Canyon Endurace CF SL Disc 8.0 vs. Domane SL 6
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Canyon Endurace CF SL Disc 8.0 vs. Domane SL 6
Warning odd ridiculous posting but...
So I picked my bike up from the shop today and the mechanic discovered a crack in the frame, getting the frame replace is a non-starter (ASI is out of business). So I need a new bike. Now I was thinking of buying a new bike "just because" and now I have to. I am looking at 2 bikes the Trek Domane SL 6 (carbon frame ultegra group) and a Canyon Endurace CF SL Disc 8.0 (Carbon frame, Ultegra group). Both bikes are similar in that they have a carbon fiber frames, disc brakes and a full Ultegra group sets. The Trek is about $1000 more dollars than the Canyon. What I would like to know is, what's the difference that the $1K buys? I really don't know in terms of specs. Does the Trek have some sort of superior frame technology that I'm not seeing? Has anyone here done a side by side of Trek over Canyon?
I realize this is pretty nebulous but it's also what a forum will have about 500 posts on in about 4 hours.
So I picked my bike up from the shop today and the mechanic discovered a crack in the frame, getting the frame replace is a non-starter (ASI is out of business). So I need a new bike. Now I was thinking of buying a new bike "just because" and now I have to. I am looking at 2 bikes the Trek Domane SL 6 (carbon frame ultegra group) and a Canyon Endurace CF SL Disc 8.0 (Carbon frame, Ultegra group). Both bikes are similar in that they have a carbon fiber frames, disc brakes and a full Ultegra group sets. The Trek is about $1000 more dollars than the Canyon. What I would like to know is, what's the difference that the $1K buys? I really don't know in terms of specs. Does the Trek have some sort of superior frame technology that I'm not seeing? Has anyone here done a side by side of Trek over Canyon?
I realize this is pretty nebulous but it's also what a forum will have about 500 posts on in about 4 hours.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,595
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 608 Post(s)
Liked 352 Times
in
225 Posts
The problem with Canyon is you can't actually touch the bike until you buy it. So it is hard to make a comparison when there are few to be seen or had. The other issue is warranty. Even if the warranty is the same, Trek has a huge presence in the US and you can take your bike anywhere for warranty purposes. With the Canyon you send it back.
A counter argument would be, what is the likelihood that you need warranty service? Probably rare but when you are that one guy. . .
Trying to compare one carbon frame over the other is difficult. Even Domane has different levels of carbon.
I also look at resale value. My bet is the Trek holds its value over the Canyon.
Of course none of this really addressed your question what do you get with the Trek over the Canyon? Sometimes it just isn't about ride quality or difference but about value for your dollar. Trek is a proven commodity, so if it was me, the Trek hands down.
Last counter argument, Canyon offers a 30 day money back policy which no other company offers. Buy the bike, if you hate it send it back, love it, well you just saved a grand. Good luck with whatever you choose.
A counter argument would be, what is the likelihood that you need warranty service? Probably rare but when you are that one guy. . .
Trying to compare one carbon frame over the other is difficult. Even Domane has different levels of carbon.
I also look at resale value. My bet is the Trek holds its value over the Canyon.
Of course none of this really addressed your question what do you get with the Trek over the Canyon? Sometimes it just isn't about ride quality or difference but about value for your dollar. Trek is a proven commodity, so if it was me, the Trek hands down.
Last counter argument, Canyon offers a 30 day money back policy which no other company offers. Buy the bike, if you hate it send it back, love it, well you just saved a grand. Good luck with whatever you choose.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
The problem with Canyon is you can't actually touch the bike until you buy it. So it is hard to make a comparison when there are few to be seen or had. The other issue is warranty. Even if the warranty is the same, Trek has a huge presence in the US and you can take your bike anywhere for warranty purposes. With the Canyon you send it back.
A counter argument would be, what is the likelihood that you need warranty service? Probably rare but when you are that one guy. . .
Trying to compare one carbon frame over the other is difficult. Even Domane has different levels of carbon.
I also look at resale value. My bet is the Trek holds its value over the Canyon.
Of course none of this really addressed your question what do you get with the Trek over the Canyon? Sometimes it just isn't about ride quality or difference but about value for your dollar. Trek is a proven commodity, so if it was me, the Trek hands down.
Last counter argument, Canyon offers a 30 day money back policy which no other company offers. Buy the bike, if you hate it send it back, love it, well you just saved a grand. Good luck with whatever you choose.
A counter argument would be, what is the likelihood that you need warranty service? Probably rare but when you are that one guy. . .
Trying to compare one carbon frame over the other is difficult. Even Domane has different levels of carbon.
I also look at resale value. My bet is the Trek holds its value over the Canyon.
Of course none of this really addressed your question what do you get with the Trek over the Canyon? Sometimes it just isn't about ride quality or difference but about value for your dollar. Trek is a proven commodity, so if it was me, the Trek hands down.
Last counter argument, Canyon offers a 30 day money back policy which no other company offers. Buy the bike, if you hate it send it back, love it, well you just saved a grand. Good luck with whatever you choose.
Regarding warranty, I have a 2016 Kestrel RT 1000. I love my body position on the bike but the frame now has a crack in it. After a very long conversation with the mfr. they are going to replace my frame. The frame they are sending is a 2011, the fork is a 2012 and does not match the colors of the frame. I am absolutely certain that the LBS that I purchased the bike from would have said this would never happen to me if I buy from them.
Of course all of the aforementioned complaints are very first world problems and I consider myself fortunate to be able to have them
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlashBazbo
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
30
11-09-18 02:21 PM
Meritage51
Road Cycling
16
07-29-15 01:19 PM