Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

1948 Raleigh Sports Model Rebuild with slight conundrum

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

1948 Raleigh Sports Model Rebuild with slight conundrum

Old 10-13-19, 06:21 PM
  #1  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times in 706 Posts
1948 Raleigh Sports Model Rebuild with slight conundrum

Started working on a 1948 Raleigh yesterday and have run into a slight conundrum as to what to do about the wheelset. But first:

As purchased







What caught my eye was the general patina and what I though, was a complete, but mixed bag bike. I have dated the frame to 1948 by the serial, which conforms to convention 2 at the Headbadge site:Raleigh Serial Numbers & Charts




And by this City of Vancouver registration decal from the same year




What also caught my eye was the (not original) Bendix 2 speed coaster brake hub which is sort of a cool oddity. It works.




My plan is to clean the frame and protect the patina as is and maybe convert it to a more path style look.

Stripped the main components off and washed the frame and rims with Dawn dish soap. So far so good




Gently peeled away this old decal with an exacto knife. Good.




Began reviving the old saddle (plus another) by heating in the oven and applying coats of mink oil to soak in. Still good




Even found two donor bike sources, a 1970's Sports and old Raleigh folder, for period looking brakes and replacement pedals (one original is slightly bent). Still good.



Took off the old 26x1.25 tires and decided to put some 26x1.75 tan wall Pasela's on to see how they looked. Could not mount them on the rear. Do tires shrink??? Double checked the old tires - yep, 26". Decided to measure the rims. The rear is actually 27"! Makes sense in one way as the rear Bendix hub is obviously from a different bike but somehow fits an old loose 26" tire.

Uggh...

The problem is either reusing the old tires which I don't want to do as they are semi rotted or matching a 27" rear tire and a 26" front (which is the actual size).

Or... abandoning the Bendix hub on this bike and installing a very nice wheelset from the 70's era Sports. Beautiful condition, everything works and chrome not pitted or rusted. Next problem - the hub is actually a Shimano 3 speed, not Sturmey Archer, yet it has an SA trigger. Somehow the 48 and donor both have oddball drive trains.

I can't decide what to do between the two choices short term until a period correct solution comes along. I could bite the bullet and try my hand at rebuilding a 26" wheelset using the hub I suppose.

Last edited by Happy Feet; 10-13-19 at 06:45 PM.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 10-13-19, 07:12 PM
  #2  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,496

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2401 Post(s)
Liked 4,350 Times in 2,075 Posts
Wheels should be 26x1-3/8" ISO 590.

What's the ISO size of the tires you're trying to mount? Decimal-sized ISO 559 will never fit.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 10-13-19, 08:24 PM
  #3  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times in 706 Posts
Learning something new every day.

They are 559. Just read up about the older 590 650a designation. Never thought about it as I assumed 26" was 26".

Thanks
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 10-13-19, 09:22 PM
  #4  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,496

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2401 Post(s)
Liked 4,350 Times in 2,075 Posts
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
Learning something new every day.

They are 559. Just read up about the older 590 650a designation. Never thought about it as I assumed 26" was 26".

Thanks
No worries. Just make sure they're not EA1 / 597mm!

One golden rule of thumb when dealing with bicycle tires: Never take any conventional measurement at face value - measured, claimed, stamped, or molded. Given time, tire size will become second nature, but the ISO number is the size to follow if you want to avoid confusion.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Likes For cudak888:
Old 10-13-19, 09:22 PM
  #5  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
One other possibility — do the tires say “26 x 1.25” or do they actually say “26 x 1 1/4”? The latter is yet another wheel size with a 597mm bead seat diameter. I’d be interested to know what the rim stamps say.

EDIT: Dangit, Kurt beat me to the punch!
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 10-13-19, 09:27 PM
  #6  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,496

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2401 Post(s)
Liked 4,350 Times in 2,075 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
One other possibility — do the tires say “26 x 1.25” or do they actually say “26 x 1 1/4”? The latter is yet another wheel size with a 597mm bead seat diameter. I’d be interested to know what the rim stamps say.

EDIT: Dangit, Kurt beat me to the punch!
You know, I'm not sure what I'm looking at now. I just gave those rims a closer look to see if anything "EA1" jumped out at me, and now I'm getting a lot of mixed signals:

The tires look like the balloony type 597's that you'd get on a Schwinn (rather than the narrow, racing 597's of an EA1 tire). Yet, the rear rim looks a lot wider than an EA3 or EA1 Endrick, and the front wheel looks like a generic aluminum MTB/beach cruiser rim. I can't quite make out the hub, but it also looks like some generic cruiser hub rather than the really small flange of a Raleigh hub.

Can we have some closeups of the rims? Any markings on them?

I haven't tried shoving a 559 rim in a Raleigh Sports in a while to see what the combo looks like - although I seem to remember they'd appear a lot smaller than these do. Still, that also looks like a fairly large brake drop...

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Likes For cudak888:
Old 10-13-19, 10:03 PM
  #7  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times in 706 Posts
Boy, you can tell a lot from a photo!

Too late to take pics tonight but...

No markings on either rim set.

The front is a regular mtb 26" rim, hence my idea that the Pasela's might fit.

The rear Bendix tire is 26 x 1 3/4 Raleigh Gold Dot, made in the USA. No ISO.

The more I think about it the more I'm inclined to keep this wheel until I find another project for it. The mix match rim sizes and resultant tires isn't the look I'm going for. If I found a similar front rim I might change my mind but I'm trying to downsize donor bikes, not add to them


The replacement wheelset has matching rims 26x1 3/8 Dunlop Gold Seal tires, made in Canada. No ISO but it says EA3 rim.

For those I've looked online at some Panaracer Col de la Vie 650a Randonee in 26x1 3/8 tan walls. The chrome is in amazing shape, if only it weren't a Shimano hub

Last edited by Happy Feet; 10-13-19 at 10:09 PM.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 10-14-19, 05:43 AM
  #8  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,496

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2401 Post(s)
Liked 4,350 Times in 2,075 Posts
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
The front is a regular mtb 26" rim, hence my idea that the Pasela's might fit.

The rear Bendix tire is 26 x 1 3/4 Raleigh Gold Dot, made in the USA. No ISO.
That answers a lot of questions.

Your front wheel is ISO 559. An MTB wheel. Belongs on a MTB or cruiser, not this frame, unless you're planning a restomod. If your plans were to take off the coasterbrake too, there are very few calipers that would reach it anyway (Tektro's big beach cruiser dual pivots just might).

Your rear wheel, given the width and the coaster brake (I had taken it for granted there was a Sturmey back there, not a Shimano 3CCC), might be a Schwinn S-6 rim or period S-6 replacement - ISO 597, a.k.a. 26x1-3/4". Even though it uses a different fractional measurement, this rim has the same effective diameter (and ISO value) as an EA1 rim - but EA1 rims and tires are fairly narrow like EA3's. S-6/26x1-3/4" tires and rims are not, and generally don't even fit well (is there any rubbing on the inside of the stays? I bet there is).

If that explanation doesn't make sense, look at this chart, then re-read the paragraph:
  • EA3 | 26x1-3/8" | ISO 590 | Most Raleigh 3-speeds into the 1980's. The French call this size 650A.
  • EA1 | 26x1-1/4" | ISO 597 | Generally Raleigh racing bikes from the 1940's, skinny tires
  • S-6 | 26x1-3/4" | ISO 597 | Schwinn middleweight bikes from the 1950's through the late 1960's, semi-fat tire
That should make it pretty easy to understand the mess of tire sizes, and how the 597 diameter wound up serving two masters.

As for your Raleigh Gold Dot tire, since it is marked 26x1-3/4", it was probably sold as an aftermarket replacement for Schwinn S-6 applications. These tires were probably marketed 15-20 years after EA1 had fell out of favor, so it's not an unreasonable possibility that Raleigh marketed tires to fit the competition.

-Kurt

P.S.: I happen to have a pair of EA3 Westrick rims for sale from a 1970's Raleigh. Front also has a GH6 Dynohub in it. IIRC though, you're in Canada, right? If so, no real value in shipping them - and at the speed you find these things, you'll probably be able to pick up a bike for donor rims pretty quick.
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Likes For cudak888:
Old 10-14-19, 10:26 AM
  #9  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,313 Times in 706 Posts
Thank you Kurt

Gotta say, this is what I like about this hobby. As well as an outlet for my physical, artistic and (meager) mechanical skills, every time I tuck into a new rebuild I learn something new about bicycle history.
Happy Feet is offline  
Likes For Happy Feet:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.