Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Tire width

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-19, 10:50 AM
  #1  
dieterpi
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Tire width

I've been sporadically restoring a vintage peugeot bike and I'm nearly done. Now I'd like to put fatter tires on the bike, to use it on gravel roads.
Any advice on how wide can I go here?

Now I'm running 28 mm width tires on the bike. Could I run 33 or even 35 mm?



The front fork has a rubber seal, I guess I could trim the bolt to gain some height.



The tightest spot is the tire cutout in the rear. Distance cutout to cutout is about 40 mm. Putting a 35 mm tire would probably not give enough clearance I guess?
dieterpi is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 12:31 PM
  #2  
due ruote 
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Ideally it’s good to have enough margin so that if a spoke breaks and your wheel goes slightly out of true, you can still ride home.
due ruote is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 01:53 PM
  #3  
delbiker1 
Mother Nature's Son
 
delbiker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,118

Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 853 Post(s)
Liked 1,436 Times in 818 Posts
Kind of hard to tell from the picture angles, but I do not see how 32 or wider are going to fit. You might have enough height on the rear brake bridge but I think not between the stays. The front tire already looks like it is about max for clearing the forks. In the end, you just have to try to see if they will fit. There is no standard on the actual size of tires, despite what the manufacturer claims the width to be.
delbiker1 is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 02:01 PM
  #4  
downtube42
Senior Member
 
downtube42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,843

Bikes: Trek Domane SL6 Gen 3, Soma Fog Cutter, Focus Mares AL, Detroit Bikes Sparrow FG, Volae Team, Nimbus MUni

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 896 Post(s)
Liked 2,063 Times in 1,081 Posts
650b conversion? Now that 650b is marketed as 27.5, and rumours swirling that 27.5 is dead, you might find someone wanting to unload 650b/27.5 hoops.
downtube42 is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 02:06 PM
  #5  
dieterpi
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by delbiker1
Kind of hard to tell from the picture angles, but I do not see how 32 or wider are going to fit...
I would think 32/33 mm would fit, since fitting a 32 would imply a 2 mm increase on each side. Or am I looking at it the wrong way?

Here's a better picture of the stays clearance: (don't mind the missing pedals and front derailleur )
dieterpi is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 03:43 PM
  #6  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by downtube42
650b conversion? Now that 650b is marketed as 27.5, and rumours swirling that 27.5 is dead, you might find someone wanting to unload 650b/27.5 hoops.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 05:06 PM
  #7  
ryansu
Senior Member
 
ryansu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841

Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times in 367 Posts
I would give 32s a shot knowing that most 32s don't actually measure that wide when you put the calipers on them.Maybe some nice Panracer pasela's with the tan sidewalls for your vintage ride.
ryansu is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 05:07 PM
  #8  
delbiker1 
Mother Nature's Son
 
delbiker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,118

Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 853 Post(s)
Liked 1,436 Times in 818 Posts
Originally Posted by dieterpi
I would think 32/33 mm would fit, since fitting a 32 would imply a 2 mm increase on each side. Or am I looking at it the wrong way?

Here's a better picture of the stays clearance: (don't mind the missing pedals and front derailleur )
Really only one way to find out. Unless you know what tires you want to use and the either the manufacturer or the seller can quote you the real measurements, not what they state them to be. Maybe a LBS can help you out with that.
delbiker1 is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 05:13 PM
  #9  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,157
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,692 Times in 2,611 Posts
Are the tires on there now a true 28mm (i.e., have you measured)? There’s often a lot of variation between what tires are labeled and what they end up measuring, whether due to rim width, psi, or manufacturer’s variation.
nlerner is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 05:34 PM
  #10  
Kuromori
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times in 64 Posts
Rule of thumb(finger) can you stick your finger in between the tire and frame comfortably? Then you have room to size up. It does look like the chainstays are going to be the tightest spot.
Kuromori is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 05:36 PM
  #11  
ryansu
Senior Member
 
ryansu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841

Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times in 367 Posts
Originally Posted by dieterpi
I would think 32/33 mm would fit, since fitting a 32 would imply a 2 mm increase on each side. Or am I looking at it the wrong way?

Here's a better picture of the stays clearance: (don't mind the missing pedals and front derailleur )
You might want to replace that FD those plastic ones from the 70s are prone to cracking and it appears yours has already started on the drive side. You might need a shim for a Suntour FD but that is a popular replacement for the simplex plastic one. YMMV
ryansu is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 06:00 PM
  #12  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,704

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1949 Post(s)
Liked 2,010 Times in 1,109 Posts
32s are a go if you think you need that much tire for your gravel roads. 28s are pretty big already. That rubber seal thingy could be removed. It likely was there to attach the front fender.
Classtime is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 06:25 PM
  #13  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
As others have pointed out, there is no way to be certain without trying it out and it does look like the chain stays will be the limiting factor.

Which model Peugeot is this? It's hi tensile steel right (or carbolite or 103 or something like that)? The reason I'm asking is that some people dimple the stays to get a bit more clearance.
bikemig is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 07:04 PM
  #14  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
You have room for at least one size bigger. Don't forget that you'd only have half of the difference on each side.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 09-08-19, 11:00 PM
  #15  
Lascauxcaveman 
Senior Member
 
Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922

Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.

Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times in 356 Posts
Geez, you guys. 32mm easy! 35mm, maybe (probably?)

But yeah, you never know until you try. And the tighter you get in those chain stays, the more important it is to have a completely straight rear wheel.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●

Lascauxcaveman is offline  
Old 09-09-19, 10:54 AM
  #16  
dieterpi
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks for all the replies!

Originally Posted by nlerner
Are the tires on there now a true 28mm (i.e., have you measured)? There’s often a lot of variation between what tires are labeled and what they end up measuring, whether due to rim width, psi, or manufacturer’s variation.
Now it's running specialized espoir tires. The measure exactly 28mm (I have measured ).

Originally Posted by ryansu
I would give 32s a shot knowing that most 32s don't actually measure that wide when you put the calipers on them.Maybe some nice Panracer pasela's with the tan sidewalls for your vintage ride.
Panracer makes some nice looking tires. I decided on Panracer Gravelkings instead, I like the tire profile more.

Originally Posted by bikemig
As others have pointed out, there is no way to be certain without trying it out and it does look like the chain stays will be the limiting factor.
Which model Peugeot is this? It's hi tensile steel right (or carbolite or 103 or something like that)? The reason I'm asking is that some people dimple the stays to get a bit more clearance.
It's an UO-8 type, using Carbolite 103 tubing.

Originally Posted by Lascauxcaveman
Geez, you guys. 32mm easy! 35mm, maybe (probably?)
But yeah, you never know until you try. And the tighter you get in those chain stays, the more important it is to have a completely straight rear wheel.
Using the comments I decided on the 32 mm tires. If I would fit 35, then this would only leave me with 2.5mm clearance on each side, which would probably be to tight..

Originally Posted by Classtime
That rubber seal thingy could be removed. It likely was there to attach the front fender.
Do you mean the rubber underneath the kickstand clamp? That's just to *protect* the frame a bit.
dieterpi is offline  
Old 09-09-19, 11:03 AM
  #17  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
Originally Posted by dieterpi
Thanks for all the replies!


Now it's running specialized espoir tires. The measure exactly 28mm (I have measured ).



Panracer makes some nice looking tires. I decided on Panracer Gravelkings instead, I like the tire profile more.


It's an UO-8 type, using Carbolite 103 tubing.


Using the comments I decided on the 32 mm tires. If I would fit 35, then this would only leave me with 2.5mm clearance on each side, which would probably be to tight..

Do you mean the rubber underneath the kickstand clamp? That's just to *protect* the frame a bit.

That's why I asked about the model. You can run fairly massive tires on a UO 8. They came stock with 27 inch and it's no problem running 27 x 1 and 1/4 on fenders. My UE8 came stock like that.

If running 700c, you can run even wider tires, a 32c will be no problem and I'd be surprised if you can't run a 35c and quite possibly a 38c as well.
bikemig is offline  
Old 09-09-19, 12:39 PM
  #18  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by dieterpi
Do you mean the rubber underneath the kickstand clamp? That's just to *protect* the frame a bit.
@Classtime is referring to this doober:

__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 09-09-19, 12:53 PM
  #19  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,264
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1974 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by Classtime
32s are a go if you think you need that much tire for your gravel roads. 28s are pretty big already.
Depends on the gravel. Well-groomed hardpack, sure. But the sky is the limit for roughness. For many the forest double-track riding out here, I'd call 28s extremely narrow; none of my friends are running anything skinnier than 35s on their allroad machines, and they're mostly going forty or bigger if clearance is adequate.
HTupolev is online now  
Old 09-09-19, 01:40 PM
  #20  
due ruote 
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
@Classtime is referring to this doober:

That’s a daruma bolt for mounting a fender.
due ruote is offline  
Old 09-09-19, 01:42 PM
  #21  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
That’s for mounting a fender.
That is what he said, yes.

Originally Posted by Classtime
That rubber seal thingy could be removed. It likely was there to attach the front fender.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 09-09-19, 05:24 PM
  #22  
old's'cool
curmudgineer
 
old's'cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,417

Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times in 70 Posts
My experience is the sticking point on some frames with conventional (i.e. forward facing) rear dropouts, is the radial clearance between the rear tire and the chainstay bridge, when installing or removing the rear wheel. In a pinch you can gain a size or two if you are willing to partially or fully deflate the tire for R&R purposes.
old's'cool is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
manuelgabriel
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
4
09-18-18 09:36 AM
Soundtallica
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
5
02-11-17 11:16 PM
Bad Lag
Classic & Vintage
17
11-20-16 12:12 PM
Charles Wahl
Classic & Vintage
16
06-02-15 08:11 PM
1987
Classic & Vintage
20
05-22-13 11:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.