Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Raleigh Stuntman / 650B?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Raleigh Stuntman / 650B?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-17, 02:19 PM
  #1  
JMONAY
Some hooligan
Thread Starter
 
JMONAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, PA / Detroit metro
Posts: 158

Bikes: Several 3-speed Raleighs, several old road bikes, several old mountain bikes, all slightly or heavily modified

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Raleigh Stuntman / 650B?

Hello, friends.

So I'm used to puttering around in the c/v forum but I bought my first modern and brand new bike a month and a half ago, a 2017 Raleigh Stuntman. I love the heck out of it but there is one issue that's been bothering me. First of all, I know it's more of a fat-tire road bike than a drop bar mountain bike, geometry wise, but I figured you guys would be better to ask since this is about wheels and tires.



Mine is a 54cm frame and I'm having a bad time with toe overlap when clipped in. I know fenders make it worse. I don't want to remove the fenders. The frame has 80 mm of bottom bracket drop and 170 mm cranks, and right now it has 700x50c tires. My main question is if anyone knows (or can infer) whether building some 650b (27.5) wheels for it will make pedal strike an issue (although i'm used to keeping my inner foot up through turns anyway), or if maybe it won't even help with the toe overlap situation that much with the same width tire, or maybe I just have terrible riding technique because I'm used to old 3-speeds and road bikes with relaxed geometry. I have an old road bike which I converted from 27" to 650b for commuting and that helped a lot with the toe overlap, but I think the Stuntman's geometry is even more cramped. I just find that when I'm crawling slowly up steep hills, it's obviously hard to keep the front wheel aimed remotely straight so I'm always bashing my feet. Thanks in advance for the feedback

Edit: or maybe I would rather have a fork with more offset?

Last edited by JMONAY; 08-20-17 at 02:25 PM.
JMONAY is offline  
Old 09-02-17, 06:32 PM
  #2  
DMC707
Senior Member
 
DMC707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395

Bikes: Too many to list

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times in 746 Posts
Maybe learn to keep the wheel straight when your climbing -- toe overlap is going to be an issue with a lot of small framed bikes

Im 5-8 and i know thats not a midget, but its short enough that i deal with that to some degree on a lot of bikes i own
DMC707 is offline  
Old 02-12-18, 02:24 PM
  #3  
Nsokerbloom
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Most likely you would end up with pedals scraping the ground when turning. Usually when converting to 650 one would put on much larger volume tires which you probably wouldn't be able to do as they are fairly large to begin with. Like others have said you really shouldn't have to turn that much unless you are just poking around a parking lot or something which you get used to and only do so while your crank arms are vertical.
Nsokerbloom is offline  
Old 02-12-18, 06:01 PM
  #4  
JonathanGennick 
Senior Member
 
JonathanGennick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131

Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 37 Posts
Do you know anyone with a 650b mountain bike who would let you borrow a wheelset for long enough to try it on a ride or two? That's the approach I took a couple years ago when I did a similar conversion.
JonathanGennick is offline  
Old 02-25-18, 02:40 PM
  #5  
JMONAY
Some hooligan
Thread Starter
 
JMONAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, PA / Detroit metro
Posts: 158

Bikes: Several 3-speed Raleighs, several old road bikes, several old mountain bikes, all slightly or heavily modified

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts


Hey folks, I forgot to update this post. I went for the new 650b wheels a few months ago and am super happy with the results. No more toe overlap. I already developed the habit of keeping the inside foot up during turns, so pedal strike has not been a problem. The new DT wheels and tires (which I am running tubeless) shed 1 kg off the weight of the bike and it rides noticeably smoother and faster. It climbs faster as well which so far has resulted in more stability and less wobbling about. It's been a good change in every way.
JMONAY is offline  
Old 02-26-18, 06:40 AM
  #6  
Nsokerbloom
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That's good to hear. That bike has great geometry and is quite practical. Now you must find out how many thousands of miles it can go. Thanks for the update. My touring bike has a very low bottom bracket. (so does the super popular trek domane) As long as you adapt to it you can enjoy the extra stability.
Nsokerbloom is offline  
Old 03-01-18, 11:55 PM
  #7  
Clem von Jones
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 660
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 16 Posts
I love the tight geometry with huge hoops so I borrowed your bike to see if it would fit. This is the right way to design a 29er mtb. Wish there were more bikes like this. Can I live with the toe overlap? Having the front as low as possible helps prevent the front wheel wandering on steep climbs but even without fenders it looks cramped. I've wondered how a 29er with geometry like this would look, and now we know.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
54cm_Stuntman.JPG (658.1 KB, 45 views)

Last edited by Clem von Jones; 03-02-18 at 02:00 AM.
Clem von Jones is offline  
Old 03-02-18, 10:23 AM
  #8  
Clem von Jones
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 660
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 16 Posts
56cm frame setup for 186cm-ish person. Toe clearance still looks a bit tight but probably okay.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Stuntman_56cm.jpg (309.6 KB, 40 views)

Last edited by Clem von Jones; 03-02-18 at 10:52 AM.
Clem von Jones is offline  
Old 03-02-18, 10:48 AM
  #9  
Clem von Jones
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 660
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 16 Posts
58cm frame, toe clearance looks good. This concludes my experiment in Stuntman frame sizing.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Stuntman-58cm.jpg (359.2 KB, 40 views)

Last edited by Clem von Jones; 03-02-18 at 10:51 AM.
Clem von Jones is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hybridbkrdr
Hybrid Bicycles
3
04-06-18 11:49 AM
Banzai
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
6
05-13-16 03:37 PM
gugie
Classic & Vintage
78
02-18-16 06:42 AM
Oil_LOL
Commuting
13
08-05-12 05:28 PM
jchabalk
Bicycle Mechanics
8
05-11-11 12:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.