Alum v. Carbon - Even if Price Were no Issue
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 8
Bikes: Orbea Aqua T23 - 2011
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Alum v. Carbon - Even if Price Were no Issue
Do any of you prefer Aluminum over carbon... even if price were not an issue?
I am sure this question has come up 1000 times on this board already, but I could not find it by digging around... apologies for asking many of you to repeat yourselves...
Thanks for being a part of this great community...
~Notto
I am sure this question has come up 1000 times on this board already, but I could not find it by digging around... apologies for asking many of you to repeat yourselves...
Thanks for being a part of this great community...
~Notto
#2
CAADdict
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BF Heaven
Posts: 6,756
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
If money were no issue, for me, carbon.
I love aluminum for what it is...a workhorse.
I'll always keep an aluminum road bike.
But I need a carbon bike bad.
And I've earned one.
And I deserve one.
Not that money is an issue anymore since a high end aluminum frame will cost more than a low end carbon frame.
It's when apples are compared to apples performance-wise that the price of carbon shoots up way past aluminum.
If money were no issue, right now, it'd be either a custom built Parlee or Calfee, or a Cannondale SuperSix EVO Ultimate.
I love aluminum for what it is...a workhorse.
I'll always keep an aluminum road bike.
But I need a carbon bike bad.
And I've earned one.
And I deserve one.
Not that money is an issue anymore since a high end aluminum frame will cost more than a low end carbon frame.
It's when apples are compared to apples performance-wise that the price of carbon shoots up way past aluminum.
If money were no issue, right now, it'd be either a custom built Parlee or Calfee, or a Cannondale SuperSix EVO Ultimate.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,679
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2326 Post(s)
Liked 4,995 Times
in
1,780 Posts
Do any of you prefer Aluminum over carbon... even if price were not an issue?
I am sure this question has come up 1000 times on this board already, but I could not find it by digging around... apologies for asking many of you to repeat yourselves...
Thanks for being a part of this great community...
~Notto
I am sure this question has come up 1000 times on this board already, but I could not find it by digging around... apologies for asking many of you to repeat yourselves...
Thanks for being a part of this great community...
~Notto
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 8
Bikes: Orbea Aqua T23 - 2011
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Primarily frames I guess... but input on alum v. carbon wheels is interesting as well..
#5
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 31
Bikes: Cervelo S1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have just two years of riding in.
First bike -custom Steel.
Sec. bike -Cervelo S1
I have never sat on or rode a carbon bike, and don't ever plan too.
I figure if I don't know what I'might be missing, I'm not really missing anything.
I Love the ride of my metal bikes.
First bike -custom Steel.
Sec. bike -Cervelo S1
I have never sat on or rode a carbon bike, and don't ever plan too.
I figure if I don't know what I'might be missing, I'm not really missing anything.
I Love the ride of my metal bikes.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
22 Posts
I ride on some older country roads that can get pretty rough in places. I have an aluminum Cervelo and a carbon Cervelo. Anyone could ride these 2 frames for 30 seconds on some of these roads and immediately tell the difference. The aluminum frame is literally a rattletrap compared to the smooth ride of the carbon frame. The difference in comfort is amazing especially on a 3-6 hour ride. The amazing thing is that the carbon frame is also stiffer and more responsive. I can't see any downside to the smoothness of the carbon ride. My old aluminum CAAD9 was exactly the same as the aluminum Cervelo.
I also have a steel Bianchi frame and this frame is much closer to the carbon frame than the aluminum.
I wouldn't buy another aluminum frame unless I was really trying to save money or if I was racing the bike and couldn't afford to replace the carbon frame if I destroyed it in a crash. On the other hand, I have seen plenty of bent aluminum frames that were beyond repair also.
I also have a steel Bianchi frame and this frame is much closer to the carbon frame than the aluminum.
I wouldn't buy another aluminum frame unless I was really trying to save money or if I was racing the bike and couldn't afford to replace the carbon frame if I destroyed it in a crash. On the other hand, I have seen plenty of bent aluminum frames that were beyond repair also.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is a Neuvation FC100 carbon frame with alloy BB, Head Tube and Seat Clusters, considered low-performing? It's certainly affordable. I love it but don't have much to compare it to.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 444
Bikes: IRO SS / Trek 2.1 / Trek 5.1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I commute on Steel, train on Aluminum and race on Carbon. They all have their purposes in life. I will say the carbon soaks up small amounts of disharmony that would rattle the aluminum and the fillings in my teeth. Given the going in proposition that money should be no object, I would choose carbon all day long and twice on Sunday. But since money is an object, I don't see me forking out that kind of cash for a carbon training rig any time soon.
#10
Peloton Shelter Dog
I have two Cervelos myself you know.
__________________
https://www.cotsiscad.com
https://www.cotsiscad.com
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550
Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
145 Posts
Why would anyone consider it "low-performing"? I don't think so. It may not be high-end compared to the more exotic brand name carbon bikes, but I don't think it is in the low end of the spectrum.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MABRA cat3
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
First primary bike is a tarmac (low-end entry carbon). I then built a BB30 cannondale CAAD9 frame for races last winter. I LOVE the aluminum. The tarmac is heavier. While the tarmac is stiff, the CAAD9 feels stiffer and more responsive. The geometry is almost identical, so the only differences are the bottom bracket and the frame material.
The carbon bike is now used for longer rides, commuting, training, and low-effort recreational rides. The aluminum bike is for races, fast rides, and training. I primarily use the aluminum bike and have even given thought to selling the carbon. If I were to go carbon again I would get a higher-end model. I've liked the test rides on higher-end carbon bikes. So... to answer the original question I would definitely get a higher end carbon if money were of no concern... who wouldn't?
The carbon bike is now used for longer rides, commuting, training, and low-effort recreational rides. The aluminum bike is for races, fast rides, and training. I primarily use the aluminum bike and have even given thought to selling the carbon. If I were to go carbon again I would get a higher-end model. I've liked the test rides on higher-end carbon bikes. So... to answer the original question I would definitely get a higher end carbon if money were of no concern... who wouldn't?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times
in
121 Posts
I ride on country roads in Illinois no question that carbon soaks the rattles much better. I had an Alu bike with carbon fork then went to a full carbon Motobecane IM Spirit and a Bottecchia, they both ride like a dream and soak up the rattles. Never an Alu bike would I ride hopefully the carbon will not just blow up.
#16
meow
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hint: check out my BF name
Posts: 5,831
Bikes: 2016 Parlee Altum, 2013 Cannondale Super Six Evo Hi Mod Di2 only, 2011 Cannondale Super Six, Dura Ace 7800, 2007 Cannondale System Six Dura Ace 7800, 1992 Bridgestone RB-1, MB-2, MB-3, MB-5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I have just two years of riding in.
First bike -custom Steel.
Sec. bike -Cervelo S1
I have never sat on or rode a carbon bike, and don't ever plan too.
I figure if I don't know what I'might be missing, I'm not really missing anything.
I Love the ride of my metal bikes.
First bike -custom Steel.
Sec. bike -Cervelo S1
I have never sat on or rode a carbon bike, and don't ever plan too.
I figure if I don't know what I'might be missing, I'm not really missing anything.
I Love the ride of my metal bikes.
#17
Flying Under the Radar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 4,116
Bikes: 10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have only used my Aluminum Allez about 4 times since getting my Carbon SuperiorLite. Nothing against the Allez, the difference is rides is just so much that it makes it very difficult to even want to ride the Alumn when I know how nice the carbon rides.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mountain View, California
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have just two years of riding in.
First bike -custom Steel.
Sec. bike -Cervelo S1
I have never sat on or rode a carbon bike, and don't ever plan too.
I figure if I don't know what I'might be missing, I'm not really missing anything.
I Love the ride of my metal bikes.
First bike -custom Steel.
Sec. bike -Cervelo S1
I have never sat on or rode a carbon bike, and don't ever plan too.
I figure if I don't know what I'might be missing, I'm not really missing anything.
I Love the ride of my metal bikes.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,551
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
+1 got the same problem.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Carbon, no question if cost not an issue. Framebuilders today make some great frames with great looks with carbon.
But if cost is an issue, absolutely aluminum. Nothing wrong with it whatsoever.
But if cost is an issue, absolutely aluminum. Nothing wrong with it whatsoever.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Antioch, IL
Posts: 2,330
Bikes: 2013 Synapse 4
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
cost no object, carbon here as well... but cost is an object in reality for most people... so it really becomes more of a question of higher end AL or lower end carbon... only a few co's make AL bikes with DA or Red from the factory, most (not all) stop at 105ish level components... would I rather spend ~$3k on a CAAD10 1 or would I rather have a SuperSix 3 for the same cash?? I'll take the SS 4 and upgrade the crank to force and shifters to Red then call it a day, thank you very much... as light as the DA caad? maybe, maybe not, but the ride quality would be worth it to me if I could afford a $3k bike...
#24
CAADdict
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BF Heaven
Posts: 6,756
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I'll get a carbon bike when (if?) I outgrow my aluminum bike.
I really really wished they would design a great aluminum bike that could take on carbon head-to-head in performance.
I like the ideal of metal for a bike more because of it's increased chances of surviving a crash more.
Although, the Cannondale SuperSix EVO is said to be stronger than a CAAD9. So, what to do, what to do...
#25
CAADdict
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BF Heaven
Posts: 6,756
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
"If" I had a set amount to spend on a bike and that put me in the lower carbon/higher aluminum range, aluminum hands down.
If my CAAD9 was the only bike I could have forever, I wouldn't pine so much for anything else. It does everything well enough for me.