Tire sizing madness
#1
Jet Jockey
Thread Starter
Tire sizing madness
I know it's been hashed out before, but it still drives me bonkers.
The accepted wisdom anymore seems to be that 25mm is the "sweet spot" for performance, the place where rolling resistance gains haven't been lost to weight and aero drag. However...
Most of the tires I see tested at the 25mm size actually plump up to 27-28mm, ESPECIALLY on the new wider rim standards that are in vogue. (My Michelin Pro4 Endurance tires plump up to just shy of 29mm on Pacenti Forza rims.) So does that mean that 28mm MEASURED is truly the sweet spot? Particularly since most are now being ridden/tested on internal 18-ish, external 23-24mm rims? Or if measured 25mm is the sweet spot, at a particular rim width in numerous tires wouldn't that make labelled 23mm actually the best performer?
And while tire measurements have long been problematic, it seems even more so now with the wide rim trend. If wide rims are the rule, and if all 25s balloon to 27-28, then do current measurement standards have any meaning? (I believe current standards are on a "classic", narrower, internal width of closer to 15mm).
These are the thoughts that occasionally spin through my head while out for a solo afternoon ride.
The accepted wisdom anymore seems to be that 25mm is the "sweet spot" for performance, the place where rolling resistance gains haven't been lost to weight and aero drag. However...
Most of the tires I see tested at the 25mm size actually plump up to 27-28mm, ESPECIALLY on the new wider rim standards that are in vogue. (My Michelin Pro4 Endurance tires plump up to just shy of 29mm on Pacenti Forza rims.) So does that mean that 28mm MEASURED is truly the sweet spot? Particularly since most are now being ridden/tested on internal 18-ish, external 23-24mm rims? Or if measured 25mm is the sweet spot, at a particular rim width in numerous tires wouldn't that make labelled 23mm actually the best performer?
And while tire measurements have long been problematic, it seems even more so now with the wide rim trend. If wide rims are the rule, and if all 25s balloon to 27-28, then do current measurement standards have any meaning? (I believe current standards are on a "classic", narrower, internal width of closer to 15mm).
These are the thoughts that occasionally spin through my head while out for a solo afternoon ride.
__________________
Good night...and good luck
Good night...and good luck
Likes For Banzai:
#2
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
I didnt realize 25mm is the accepted wisdom for ideal width.
But I dont really buy into wind resistance for 3mm of tire width being what's keeping me back from riding faster.
What runs thru the mind on long solo rides certainly can be seemingly random.
But I dont really buy into wind resistance for 3mm of tire width being what's keeping me back from riding faster.
What runs thru the mind on long solo rides certainly can be seemingly random.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Unless you're on aero wheels, it doesn't make a difference.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
I would be surprised if what you referring to wasn’t taken into account. Seems to me, to test the aerodynamics of the tire, they mounted it on a wheel. It would make sense that used several different kinds of wheels.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Northeastern MA, USA
Posts: 1,678
Bikes: Garmin/Tacx Bike Smart
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
191 Posts
Given the number of variables involved, road conditions, rim width and type, weight of the rider, type of riding, etc, defining a so-called "sweet spot" is simply impossible. I arrived at mine through trial and error. And I'm very content with my choice, 700 x 25 tires. Yes, they plump up a little, but not too bad. Also, I'm 175 pounds so I tend to run higher pressures than the waifs who race.
FWIW, I never considered aerodynamics when choosing a tire. I'm not fast enough for that to be a concern.
FWIW, I never considered aerodynamics when choosing a tire. I'm not fast enough for that to be a concern.
Likes For dmanthree:
#6
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
Tire choice is not a huge investment. buy one size, ride it and if you want to try a different size, spend the $100 for them. That's less than a half way decent jersey.
#7
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
So its apparently...
crap jersey for $30 --> perfectly fine jersey for $50 --> halfway decent jersey for $100 --> decent jersey for $200 --> nice jersey for $250 or more
I look forward to the day I can own a decent jersey.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#8
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
Or its twice the cost of a perfectly fine jersey.
So its apparently...
crap jersey for $30 --> perfectly fine jersey for $50 --> halfway decent jersey for $100 --> decent jersey for $200 --> nice jersey for $250 or more
I look forward to the day I can own a decent jersey.
So its apparently...
crap jersey for $30 --> perfectly fine jersey for $50 --> halfway decent jersey for $100 --> decent jersey for $200 --> nice jersey for $250 or more
I look forward to the day I can own a decent jersey.
But thanks for not staying on topic.
Likes For GlennR:
#9
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
re straying off topic- Im not the one comparing tires to jerseys, but regardless- its what I do best. I thought about converting tire cost to socks, but then I decided not to since I wasnt sure if I should use 'decent' or only 'halfway decent' socks in the conversion.
I did find it funny that you think a decent jersey costs $200, but $100 is more than enough to get tires. I would figure someone that views $200 as the threshold for decent jerseys would spend more on tires. But it appears you found the value point on tires, so you are halfway there!
I did find it funny that you think a decent jersey costs $200, but $100 is more than enough to get tires. I would figure someone that views $200 as the threshold for decent jerseys would spend more on tires. But it appears you found the value point on tires, so you are halfway there!
Likes For mstateglfr:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,957
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 877 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
I did find it funny that you think a decent jersey costs $200, but $100 is more than enough to get tires. I would figure someone that views $200 as the threshold for decent jerseys would spend more on tires. But it appears you found the value point on tires, so you are halfway there!
#11
Jet Jockey
Thread Starter
I’m not having any issues with choosing a tire, or something like that.
I was just pedaling along, thinking about how the numbers are more meaningless than ever. And hence, how meaningless the articles that say 25mm is the current “ideal”
It’s post-modern cycling: what does 25mm even mean?
I was just pedaling along, thinking about how the numbers are more meaningless than ever. And hence, how meaningless the articles that say 25mm is the current “ideal”
It’s post-modern cycling: what does 25mm even mean?
#12
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
I’m not having any issues with choosing a tire, or something like that.
I was just pedaling along, thinking about how the numbers are more meaningless than ever. And hence, how meaningless the articles that say 25mm is the current “ideal”
It’s post-modern cycling: what does 25mm even mean?
I was just pedaling along, thinking about how the numbers are more meaningless than ever. And hence, how meaningless the articles that say 25mm is the current “ideal”
It’s post-modern cycling: what does 25mm even mean?
https://www.panaracer.com/news/detail.php?id=13
Some cried foul, as if they were trying to fool buyers into thinking the tires were wider. Others praised their honesty. Either way, the tire could be anywhere from 41 mm to 46 mm depending on pressure and rim width. How does a manufacturer accurately size a tire given such a wide variety of applications in the field?
Perhaps sizing nowadays is a guideline rather than a statement of fact. Maybe manufacturers should label tires with a nominal measurement and uncertainty such as 700x25c +/- 3 mm. I don't know.
-Tim-
Last edited by TimothyH; 08-20-19 at 10:15 AM.
#13
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
re straying off topic- Im not the one comparing tires to jerseys, but regardless- its what I do best. I thought about converting tire cost to socks, but then I decided not to since I wasnt sure if I should use 'decent' or only 'halfway decent' socks in the conversion.
I did find it funny that you think a decent jersey costs $200, but $100 is more than enough to get tires. I would figure someone that views $200 as the threshold for decent jerseys would spend more on tires. But it appears you found the value point on tires, so you are halfway there!
I did find it funny that you think a decent jersey costs $200, but $100 is more than enough to get tires. I would figure someone that views $200 as the threshold for decent jerseys would spend more on tires. But it appears you found the value point on tires, so you are halfway there!
My point was tires are not a major decision, my set of GP4000IIS were $85 for the pair including shipping.
Now that this is cleared up you can go back under the bridge and wait for the next topic to derail.
#14
Chases Dogs for Sport
My road bike has ENVE SES 3.4 Disc wheels on it. ENVE always said those wheels are optimized for 25mm wide tires. I put 25mm Conti 4000SII's on them and they measured 29mm wide. Fast forward to 2019 and the 25mm Conti 5000 TL which is reputed to be narrower than the 4000. Because of this, I contacted ENVE customer service and asked if the wheels were optimized for the OLD 25mm tires or the NEW (narrower) 25mm tires. Their answer was yes.
I mounted the 5000TL's up on the ENVE's and they measure 27.5mm wide. Slightly narrower than the max outside rim width -- just as ENVE designed them.
So . . . at least for ENVE, they are telling you the wheels are designed for the stated number on side of the tire while knowing (and designing for) the actual width of the tire. Perfect.
I mounted the 5000TL's up on the ENVE's and they measure 27.5mm wide. Slightly narrower than the max outside rim width -- just as ENVE designed them.
So . . . at least for ENVE, they are telling you the wheels are designed for the stated number on side of the tire while knowing (and designing for) the actual width of the tire. Perfect.
#15
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Actually my analogy was inflated, most jerseys are in the $80-$100 range with my most expensive being $130 since it was a custom design.
My point was tires are not a major decision, my set of GP4000IIS were $85 for the pair including shipping.
Now that this is cleared up you can go back under the bridge and wait for the next topic to derail.
My point was tires are not a major decision, my set of GP4000IIS were $85 for the pair including shipping.
Now that this is cleared up you can go back under the bridge and wait for the next topic to derail.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
I’m not having any issues with choosing a tire, or something like that.
I was just pedaling along, thinking about how the numbers are more meaningless than ever. And hence, how meaningless the articles that say 25mm is the current “ideal”
It’s post-modern cycling: what does 25mm even mean?
I was just pedaling along, thinking about how the numbers are more meaningless than ever. And hence, how meaningless the articles that say 25mm is the current “ideal”
It’s post-modern cycling: what does 25mm even mean?
For tubulars, which pros use, 25mm tires are actually 25mm tires. The bike media made a big deal about pros going from 23mm tubulars to 25mm tubulars but amateurs have gone from actual 23mm tires to 30-32mm measured. My 25mm tire measures around 30mm. Everyone’s sweet spot is different. Mine is on the wider side because I like grip and my bike is uncomfortable and my roads are crap. Someone who is very heavy and tends to pinch tires or break rims may need a bigger tire for the same preferences. Someone riding on flat, glass roads may want a narrower tire. It’s personal, for now. Conditions are too variable and the human body too fickle for science to draw a firm conclusion yet. Maybe one day someone will make something that measures tire compression over the course of your ride and can make a recommendation (I know about the TireWiz, but that only recommends pressure, not size?).
Until very recently, most aero wheels were very narrow. 15-17mm internal widths, and maybe 23-25mm wide. And yet they would say that these rims are optimized for 25mm tires that measure 27mm across. And we all know (now at least) that a bulbous tire is terrible for aero. There was also an incongruence between mfg recommendations and what the ETRTO allowed - 25mm tires weren’t allowed on anything more than 17mm rims - which made it impossible to achieve the 105% ratio. They’ve allegedly updated the list of approved rims widths but they’re dragging their feet for releasing it.
Don’t look to the bike media for any sort of guidance. Don’t even look to bike companies for technical expertise. Someone posted about their experience with ENVE, which pretty much sums up what you can expect from the tier of engineers that end up in the bike industry. There are no standards. There is no integrity. There is no rigor or precision. Find your own truths from your own experiences, or your friends or maybe (gasp) forums.
Last edited by smashndash; 08-21-19 at 01:56 AM.
#17
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
Most of the tires I see tested at the 25mm size actually plump up to 27-28mm, ESPECIALLY on the new wider rim standards that are in vogue. (My Michelin Pro4 Endurance tires plump up to just shy of 29mm on Pacenti Forza rims.) So does that mean that 28mm MEASURED is truly the sweet spot?
#18
Senior Member
All you need to know if your tires are optomized for the rim is does the tire overlap the rim. If that little 3mm wider overlaps the wheel you will trip the wind and lose value of those deep wheels. Weight of the rider and road surface will factor into the width of the wheels and tires.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 419
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I know it's been hashed out before, but it still drives me bonkers.
The accepted wisdom anymore seems to be that 25mm is the "sweet spot" for performance, the place where rolling resistance gains haven't been lost to weight and aero drag. However...
Most of the tires I see tested at the 25mm size actually plump up to 27-28mm, ESPECIALLY on the new wider rim standards that are in vogue. (My Michelin Pro4 Endurance tires plump up to just shy of 29mm on Pacenti Forza rims.) So does that mean that 28mm MEASURED is truly the sweet spot? Particularly since most are now being ridden/tested on internal 18-ish, external 23-24mm rims? Or if measured 25mm is the sweet spot, at a particular rim width in numerous tires wouldn't that make labelled 23mm actually the best performer?
And while tire measurements have long been problematic, it seems even more so now with the wide rim trend. If wide rims are the rule, and if all 25s balloon to 27-28, then do current measurement standards have any meaning? (I believe current standards are on a "classic", narrower, internal width of closer to 15mm).
These are the thoughts that occasionally spin through my head while out for a solo afternoon ride.
The accepted wisdom anymore seems to be that 25mm is the "sweet spot" for performance, the place where rolling resistance gains haven't been lost to weight and aero drag. However...
Most of the tires I see tested at the 25mm size actually plump up to 27-28mm, ESPECIALLY on the new wider rim standards that are in vogue. (My Michelin Pro4 Endurance tires plump up to just shy of 29mm on Pacenti Forza rims.) So does that mean that 28mm MEASURED is truly the sweet spot? Particularly since most are now being ridden/tested on internal 18-ish, external 23-24mm rims? Or if measured 25mm is the sweet spot, at a particular rim width in numerous tires wouldn't that make labelled 23mm actually the best performer?
And while tire measurements have long been problematic, it seems even more so now with the wide rim trend. If wide rims are the rule, and if all 25s balloon to 27-28, then do current measurement standards have any meaning? (I believe current standards are on a "classic", narrower, internal width of closer to 15mm).
These are the thoughts that occasionally spin through my head while out for a solo afternoon ride.
#22
Non omnino gravis
If you're obsessed with aero, the mounted width of the tire should be the same as the external width of the deep section wheel.
If you're obsessed with comfort, the tire should be the widest one that will fit on the bike.
Everything else is a compromise in one direction or the other.
If you're obsessed with comfort, the tire should be the widest one that will fit on the bike.
Everything else is a compromise in one direction or the other.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
I had been riding 25's until I got my Forza rims.
Now I am back on 23's which "plump out" to about the same size as the 25's I was previously using.
25's are still better on my older model Open Pro's.
Now I am back on 23's which "plump out" to about the same size as the 25's I was previously using.
25's are still better on my older model Open Pro's.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Oh yeah - I saw some news about the new Schwalbe Pro One souplesse tubeless tires, and the OPs question was directly addressed: with these new tires, Schwalbe's nominal sizes accurately reflect width when mounted on 19mm internal width rims.