Calorie calculators
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Calorie calculators
Biking calorie calculators take as input, age / sex? Yup, weight? 4 sure, distance, time OK. Result = ~ calories burned.
Nice.
Pretty clearly (IMO) a svelte 18 pound road bike is going to take substantially less effort than my 40 pound fully fishing equipped mtn bike at 40 pounds. Where I ride my road bikes are clearly not usable and the mtn bike is just more fun.
I know "a body in motion tends to stay in motion" and some postulate that a heavy bike is no more difficult to keep rolling than a lightweight, but then SUV's should get the same gas mileage as a runt car and manufacturers of vehicles would see no benefit to weight reduction year after year in vehicles :-)
I for one KNOW I work my butt off FAR more to keep 15 mph up on my Mtn bike than my road bikes.
So, bike weight / effort theology set aside for this discussion is there a way to take into account the (IMO) extra exertion it takes to use a heavier bike for distance?
Nice.
Pretty clearly (IMO) a svelte 18 pound road bike is going to take substantially less effort than my 40 pound fully fishing equipped mtn bike at 40 pounds. Where I ride my road bikes are clearly not usable and the mtn bike is just more fun.
I know "a body in motion tends to stay in motion" and some postulate that a heavy bike is no more difficult to keep rolling than a lightweight, but then SUV's should get the same gas mileage as a runt car and manufacturers of vehicles would see no benefit to weight reduction year after year in vehicles :-)
I for one KNOW I work my butt off FAR more to keep 15 mph up on my Mtn bike than my road bikes.
So, bike weight / effort theology set aside for this discussion is there a way to take into account the (IMO) extra exertion it takes to use a heavier bike for distance?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Yes. A power meter will tell you how much energy you are expending.
Likes For caloso:
#3
Seat Sniffer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,630
Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti; 2006 Schwinn Fastback Pro and 1996 Colnago Decor Super C96; 2003 Univega Alpina 700; 2000 Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 945 Post(s)
Liked 1,985 Times
in
569 Posts
The simple answer is to add the difference between the bike weights to what you enter for your weight.
But that assumes a lot of stuff. For example, we don't know what sort of bike the algorithm has assumed you are riding (how heavy, wind resistance, etc.).
FWIW, I think the calorie counters are of limited value. Mine sez I am burning somewhere near 700 calories an hour. But I know that can't be the case because if it were, I'd be a whole lot thinner than I am. I'm not sure why they are so far off, but I believe it probably has something to do with the body adapting to the exercise that it does. While I might have burned 700 calories an hour riding at my speed when I first began, I am in better shape and more efficient than I used to be, so my body is probably only consuming 400 or so calories an hour.
So my advice is to try to calibrate your calorie counter to your body. Consider your weight (including gain and loss) and calories in, and from there, you should know your calories out and from that, figure out how many calories you are consuming with your exercise. I've done that, and I think the number is something in the range of 350-400 calories per hour of bicycle riding.
Or, like caloso said ... get a power meter or maybe a heart rate monitor.
But that assumes a lot of stuff. For example, we don't know what sort of bike the algorithm has assumed you are riding (how heavy, wind resistance, etc.).
FWIW, I think the calorie counters are of limited value. Mine sez I am burning somewhere near 700 calories an hour. But I know that can't be the case because if it were, I'd be a whole lot thinner than I am. I'm not sure why they are so far off, but I believe it probably has something to do with the body adapting to the exercise that it does. While I might have burned 700 calories an hour riding at my speed when I first began, I am in better shape and more efficient than I used to be, so my body is probably only consuming 400 or so calories an hour.
So my advice is to try to calibrate your calorie counter to your body. Consider your weight (including gain and loss) and calories in, and from there, you should know your calories out and from that, figure out how many calories you are consuming with your exercise. I've done that, and I think the number is something in the range of 350-400 calories per hour of bicycle riding.
Or, like caloso said ... get a power meter or maybe a heart rate monitor.
__________________
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...
#4
Senior Member
The Strava app uses my weight and heart rate monitor to calculate calories burned. My Apple Watch does the same thing. The Apple Watch is always lower. I usually stick with that one and delete the Strava calories. I also try to not eat back my exercise calories as I am still trying to lose weight.
#5
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,563 Times
in
1,790 Posts
Pushing a heavier bike will increase your heart rate, which will register as more calories burned.
Many of the fitness wearables and bike computers use algorithms developed by Firstbeat to estimate calorie consumption, based on heart rate data.
Tests indicate that the Firsbeat algorithm is within 7% of laboratory measured calorie consumption.
This page lists devices that use Firstbeat algorithm
Here's an article on accuracy: Firstbeat Gets Calorie Counts Right
Many of the fitness wearables and bike computers use algorithms developed by Firstbeat to estimate calorie consumption, based on heart rate data.
Tests indicate that the Firsbeat algorithm is within 7% of laboratory measured calorie consumption.
This page lists devices that use Firstbeat algorithm
Here's an article on accuracy: Firstbeat Gets Calorie Counts Right
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,537
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
329 Posts
Pushing a heavier bike will increase your heart rate, which will register as more calories burned.
Many of the fitness wearables and bike computers use algorithms developed by Firstbeat to estimate calorie consumption, based on heart rate data.
Tests indicate that the Firsbeat algorithm is within 7% of laboratory measured calorie consumption.
This page lists devices that use Firstbeat algorithm
Here's an article on accuracy: Firstbeat Gets Calorie Counts Right
Many of the fitness wearables and bike computers use algorithms developed by Firstbeat to estimate calorie consumption, based on heart rate data.
Tests indicate that the Firsbeat algorithm is within 7% of laboratory measured calorie consumption.
This page lists devices that use Firstbeat algorithm
Here's an article on accuracy: Firstbeat Gets Calorie Counts Right
So now I have a pretty good idea of what those efforts feel like, which means that the estimates I get from Strava or my Wahoo out on the road (where I don't have a power meter) are always way, way too high.
Granted, this is still all guesswork, but at least now that I have some sort of idea of what 700 calories/hour feels like, I know that the relaxed coffee ride I did with friends did not actually burn 800 calories per hour.
So for my own calorie-tracking purposes, in my head I just automatically adjust every outdoor ride to roughly 600 calories/hour.
Anyway, so I've had a Fitbit for a few months. I don't wear it when I'm riding but I have it synced to Strava, so my rides eventually show up in my activities.
If I talk a 30-minute walk, I think Fitbit comically exaggerates the amount of calories I've burned. There is absolutely no way I'm burning 350 calories in a 20-30 minute walk.
However, when a bike ride syncs from Strava, Fitbit disregards Strava's calorie estimates and uses its own calculations. Based on my own 600-650 calories/hour estimate, Fitbit's estimates are very close to that every time.
So in conclusion: Fitbit: bad at auto-detecting activities and estimating calories for walks, but good at estimating calories for bikes.
#7
Life Feeds On Life
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 2,143
Bikes: Too many Motobecanes
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4420 Post(s)
Liked 4,526 Times
in
3,028 Posts
I don’t worry about it there are too many factors. Charts say 700-800 an hour maybe pedaling a gravel grinder uphill. But then I coast downhill.
Likes For Hondo Gravel:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
The only time I’ve seen 700kcal/hr is in a race.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
#11
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,531
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3887 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Even without a power meter, and ignoring the HRM, Strava will calculate kj which are pretty much the same as calories. Not as accurate as with a PM, but a much better idea than from some HRM software, which relies on your inputs for zones and probably wouldn't be accurate even if your inputs were correct. You have to have a device on your bike which records GPS and elevation information and which will upload to Strava. And your inputs to Strava regarding your weight and your bike's in-use weight have to be correct. Of course this doesn't work for stationary bikes.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
I've tried most of the methods out there. Results are all over and doubtful. These days I just ride the bike.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,286
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8279 Post(s)
Liked 9,033 Times
in
4,471 Posts
Biking calorie calculators take as input, age / sex? Yup, weight? 4 sure, distance, time OK. Result = ~ calories burned.
Nice.
Pretty clearly (IMO) a svelte 18 pound road bike is going to take substantially less effort than my 40 pound fully fishing equipped mtn bike at 40 pounds. Where I ride my road bikes are clearly not usable and the mtn bike is just more fun.
I know "a body in motion tends to stay in motion" and some postulate that a heavy bike is no more difficult to keep rolling than a lightweight, but then SUV's should get the same gas mileage as a runt car and manufacturers of vehicles would see no benefit to weight reduction year after year in vehicles :-)
I for one KNOW I work my butt off FAR more to keep 15 mph up on my Mtn bike than my road bikes.
So, bike weight / effort theology set aside for this discussion is there a way to take into account the (IMO) extra exertion it takes to use a heavier bike for distance?
Nice.
Pretty clearly (IMO) a svelte 18 pound road bike is going to take substantially less effort than my 40 pound fully fishing equipped mtn bike at 40 pounds. Where I ride my road bikes are clearly not usable and the mtn bike is just more fun.
I know "a body in motion tends to stay in motion" and some postulate that a heavy bike is no more difficult to keep rolling than a lightweight, but then SUV's should get the same gas mileage as a runt car and manufacturers of vehicles would see no benefit to weight reduction year after year in vehicles :-)
I for one KNOW I work my butt off FAR more to keep 15 mph up on my Mtn bike than my road bikes.
So, bike weight / effort theology set aside for this discussion is there a way to take into account the (IMO) extra exertion it takes to use a heavier bike for distance?
I think if you took your road bike up to a certain speed on a flat road and suddenly added several pounds to it you wouldn't notice much difference.
If you are mountain biking on rough terrain there's probably no way to quantify that. I know when I climb a rutted out hill with holes and rocks all over it drains me.
Last edited by big john; 07-15-19 at 08:46 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,286
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8279 Post(s)
Liked 9,033 Times
in
4,471 Posts
Pushing a heavier bike will increase your heart rate, which will register as more calories burned.
Many of the fitness wearables and bike computers use algorithms developed by Firstbeat to estimate calorie consumption, based on heart rate data.
Tests indicate that the Firsbeat algorithm is within 7% of laboratory measured calorie consumption.
This page lists devices that use Firstbeat algorithm
Here's an article on accuracy: Firstbeat Gets Calorie Counts Right
Many of the fitness wearables and bike computers use algorithms developed by Firstbeat to estimate calorie consumption, based on heart rate data.
Tests indicate that the Firsbeat algorithm is within 7% of laboratory measured calorie consumption.
This page lists devices that use Firstbeat algorithm
Here's an article on accuracy: Firstbeat Gets Calorie Counts Right
#15
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,563 Times
in
1,790 Posts
Hi Big John! It has been too many years. I'm just now getting on the bike again, after a 3-year dry spell (sold the bike touring/rental business and was burned out). Crawling slowly out of the fitness well.
Fitness permitting, I plan to do the three "king of the mountains" centuries in Southern California early next year. Will you be there?
Fitness permitting, I plan to do the three "king of the mountains" centuries in Southern California early next year. Will you be there?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,286
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8279 Post(s)
Liked 9,033 Times
in
4,471 Posts
Hi Big John! It has been too many years. I'm just now getting on the bike again, after a 3-year dry spell (sold the bike touring/rental business and was burned out). Crawling slowly out of the fitness well.
Fitness permitting, I plan to do the three "king of the mountains" centuries in Southern California early next year. Will you be there?
Fitness permitting, I plan to do the three "king of the mountains" centuries in Southern California early next year. Will you be there?
#17
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,563 Times
in
1,790 Posts
It's possible I may do one of them but I haven't done a century in a while. I'm trying to crawl out of that well myself. I retired in April and have been trying to do lots of climbing. We'll see how I progress, if at all. I always loved that Heartbreak Century route, did it solo when I lived up there.
Starting easy, I’m going to try Tour de Tahoe this September. 75 miles, mostly flat.
Likes For terrymorse:
#18
Calorie calculators are bogus as far as accurate calorie measurement for virtually everyone. Too many factors for a real number to materialize. They can help you understand relative adjustments. So yes, for ANY individual a heavier bike WILL burn more calories IF ALL OTHER factors remain consistent.
Plus after you'll need to record how many calories you're consuming. It ends up being a huge effort that's hard for most, to maintain.
If you're interested in calories to LOSE WEIGHT (or gain) the scale is what you want to look at. Measure daily but record weekly.
Plus after you'll need to record how many calories you're consuming. It ends up being a huge effort that's hard for most, to maintain.
If you're interested in calories to LOSE WEIGHT (or gain) the scale is what you want to look at. Measure daily but record weekly.
Likes For BigAura:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WonderMonkey
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
30
04-10-15 03:16 PM
Ranmaniac
Training & Nutrition
2
01-08-15 05:53 AM
umazuki
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
4
07-08-12 06:49 PM