Triple triangle frame
08-17-20, 04:18 AM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Triple triangle frame
Anyone can tell performance of a triple triangle frame. Is it meant for something just aesthetics. Im planning to have one customized since its the only frame that i dont have. Just curious what the geometry is for.
Thanks for any insights.
Thanks for any insights.
08-17-20, 05:59 AM
#2
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
What do you mean “have one customized?
And what do you even mean by “triple triangle”? Are you talking about GT frames? If so, it has nothing to do with the geometry of the frame.
08-17-20, 06:29 AM
#3
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
"Triple triangle," aka "Hellenic" frames are an aesthetic flourish, not a performance or structural improvement.
Likes For JohnDThompson:
08-17-20, 06:59 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
They look nice IMO; I have one and the only thing I don't like is that my legs rub the seat stays occasionally. It happens more later into long rides as I get sloppier but its there. This must be a YMMV thing due to frame size, angles, fit, and body proportions. I asked a friend if that happens to him on his GT and he looked at me like I was crazy. I am way skinnier than he.
08-17-20, 07:29 AM
#5
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,588
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1086 Post(s)
Liked 859 Times
in
488 Posts
I think the op reversed his words and forgot to use a question mark. Can anyone tell the ....?
For most GTs, especially 90s metal ones, it is just a way to identify the brand. It's practically their logo.
The relatively recent GT Grade gravel bikes in carbon might actually be different. The seatstays are not bonded to the seat tube, just the top tube connection point. They claim this allows float and acts like a passive suspension. Not much but enough to give a comfy ride. I don't know if their claims are true or if the engineered flex is greater with their design.
For most GTs, especially 90s metal ones, it is just a way to identify the brand. It's practically their logo.
The relatively recent GT Grade gravel bikes in carbon might actually be different. The seatstays are not bonded to the seat tube, just the top tube connection point. They claim this allows float and acts like a passive suspension. Not much but enough to give a comfy ride. I don't know if their claims are true or if the engineered flex is greater with their design.
Likes For rosefarts:
08-17-20, 04:59 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,392
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1561 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times
in
974 Posts
GT was well known but they were certainly not the only manufacturer making triple triangle frames.
Shogun Kaze lopro bike.
My '87 Nishiki Linear
Shogun Kaze lopro bike.
My '87 Nishiki Linear
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
08-17-20, 05:28 PM
#7
Senior Member
Not sure if it's more time period or frame size, but the ones that appeal to me the most are when the seat stays are parallel to the downtube.
08-17-20, 06:53 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
Likes For DorkDisk:
08-18-20, 04:24 PM
#10
Junior Member
They seem to be designed primarily for banging your kneecaps against.
08-21-20, 06:53 PM
#11
Member
Thread Starter
What is the question? You state in your first sentence there is a performance difference and then ask if is just aesthetics.
What do you mean “have one customized?
And what do you even mean by “triple triangle”? Are you talking about GT frames? If so, it has nothing to do with the geometry of the frame.
What do you mean “have one customized?
And what do you even mean by “triple triangle”? Are you talking about GT frames? If so, it has nothing to do with the geometry of the frame.
08-21-20, 06:55 PM
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Thank you all for the infos it helped a lot knowing some background info on a bike. Thank you so much!
08-21-20, 07:45 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 832
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times
in
286 Posts
It was supposed to make the rear triangle stiffer, because frame flex was thought to absorb pedaling energy. If memory serves, back when Bicycling used to include measured frame deflection in their bike reviews, such frames often measured stiffer than normal ones with the same tubing. This does make geometric sense. But, since frame flex does not in fact absorb pedaling energy, this is irrelevant for any reason other than subjective preference.
If you like the look, and you like the feel of a stiff, short rear triangle, and if they don't hit your legs, go for it.
The only reason they were made, and the only reason they stopped being made, was fashion. I'd bet that the crapification of GT bicycles in the late 90s and early 2000s is the biggest reason that nobody makes them that way anymore... it was GT's signature thing, so when GT bikes became garbage, the "triple triangle" died along with GTs reputation.
(I always thought it looked coolest on "funny bike" designs. Those Shoguns were the cat's ass when I was a junior racer in the late 80s. Cheapest way to get a cool TT bike. Having a cool TT bike was important back then.)
--Shannon
If you like the look, and you like the feel of a stiff, short rear triangle, and if they don't hit your legs, go for it.
The only reason they were made, and the only reason they stopped being made, was fashion. I'd bet that the crapification of GT bicycles in the late 90s and early 2000s is the biggest reason that nobody makes them that way anymore... it was GT's signature thing, so when GT bikes became garbage, the "triple triangle" died along with GTs reputation.
(I always thought it looked coolest on "funny bike" designs. Those Shoguns were the cat's ass when I was a junior racer in the late 80s. Cheapest way to get a cool TT bike. Having a cool TT bike was important back then.)
--Shannon
Likes For ShannonM:
08-22-20, 09:08 PM
#14
Member
Thread Starter
It was supposed to make the rear triangle stiffer, because frame flex was thought to absorb pedaling energy. If memory serves, back when Bicycling used to include measured frame deflection in their bike reviews, such frames often measured stiffer than normal ones with the same tubing. This does make geometric sense. But, since frame flex does not in fact absorb pedaling energy, this is irrelevant for any reason other than subjective preference.
If you like the look, and you like the feel of a stiff, short rear triangle, and if they don't hit your legs, go for it.
The only reason they were made, and the only reason they stopped being made, was fashion. I'd bet that the crapification of GT bicycles in the late 90s and early 2000s is the biggest reason that nobody makes them that way anymore... it was GT's signature thing, so when GT bikes became garbage, the "triple triangle" died along with GTs reputation.
(I always thought it looked coolest on "funny bike" designs. Those Shoguns were the cat's ass when I was a junior racer in the late 80s. Cheapest way to get a cool TT bike. Having a cool TT bike was important back then.)
--Shannon
If you like the look, and you like the feel of a stiff, short rear triangle, and if they don't hit your legs, go for it.
The only reason they were made, and the only reason they stopped being made, was fashion. I'd bet that the crapification of GT bicycles in the late 90s and early 2000s is the biggest reason that nobody makes them that way anymore... it was GT's signature thing, so when GT bikes became garbage, the "triple triangle" died along with GTs reputation.
(I always thought it looked coolest on "funny bike" designs. Those Shoguns were the cat's ass when I was a junior racer in the late 80s. Cheapest way to get a cool TT bike. Having a cool TT bike was important back then.)
--Shannon
