Space for front brake??
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 185
Bikes: Tommasini, Caad 7 , Seven, Pinarello
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
Space for front brake??
Hi what do you think about ? I need more space for this bracket ?
https://alexscycle.com/products/801-...for-700c-fd700
https://alexscycle.com/products/801-...for-700c-fd700
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848
Bikes: Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times
in
422 Posts
So,, what's the problem? You might want to clarify you are using a 700 wheel, not a 27 inch wheel. Headset doesn't look right either.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 185
Bikes: Tommasini, Caad 7 , Seven, Pinarello
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
so they are the sufficient space for installation?
question : this headset was mounted this week by pro mechanic at LBS , what do you think? thank,s
Last edited by brooklyn6640; 10-11-19 at 09:06 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,084
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4205 Post(s)
Liked 3,864 Times
in
2,312 Posts
See this recent thread for more back story. https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-m...-fg-brake.html
No surprise when one doesn't get the answer they wish to seek others' opinions.
In that other thread my first reply suggested that this was the wrong bike to use with a brake (as most every states have a law covering). Admittedly I never answered the OP's real question so here's my answer- There have been a few side pull calipers with exceptionally short reaches. The CLB design from the late 1970s/early 1980s is one. Whether it is short enough is unknown till tried. Good luck finding one to try. Andy
No surprise when one doesn't get the answer they wish to seek others' opinions.
In that other thread my first reply suggested that this was the wrong bike to use with a brake (as most every states have a law covering). Admittedly I never answered the OP's real question so here's my answer- There have been a few side pull calipers with exceptionally short reaches. The CLB design from the late 1970s/early 1980s is one. Whether it is short enough is unknown till tried. Good luck finding one to try. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times
in
3,353 Posts
Is that brake mounting hole plugged? Perhaps designed for Track?
I've seen a few short reach brakes, and think some of the newer ones are short reach. Of course, they can't hang down much on your bike either.
What size of tire are you using?
Distance from center of hole to top of brake track? Bottom of brake track? Center of hole to top of tire?
I've seen a few short reach brakes, and think some of the newer ones are short reach. Of course, they can't hang down much on your bike either.
What size of tire are you using?
Distance from center of hole to top of brake track? Bottom of brake track? Center of hole to top of tire?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,084
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4205 Post(s)
Liked 3,864 Times
in
2,312 Posts
As to the headset question- I suspect one (or more?) of a few possibilities. First is using too large ball diameters in the lower stack. Next is not using the lower cup's specific crown race, it might be that the function of this mix is actually fine but the crown race is much taller then what is the usual. Third is that both cup and crown race are of the same spec but a sealing ring is missing, which would have smoothened out the "flow" from the cup to the race. (I doubt this though). Fourth is that there are two retaining rings of balls in the lower stack. (A real stupid boo boo IMO). Fifth is that there are way too many balls (meaning no retaining ring but all loose balls) so that the balls have bunched up and are "climbing" up adjacent balls, therefore lifting/separating the cup and race by more then a properly fitted ball count would. last might be a cartridge bearing in the lower stack instead of loose (or retainered) balls.
However the discovery is simple. First is the function good, no rock but no friction? If so then why fix a working system. By dropping the fork a few CM one can look at the bearing/ball situation to see what's going on WRT the bearings. Usually, but not always, the upper stack and lower stacks use the same bearing design and spec. It would be interesting to see how the two stacks compare. Andy
However the discovery is simple. First is the function good, no rock but no friction? If so then why fix a working system. By dropping the fork a few CM one can look at the bearing/ball situation to see what's going on WRT the bearings. Usually, but not always, the upper stack and lower stacks use the same bearing design and spec. It would be interesting to see how the two stacks compare. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 185
Bikes: Tommasini, Caad 7 , Seven, Pinarello
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
Is that brake mounting hole plugged? Perhaps designed for Track?
I've seen a few short reach brakes, and think some of the newer ones are short reach. Of course, they can't hang down much on your bike either.
What size of tire are you using?
Distance from center of hole to top of brake track? Bottom of brake track? Center of hole to top of tire?
I've seen a few short reach brakes, and think some of the newer ones are short reach. Of course, they can't hang down much on your bike either.
What size of tire are you using?
Distance from center of hole to top of brake track? Bottom of brake track? Center of hole to top of tire?
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 185
Bikes: Tommasini, Caad 7 , Seven, Pinarello
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
As to the headset question- I suspect one (or more?) of a few possibilities. First is using too large ball diameters in the lower stack. Next is not using the lower cup's specific crown race, it might be that the function of this mix is actually fine but the crown race is much taller then what is the usual. Third is that both cup and crown race are of the same spec but a sealing ring is missing, which would have smoothened out the "flow" from the cup to the race. (I doubt this though). Fourth is that there are two retaining rings of balls in the lower stack. (A real stupid boo boo IMO). Fifth is that there are way too many balls (meaning no retaining ring but all loose balls) so that the balls have bunched up and are "climbing" up adjacent balls, therefore lifting/separating the cup and race by more then a properly fitted ball count would. last might be a cartridge bearing in the lower stack instead of loose (or retainered) balls.
However the discovery is simple. First is the function good, no rock but no friction? If so then why fix a working system. By dropping the fork a few CM one can look at the bearing/ball situation to see what's going on WRT the bearings. Usually, but not always, the upper stack and lower stacks use the same bearing design and spec. It would be interesting to see how the two stacks compare. Andy
However the discovery is simple. First is the function good, no rock but no friction? If so then why fix a working system. By dropping the fork a few CM one can look at the bearing/ball situation to see what's going on WRT the bearings. Usually, but not always, the upper stack and lower stacks use the same bearing design and spec. It would be interesting to see how the two stacks compare. Andy
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 185
Bikes: Tommasini, Caad 7 , Seven, Pinarello
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
Is that brake mounting hole plugged? Perhaps designed for Track?
I've seen a few short reach brakes, and think some of the newer ones are short reach. Of course, they can't hang down much on your bike either.
What size of tire are you using?
Distance from center of hole to top of brake track? Bottom of brake track? Center of hole to top of tire?
I've seen a few short reach brakes, and think some of the newer ones are short reach. Of course, they can't hang down much on your bike either.
What size of tire are you using?
Distance from center of hole to top of brake track? Bottom of brake track? Center of hole to top of tire?
center of hole to top of brake track :32mm
""""""""""""""""bottom of brake track :43mm
"""""""""""""""center of hole to top of tire: 13mm
the bubular will be 22mm
also Alex cycle saiy I can use this:
https://alexscycle.com/products/801-...77f2619d&_ss=r
so ????
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 185
Bikes: Tommasini, Caad 7 , Seven, Pinarello
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
As to the headset question- I suspect one (or more?) of a few possibilities. First is using too large ball diameters in the lower stack. Next is not using the lower cup's specific crown race, it might be that the function of this mix is actually fine but the crown race is much taller then what is the usual. Third is that both cup and crown race are of the same spec but a sealing ring is missing, which would have smoothened out the "flow" from the cup to the race. (I doubt this though). Fourth is that there are two retaining rings of balls in the lower stack. (A real stupid boo boo IMO). Fifth is that there are way too many balls (meaning no retaining ring but all loose balls) so that the balls have bunched up and are "climbing" up adjacent balls, therefore lifting/separating the cup and race by more then a properly fitted ball count would. last might be a cartridge bearing in the lower stack instead of loose (or retainered) balls.
However the discovery is simple. First is the function good, no rock but no friction? If so then why fix a working system. By dropping the fork a few CM one can look at the bearing/ball situation to see what's going on WRT the bearings. Usually, but not always, the upper stack and lower stacks use the same bearing design and spec. It would be interesting to see how the two stacks compare. Andy
However the discovery is simple. First is the function good, no rock but no friction? If so then why fix a working system. By dropping the fork a few CM one can look at the bearing/ball situation to see what's going on WRT the bearings. Usually, but not always, the upper stack and lower stacks use the same bearing design and spec. It would be interesting to see how the two stacks compare. Andy
Many tank,s
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,084
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4205 Post(s)
Liked 3,864 Times
in
2,312 Posts
Not sure of all you wrote...
If your "too small" reference is about the crown's seat for the race then do know that has nothing to do with the outer shape of the crown race. It's ID is independent of the ball track shape, in face many headsets have come in both seat diameters with the ability to interchange races (due to fork changes or milling the old fork's race to the 26.4 size) but keep the reminder of the headset.
If that reference is about the ball track portion of the race then one would think the race would fit into the cup more then intended, not stick out as the photo shows. However if the race is TALLER then, yes, the ball track could be smaller then wanted and still not fit somewhat flush with the cup.
Some headsets have a plastic/"rubber" seal that rides between the race and cup edges. If it were missing you wouldn't see it.
Did the shop install the headset? (I now read that they did so...) Did they have the fork on hand too? Did they say anything about all this mates together? If you bought the headset from them did they return the unused parts (and if you provided the headset they certainly owe you your "spare" parts).?
By your measurements the caliper(brake) reach you need is about 37mm, as most short reach calipers are limited to about 39mm AND that the measurement location that the pads are actually at is about 15mm ahead of the face of the crown and since the rim continues it upward curve (due to the fork being raked) the real life reach is about 1 or 2mm less then what's measured right next to the crown's face. So a real life reach is more likely to be about 36mms. Good luck finding such a caliper. My Sutherlands Manual suggests that a few Dia Comp calipers (from the early 1980s IIRC) have a minimum reach of about 37mm. One can always file the top edge of the pad to avoid tire side wall contact. Andy
If your "too small" reference is about the crown's seat for the race then do know that has nothing to do with the outer shape of the crown race. It's ID is independent of the ball track shape, in face many headsets have come in both seat diameters with the ability to interchange races (due to fork changes or milling the old fork's race to the 26.4 size) but keep the reminder of the headset.
If that reference is about the ball track portion of the race then one would think the race would fit into the cup more then intended, not stick out as the photo shows. However if the race is TALLER then, yes, the ball track could be smaller then wanted and still not fit somewhat flush with the cup.
Some headsets have a plastic/"rubber" seal that rides between the race and cup edges. If it were missing you wouldn't see it.
Did the shop install the headset? (I now read that they did so...) Did they have the fork on hand too? Did they say anything about all this mates together? If you bought the headset from them did they return the unused parts (and if you provided the headset they certainly owe you your "spare" parts).?
By your measurements the caliper(brake) reach you need is about 37mm, as most short reach calipers are limited to about 39mm AND that the measurement location that the pads are actually at is about 15mm ahead of the face of the crown and since the rim continues it upward curve (due to the fork being raked) the real life reach is about 1 or 2mm less then what's measured right next to the crown's face. So a real life reach is more likely to be about 36mms. Good luck finding such a caliper. My Sutherlands Manual suggests that a few Dia Comp calipers (from the early 1980s IIRC) have a minimum reach of about 37mm. One can always file the top edge of the pad to avoid tire side wall contact. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 185
Bikes: Tommasini, Caad 7 , Seven, Pinarello
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
Not sure of all you wrote...
If your "too small" reference is about the crown's seat for the race then do know that has nothing to do with the outer shape of the crown race. It's ID is independent of the ball track shape, in face many headsets have come in both seat diameters with the ability to interchange races (due to fork changes or milling the old fork's race to the 26.4 size) but keep the reminder of the headset.
If that reference is about the ball track portion of the race then one would think the race would fit into the cup more then intended, not stick out as the photo shows. However if the race is TALLER then, yes, the ball track could be smaller then wanted and still not fit somewhat flush with the cup.
Some headsets have a plastic/"rubber" seal that rides between the race and cup edges. If it were missing you wouldn't see it.
Did the shop install the headset? (I now read that they did so...) Did they have the fork on hand too? Did they say anything about all this mates together? If you bought the headset from them did they return the unused parts (and if you provided the headset they certainly owe you your "spare" parts).?
By your measurements the caliper(brake) reach you need is about 37mm, as most short reach calipers are limited to about 39mm AND that the measurement location that the pads are actually at is about 15mm ahead of the face of the crown and since the rim continues it upward curve (due to the fork being raked) the real life reach is about 1 or 2mm less then what's measured right next to the crown's face. So a real life reach is more likely to be about 36mms. Good luck finding such a caliper. My Sutherlands Manual suggests that a few Dia Comp calipers (from the early 1980s IIRC) have a minimum reach of about 37mm. One can always file the top edge of the pad to avoid tire side wall contact. Andy
If your "too small" reference is about the crown's seat for the race then do know that has nothing to do with the outer shape of the crown race. It's ID is independent of the ball track shape, in face many headsets have come in both seat diameters with the ability to interchange races (due to fork changes or milling the old fork's race to the 26.4 size) but keep the reminder of the headset.
If that reference is about the ball track portion of the race then one would think the race would fit into the cup more then intended, not stick out as the photo shows. However if the race is TALLER then, yes, the ball track could be smaller then wanted and still not fit somewhat flush with the cup.
Some headsets have a plastic/"rubber" seal that rides between the race and cup edges. If it were missing you wouldn't see it.
Did the shop install the headset? (I now read that they did so...) Did they have the fork on hand too? Did they say anything about all this mates together? If you bought the headset from them did they return the unused parts (and if you provided the headset they certainly owe you your "spare" parts).?
By your measurements the caliper(brake) reach you need is about 37mm, as most short reach calipers are limited to about 39mm AND that the measurement location that the pads are actually at is about 15mm ahead of the face of the crown and since the rim continues it upward curve (due to the fork being raked) the real life reach is about 1 or 2mm less then what's measured right next to the crown's face. So a real life reach is more likely to be about 36mms. Good luck finding such a caliper. My Sutherlands Manual suggests that a few Dia Comp calipers (from the early 1980s IIRC) have a minimum reach of about 37mm. One can always file the top edge of the pad to avoid tire side wall contact. Andy
https://alexscycle.com/products/801-seisakusho-geta-spacers?_pos=1&_sid=077f2619d&_ss=r
expensive but :::żżż
When I say the crown race OD IS too small I say the base plate is smaller than the cup.
Last edited by brooklyn6640; 10-13-19 at 05:27 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,084
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4205 Post(s)
Liked 3,864 Times
in
2,312 Posts
Interesting possible solution, the off set axle washers. Do try it and let us know how they work for you. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 185
Bikes: Tommasini, Caad 7 , Seven, Pinarello
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
10 Posts
No ???