Tire Pressure
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Tire Pressure
I’m confused about what air pressure to use for the most speed on tubeless tires. I’ve read a lot of info saying you should decrease the pressure a lot. However, the Silca guide says much higher (for me on smooth roads, 96 rear and 93.5 front).
Anyone have testing results/opinions?
Anyone have testing results/opinions?
Last edited by rclouviere; 11-27-23 at 12:58 PM.
#2
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,056
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,927 Times
in
4,160 Posts
Likes For datlas:
#3
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,810 Times
in
3,318 Posts
I think just like with tubed tires, you should ride the bike and find out what pressure you prefer to run in them and watch your metrics to see if they confirm your perceptions. Pick a number to start with and go from there. The Silca recommendation is as good as any for a starting point.
Your actual road conditions, smoothness or roughness as well as the frequency of bumps will make a difference that no calculator will be able to precisely figure for you.
Your actual road conditions, smoothness or roughness as well as the frequency of bumps will make a difference that no calculator will be able to precisely figure for you.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4415 Post(s)
Liked 4,867 Times
in
3,012 Posts
The Silca guide is a reasonable starting point. What width tyres and rider weight did you input?
#6
Junior Member
I’m confused about what air pressure to use for the most speed on tubeless tires. I’ve read a lot of info saying you should decrease the pressure a lot. However, the Silca guide says much higher (for me on smooth roads, 96 rear and 85 front).
Anyone have testing results/opinions?
Anyone have testing results/opinions?
#7
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,639
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4737 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
I’m confused about what air pressure to use for the most speed on tubeless tires. I’ve read a lot of info saying you should decrease the pressure a lot. However, the Silca guide says much higher (for me on smooth roads, 96 rear and 85 front).
Anyone have testing results/opinions?
Anyone have testing results/opinions?
96R/85F -- that seems like a much larger difference than Silca's calculator usually returns between rear and front. Are you running different width tires in Front vs Rear?
#8
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,997
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4957 Post(s)
Liked 8,098 Times
in
3,833 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,767
Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times
in
849 Posts
I have inputed data into the Silca calculator the Rene Herse Calculator and the SRAM calculator and all are pretty different.
#10
Newbie
Thread Starter
#11
Senior Member
I use the pressure calculator at zipp.com. The results aren't said to be the fastest, AFAIK. The issue is often how smooth or rough the asphalt is. One pressure is never perfect for all conditions. I ride tubeless with hookless rims. At 135 pounds, I never exceed 60 psi with 28-30mm tires. I have a lot of chip sealed roads, so I tend to use lower pressure.
#12
Junior Member
I have used Silca and SRAM and find them to be within about 2psi for the rear tire, SRAM being lower. And this is with using the actual measured width for Silca. For example I use 28mm tires, SRAM asks for that value (and the inner rim width) and when inflated the tires actually measure 29mm on my wheels which, if you input 28 vs 29mm in the Silca calculator, makes a significant difference in the calculated pressure. Also, SRAM always has a greater difference between front and rear tires than Silca.
I also have looked closely at the info on rollingresistance.com……so much data to digest in this ‘modern era’ of cycling……I love it!!!
Likes For Biker Pete:
#13
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,639
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4737 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
I haven’t tried the RH calculator…..thanks for the info!
I have used Silca and SRAM and find them to be within about 2psi for the rear tire, SRAM being lower. And this is with using the actual measured width for Silca. For example I use 28mm tires, SRAM asks for that value (and the inner rim width) and when inflated the tires actually measure 29mm on my wheels which, if you input 28 vs 29mm in the Silca calculator, makes a significant difference in the calculated pressure. Also, SRAM always has a greater difference between front and rear tires than Silca.
I also have looked closely at the info on rollingresistance.com……so much data to digest in this ‘modern era’ of cycling……I love it!!!
I have used Silca and SRAM and find them to be within about 2psi for the rear tire, SRAM being lower. And this is with using the actual measured width for Silca. For example I use 28mm tires, SRAM asks for that value (and the inner rim width) and when inflated the tires actually measure 29mm on my wheels which, if you input 28 vs 29mm in the Silca calculator, makes a significant difference in the calculated pressure. Also, SRAM always has a greater difference between front and rear tires than Silca.
I also have looked closely at the info on rollingresistance.com……so much data to digest in this ‘modern era’ of cycling……I love it!!!
For any calculator, what none of them seem to ask for is the inflated height as well. Even sites like BicycleRollingResistance, will show the inflated height as well as width. I presume a taller inflated height means more air volume than a lesser height (for an equivalent inflated width, and there are sometimes fairly significant differences between tire brands on inflated height.
Last edited by Sy Reene; 11-27-23 at 06:48 PM.
Likes For Sy Reene:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,957
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 878 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
As Sy Reene pasted, Silca's usually is race-focused and gives you the estimated breakpoint pressure -- meaning the maximum pressure before rolling resistance is expected to increase. Note that going too high increases Crr more than running pressure under that breakpoint, so it should be treated as an upper limit. The reasons the common wisdom is to use lower pressure for tubeless setups than tubed are 1) that it's more comfortable, 2) you don't have to worry about pinch flats with tubeless, and 3) you won't increase Crr much, so the trade-off tends to be worth it, especially for running narrower tires.
My recommendations would be to try lower pressures and see whether you like how the bike handles. Your goal should be to have your bike feels smooth, not sluggish or squirmy.
My recommendations would be to try lower pressures and see whether you like how the bike handles. Your goal should be to have your bike feels smooth, not sluggish or squirmy.
Likes For surak:
#15
Junior Member
Never liked the SRAM calculator, because it is inferring how wide your tires will be for a given rim width, even though it's quite known that different manufacturers nominally label their tire sizes differently versus how they actually inflate. It also only has 2 road surfaces to choose from -- Dry or Wet. Nothing to do with actual texture -- eg. rocky, smooth, dirt, etc. And then of course, since they're heavily invested in selling the hookless variety of wheel through Zipp, I expect their bias on PSI recommendations is always going to be on the low side in order to satisfy the marketing side of their business.
For any calculator, what none of them seem to ask for is the inflated height as well. Even sites like BicycleRollingResistance, will show the inflated height as well as width. I presume a taller inflated height means more air volume than a lesser height (for an equivalent inflated width, and there are sometimes fairly significant differences between tire brands on inflated height.
For any calculator, what none of them seem to ask for is the inflated height as well. Even sites like BicycleRollingResistance, will show the inflated height as well as width. I presume a taller inflated height means more air volume than a lesser height (for an equivalent inflated width, and there are sometimes fairly significant differences between tire brands on inflated height.
Regarding my own journey, I just recently came into the ‘modern era’ with the purchase of a used Kestrel from 2016. Still old fashioned rim brakes, cabled shifters, no power meter. But I did ‘upgrade’ the Zipp carbon wheels optimized for 23mm tires with new ‘aero’ ‘tubeless ready’ carbon wheels optimized for 28mm tires. Hence my investigation into the tire pressure calculators.
Likes For Biker Pete:
#16
Junior Member
I’m confused about what air pressure to use for the most speed on tubeless tires. I’ve read a lot of info saying you should decrease the pressure a lot. However, the Silca guide says much higher (for me on smooth roads, 96 rear and 93.5 front).
Anyone have testing results/opinions?
Anyone have testing results/opinions?
As for the pressure that will provide the most speed... there is no single magical number. It depends. And it will change based on weather conditions, road conditions, and the specific tires you are using. As stated by others, the Silca guide is a good starting point. Start there and feel free to experiment until you find what you like. At the end of the day, the best pressure is the one that works best for you.
Likes For Turnin_Wrenches:
#18
Senior Member
What hasn't been mentioned is to verify the accuracy of your pump gauge. That's not easy to do unless you want to purchase a pricey gauge that's for calibration purposes. I use liquid filled Winters brand gauges for calibration, with the gauge attached to some pipe with a presta valve attached to it. My old silca 0-160 psi gauge was off by 8 psi, only delivering 72 instead of 80. I replaced it with a much larger diameter Winters gauge. I use a 0-100 psi gauge, since I never use more than 60. I can compare several gauges at once. My newest lezyne pump is accurate.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,952
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,301 Times
in
2,948 Posts
Likes For tomato coupe:
#20
Senior Member
Most tires have a specific rim width that's used as a basis for the advertised width. It's usually listed on the packaging. Wider rims will result in a wider mounted width. I have some 25mm internal width hookless rims. The narrowest tire that can be used is a 28mm and not all of those are approved for that rim width. 28mm tires will measure about 31mm on a 25mm IW rim and 30mm tires measure about 33mm. I've only used Michelin and Pirelli tires. Both measure about the same.
#21
Senior Member
I have two pumps and want similar results. Those pushing the 73psi limit with hookless might want accuracy.
Likes For DaveSSS:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,395
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,979 Times
in
1,920 Posts
digital Air Pressure Regulators with a zero-out feature tends to be a less expensive route to test tire inflation tools for accuracy.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
What hasn't been mentioned is to verify the accuracy of your pump gauge. That's not easy to do unless you want to purchase a pricey gauge that's for calibration purposes. I use liquid filled Winters brand gauges for calibration, with the gauge attached to some pipe with a presta valve attached to it. My old silca 0-160 psi gauge was off by 8 psi, only delivering 72 instead of 80. I replaced it with a much larger diameter Winters gauge. I use a 0-100 psi gauge, since I never use more than 60. I can compare several gauges at once. My newest lezyne pump is accurate.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,952
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3953 Post(s)
Liked 7,301 Times
in
2,948 Posts
Accuracy isn't very important for most people. You can do whatever you like.
The 73 psi limit is chosen somewhat arbitrarily and the actual maximum safe pressure varies with tire and rim combos. Inflating your tubeless tires right up to the 73 psi limit with a "calibrated" pump might make you feel safer, but it's not doing much for you.
Those pushing the 73psi limit with hookless might want accuracy.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#25
Senior Member
If I were going for the world hour record on a track I would worry. Riding to the next town with a bunch of 70-year-old for cake and coffee, not so much. As long as I don't get a flat.
That said, I run Conti 5000 tires at about 90psi. Or so my pump says.