cycling, ride faster and ride uphill -depending on the geography of your place of course- and ride faster going uphill. I'd rather have the option of being light (lighter bike). But if I want more weight I can always wear those exercise vests/clothing (not sure what they're called) that you can load with weight blocks. I always see guys wearing those.
10-20-20, 01:22 PM
#37
Senior Member
heavy bikes don't give a better (or worse) workout. bike riding is not weight lifting, it's aerobic activity. So you'll just go slower for the equivalent effort.
10-20-20, 01:27 PM
#38
Senior Member
Yes but think of the awesome workout you're getting! The rest of us riding without towing all the extra weight are just chumps.
Last edited by Reflector Guy; 10-20-20 at 01:54 PM.
10-20-20, 01:49 PM
#39
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 32,978
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11952 Post(s)
Liked 6,599 Times
in
3,465 Posts
Duplicate threads merged.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
10-20-20, 02:42 PM
#40
Lopsided biped
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 737
Bikes: 2017 Day 6 Cyclone (the Buick); 2015 Simcoe Deluxe (the Xebec); Street Strider 3i (the not-a-bike); GreenSpeed Anura (the Black Swan)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 316 Post(s)
Liked 160 Times
in
97 Posts
Here's your ride, preventec47 . Don't stop with the bone-stock version, though; load it up with the thicker tubes, tire sealant, tire liners, chromed-steel fenders, rear baskets, large front basket, and front drum brake. Then go aftermarket for lights, an electric air-horn, maybe a 50-watt stereo system ...
https://www.worksmancycles.com/inb.html
https://www.worksmancycles.com/inb.html
10-20-20, 02:42 PM
#41
Full Member
Once you're rolling on a flat road, heavy bikes don't take any more energy to pedal than light bikes.
Knobby tires do take more energy, but as Pop notes, they're not as much fun to ride.
Now if you can keep up with a group ride, and ring your bell as you pass the leader going uphill, THAT will give you serious points. Of course, it'll probably piss them off and you'll never see the group again after you get over the hill.
Knobby tires do take more energy, but as Pop notes, they're not as much fun to ride.
Now if you can keep up with a group ride, and ring your bell as you pass the leader going uphill, THAT will give you serious points. Of course, it'll probably piss them off and you'll never see the group again after you get over the hill.
10-20-20, 02:50 PM
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,212
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,485 Times
in
7,316 Posts
10-20-20, 02:54 PM
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,352
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,942 Times
in
1,905 Posts
if you want to move slow & want a workout, in-door trainer is best. You're physical mph will be 0 & you can add as much resistance allowed. all while respecting the mup by not being on it.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
Likes For Troul:
10-20-20, 03:02 PM
#44
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times
in
28 Posts
If you dont have solid tires on your heavy bike you are probably a communist - maybe a secret spy ! ( is it still ok to pick on communists )
No manly man ever would ever want to consider fooling around with flat tires !
No manly man ever would ever want to consider fooling around with flat tires !
10-20-20, 04:26 PM
#45
Senior Member
Likes For BlazingPedals:
10-20-20, 05:12 PM
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,480
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7648 Post(s)
Liked 3,465 Times
in
1,831 Posts
"Better" is subjective, so this whole thread is sort of just, "I like what I like." But ... because it is stated as a fact, not an opinion, this is sure to attract a little controversy.
For example, for me, typing less and riding more is "better," but I wouldn't try to push that idea on folks here .......
For example, for me, typing less and riding more is "better," but I wouldn't try to push that idea on folks here .......
10-20-20, 05:46 PM
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,212
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,485 Times
in
7,316 Posts
"Better" is subjective, so this whole thread is sort of just, "I like what I like." But ... because it is stated as a fact, not an opinion, this is sure to attract a little controversy.
For example, for me, typing less and riding more is "better," but I wouldn't try to push that idea on folks here .......
For example, for me, typing less and riding more is "better," but I wouldn't try to push that idea on folks here .......
10-20-20, 05:51 PM
#48
Not a newbie to cycling
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 911
Bikes: Omnium Cargo Ti with Rohloff, Bullitt Milk Plus, Dahon Smooth Hound
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 356 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times
in
199 Posts
Nah, one of the "heaviest" reasons for me to move to a titanium Omnium cargo bike from my Bullitt was that no matter what I did to the Bullitt I could never make it as light as even a steel Omnium. And the lighter the bike, the more "stuff" you can carry uphill.
Seriously, I'm not a weight-weenie, but heavy bikes better than light bikes? Hell no!
Seriously, I'm not a weight-weenie, but heavy bikes better than light bikes? Hell no!
10-20-20, 06:39 PM
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,839
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6934 Post(s)
Liked 10,938 Times
in
4,673 Posts
Likes For Koyote:
10-20-20, 06:44 PM
#50
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
