Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Daytime Lights: Best Thing I Ever Did

Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Daytime Lights: Best Thing I Ever Did

Old 09-27-19, 08:00 AM
  #26  
Papa Tom
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,440
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 136 Posts
Originally Posted by bobwysiwyg
+1
Jim: Gotta say that I, too, have trouble following those embedded quotes, Also, I strongly disagree that cyclists do not need to be seen from the front.
Papa Tom is offline  
Likes For Papa Tom:
Old 09-27-19, 10:28 AM
  #27  
Jim from Boston
Senior Member
 
Jim from Boston's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times in 171 Posts
Originally Posted by alan s
Jim, I have no idea what you are trying to say with embedded quote after embedded quote, but the one thing that jumped out at me as wrong is “While nice, it is not essential that oncoming traffic see you, it is more important that trailing traffic see you.

Oncoming turning and crossing traffic has very little time to react to a cyclist, so it is equally important to be visible from the front and the rear.
Originally Posted by bobwysiwyg
+1
Originally Posted by Papa Tom
Jim: Gotta say that I, too, have trouble following those embedded quotes, Also, I strongly disagree that cyclists do not need to be seen from the front.
Thanks for (attempting) to read my posts, and for your replies. FWIW, I have several times in the past tried to explain my posting style, including my signature line, but otherwise it's done with nested quotes.

In any case I initially posted to this thread started by @Papa Tom, about a similar current thread:
Originally Posted by Papa Tom
For anyone on the fence about whether to add daytime lights to your commuter, I just want to say that mine have added a much, much better sense of security to my rides, both to and from work. People clearly see me now and treat me like a moving vehicle, rather than just another annoying tree-hugger who's not in a car.

Don't even worry so much about WHICH headlight and tail light you buy; just do it.
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
So @Papa Tom, is your [pointed] current thread actually a reply to this similar current thread,“Daytime Running Lights - Get Them! Video”? There was a lot of the theorizing, analyzing, and disputes on that one. .
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
Just my opinion, but as one who cycles and occasionally drives in visually complex urban conditions, I think in ambient lighting a bright pinpoint light. especially flashing, is conspicuous [incuding a rear blinkie].
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
Yawn. Over in the A&S forum a cyclist was hit in broad daylight with a flasher going. At very, very high speed. I am amazed they survived at all.

While nice, it is not essential that oncoming traffic see you, it is more important that trailing traffic see you, but it is even more important that you as a cyclist do not act unpredictably and force a motorist to accommodate your erratic actions. Because they may not, whether they 'see' you or not
.
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
Which then begs the question: how much MONEY is it reasonable to spend on what has already been acknowledged as a crapshoot?
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
Obviously night time lights are a necessity, but I think calling day time lights a crapshoot is begging the question
IMO, nesting quotes allows me to to consider the contrasting or concurring opinions of various subscribers to a thread.

“The opinions expressed by @Liesesturm above do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Jim from Boston, Bike Forums, or Internet Brands."

Last edited by Jim from Boston; 09-27-19 at 10:32 AM.
Jim from Boston is offline  
Old 09-27-19, 10:59 AM
  #28  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times in 936 Posts
Yeah, sorry, but the nested quotes are confusing. Much more clear to quote another poster, then put your comments under that quote. Then post another quote and then comment on that quote, etc.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Likes For Milton Keynes:
Old 09-27-19, 12:04 PM
  #29  
Jim from Boston
Senior Member
 
Jim from Boston's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times in 171 Posts
Originally Posted by Milton Keynes
Yeah, sorry, but the nested quotes are confusing. Much more clear to quote another poster, then put your comments under that quote. Then post another quote and then comment on that quote, etc.
Thanks too for your comment, and not to be flippant, but I’ve been happily post my way for over 6800 posts over more than 10 years.

Perhaps you noticed that I nested two of your separate posts, appearing on a different thread, to present your opinion in a connected, continuous fashion, with my commentary:
Originally Posted by Milton Keynes
Having a bright flashing light on the front & back of your bike ought to negate the "I didn't see him" excuse somewhat.

Why couldn't you see the cyclist wearing brightly colored clothing with flashing lights on his bike?
Originally Posted by Milton Keynes
What I mean is, a distracted driver shouldn't be able to use "I didn't see him" when the cyclist has brightly colored clothing and bright flashing lights.

I hope my daytime lights attract the attention of drivers so they know I'm there, but we all know that all too often "I didn't see him" is what they say because they weren't looking.

So I would hope that a cop would ask the driver, "WHY didn't you see them? What were you looking at which made you not see them?"…
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
I have had the experience of being hit-and-run, presumably not intentionally, but by a distracted (?inebriated) driver. The police filed charges.

The police were great, and their report at the subsequent trial was spot on and particularly noted my details for visibility, including lights and high vis vest.
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
I think the police testimony in my accident about lights was favorable to my case, though was in the situation of a rear hit-and-run at night...

The driver got a year in jail.
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
By nesting quote boxes, I indicate to the quoted subscriber(s) that I have read the post(s), reflected on the content, and extracted meaningful point(s) that I worked into a [contrived] quote chain

The quote chain allows me to quote a few subscribers [and/or myself] on one topic in one post
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
Furthermore, I have documented to the reader that the topic at hand has been considered before, and the thread containing that quote, with the link, may be a source of further information.
Originally Posted by indyfabz
I scroll past JFB's musings. If you are reading this, quoting me is a waste of time.
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
Sometimes I do too. (tldr) Other times I'll quickly find and read the "new" unquoted thoughts in the post to see what he's writing about. Either way, it's hardly difficult to deal with.

But, if he's quoted me, I'll almost always read the entire post, just because I'm curious to see where I fit in his virtual conversation.

I find a variety of posting styles makes things more interesting, even if I skip reading some of them.

Last edited by Jim from Boston; 09-27-19 at 04:04 PM.
Jim from Boston is offline  
Old 09-27-19, 12:33 PM
  #30  
alan s 
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
Thanks too for your comment, and not to be flippant, but I’ve been happily post my way for over 6800 posts over more than 10 years.

Perhaps you noticed that I nested two of your separate posts, appearing on a different thread, to present your opinion in a connected, continuous fashion, with my commentary:
Jim, can you imagine if everyone here posted this way? If you are not a lawyer getting paid by the word, you went into the wrong profession.
alan s is offline  
Likes For alan s:
Old 09-27-19, 03:38 PM
  #31  
Jim from Boston
Senior Member
 
Jim from Boston's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times in 171 Posts
Originally Posted by alan s
Jim, can you imagine if everyone here posted this way?
Why not? Quote boxes are cool.
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
(from a now-closed thread) I think that the use of quote boxes, which I have not seen elsewhere is a remarkable way to graphically diagram a dialogue...
Originally Posted by alan s
If you are not a lawyer getting paid by the word, you went into the wrong profession.
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
…Posting has become an avocation for me. Since my job requires writing reports, with legal implications, I consider myself a “wordsmith,” and beside the exchange of information and ideas, I enjoy the mechanics of writing, such as grammar, composition , style, etc. for that addtional mental stimulation.
Originally Posted by W.C. Fields
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with b..s..t.”
Jim from Boston is offline  
Old 09-27-19, 05:14 PM
  #32  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,959

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,527 Times in 1,040 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
...and not to be flippant, but I’ve been happily post my way for over 6800 posts over more than 10 years.
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
Originally Posted by W.C. Fields
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with b..s..t.”
Or show contempt for normal means of communication/discussion by pleasuring yourself with imaginary conversations.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 09-27-19, 05:48 PM
  #33  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,545

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5222 Post(s)
Liked 3,574 Times in 2,338 Posts
personal attacks are not allowed
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-27-19, 05:52 PM
  #34  
alan s 
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
personal attacks are not allowed
No one is personally attacking anyone. I’m sure Jim has a lot to share and I’d love to read it, but his responses are usually lost in the bloated quotes.
alan s is offline  
Likes For alan s:
Old 09-27-19, 05:54 PM
  #35  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,545

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5222 Post(s)
Liked 3,574 Times in 2,338 Posts
Originally Posted by alan s
No one is personally attacking anyone. I’m sure Jim has a lot to share and I’d love to read it, but his responses are usually lost in the bloated quotes.
can't change it so I just leave it alone
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-27-19, 06:19 PM
  #36  
bobwysiwyg
Senior Member
 
bobwysiwyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 961' 42.28° N, 83.78° W (A2)
Posts: 2,344

Bikes: Mongoose Selous, Trek DS

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times in 189 Posts
Originally Posted by alan s
... I’m sure Jim has a lot to share and I’d love to read it, but his responses are usually lost in the bloated quotes.
I agree. Just can't see scrolling through two or three screens-worth at times. I've never resorted to a forum's ignore function until now, plus they remind me of years of debugging nested "if" statements. (Shudder )
bobwysiwyg is offline  
Old 09-27-19, 07:49 PM
  #37  
Papa Tom
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,440
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 136 Posts
Jim:

Consider this an intervention. All of us who love you want to see you kick the quotes!

Now, anyway, back to the daytime light discussion...
Papa Tom is offline  
Likes For Papa Tom:
Old 09-28-19, 04:10 AM
  #38  
Jim from Boston
Senior Member
 
Jim from Boston's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times in 171 Posts
I ride with daytime lights. I think it’s safer.
Jim from Boston is offline  
Old 09-28-19, 05:32 AM
  #39  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,545

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5222 Post(s)
Liked 3,574 Times in 2,338 Posts
Originally Posted by Papa Tom
All of us who love you want to see you kick the quotes!
no, not all of us
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-28-19, 06:29 AM
  #40  
Papa Tom
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,440
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 136 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim from Boston
I ride with daytime lights. I think it’s safer.
That-a-way, Jim. You're doing great. And my apology to rumrunn6 for dragging him into this.

Regarding the daytime lights, I only wish I had one switch to turn them both off when I arrive at work. Along with my ipod and my bluetooth speaker.
Papa Tom is offline  
Old 09-28-19, 07:24 AM
  #41  
flangehead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 889

Bikes: 2017 Co-op ADV 1.1; ~1991 Novara Arriba; 1990 Fuji Palisade; mid-90's Moots Tandem; 1985 Performance Superbe

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 387 Post(s)
Liked 566 Times in 330 Posts
Be careful with rechargeable batteries

I use a small Cateye white LED forward during the day in the flashing mode. I don't use it at night because it is small. It runs on two AA and I use rechargeable batteries. I found that they will flash even when the battery is really low on charge. This is good in one sense since it doesn't cut out but bad in that I don't have a good sense of when to recharge. I've learned to regularly turn it on in the solid mode and examine it to know when to change the batteries.

I believe a daylight running light adds to my conspicuity and thus my safety.
flangehead is offline  
Old 09-28-19, 07:53 AM
  #42  
KraneXL
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: La-la Land, CA
Posts: 3,623

Bikes: Cannondale Quick SL1 Bike - 2014

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3405 Post(s)
Liked 240 Times in 185 Posts
Originally Posted by TXBDan
I'm a big fan as well.

There is such a thing as TOO bright a blinkie at night. Prob less so during the day.

I just got some Bontrager Ion/Flare 200 lights that I like a lot because they change brightness automatically based on the light conditions. Also very small and light.
Absolutely. That would piss people off big time. I check before every ride, to ensure that I'm not blinding anyone. I have a few store fronts (glass walls) that I can pull into to check brightness from a distance.
Originally Posted by Papa Tom
So how many lights is too many? I have one 850-lumen headlight set to steady/pulse and one 150-lumen taillight set to a delayed blink. I feel like they are perfect. At what point do you think multiple lights blinking at various speeds becomes more of a (potentially dangerous) distraction than an eye-catcher?
Well for me, that would be one light up front. (I typically set that one to flash/pulse since I live in the city so I set it to get motorists attention more than something I need to see the road) and in the rear, I think 3 should be the limit: one mounted high, medium, and low.

The medium and low are permanently mounted to my bike, while the helmet rear light is less used except for added safety when necessary.

When I use all three (only dark/low-light high-speed roads) I set them to pulse rather than flash since the random pulse of all 3 is enough to be seen but not so rapid that they become annoying or give someone vertigo.
KraneXL is offline  
Old 09-28-19, 08:46 AM
  #43  
Archwhorides 
Senior Member
 
Archwhorides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 927

Bikes: Death machines all

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 63 Posts
I have a helmet-mounted head/tail light setup (L&M Vis 360 Pro) that I use for all of my road and MUP riding, day and night. The blinking tail light is 25 lumens and the head lamp runs between 150 lumens (steady or blinking) up to 600 lumens (steady only). I have the option to turn off the tail light, but I never do. Switching on the helmet is very convenient and I vary the intensity of the light and mode depending on light and traffic conditions.

One thing I like about this setup is that I can turn my head to direct my headlight beam away from bikers and pedestrians on the MUP, and conversely towards drivers who I want to be sure to see my presence

If a driver does something unsafe around me and I catch up to them at a stop, beaming a headlight into their brains is a good way to let them know that I care.

Particularly on bright days with comparatively dark shadows, I'm convinced that having tail lights on is essential, and head lights are a good thing too.
__________________
Work is the curse of the drinking classes - Oscar Wilde
Archwhorides is offline  
Likes For Archwhorides:
Old 09-28-19, 09:12 AM
  #44  
flangehead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 889

Bikes: 2017 Co-op ADV 1.1; ~1991 Novara Arriba; 1990 Fuji Palisade; mid-90's Moots Tandem; 1985 Performance Superbe

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 387 Post(s)
Liked 566 Times in 330 Posts
Helmet Mounted DRL

In addition to bike-mounted DRL front and back, I use lights on my helmet during the day in particular situations. Both lights can be turned on and off quickly and reliably.

Forward, I have a small white LED (like current Blackburn 2fer) which I turn on as soon as I sense the possibility of a situation developing such as a left or right cross. I turn it on long before evasive maneuvers would be necessary.



Front white LED (like Blackburn 2fer)


My commute includes a road with adequate shoulders that pinch out in some places. I turn on my rear LED (a very bright discontinued Serfas) in flashing mode before I move into the lane. Also, when in the lane on streets without a shoulder, I’ll turn it on when I am not comfortable with the vehicle approaching me. This includes a fast closing rate or a dense group of vehicles.



Rear-facing bright Serfas (discontinued)

My rationale is that by introducing a new, eye-catching element to the visual scene I’ll catch the attention of those posing the threat and communicate to everyone around me that I’m aware a situation could develop.

Realistically, it probably helps in some situations and with some people and not with others. I think it helps my odds.
flangehead is offline  
Likes For flangehead:
Old 09-28-19, 09:21 AM
  #45  
Papa Tom
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,440
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 136 Posts
What a great idea, the front and rear lights on the helmet! I'll bet this has been around for a while and that I just haven't been aware of the option. My only concern would be that "the look" is something that might encourage a wise-ass driver to want to mess with someone wearing one.

I wonder, too, how long it will be before even the brightest, flashiest bike lights start to blend into the scenery and become invisible, like day-glo shirts and orange flags.
Papa Tom is offline  
Old 09-28-19, 12:24 PM
  #46  
Archwhorides 
Senior Member
 
Archwhorides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Boston
Posts: 927

Bikes: Death machines all

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 63 Posts
IMO, a driver would have to be a real Neanderthal to go after an obvious bike commuter for the type of light they use, but I suppose anything is possible.

I also suppose that drivers could become indifferent to bike lights, but what is the alternative?

Originally Posted by Papa Tom
What a great idea, the front and rear lights on the helmet! I'll bet this has been around for a while and that I just haven't been aware of the option. My only concern would be that "the look" is something that might encourage a wise-ass driver to want to mess with someone wearing one.

I wonder, too, how long it will be before even the brightest, flashiest bike lights start to blend into the scenery and become invisible, like day-glo shirts and orange flags.
__________________
Work is the curse of the drinking classes - Oscar Wilde
Archwhorides is offline  
Old 09-30-19, 12:38 PM
  #47  
Jaackil
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gear64
Maybe she was politely suggesting they might actually be too bright. That's my opinion of many models, bright enough to be counter productive in many instances. Analogous to riding into the sun. Not necessarily a total white out but enough to be painfully distracting, and just asinine on MUPs.
How exactly can they be too bright to be counter productive? That is the most bizarre statement and I have heard it over and over on this forum. If you are traveling in the right lane incoming drivers are to your left and not in direct line of your head light. If it is a driver in the same line they do not see the head light until they are past you and only get a view in the rear view mirror and during the day it is hardly too bright. As for rear reds do you find other cars brake lights too bright also? SMH.

If the lights annoy you good! That’s the objective
Jaackil is offline  
Old 09-30-19, 12:41 PM
  #48  
CharlieFree
Senior Member
 
CharlieFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Papa Tom
For anyone on the fence about whether to add daytime lights to your commuter, I just want to say that mine have added a much, much better sense of security to my rides, both to and from work. People clearly see me now and treat me like a moving vehicle, rather than just another annoying tree-hugger who's not in a car.

Don't even worry so much about WHICH headlight and tail light you buy; just do it.
I second the thought! I use dynamos which I just leave on most of the time. I can put them in a sensor mode, which brightens them at night and leaves them slighly less bright for the day. Awesome.

A personal nitpick: I'm not a fan of flashing lights in my face, plus there's a fair bit of evidence they are no more effective than steady (counter-intuitively, they may actually be LESS effective than steady). Please be judicious if you have to use them, especially at night.
https://averagejoecyclist.com/use-flashing-bike-lights/
https://nextcity.org/daily/entry/bic...nking-problems
CharlieFree is offline  
Likes For CharlieFree:
Old 09-30-19, 12:46 PM
  #49  
redfishnc
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Myrtle Grove Sound, NC
Posts: 19

Bikes: Univega Viva Tech 1050, Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, Haro Extreme

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
I was delivering evening edition newspapers in the early 60s. I had a Schwinn 3 speed with a huge front basket for holding papers. Once the days got shorter I bought a generator driven light. Talk about resistance! And it had the brightness of an old ‘C’ cell flashlight. Today’s lights are amazing
redfishnc is offline  
Likes For redfishnc:
Old 09-30-19, 01:45 PM
  #50  
Skipjacks
Senior Member
 
Skipjacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Mid Atlantic / USA
Posts: 2,115

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Crosstrail / 2013 Trek Crossrip Elite

Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1002 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times in 155 Posts
Originally Posted by Milton Keynes
Yeah, sorry, but the nested quotes are confusing. Much more clear to quote another poster, then put your comments under that quote. Then post another quote and then comment on that quote, etc.
Yeah, I just skip the nesting doll posts.

I can't make heads or tails out of them.

Jim seems like a nice guy and I think he has valid commentary to offer most of the time. But it's just too much to sort through trying to figure out post order and context and relevance on each post on the nested post threads.

As for the main topic of the thread.....

No one has ever said that a day time running flasher light made a bike LESS visible. Maybe they don't work all the time. I can see if you are coming around a corner into oncoming traffic no amount of light would help as there just wouldn't be enough time to react once the bike was in view. That stuff happens.

But having a light doesn't make you LESS visible. It can ONLY help. And 90% of the time it does make you more visible.

90% of the time (not scientific) it makes you more visible
10% of the time it doesn't help much
0% of the time it makes you less visible

That's easy math for me

Last edited by Skipjacks; 09-30-19 at 01:51 PM.
Skipjacks is offline  
Likes For Skipjacks:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.