Enough already with the Gravel Grinding !
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Enough already with the Gravel Grinding !
From todays's online Bicycling Magazine .
Diamondback Haanjenn Review
THIS VERSATILE WOMEN'S COMMUTER BIKE HAS THE GEARS AND TIRES TO HANDLE LONGER GRAVEL RIDES ON THE WEEKEND.
The Liv Amiti-E+ 2 Is a Women's E-Bike That Wants to Cruise
It has a combination of features and components that make it as capable on smooth, hilly commutes as it is on gravel bike paths and rail trails.
Diamondback Haanjenn Review
THIS VERSATILE WOMEN'S COMMUTER BIKE HAS THE GEARS AND TIRES TO HANDLE LONGER GRAVEL RIDES ON THE WEEKEND.
The Liv Amiti-E+ 2 Is a Women's E-Bike That Wants to Cruise
It has a combination of features and components that make it as capable on smooth, hilly commutes as it is on gravel bike paths and rail trails.
#2
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,528
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3664 Post(s)
Liked 5,412 Times
in
2,750 Posts
I'm missing the point, apparently. Is this going to morph into yet another circular "what bike" thread?
#3
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
It's the newest marketing buzzword.
Hybrid bikes like the Trek fx series make pretty great gravel bikes and they have been making those for what seems like forever.
Hybrid bikes like the Trek fx series make pretty great gravel bikes and they have been making those for what seems like forever.
#5
Senior Member
I don't understand why people seem so uniquely offended by the gravel marketing BS these days. This is how bike companies create differentiation while marketing what is certainly a very simple machine: define meaningless niches and make extremely minor differences seem monumental.
For years, companies have tried to draw sharp lines between essentially indistinguishable endurance/climbing/aero models in the road space. Similarly, in mountain bikes the definitions of enduro vs. trail vs. all mountain vs. etc has become complete nonsense. You could drown in the snake oil of the supposed magical qualities of various commoditized frame materials. Other companies differentiate by proliferating absurd "standards". Etc. "Gravel" is simply example no. 2,398 of this BS.
For years, companies have tried to draw sharp lines between essentially indistinguishable endurance/climbing/aero models in the road space. Similarly, in mountain bikes the definitions of enduro vs. trail vs. all mountain vs. etc has become complete nonsense. You could drown in the snake oil of the supposed magical qualities of various commoditized frame materials. Other companies differentiate by proliferating absurd "standards". Etc. "Gravel" is simply example no. 2,398 of this BS.
#6
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
Originally Posted by OP
Enough already with the Gravel Grinding !
I agree, we need more groading.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
I don't understand why people seem so uniquely offended by the gravel marketing BS these days. This is how bike companies create differentiation while marketing what is certainly a very simple machine: define meaningless niches and make extremely minor differences seem monumental.
For years, companies have tried to draw sharp lines between essentially indistinguishable endurance/climbing/aero models in the road space. Similarly, in mountain bikes the definitions of enduro vs. trail vs. all mountain vs. etc has become complete nonsense. You could drown in the snake oil of the supposed magical qualities of various commoditized frame materials. Other companies differentiate by proliferating absurd "standards". Etc. "Gravel" is simply example no. 2,398 of this BS.
For years, companies have tried to draw sharp lines between essentially indistinguishable endurance/climbing/aero models in the road space. Similarly, in mountain bikes the definitions of enduro vs. trail vs. all mountain vs. etc has become complete nonsense. You could drown in the snake oil of the supposed magical qualities of various commoditized frame materials. Other companies differentiate by proliferating absurd "standards". Etc. "Gravel" is simply example no. 2,398 of this BS.
#8
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
It is what should have been the definition of "hybrid." The standard definition is a flat-bar bike with inferior front suspension that superficially resembles a hard-tailed mountain bike, ridden by people in Geritol advertisements.
The "gravel grinder" is (typically) a drop-bar road-bike that accommodates wide (ca. 35-45mm) 700c tires, has good brakes (often disc), and often has more forgiving gearing than a classic on-road road bike, but is a hybrid in the sense that its tires, brakes, geometry and gearing are inspired by mountain bikes and cyclocross bikes. IMO this is what the term "hybrid" really ought to invoke, but generally doesn't.
The "gravel grinder" is (typically) a drop-bar road-bike that accommodates wide (ca. 35-45mm) 700c tires, has good brakes (often disc), and often has more forgiving gearing than a classic on-road road bike, but is a hybrid in the sense that its tires, brakes, geometry and gearing are inspired by mountain bikes and cyclocross bikes. IMO this is what the term "hybrid" really ought to invoke, but generally doesn't.
#9
Senior Member
"Hybrid" bikes are only called that because the segment was created at a time when gasoline-electric hybrid cars were becoming very popular with consumers, so the bike industry borrowed the name to help with marketing.
#10
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,610
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10955 Post(s)
Liked 7,483 Times
in
4,185 Posts
Miyata, Trek, Univega, Bianchi, Schwinn, etc all had multiple models.
Try again.
#11
Senior Member
https://www.vintage-trek.com/Trek-Fis...d/1994trek.pdf
Find me an instance of the term "hybrid" in that catalog from 1994.
Or this one: https://www.miyatacatalogs.com/2007/1...alog-1994.html
Or these: https://waterfordbikes.com/SchwinnCat...00/index2.html
Last edited by General Geoff; 04-06-18 at 06:36 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Bicycling Magazine is trying to sell more bikes. Appeal to the N+1. Gravel is likely the slot that most people have open so sell those. Easy fix is to stop reading Bicycling - I did.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 506
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 41 Times
in
33 Posts
No thanks!
https://www.vintage-trek.com/Trek-Fis...d/1994trek.pdf
Find me an instance of the term "hybrid" in that catalog from 1994.
https://www.vintage-trek.com/Trek-Fis...d/1994trek.pdf
Find me an instance of the term "hybrid" in that catalog from 1994.
I bought my first MTB heading into college around this time...the term “hybrid” was definitely out there. I should have bought a hybrid for what I ended up using that bike for.
#15
Senior Member
#16
Pokemon Master
The Rock Combo was called a hybrid in the 1989 Specialized Catalog, and it even had drop bars!
89 Specialized Rock Combo #? of 500- Mtbr.com
89 Specialized Rock Combo #? of 500- Mtbr.com
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
421 Posts
I don't normally visit this forum, but the thread title caught my eye.
A couple years ago, I bought my first new bike since before the Internet era. I quickly learned: Don't read the marketing copy for a bike that you're trying to take seriously.
My bike was marketed as an "urban" bike. Elsewhere, it was a "flat bar road bike." A friend of mine recently said: "That's a gravel bike." I wonder what my bike will be next year?
It's basically a hybrid with sporty styling. With that said, it fits me like glove and I've been quite happy with it.
A couple years ago, I bought my first new bike since before the Internet era. I quickly learned: Don't read the marketing copy for a bike that you're trying to take seriously.
My bike was marketed as an "urban" bike. Elsewhere, it was a "flat bar road bike." A friend of mine recently said: "That's a gravel bike." I wonder what my bike will be next year?
It's basically a hybrid with sporty styling. With that said, it fits me like glove and I've been quite happy with it.
#19
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I don’t see any problem with expanding the vocabulary to describe different types of bikes, even it some of the differences are subtle.
In both the road and mtb markets, the number of maketing descriptors increased when the actually variety of offerings did as well.
Just because the definitions are a little loose and not all bikes fit neatly into them does not mean they are not useful.
In both the road and mtb markets, the number of maketing descriptors increased when the actually variety of offerings did as well.
Just because the definitions are a little loose and not all bikes fit neatly into them does not mean they are not useful.
#20
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,610
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10955 Post(s)
Liked 7,483 Times
in
4,185 Posts
No thanks!
https://www.vintage-trek.com/Trek-Fis...d/1994trek.pdf
Find me an instance of the term "hybrid" in that catalog from 1994.
Or this one: Miyata Bicycle Catalogs: Miyata Catalog 1994
Or these: Schwinn catalogs, 1991 - 2000
https://www.vintage-trek.com/Trek-Fis...d/1994trek.pdf
Find me an instance of the term "hybrid" in that catalog from 1994.
Or this one: Miyata Bicycle Catalogs: Miyata Catalog 1994
Or these: Schwinn catalogs, 1991 - 2000
Those catalog scans dont support your comment.
Hybrids were popular in the early 90s before hybrid cars.
#22
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I think hybrid is a good term for these bikes, because they are a compromise that kind of suck at everything.
Gravel bikes, on the other hand, are kind of GOOD at everything.
Last edited by Kapusta; 04-07-18 at 01:38 PM.
#23
Banned
Saw an old French movie yesterday , in this film they just rode regular bicycles even though the road was gravel.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 1,667
Bikes: Trek Emonda SL6 .... Miyata One Thousand
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times
in
22 Posts
Gravel Bike = a road bike with wider tyres and mounts for fenders and racks .... slacker geometry for comfort, but a lot slower (and heavier) (especially on hills)
great bike for commuting though
great bike for commuting though