Are GXP, Hollowtech II, and Mega Exo b brackets for 68mm English all interchangeable?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Are GXP, Hollowtech II, and Mega Exo b brackets for 68mm English all interchangeable?
That’s my basic question. Building a training bike. Going to use outboard bearings, 68mm English B.B. Right now I have an old Truvative Elita compact crank. Might replace it down the road, but might go with an FSA Gossamer, Shimano Tiagra, or whatever compact double is cheapest at the time. If I install a GXP bottom bracket now, am I correct that it should work fine with an FSA or Shimano two piece crank, assuming they are road cranks with 24mm spindles? Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 580
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 254 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 182 Times
in
141 Posts
Short answer is no. The GXP that is 24 on the drive side reduces to 22 on the non drive side whereas Hollowtech stays 24. Here’s a good chart:https://wheelsmfg.com/crankset-tech
Likes For AeroGut:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mountain Brook. AL
Posts: 4,002
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 136 Times
in
104 Posts
I believe that Shimano and Truvative have different splines on their spindles as well.
FWIW FSA Mega EXO is their 24mm spindle standard for which Shimano BB tools work fine.
FSA Mega EVO is their 30mm spindle standard for which a special BB tool is needed as the outer diameter
of the bearing holder is larger. Also note that IME EVO spindles are not a slide fit into the BB, but
putting the crank in the freezer for ~30 minutes before install will shrink the spindle diameter enough
to make it a slide in fit in the BB. Otherwise a hammer is needed, and will be needed to knock the crank
out of the BB.
FWIW FSA Mega EXO is their 24mm spindle standard for which Shimano BB tools work fine.
FSA Mega EVO is their 30mm spindle standard for which a special BB tool is needed as the outer diameter
of the bearing holder is larger. Also note that IME EVO spindles are not a slide fit into the BB, but
putting the crank in the freezer for ~30 minutes before install will shrink the spindle diameter enough
to make it a slide in fit in the BB. Otherwise a hammer is needed, and will be needed to knock the crank
out of the BB.
Last edited by sch; 08-09-19 at 11:00 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,537
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
329 Posts
Somewhat as an aside the FSA Mega Exo and Evo BBs are crap. They're super expensive for some reason but they get stiff and creaky after about 10 minutes.
It's been a minute since I messed with it but I'm thinking the Shimano Hollowtech BB was a straight swap? I ended up changing cranks so it became a non-issue.
It's been a minute since I messed with it but I'm thinking the Shimano Hollowtech BB was a straight swap? I ended up changing cranks so it became a non-issue.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Somewhat as an aside the FSA Mega Exo and Evo BBs are crap. They're super expensive for some reason but they get stiff and creaky after about 10 minutes.
It's been a minute since I messed with it but I'm thinking the Shimano Hollowtech BB was a straight swap? I ended up changing cranks so it became a non-issue.
It's been a minute since I messed with it but I'm thinking the Shimano Hollowtech BB was a straight swap? I ended up changing cranks so it became a non-issue.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
87 Posts
Have found them to be expensive vs Shimano HT2 on the aftermarket, but all mine where OEM spec on different bikes, and the FSA chainrings generally gave up before the BB's, so that made sense then to change totally to Shimano, mainly as their chainrings are more durable.
#8
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Part of the problem with standards is not understanding what they refer to.
GPX, Hollowtech II and Mega Exo describe cranksets.
68 mm English AKA BSA describes the bottom bracket shell which is part of the frame.
The fact that a bottom bracket works with any given crankset does not tell us what bottom bracket shell (frame) it fits. Conversely, the fact that a bottom bracket fits 68 mm English threaded bottom bracket shells does not tell us what cranks it might work with.
The bottom bracket must match both the bottom bracket shell (frame) and the crankset.
- 68 mm English (BSA) for GPX cranks
- 68 mm English (BSA) for Hollowtech II cranks
- 68 mm English (BSA) for Mega Exo cranks
- and so forth
It doesn't help that companies like FSA use the "Mega Exo" to describe bottom brackets which work with their Mega Exo cranks but fit many different bottom bracket shell standards. Shimano and SRAM are no different.
-Tim-
GPX, Hollowtech II and Mega Exo describe cranksets.
68 mm English AKA BSA describes the bottom bracket shell which is part of the frame.
The fact that a bottom bracket works with any given crankset does not tell us what bottom bracket shell (frame) it fits. Conversely, the fact that a bottom bracket fits 68 mm English threaded bottom bracket shells does not tell us what cranks it might work with.
The bottom bracket must match both the bottom bracket shell (frame) and the crankset.
- 68 mm English (BSA) for GPX cranks
- 68 mm English (BSA) for Hollowtech II cranks
- 68 mm English (BSA) for Mega Exo cranks
- and so forth
It doesn't help that companies like FSA use the "Mega Exo" to describe bottom brackets which work with their Mega Exo cranks but fit many different bottom bracket shell standards. Shimano and SRAM are no different.
-Tim-
Last edited by TimothyH; 08-07-19 at 12:40 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
87 Posts
Part of the problem with standards is not understanding what they refer to.
GPX, Hollowtech II and Mega Exo describe cranksets.
68 mm English AKA BSA describes the bottom bracket shell which is part of the frame.
The fact that a bottom bracket works with any given crankset does not tell us what bottom bracket shell (frame) it fits. Conversely, the fact that a bottom bracket fits 68 mm English threaded bottom bracket shells does not tell us what cranks it might work with.
The bottom bracket must match both the bottom bracket shell and the crankset.
- 68 mm English (BSA) for GPX cranks
- 68 mm English (BSA) for Hollowtech II cranks
- 68 mm English (BSA) for Mega Exo cranks
- and so forth
It doesn't help that companies like FSA use the "Mega Exo" to describe bottom brackets which work with their Mega Exo cranks but fit many different bottom bracket shell standards. Shimano and SRAM are no different.
-Tim-
GPX, Hollowtech II and Mega Exo describe cranksets.
68 mm English AKA BSA describes the bottom bracket shell which is part of the frame.
The fact that a bottom bracket works with any given crankset does not tell us what bottom bracket shell (frame) it fits. Conversely, the fact that a bottom bracket fits 68 mm English threaded bottom bracket shells does not tell us what cranks it might work with.
The bottom bracket must match both the bottom bracket shell and the crankset.
- 68 mm English (BSA) for GPX cranks
- 68 mm English (BSA) for Hollowtech II cranks
- 68 mm English (BSA) for Mega Exo cranks
- and so forth
It doesn't help that companies like FSA use the "Mega Exo" to describe bottom brackets which work with their Mega Exo cranks but fit many different bottom bracket shell standards. Shimano and SRAM are no different.
-Tim-
For the consumer, the BB is less relevant than the crank (and it's much harder to change a BB type of a bike than a crank), so having the name of the crank type being used to also describe the BB makes marketing sense, and makes it easier for the consumer to know what to ask for, as there is no industry compatibility between brands.
For FSA MegaExo this only fits threaded BB's, they have different names for other BB specs, and when you narrow it down to road BB's you only have the 2 options as I mention above, the same goes for Shimano, their road threaded BB's only come in 68mm English or 70mm Italian flavors. As in if you went to a LBS, and wanted a Shimano BB-R60, you could just ask for 'a Shimano HT2 BB for my Ultegra crank', and they should know which part to sell you, without seeing the bike.
For the OP, get the shell faced, and then get a Shimano HT2 crank/BB, don't mess with FSA (their chainrings don't last or shift as well as Shimano) and you will probably notice an increase in flex if you go to square taper.