Gravel bike popularity
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,235
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 353 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
Gravel bike popularity
In the summers here they have a weekly XC racing series and they just added gravel as one of the categories. The other categories are just age brackets. The course is the same as the XC course so 40+mm tires are recommended. Looks like mtb and gravel folk can coexist after all. The trails here have seen a huge increase of people doing them on gravel bikes so makes sense.
#2
Chases Dogs for Sport
I was there when mountain bikes began. In the beginning, mountain bikes tended to be road bikes with clearance for bigger tires and a flat bar. The small-diamond, 26" wheel MTB didn't come until several years into the phenomenon. In other words . . . don't tell anybody but, except for the handlebar, today's gravel bikes pretty much are the same as the original mountain bikes. Extremely versatile. Rugged. Reliable. Fun.
#3
Senior Member
I was there when mountain bikes began. In the beginning, mountain bikes tended to be road bikes with clearance for bigger tires and a flat bar. The small-diamond, 26" wheel MTB didn't come until several years into the phenomenon. In other words . . . don't tell anybody but, except for the handlebar, today's gravel bikes pretty much are the same as the original mountain bikes. Extremely versatile. Rugged. Reliable. Fun.
I just need a way to find the same level of riding time.
#4
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
I agree.
Apart from carbon frames, carbon wheels, carbon handlebars, carbon seatposts, hydraulic disk brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, electronic shifting, internal cable routing, integration of shifters with brake levers and 1x, today's gravel bikes are exactly the same as bikes from the 90's
-Tim-
Apart from carbon frames, carbon wheels, carbon handlebars, carbon seatposts, hydraulic disk brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, electronic shifting, internal cable routing, integration of shifters with brake levers and 1x, today's gravel bikes are exactly the same as bikes from the 90's
-Tim-
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree.
Apart from carbon frames, carbon wheels, carbon handlebars, carbon seatposts, hydraulic disk brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, electronic shifting, internal cable routing, integration of shifters with brake levers and 1x, today's gravel bikes are exactly the same as bikes from the 90's
-Tim-
Apart from carbon frames, carbon wheels, carbon handlebars, carbon seatposts, hydraulic disk brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, electronic shifting, internal cable routing, integration of shifters with brake levers and 1x, today's gravel bikes are exactly the same as bikes from the 90's
-Tim-
#6
Senior Member
I was there when mountain bikes began. In the beginning, mountain bikes tended to be road bikes with clearance for bigger tires and a flat bar. The small-diamond, 26" wheel MTB didn't come until several years into the phenomenon. In other words . . . don't tell anybody but, except for the handlebar, today's gravel bikes pretty much are the same as the original mountain bikes. Extremely versatile. Rugged. Reliable. Fun.
Slack head tube with a low-offset fork for massive trail, slack seat tube, and chainstays that Grant Petersen would approve of. Total beach cruiser. I've only been able to give it a road-esque fit by using a too-small frame with a weird stem and the saddle slammed forward on a zero-offset seatpost.
It was more toward the late 80s and into the 90s that mountain bikes got road-like. The NORBA-era mountain bikes tended to be much steeper, and had overall geometries that weren't too far off a road bike. The super-long stems and narrow flat bars even emulated the contact points of drop-bar road bikes. John Tomac wasn't being that weird by throwing drop bars on his.
#7
Senior Member
I agree.
Apart from carbon frames, carbon wheels, carbon handlebars, carbon seatposts, hydraulic disk brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, electronic shifting, internal cable routing, integration of shifters with brake levers and 1x, today's gravel bikes are exactly the same as bikes from the 90's
-Tim-
Apart from carbon frames, carbon wheels, carbon handlebars, carbon seatposts, hydraulic disk brakes, tubeless tires, thru axles, electronic shifting, internal cable routing, integration of shifters with brake levers and 1x, today's gravel bikes are exactly the same as bikes from the 90's
-Tim-
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
I was there when mountain bikes began. In the beginning, mountain bikes tended to be road bikes with clearance for bigger tires and a flat bar. The small-diamond, 26" wheel MTB didn't come until several years into the phenomenon. In other words . . . don't tell anybody but, except for the handlebar, today's gravel bikes pretty much are the same as the original mountain bikes. Extremely versatile. Rugged. Reliable. Fun.
Buy the time we got to the early '90s MTB geometry certainly was closer to road bike geometry than it is today (steep head angles, high BB, longer wheelbases). You are right - they are similar in handling to today's gravel bikes - but naturally the components have all changed.
Last edited by chas58; 04-01-19 at 03:15 PM.
#9
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
I was there when mountain bikes began. In the beginning, mountain bikes tended to be road bikes with clearance for bigger tires and a flat bar. The small-diamond, 26" wheel MTB didn't come until several years into the phenomenon. In other words . . . don't tell anybody but, except for the handlebar, today's gravel bikes pretty much are the same as the original mountain bikes. Extremely versatile. Rugged. Reliable. Fun.
Geometry is different(which makes it a totally different bike), gearing exists(vs the cruisers from then), and...well yeah its just too significant a list for me to type out. See the first 2 examples as all that should be needed to show there is a clear and significant difference.
#10
Chases Dogs for Sport
Good grief! I didn't intend to start the sadly typical bike forum pi**ing match.
First, I was talking NOT about the Frankenbikes that truly started the mountain bike thing. Yes, those were junk bikes and usually modified beach cruiser frames. I was talking about the production mountain bikes that started in the 1980 to 1982 period (which weren't all that well suited for mountain biking, but were great for what we now call gravel biking). See also, Diamondback Ridge Runner.
Second, I was talking about similarity to the road bikes of 1980-1982, NOT to today's road geometry. The road bikes of the 70's and early 80's looked a lot more like today's gravel bikes than today's road bikes do. Vastly different than today's road bikes. Friendlier geometry, to start with. My comments were era specific -- which, to me, only made sense.
Sorry if I gave you the impression I was "pulling something" on everyone. Geez. I was making relative comparisons, not angle-by-angle, component-by-component comparisons. (That would have been stupid.)
First, I was talking NOT about the Frankenbikes that truly started the mountain bike thing. Yes, those were junk bikes and usually modified beach cruiser frames. I was talking about the production mountain bikes that started in the 1980 to 1982 period (which weren't all that well suited for mountain biking, but were great for what we now call gravel biking). See also, Diamondback Ridge Runner.
Second, I was talking about similarity to the road bikes of 1980-1982, NOT to today's road geometry. The road bikes of the 70's and early 80's looked a lot more like today's gravel bikes than today's road bikes do. Vastly different than today's road bikes. Friendlier geometry, to start with. My comments were era specific -- which, to me, only made sense.
Sorry if I gave you the impression I was "pulling something" on everyone. Geez. I was making relative comparisons, not angle-by-angle, component-by-component comparisons. (That would have been stupid.)
Last edited by FlashBazbo; 04-01-19 at 03:18 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,065
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1217 Post(s)
Liked 186 Times
in
117 Posts
You make less sense now.
I wager it would be extremely difficult to find a road bike with 71/70 headtube angle and 65mm+ trail from the early 80s. Today's road bikes are visually different than classic and vintage road bikes but geometrically they are very similar. Not so with gravel bikes that often feature very high trail, and high short stack/reach.
I could see tire clearance, but otherwise, no not really. Today's gravel bikes look nothing (visually, geometrically, etc) like the road bikes of the 70s and 80s.
I wager it would be extremely difficult to find a road bike with 71/70 headtube angle and 65mm+ trail from the early 80s. Today's road bikes are visually different than classic and vintage road bikes but geometrically they are very similar. Not so with gravel bikes that often feature very high trail, and high short stack/reach.
I could see tire clearance, but otherwise, no not really. Today's gravel bikes look nothing (visually, geometrically, etc) like the road bikes of the 70s and 80s.
#12
Senior Member
Good grief! I didn't intend to start the sadly typical bike forum pi**ing match.
First, I was talking NOT about the Frankenbikes that truly started the mountain bike thing. Yes, those were junk bikes and usually modified beach cruiser frames. I was talking about the production mountain bikes that started in the 1980 to 1982 period (which weren't all that well suited for mountain biking, but were great for what we now call gravel biking). See also, Diamondback Ridge Runner.
First, I was talking NOT about the Frankenbikes that truly started the mountain bike thing. Yes, those were junk bikes and usually modified beach cruiser frames. I was talking about the production mountain bikes that started in the 1980 to 1982 period (which weren't all that well suited for mountain biking, but were great for what we now call gravel biking). See also, Diamondback Ridge Runner.
Go look at a photograph from the side of an '82 Ridge Runner. You'll find that it's similar to my '84 Stumpjumper, slack angles and super-long chainstays. It's very cruiser-like, nothing like the gravel bikes of today.
Second, I was talking about similarity to the road bikes of 1980-1982, NOT to today's road geometry. The road bikes of the 70's and early 80's looked a lot more like today's gravel bikes than today's road bikes do. Vastly different than today's road bikes. Friendlier geometry, to start with. My comments were era specific -- which, to me, only made sense.
415mm chainstays, 73-degree head angle, 58mm of trail. Those figures are all pretty normal on today's market. So is the 84-degree seat tube angle.
The contact points behave differently than modern stuff (i.e. the drops can be a better handrest position than the hoods), but overall, the natural fit and posture of the bike isn't weird today.
Last edited by HTupolev; 04-01-19 at 04:40 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,857
Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 298 Times
in
214 Posts
so my gravel bike is a yesteryear mtb - 20 pounds
so what is in 20 lbs that makes it different? Ummm everything!!
so what is in 20 lbs that makes it different? Ummm everything!!
#15
HarborBandS
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago Western Suburbs
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 266 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
57 Posts
Not at all. The klunkerz of Repack were essentially beach cruisers, built from frames like 1940s Schwinn Excelsiors. The slack front ends and reclined postures were fairly reasonable for the fire road descents and whatnot that they put the bikes through. The first production mountain bikes continued in this mold for a while. Here's my 1984 Stumpjumper:
Slack head tube with a low-offset fork for massive trail, slack seat tube, and chainstays that Grant Petersen would approve of. Total beach cruiser. I've only been able to give it a road-esque fit by using a too-small frame with a weird stem and the saddle slammed forward on a zero-offset seatpost.
It was more toward the late 80s and into the 90s that mountain bikes got road-like. The NORBA-era mountain bikes tended to be much steeper, and had overall geometries that weren't too far off a road bike. The super-long stems and narrow flat bars even emulated the contact points of drop-bar road bikes. John Tomac wasn't being that weird by throwing drop bars on his.
Slack head tube with a low-offset fork for massive trail, slack seat tube, and chainstays that Grant Petersen would approve of. Total beach cruiser. I've only been able to give it a road-esque fit by using a too-small frame with a weird stem and the saddle slammed forward on a zero-offset seatpost.
It was more toward the late 80s and into the 90s that mountain bikes got road-like. The NORBA-era mountain bikes tended to be much steeper, and had overall geometries that weren't too far off a road bike. The super-long stems and narrow flat bars even emulated the contact points of drop-bar road bikes. John Tomac wasn't being that weird by throwing drop bars on his.
I used to ride 18" frame rigid mountain bikes in this era, including a few races with my bike shop mates. Now I ride a 56-58 cm road bikes. For me, the 90's MTB's had very compact triangles compared to most of the modern "gravel bikes" I see around (short seat tubes, but longer top tubes). I worked for a Trek and GT shop at the time, so my experience is mostly with those brands.
#16
HarborBandS
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago Western Suburbs
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 266 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
57 Posts
Here’s the catalog pic of the 1995 Trek 8700 I sold years ago. Bonded carbon fiber/aluminum frame was a partnership between Easton and Trek in the pre-Bontrager era. Great bike on gravel, and super light. I’d love to find a geometry chart for this bike to see what I was really riding.
Last edited by HarborBandS; 04-02-19 at 08:51 AM.
#17
HarborBandS
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago Western Suburbs
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 266 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
57 Posts
My 18" 8700 appears to have lot's of reach with effective top tube of 59.2 cm on my old 18" frame! Stem wasn't exactly short either, but did have some rise (until I turned mine upside down).
LOOOOnnngggg wheelbase of 105.9 cm. Lots of trail. Head tube angle 71 degrees, seat tube angle 73 degrees.
26" gravel bike?
Last edited by HarborBandS; 04-02-19 at 09:27 AM.
#20
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
True story...a group of us were out riding by Merrit Reservoir, Which within a 50 mile radius has fewer people than some small apartment complexes. We saw some cattle grazing by the side of the road and called "Moo" at them....they ran away.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
468 Posts
"Most" being the key word. We've had several riders get bitten around here. And then to compound the problem the dog owners get pissed at us for being out there. The latest interaction with some hillbilly that lives on our favorite climb is that he told us to "go ride your f****ing bikes somewhere else!!", while his huge pit bull is trying to get through the rider's bike-shield. Yeah, I've never had to deal with that on the road. Grr.. /endrant
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#22
Senior Member
"Most" being the key word. We've had several riders get bitten around here. And then to compound the problem the dog owners get pissed at us for being out there. The latest interaction with some hillbilly that lives on our favorite climb is that he told us to "go ride your f****ing bikes somewhere else!!", while his huge pit bull is trying to get through the rider's bike-shield. Yeah, I've never had to deal with that on the road. Grr.. /endrant
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
Second, I was talking about similarity to the road bikes of 1980-1982, NOT to today's road geometry. The road bikes of the 70's and early 80's looked a lot more like today's gravel bikes than today's road bikes do. Vastly different than today's road bikes. Friendlier geometry, to start with. My comments were era specific -- which, to me, only made sense.
by the time mountain bikes were around with relevancy ('90s), the road bikes I have were very steep and tight, while mountain bike had a geometry similar to what gravel bike had today.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,235
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 353 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 92 Times
in
67 Posts
Goes to show how a thread to talk about XC racing with gravel bikes turned into a dumb pissing contest about geometry and comfort for some ridiculous reason.
#25
Senior Member
The fairly modern-geo 1983 bike that I posted above has 27" wheels. They're only 8mm larger than 700c, so they don't have very significant implications on what you can and can't do with bike geometry.
Also, higher-end racing bikes were always effectively designed for 700c because they used tubulars; road tubulars have been "700c"-sized since the dawn of time. (700c clincher road bikes also existed during the 27" era, it just wasn't a US thing.)
Also, higher-end racing bikes were always effectively designed for 700c because they used tubulars; road tubulars have been "700c"-sized since the dawn of time. (700c clincher road bikes also existed during the 27" era, it just wasn't a US thing.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johngwheeler
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
35
01-21-18 01:57 PM
KonaRider125
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
30
03-31-17 03:53 PM
thehammerdog
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
6
06-04-15 06:30 AM