Wheel build advice
#26
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,620
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3878 Post(s)
Liked 6,467 Times
in
3,199 Posts
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
#28
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
1,709 Posts
Bothell Ski & Bike (which is actually located in Kenmore these days). They have a couple older guys wrenching there that appreciate - and know how to look after - the old stuff.
DD
DD
Likes For Drillium Dude:
#29
Full Member
I've been watching a bunch of YouTube videos on wheel building. It's something I've always wanted to try. I end up with mismatched wheels buying bikes a lot and if I switch things around I can make a couple matching sets for zero dollars. I think it would be fun too.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,945
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 116 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1303 Post(s)
Liked 1,908 Times
in
1,139 Posts
DD, Too bad you are so far away from me or I would offer you a four hour course on wheel building that would have you proficient in the art. It is not that bad, but there are some basics involved. If wanted contact me by PM and I can talk you through the process by phone. Smiles, MH
Likes For Mad Honk:
#31
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
1,709 Posts
Here, I'll discourage you. Releasing two at a time to just cross one over the other is not onerous. Replacing two at a time is getting onerous as you have to deal with getting the old spokes out and the new'ens fed in. Remember that the spokes must flow out of the hub holes and across the hub. Then the new'ens fed back in. Not trivial. I had to do several spokes on my Fuji due to rust. Fussy job and I know what I'm doing, used to it, don'it plenty (at home and at LBS).
I vote replacing them all, one at a time, is not a good way to start. Too much frustration and you'll probably scratch the rims a couple times.
However if you want to try a few on a scrap wheel, that would learn ya something. Your LBS may have scrap wheels.
I vote replacing them all, one at a time, is not a good way to start. Too much frustration and you'll probably scratch the rims a couple times.
However if you want to try a few on a scrap wheel, that would learn ya something. Your LBS may have scrap wheels.
DD
#32
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
1,709 Posts
I goofed like this on a set before. It was fine on the front but on the rear when standing on a hill I got the occasional spoke rub on the derailleur. The front is still true after 2000+. FWIW I used straight gauge spokes on high flange hubs with Ambrosio Olympic tubular rims.
DD
#33
Senior Member
It's too bad that you feel you're too old to learn new tricks, but it is a useful skill, and isn't that complicated. I think a lot of bike boom bikes were thrown together an assembled rapidly. Your wheel may have been partially machine spoked and not inspected, but it definately would be stronger if the spokes were properly woven.
#34
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
232 Posts
DD, first an editorial comment. Wheelbuilding is relaxing but not hard! Worth a sipping beer. Or two.
A few technical observations. Jobst Brandt's book describes the spoke and rim behavior of a wheel in use. The spokes are under elongation from tension. At the bottom where the tire contacts the ground the rim flattens from the pressure. This momentarily shortens the spoke and reduces its tension. This reduction and subsequent restoration of tension causes repeated flexion of the elbow at the flange, eventually leading to fatigue failure. That's where most breaks occur, and usually on spokes at the bottom of rotation, not at the top or around the rest of the rim. So anything you can do to distribute the changes in tension, and therefore changes in displacement, away from the elbow is desired. Thinner multi-gauge spokes last longer because they stretch and shrink more along the length of the spoke rather than concentrating the displacement at the elbow.
When a spoke is laced around another it has some lateral displacement in the middle instead of being a straight line from rim to hub. So when the rim deforms upward the tension of other spoke will pull that portion of the spoke sideways and take up some of the displacement. Essentially it helps maintain a more constant tension in the spoke and reduces the flexion at the elbow. It makes the other spoke shorten a little but better to have two spokes flex a little than each flex more one at a time. So in principle it will make the spoke last longer before it breaks from fatigue.
Inotherwords, your wheel should last longer if it is strung right.
If it was mine I'd change them. I'd go around the rim reducing each spoke little by little until they are all pretty soft. Only then would I loosen each by very much at a time. That way it minimize deforming the rim either laterally or radially. Then I could go around the rim and restring each spoke. Re-tightening them is an exercise you'll need to do, so if you do this you might as well restring with better spokes. If that seems too much, then keep the wheel tensioned so you don't have to do the full re-tightening exercise.
A few technical observations. Jobst Brandt's book describes the spoke and rim behavior of a wheel in use. The spokes are under elongation from tension. At the bottom where the tire contacts the ground the rim flattens from the pressure. This momentarily shortens the spoke and reduces its tension. This reduction and subsequent restoration of tension causes repeated flexion of the elbow at the flange, eventually leading to fatigue failure. That's where most breaks occur, and usually on spokes at the bottom of rotation, not at the top or around the rest of the rim. So anything you can do to distribute the changes in tension, and therefore changes in displacement, away from the elbow is desired. Thinner multi-gauge spokes last longer because they stretch and shrink more along the length of the spoke rather than concentrating the displacement at the elbow.
When a spoke is laced around another it has some lateral displacement in the middle instead of being a straight line from rim to hub. So when the rim deforms upward the tension of other spoke will pull that portion of the spoke sideways and take up some of the displacement. Essentially it helps maintain a more constant tension in the spoke and reduces the flexion at the elbow. It makes the other spoke shorten a little but better to have two spokes flex a little than each flex more one at a time. So in principle it will make the spoke last longer before it breaks from fatigue.
Inotherwords, your wheel should last longer if it is strung right.
If it was mine I'd change them. I'd go around the rim reducing each spoke little by little until they are all pretty soft. Only then would I loosen each by very much at a time. That way it minimize deforming the rim either laterally or radially. Then I could go around the rim and restring each spoke. Re-tightening them is an exercise you'll need to do, so if you do this you might as well restring with better spokes. If that seems too much, then keep the wheel tensioned so you don't have to do the full re-tightening exercise.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Last edited by jimmuller; 01-05-20 at 08:12 AM.
Likes For jimmuller:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,701
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1946 Post(s)
Liked 2,008 Times
in
1,107 Posts
DD, it is about time you started tuning/rebuilding your wheels. The bikes that you post are testament to the top shelf handiwork you are capable of. With out the weave, that broken spoke will flop around. But you probably wont break one. I suggest that you put that wheelset on your Casati and use new rims, spokes and nipples on Record hubs to build wheels for your Bianchi. Then you can go back and play with that 4X wheelset.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Likes For Classtime:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
If I intend to save the rim and or spokes, 1/2 turn per spoke on ONE side at a time. Until loose, I make sure I segregate drive and non drive side spokes on the rear wheel, the drive side should be 1-2 mm shorter on a rear wheel.
FIRST- check the spoke engagement all around the wheel, note with a sharpie spokes that are long, on the spoke and at the rim.
Reason is to check for weird corrections and or non common length spokes.
I have found enough built in errors over the years, to make me wary. Unless I built the wheel.
I am not against reusing rims. Or spokes, not for "Show" bikes but for "training wheels"
I had one set of wheels built with used rim and spoke in front, used rim and cad spokes for the rear, and They would not die. Finally retired them after 40 years. (there was 10 years worth of total storage in that time frame)
Upon reflection, I should have built with stainless steel spokes in the rear wheel. It was corrosion of the spokes that called the end.
Using new nipples wherever possible. The front were Robergel... not a chance there.
Likes For repechage:
#37
Senior Member
It's a worthwhile exercise, in my opinion, but if you are replacing spokes (going 4x to 2x or replacing galvanized with ss) you will spend some change. Even if not replacing spokes, good rim strips and replacing nipples won't be free, though not very much with used spokes.
Likes For desconhecido:
#38
Senior Member
Lots of low-end Raleighs came with wheels built this way. I agree it was likely a labor/cost saving design. While the OP's wheel is probably just fine to ride, I was surprised that non-laced spokes would be used on what appears to be a fairly high-end wheel (Campagnolo Record skewer, sealed bearing hub).
#39
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
1,709 Posts
Lots of low-end Raleighs came with wheels built this way. I agree it was likely a labor/cost saving design. While the OP's wheel is probably just fine to ride, I was surprised that non-laced spokes would be used on what appears to be a fairly high-end wheel (Campagnolo Record skewer, sealed bearing hub).
I'm going to clean off the old glue myself and have my LBS re-tension both wheels. I took a good look at the wheel in the Casati's rear triangle today during unrelated preparatory maintenance and noticed the dish is out a bit, which makes sense: this wheelset came from the Bianchi which had been off a bit. I'll then tape up the tires and take it for a test ride as soon as I get a dry afternoon.
Kind of in a hurry to try out tubulars again, I guess! But the wheel-building stuff will have to wait just a little while longer, unless the test ride results tell me I need to make changes.
DD
#41
Hoards Thumbshifters
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 1,156
Bikes: '23 Black Mtn MC, '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times
in
192 Posts
I missed this post, but it answers a lot. One, it does suggest that the wheel is safe and reliable to ride as-is. Two, I was not wrong to be surprised at the lack of lacing; the wheel in question, btw, has early stainless steel barrel/alloy flange Phil Wood hubs and spokes with unmarked heads which are possibly chromed or galvanized - I can't tell what kind of patina it is. Rims are Ambrosio Synthesis Durex Super Professional tubulars. So yeah, the spokes are the only bit that appears somewhat cheap, but they are also hefty and may well have been the answer to the question why they weren't weaved: it was easier, and somewhat cheaper, to do it that way.
I'm going to clean off the old glue myself and have my LBS re-tension both wheels. I took a good look at the wheel in the Casati's rear triangle today during unrelated preparatory maintenance and noticed the dish is out a bit, which makes sense: this wheelset came from the Bianchi which had been off a bit. I'll then tape up the tires and take it for a test ride as soon as I get a dry afternoon.
Kind of in a hurry to try out tubulars again, I guess! But the wheel-building stuff will have to wait just a little while longer, unless the test ride results tell me I need to make changes.
DD
I'm going to clean off the old glue myself and have my LBS re-tension both wheels. I took a good look at the wheel in the Casati's rear triangle today during unrelated preparatory maintenance and noticed the dish is out a bit, which makes sense: this wheelset came from the Bianchi which had been off a bit. I'll then tape up the tires and take it for a test ride as soon as I get a dry afternoon.
Kind of in a hurry to try out tubulars again, I guess! But the wheel-building stuff will have to wait just a little while longer, unless the test ride results tell me I need to make changes.
DD
#42
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,746
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 285 Times
in
222 Posts
If I intend to save the rim and or spokes, 1/2 turn per spoke on ONE side at a time. Until loose, I make sure I segregate drive and non drive side spokes on the rear wheel, the drive side should be 1-2 mm shorter on a rear wheel.
FIRST- check the spoke engagement all around the wheel, note with a sharpie spokes that are long, on the spoke and at the rim.
Reason is to check for weird corrections and or non common length spokes.
I have found enough built in errors over the years, to make me wary. Unless I built the wheel.
I am not against reusing rims. Or spokes, not for "Show" bikes but for "training wheels"
I had one set of wheels built with used rim and spoke in front, used rim and cad spokes for the rear, and They would not die. Finally retired them after 40 years. (there was 10 years worth of total storage in that time frame)
Upon reflection, I should have built with stainless steel spokes in the rear wheel. It was corrosion of the spokes that called the end.
Using new nipples wherever possible. The front were Robergel... not a chance there.
FIRST- check the spoke engagement all around the wheel, note with a sharpie spokes that are long, on the spoke and at the rim.
Reason is to check for weird corrections and or non common length spokes.
I have found enough built in errors over the years, to make me wary. Unless I built the wheel.
I am not against reusing rims. Or spokes, not for "Show" bikes but for "training wheels"
I had one set of wheels built with used rim and spoke in front, used rim and cad spokes for the rear, and They would not die. Finally retired them after 40 years. (there was 10 years worth of total storage in that time frame)
Upon reflection, I should have built with stainless steel spokes in the rear wheel. It was corrosion of the spokes that called the end.
Using new nipples wherever possible. The front were Robergel... not a chance there.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
64 Posts
Only kind of. While 304 or 18/8 usually used in stainless spokes is non-magnetic when annealed, when cold worked it is somewhat magnetic, although not as magnetic as a chrome or galvanized spoke.
#44
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
DD, first an editorial comment. Wheelbuilding is relaxing but not hard! Worth a sipping beer. Or two.
A few technical observations. Jobst Brandt's book describes the spoke and rim behavior of a wheel in use. The spokes are under elongation from tension. At the bottom where the tire contacts the ground the rim flattens from the pressure. This momentarily shortens the spoke and reduces its tension. This reduction and subsequent restoration of tension causes repeated flexion of the elbow at the flange, eventually leading to fatigue failure. That's where most breaks occur, and usually on spokes at the bottom of rotation, not at the top or around the rest of the rim. So anything you can do to distribute the changes in tension, and therefore changes in displacement, away from the elbow is desired. Thinner multi-gauge spokes last longer because they stretch and shrink more along the length of the spoke rather than concentrating the displacement at the elbow.
When a spoke is laced around another it has some lateral displacement in the middle instead of being a straight line from rim to hub. So when the rim deforms upward the tension of other spoke will pull that portion of the spoke sideways and take up some of the displacement. Essentially it helps maintain a more constant tension in the spoke and reduces the flexion at the elbow. It makes the other spoke shorten a little but better to have two spokes flex a little than each flex more one at a time. So in principle it will make the spoke last longer before it breaks from fatigue.
Inotherwords, your wheel should last longer if it is strung right.
If it was mine I'd change them. I'd go around the rim reducing each spoke little by little until they are all pretty soft. Only then would I loosen each by very much at a time. That way it minimize deforming the rim either laterally or radially. Then I could go around the rim and restring each spoke. Re-tightening them is an exercise you'll need to do, so if you do this you might as well restring with better spokes. If that seems too much, then keep the wheel tensioned so you don't have to do the full re-tightening exercise.
A few technical observations. Jobst Brandt's book describes the spoke and rim behavior of a wheel in use. The spokes are under elongation from tension. At the bottom where the tire contacts the ground the rim flattens from the pressure. This momentarily shortens the spoke and reduces its tension. This reduction and subsequent restoration of tension causes repeated flexion of the elbow at the flange, eventually leading to fatigue failure. That's where most breaks occur, and usually on spokes at the bottom of rotation, not at the top or around the rest of the rim. So anything you can do to distribute the changes in tension, and therefore changes in displacement, away from the elbow is desired. Thinner multi-gauge spokes last longer because they stretch and shrink more along the length of the spoke rather than concentrating the displacement at the elbow.
When a spoke is laced around another it has some lateral displacement in the middle instead of being a straight line from rim to hub. So when the rim deforms upward the tension of other spoke will pull that portion of the spoke sideways and take up some of the displacement. Essentially it helps maintain a more constant tension in the spoke and reduces the flexion at the elbow. It makes the other spoke shorten a little but better to have two spokes flex a little than each flex more one at a time. So in principle it will make the spoke last longer before it breaks from fatigue.
Inotherwords, your wheel should last longer if it is strung right.
If it was mine I'd change them. I'd go around the rim reducing each spoke little by little until they are all pretty soft. Only then would I loosen each by very much at a time. That way it minimize deforming the rim either laterally or radially. Then I could go around the rim and restring each spoke. Re-tightening them is an exercise you'll need to do, so if you do this you might as well restring with better spokes. If that seems too much, then keep the wheel tensioned so you don't have to do the full re-tightening exercise.
Thanks for the very informative explanation of the dynamics. The only thing I see a problematic is the reference to new spokes. I have built enough wheels to know the horrors of trying to lace spokes with their heads on the outside of the hub while the spokes that have their heads on the inside are present. This can quickly lead to scratched rims, frustration, swearing and drinking while trying to make this take place.
If going the route of relacing the wheel with new spokes, I advise reducing the tension to just about zero, removing all the spokes with their heads on the inside of the hub, and then set about to replacing them one at a time.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#45
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
My English 3-speed didn't have interlaced spokes, and that's a bike that's been ridden since the Beatles appeared on Ed Sullivan. Lots of bikes throughout history were made that way, and I think the merits of interlaced spokes may be overstated by those of us who obsess about best practices.
Helping the rear derailleur cage clear the spokes is one solid argument for doing it on rear wheels. But arguments for wheel strength involve the boundary condition where spokes are momentarily losing ALL their tension. That just shouldn't happen (well, hardly ever) on a wheel with proper tension.
If you do decide to interlace the spokes, I will contradict most of the advice here. I would NOT completely loosen the wheels first. Just do it one spoke at a time -- loosen the crossing spoke completely, lace it through, pull it back up to tension. You'll know it's right when that spot come back into true with the rest of the wheel.
Helping the rear derailleur cage clear the spokes is one solid argument for doing it on rear wheels. But arguments for wheel strength involve the boundary condition where spokes are momentarily losing ALL their tension. That just shouldn't happen (well, hardly ever) on a wheel with proper tension.
If you do decide to interlace the spokes, I will contradict most of the advice here. I would NOT completely loosen the wheels first. Just do it one spoke at a time -- loosen the crossing spoke completely, lace it through, pull it back up to tension. You'll know it's right when that spot come back into true with the rest of the wheel.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
64 Posts
3 speeds have the advantage of not having dish. Derailer equipped bicycles, especially later ones that are less C&V have the unfortunate problem of not having proper tension on the rear NDS except when there's some asymmetry like 2:1 lacing or offset rims to compensate.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,902
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4802 Post(s)
Liked 3,922 Times
in
2,551 Posts
I'd de-tension the rim and cross the spokes. De-tensioned enough, the order you do the crosses in won't matter. But ... this is a full wheel build except for the seating of the spokes and thist is a nice wheel. I'd do my learning elsewhere.
Wheel building is a great skill. I"m surprised you haven't mastered it yet. Grab a hub and rim, go to a calculator or trusted bike shop, get the right length spokes and build your first. Do another. (It gets more fun every wheel.) Then take this one on. And you'll find this is much easier than new spokes you have to bend and seat.
Now, you could buy new, lighter, double butted spokes. That wold be a full build. But, you have the lengths you need already done for you, Hub flange holes are seated. Spoke directions are defined. End result would be a really sweet wheel.
Too old to learn - naw! Just do it!
Ben
Wheel building is a great skill. I"m surprised you haven't mastered it yet. Grab a hub and rim, go to a calculator or trusted bike shop, get the right length spokes and build your first. Do another. (It gets more fun every wheel.) Then take this one on. And you'll find this is much easier than new spokes you have to bend and seat.
Now, you could buy new, lighter, double butted spokes. That wold be a full build. But, you have the lengths you need already done for you, Hub flange holes are seated. Spoke directions are defined. End result would be a really sweet wheel.
Too old to learn - naw! Just do it!
Ben
#48
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
1,709 Posts
It's a worthwhile exercise, in my opinion, but if you are replacing spokes (going 4x to 2x or replacing galvanized with ss) you will spend some change. Even if not replacing spokes, good rim strips and replacing nipples won't be free, though not very much with used spokes.
It sure is funny the way threads seem to go way out into left field in the winter months! All I wanted to know at the outset of this thread was whether or not the wheels were safe to ride without the weave
DD
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,945
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Basso
Mentioned: 116 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1303 Post(s)
Liked 1,908 Times
in
1,139 Posts
Drillium Dude,
Why mess with something that is working? Lacing on wheels is kind of over-rated, just like is it three or four cross? The lacing thing does very little in the bigger picture of tensions to hub and rim. I build my wheels differently than Jobst-Brant, but they have withstood Race Across America just fine. JMHO, MH
Why mess with something that is working? Lacing on wheels is kind of over-rated, just like is it three or four cross? The lacing thing does very little in the bigger picture of tensions to hub and rim. I build my wheels differently than Jobst-Brant, but they have withstood Race Across America just fine. JMHO, MH