Campagnolo NR/SR cranksets - Has anyone on C&V actually broken one?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Campagnolo NR/SR cranksets - Has anyone on C&V actually broken one?
Knowing that there are probably several hundred of these cranksets in use by this group what are the real risks?
I've seen the scary photos (but heard some were machine-forced to failure by University students studying fatigue), I've read Jobst Brandt's claim to have broken more than a dozen and I have seen one actually broken by a very strong rider (who also breaks frames) and the thirty or so stitches it took to close the wound the broken end made in his calf.
Those cranksets were made for such a long time and were the only thing to have on almost any up-market bike for decades, the population of them is likely huge compared to any other specific model of crankset, so perhaps in proportion the failure rate is no higher than anything else? Or......?
I've seen the scary photos (but heard some were machine-forced to failure by University students studying fatigue), I've read Jobst Brandt's claim to have broken more than a dozen and I have seen one actually broken by a very strong rider (who also breaks frames) and the thirty or so stitches it took to close the wound the broken end made in his calf.
Those cranksets were made for such a long time and were the only thing to have on almost any up-market bike for decades, the population of them is likely huge compared to any other specific model of crankset, so perhaps in proportion the failure rate is no higher than anything else? Or......?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
I haven't done it but in my racing days I was twice on the wheel of a Campy (probably NR) crankset rider when the right crank broke. Both riders crashed. I missed both. This was in the late '70s.
Those cranks were well made, but - many have led hard lives, they have cut threads (both I saw broke at the pedal) and they are aluminum. None of them are new.
Ben
Those cranks were well made, but - many have led hard lives, they have cut threads (both I saw broke at the pedal) and they are aluminum. None of them are new.
Ben
#4
Senior Member
I've seen the scary photos (but heard some were machine-forced to failure by University students studying fatigue), I've read Jobst Brandt's claim to have broken more than a dozen and I have seen one actually broken by a very strong rider (who also breaks frames) and the thirty or so stitches it took to close the wound the broken end made in his calf.
Those cranksets were made for such a long time and were the only thing to have on almost any up-market bike for decades, the population of them is likely huge compared to any other specific model of crankset, so perhaps in proportion the failure rate is no higher than anything else? Or......?
Those cranksets were made for such a long time and were the only thing to have on almost any up-market bike for decades, the population of them is likely huge compared to any other specific model of crankset, so perhaps in proportion the failure rate is no higher than anything else? Or......?
All cranks crack. I've never broken a campy, but I cracked one at the spider, and eventually retired it before it got too bad. I bought it used from an ex Italian pro, and put probably close to another 100k miles on it before this happened. So don't worry about it. Always check cranks regularly for cracks. There's often a small crack there for months before they actually snap.
AFA Jobst Brandt, first of all he was a big guy. 2nd of all he'd ride crazy single track, and regularly chainring climb over logs and stuff -- with a road bike. He could break anything.
Likes For Salamandrine:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Bend, Washington State
Posts: 2,942
Bikes: 1937 Hobbs; 1977 Bruce Gordon; 1987 Bill Holland; 1988 Schwinn Paramount (Fixed gear); 1999 Fat City Yo Eddy (MTB); 2018 Woodrup (Touring) 2016 Ritchey breakaway
Mentioned: 291 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 554 Post(s)
Liked 3,794 Times
in
668 Posts
Yes, I had a Campagnolo Crank fail at pedal hole while I was sprinting hard out of the saddle. I went down hard and broke my collar bone.
That was about 10 or 15 years ago.
That was about 10 or 15 years ago.
#6
Senior Member
Same thing happened to me. Was doing intervals, stood up for the next repeat, and next thing I knew I was going across the road with a pedal hanging from my foot that was dragging along the road. Ended up in the field adjacent to the road. Crank had snapped right through the pedal hole.No broken bones but had I been on that road a half hour earlier, I would have run into, literally, the shift change at the industrial park at the end of the road.
Last edited by Mr. Spadoni; 09-21-20 at 11:14 PM.
#7
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
163 Posts
Neither of the two cranks that I have broken were Campag. Both were decades old — when I bought them new in the 70s - 80s I couldn’t afford Campagnolo bling parts. A Stronglight, the one that looks like Campag Record, 103 was it?, broke obliquely 2/3 the way down the shaft just as I was starting a stroke. No crash. Later the same year, a TA Cycltotouriste broke through the pedal eye as I stood to roller-coaster over an overpass. Went down hard but no injury. Being short and light, not so far and hard to fall? Broken surfaces of both cranks showed the dark-light separation implying old crack propagating slowly then suddenly, just as described for Campag failures. A dragon lives forever, but not those alloy cranks....
i’m optimIstic that the Campag cranks I have now will outlast me. But I peer at them often. And I filed the spider web prophylacticly.
i’m optimIstic that the Campag cranks I have now will outlast me. But I peer at them often. And I filed the spider web prophylacticly.
Last edited by conspiratemus1; 09-22-20 at 12:13 AM.
#8
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
163 Posts
Now, here’s a can of worms: do you use pedal washers, in hopes of preventing fretting (-> cracking) around the eye? Campagnolo says not to. But I do.
#9
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Likes For cudak888:
#10
WGB
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 2,917
Bikes: Panasonic PT-4500
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1800 Post(s)
Liked 2,334 Times
in
1,378 Posts
@conspiratemus "a dragons live forever but not those alloy cranks."
That made my day!!!
That made my day!!!
#11
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
I haven't personally broken one (yet), but have had people bring their broken Record cranks into the shop, so I know it really happens.
#12
Senior Member
Pedal eye breaks can happen. This is a known thing and has been for decades. Note that newer Sugino cranks are much beefier around the pedal eye compared to vintage cranks. Over torquing pedals is part of the problem. Not necessary and increases chance of cracking. Save the lawyer/Park specs for cheap soft thick cast cranks.
Newfangled hollowtech cranks break too, I suspect more often than vintage campy, on a miles/failures ration. Of course there isn't actual data on this.
Again, you'll see more broken campy cranks because more people used them and more miles have been ridden on them than any others. People that bought Takagi or SR cranks didn't ride 400/week for years on end.
Likes For Salamandrine:
#13
Steel is real
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,105
Bikes: 40 - accumulated over 40 years
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 375 Post(s)
Liked 1,082 Times
in
303 Posts
The main “problem” is the user.
Any part made of aluminium and that is under dynamic load will fail eventually. It has a lifespan depending on, among other things, construction/design/grade/alloy/casting/forging/etc. and /load/cycles/deformation/etc. But one thing is sure - from the first day of use it deteriorates and eventually it will fail. Depending of all the above it can happen early or late in the components use.
The user of aluminium frames, cranks, stems, bars, etc. must know this and take it into account. It is the cost of lightness (one can design and construct with aluminium in a way that it will not fail in many lifetimes but then it will be heavier than using steel). The user must check for damage and/or substitute the parts before damage occurs. Think of it as maintaining a building – you can wait until the plumbing systems collapse or you maintain it by substituting parts according to a cyclic plan. To maintain the buildings functions and therefore its use and value. The main problem is the user – not realizing this.
All alu-cranks will fail – in the end and under the right (or shall I say wrong… hrmmm difficult) circumstances. The vintage Record crank was made to endure all out pro racing – but eventually it will fail. Smart mechanics substituted it regularly. It is probably less prone to failure than most cranks but was/is used harder and longer than a “lesser” crank. Why do we not hear about cheap cranks failing? Because they are not used in a manner or long enough for them to break – ending up on the scrap yard many dynamic loads before their time is due.
A component can of course also fail because of a glitch in the manufacturing process – but let us not discuss parts made after lunch on Fridays or before lunch on Mondays. Let us talk about the mass of parts that are made as they were intended.
I have never had a Record, or any other crank, fail under me. I have checked them for cracks and even if not having cracks I have substituted them when I felt my pretty face was more worth than the price for getting another set of cranks…
And I have been into building property management all my life…
Any part made of aluminium and that is under dynamic load will fail eventually. It has a lifespan depending on, among other things, construction/design/grade/alloy/casting/forging/etc. and /load/cycles/deformation/etc. But one thing is sure - from the first day of use it deteriorates and eventually it will fail. Depending of all the above it can happen early or late in the components use.
The user of aluminium frames, cranks, stems, bars, etc. must know this and take it into account. It is the cost of lightness (one can design and construct with aluminium in a way that it will not fail in many lifetimes but then it will be heavier than using steel). The user must check for damage and/or substitute the parts before damage occurs. Think of it as maintaining a building – you can wait until the plumbing systems collapse or you maintain it by substituting parts according to a cyclic plan. To maintain the buildings functions and therefore its use and value. The main problem is the user – not realizing this.
All alu-cranks will fail – in the end and under the right (or shall I say wrong… hrmmm difficult) circumstances. The vintage Record crank was made to endure all out pro racing – but eventually it will fail. Smart mechanics substituted it regularly. It is probably less prone to failure than most cranks but was/is used harder and longer than a “lesser” crank. Why do we not hear about cheap cranks failing? Because they are not used in a manner or long enough for them to break – ending up on the scrap yard many dynamic loads before their time is due.
A component can of course also fail because of a glitch in the manufacturing process – but let us not discuss parts made after lunch on Fridays or before lunch on Mondays. Let us talk about the mass of parts that are made as they were intended.
I have never had a Record, or any other crank, fail under me. I have checked them for cracks and even if not having cracks I have substituted them when I felt my pretty face was more worth than the price for getting another set of cranks…
And I have been into building property management all my life…
Likes For styggno1:
#14
Senior Member
Mine broke through the pedal eye. It was less than five years old at the time. Shop where I bought the bike gave me a used replacement, not because there was any notion of a warranty but because they were amused that I was able to break a crank.
Likes For Mr. Spadoni:
#15
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
163 Posts
@conspiratemus "a dragons live forever but not those alloy cranks."
That made my day!!!
That made my day!!!
Last edited by conspiratemus1; 09-22-20 at 11:25 AM.
#16
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
I have no authority to say this but I suspect those cranks failed at a greater rate than that of other cranks. But! Does that mean it's an inordinate risk? No, at least not for everyone. I'm fairly light and not very strong. I would ride one. I did ride one for nearly 30 years, the same one. Brandt cited a design or materials defect compared with other cranks. I don't remember what it was, but he was a well qualified mechanical engineer,, and I'm not. If I worried about this kind of failure, I would use a different crank.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Jobst Brandt had several criticisms of general crankset design (related to pedals spindles fretting the crankarm where they mount) and mentioned the sharp-edge stress riser on the NR/SR crank at the spider (though most appear to fail at the pedal eye rather than the spider). I'm a little surprised he didn't single out the NR/SR cranks for their anodized finish - there are a number of technical papers on how anodizing can shorten fatigue life.
Likes For daka:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
"spider cracks" do happen, neglect if not caught and filed clear.
From way back, if is when ankles or toe straps rub the arm, polish through the anodizing... sometimes taking away metal.
a metallurgist acquaintance asked on the material, 7000 series grades are prone to micro fractures with the type of abrasion seen with toe straps and or ankles.
I have retired cranks that exhibited too much localized "polishing".
when the non destructive testing place nearby has time they are going to apply dye and x-ray the monsters...
Things have been slowing down with the 737 Max stoppage.
From way back, if is when ankles or toe straps rub the arm, polish through the anodizing... sometimes taking away metal.
a metallurgist acquaintance asked on the material, 7000 series grades are prone to micro fractures with the type of abrasion seen with toe straps and or ankles.
I have retired cranks that exhibited too much localized "polishing".
when the non destructive testing place nearby has time they are going to apply dye and x-ray the monsters...
Things have been slowing down with the 737 Max stoppage.
#19
Senior Member
I'm still not buying the notion that they were worse than other cranks from the time period. Stronglight 93/105 didn't crack, but the soft alloy caused other issues. AFAIK Brandt went directly from steel cottered to Campy NR/SR, not riding anything else until eventually switching to 7400. Like pretty much every one else. It's not like there was some big variety of choices BITD in pro level cranksets. Different time. He told me he preferred the old steel cranks. May have been an off the cuff comment.
Aluminum fatigues with enough cycles. I had worse luck with other brands.
Aluminum fatigues with enough cycles. I had worse luck with other brands.
Likes For Salamandrine:
#20
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Folks cropping up in here telling half the story about their crank failure (or bringing up a crank of a completely different design and barely mentioning the difference in their horror story) make it very difficult to infer worthwhile qualitative information, and the previous thread is full of it.
By comparison, this thread's title is pretty specific to one crank. I'm just trying to put down some good ground rules for failure reporting.
-Kurt
Last edited by cudak888; 09-22-20 at 07:59 PM.
#21
Member
Not a Campy, but my Dad had a spindle on an Ofmega Mistral bottom bracket snap in half in the middle of a sprint.
#22
Senior Member
OK, one failure technically. Campy NR. Classic web crack. I rode it for at least a year after it got the crack, probably longer, maybe 100 miles/week. Eventually pulled it off. I've never actually seen a complete failure from the web crack, except that one that turned out to be a university fatigue test.
Likes For Salamandrine:
#23
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
163 Posts
All fair enough, but I'm hoping that those who post in reply will be kind enough to note how their cranks failed, and that they were NR/SR.
Folks cropping up in here telling half the story about their crank failure (or bringing up a crank of a completely different design and barely mentioning the difference in their horror story) make it very difficult to infer worthwhile qualitative information, and the previous thread is full of it.
By comparison, this thread's title is pretty specific to one crank. I'm just trying to put down some good ground rules for failure reporting.
-Kurt
Folks cropping up in here telling half the story about their crank failure (or bringing up a crank of a completely different design and barely mentioning the difference in their horror story) make it very difficult to infer worthwhile qualitative information, and the previous thread is full of it.
By comparison, this thread's title is pretty specific to one crank. I'm just trying to put down some good ground rules for failure reporting.
-Kurt
Statisticians tell us that anything that can happen eventually does. (Healthy people under 30 hardly ever die of Coronavirus but a 28-y.o. doctor in training just did.). So no surprise that a few BF-ers have broken NR/SR cranks. If the answer had been zero, I would have said the polling space is either too small or is skewed against finding broken cranks, like looking for Clinton supporters at a QAnon rally.
We all “know” that “NR cranks break.” There is a certain status you get from breaking one, which ensures they will be talked about. Breaking the crank that came on a Chinese BSO, not so much. You’d lose style points for admitting you were even riding one in the first place, so you’d start out in the hole, pre-break. So ferreting out stories of other cranks breaking is important for comparison in context. You can’t make much inference from haphazard samples of convenience but still, “Any Al crank can break and driven long enough eventually will,” is more useful than “NR cranks break.”
Besides, getting us to follow ground rules is like herding cats. 🐈🐈🐈🐆
Last edited by conspiratemus1; 09-22-20 at 08:32 PM.
#24
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Absolutely. But again, if it's just some story about someone's crank breaking (What type? Where?), it's just a lot of pointless guesswork that doesn't do much except fan the fearmongering flames.
Status quo for any room of over 2 people.
-Kurt
-Kurt
#25
Pedalin' Erry Day
Not really sure what this proves, but I too have had an NR crank develop a crack at the spider. No failure, but that's because it made creaking noises under load and so I took it off my bike.