Well, it finally happened...
#26
No one cares
haven't read thread but fork seems bent?
__________________
I prefer emails to private messages - holiday76@gmail.com
Jack Taylor Super Tourer Tandem (FOR SALE), Jack Taylor Tour of Britain, Px-10, Carlton Flyer, Fuji The Finest, Salsa Fargo, Santa Cruz Tallboy, Carver All-Road .
I prefer emails to private messages - holiday76@gmail.com
Jack Taylor Super Tourer Tandem (FOR SALE), Jack Taylor Tour of Britain, Px-10, Carlton Flyer, Fuji The Finest, Salsa Fargo, Santa Cruz Tallboy, Carver All-Road .
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,154
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2363 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
1,191 Posts
The provenance of the bike notwithstanding, it's all speculation, in both camps, without removing the fork and inspecting it. It would be best to have a good frame shop measure it, OFF the bike.
#28
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
If the frame shop doesn't have the factory dimensions for the fork (assuming that visual inspection is irrelevant), any judgement call on the fork would be as much of a guess as any other guess in this thread.
-Kurt
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,154
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2363 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
1,191 Posts
If the shop doesn't have dimension info on something as common (historically) as a '90s Giant Iguana, then they're not a "good frame shop".
#30
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
-Kurt
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,154
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2363 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
1,191 Posts
A shop that's been around long enough would have the info from when the bikes were on the market. You know, back when service enterprises actually bought and shelved and read paper manuals. Not everything that's ever been printed is online.
In, say, 1992, would you have trusted your car to a body shop that didn't have the specs for the unibody alignment? Would you have trusted your bike to a shop that didn't have the equivalent? There were obviously shops that did, and they didn't all get pushed out by palaces of black carbon and GU. The OP needs to find such a shop.
This isn't some obscure rarity. It's a Giant Iguana. The Ford Taurus of the MTB world in its day.
In, say, 1992, would you have trusted your car to a body shop that didn't have the specs for the unibody alignment? Would you have trusted your bike to a shop that didn't have the equivalent? There were obviously shops that did, and they didn't all get pushed out by palaces of black carbon and GU. The OP needs to find such a shop.
This isn't some obscure rarity. It's a Giant Iguana. The Ford Taurus of the MTB world in its day.
#32
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
A shop that's been around long enough would have the info from when the bikes were on the market. You know, back when service enterprises actually bought and shelved and read paper manuals. Not everything that's ever been printed is online.
In, say, 1992, would you have trusted your car to a body shop that didn't have the specs for the unibody alignment? Would you have trusted your bike to a shop that didn't have the equivalent? There were obviously shops that did, and they didn't all get pushed out by palaces of black carbon and GU. The OP needs to find such a shop.
This isn't some obscure rarity. It's a Giant Iguana. The Ford Taurus of the MTB world in its day.
In, say, 1992, would you have trusted your car to a body shop that didn't have the specs for the unibody alignment? Would you have trusted your bike to a shop that didn't have the equivalent? There were obviously shops that did, and they didn't all get pushed out by palaces of black carbon and GU. The OP needs to find such a shop.
This isn't some obscure rarity. It's a Giant Iguana. The Ford Taurus of the MTB world in its day.
The possibility of all this lining up is so slim that I really don't think it's a feasible option. But since this is nothing more than a guess, I'm going to try something - I'm going to reach out to both local Giant dealers (Cycle World and Mack Cycle) to see what their replies are. I know the staff at both pretty well, so I know they'll make the effort rather than feed me a canned salesman's reply.
TBH, I've never seen or heard of the Giant Iguana until now. In my region, Trek MultiTracks and the Jamis Boss Cruiser reign supreme for anyone considering a bike similar to the Iguana. Bought by recreational bicycle riders who'd buy another if they smashed up the first, mostly because that's what LBSs tend to do - mock your crashed bicycle and point out how much better the new one is on the floor.
-Kurt
Last edited by cudak888; 06-21-19 at 05:55 AM.
#34
Senior Member
Frame shop does not need dimensions. OP is claiming one inch of rake. No similar bike of era would have had one inch of rake.
Bent at steerer/crown. Those don't get repaired or re-raked. Plain dangerous. That fork gets replaced. Before or after failure.
Bent at steerer/crown. Those don't get repaired or re-raked. Plain dangerous. That fork gets replaced. Before or after failure.
#35
Senior Member
It sure would be easier to take a proper photo and post it up, than look for manuals and go to bike shops. Just saying.
Likes For Steve Whitlatch:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,154
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2363 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
1,191 Posts
Likes For madpogue:
#38
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
They do not keep documentation on any model after 4 to 5 years, with exception to some of the road bikes. And if the Iguana did not spec the geometry in the consumer catalog, then they didn't have any documentation in the first place.
Mind, these things are not like a car which have a chassis/unibody manual with all the frame points measured out. Closest thing you'll find are high-end road frames that spec geometry, including trail and rake. Sure, there are a few odd exceptions, but that's when you have a Grant Peterson type heading your marketing department.
-Kurt
#39
Full Member
Thread Starter
I couldn't find the other fork, so I ordered a generic cro/mo mtb fork in the right size. I'm assuming Giant used generic parts, for the most part, in 1987. Worst case is I'll have a spare fork.
Likes For Needles:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 315
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times
in
23 Posts
That’s the high trail version of that model, made to rectify the wheel flop issues during low speed maneuvering. It just LOOKS like the fork is bent, but it’s all in the design. Note the lack of brake ons for low riders, since loading this would negatively affect the handling.
#41
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
This example is extreme.
-Kurt
Likes For cudak888:
#42
Junior Member
The lab was OK but my light steel criterium fork was not. The onset of the high speed shimmy was so fast I could not regain control, and took a bad high speed tumble. OK handling at low speed does not necessarily extrapolate to high speed stability. Am now accepting Darwin Award nominations for a) riding with a bent fork and b) bad refreshment timing.
Likes For movelo:
#43
Full Member
Thread Starter
Well, the final (I hope) iteration is shown here. I took the OEM fork to the local Giant place, and they couldn't tell me anything. They did find an NOS fork they said was an alternative "upgrade" from around 1990. It was straight as an arrow through the crown with larger diameter tubing. The only rake and trail was accomplished by the drops being mounted on triangular metal pieces at the bottom. The wheel was only about an inch or so ahead of center on the NOS fork. In fact, they put it into a frame to act as a jig and did some measurements, and the offset (for rake and trail) were within 2mm of identical for both forks. Even THEIR mechanic said that usually there would be stress cracks or bulges in the paint at the crown if it was bent, and there are none. As to instability, I have ridden it down some long (paved) downhills in New Mexico, where I have exceeded 40 mph, and it never shimmied, or even weaved. However, I did leave the generic fork on the bike. I had to pay the shop to seat the crown race with a slide hammer thing. Most all of my riding these days is on pavement, so, maybe the additional rake and trail will be more comfortable. If it gives me any problems, the original goes back on. I also ended up just servicing the cantilever brakes and putting them back on. The inventor of the V brake should be castrated with a plastic fork.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,658
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,590 Times
in
1,224 Posts
Ahhhhhh, looks better!, but you missed your chance...
#45
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,653
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,525 Times
in
1,055 Posts
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 700 Ft. above sea level.
Posts: 3,249
Bikes: More than there were awhile ago.
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 637 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
609 Posts
Why? V-brakes are a breeze to set up. When I get a bike with good cantis I keep them but replace the shoes with V-brake style as they're easier to adjust. If they're cheap crappy cantis or need replaced I go V-brake if it's something I'm building for myself.
__________________
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
Likes For Murray Missile:
#47
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
865 Posts
I didn't know that the Giant Iguana featured a "funny bike" frame, nor would I have expected.
Looks like the frame is suspension-corrected for a 5" travel fork(?).
Looks like the frame is suspension-corrected for a 5" travel fork(?).
Likes For dddd:
#48
Full Member
Thread Starter
I don't think there were any suspension forks in 1987. The long seat tube is due to my 34" inseam. Lowered top tubes were still in the future, too. This one is now a hybrid/city/whatever. I couldn't make the v brakes work. They either rubbed or I had no brakes. Occasionally, I'd get them just right, then the heat/humidity/karma/witchcraft would affect them the next day and then they'd either rub or I'd have no brakes. After a month I said to hell with 'em. The original cantilevers (Deore XCM) work fine.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 700 Ft. above sea level.
Posts: 3,249
Bikes: More than there were awhile ago.
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 637 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
609 Posts
I don't think there were any suspension forks in 1987. The long seat tube is due to my 34" inseam. Lowered top tubes were still in the future, too. This one is now a hybrid/city/whatever. I couldn't make the v brakes work. They either rubbed or I had no brakes. Occasionally, I'd get them just right, then the heat/humidity/karma/witchcraft would affect them the next day and then they'd either rub or I'd have no brakes. After a month I said to hell with 'em. The original cantilevers (Deore XCM) work fine.
__________________
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
#50
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
865 Posts
Those look like the thickest seatstays I've seen on a steel bike.
How did you make the seat tube longer? (I didn't know that sloping toptubes were "a thing" on 1980's mtbs!)
Yeah, V-Brakes definitely require V-Brake levers to get sufficient clearance at the rim, since the cable needs to move about 50% further..
How did you make the seat tube longer? (I didn't know that sloping toptubes were "a thing" on 1980's mtbs!)
Yeah, V-Brakes definitely require V-Brake levers to get sufficient clearance at the rim, since the cable needs to move about 50% further..
Last edited by dddd; 07-05-19 at 10:21 AM.