Why don't US Bike Lanes Have Concrete Barriers?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Why don't US Bike Lanes Have Concrete Barriers?
Have been in Europe for six months now.
The Europeans treat cycling as an extra mode of transportation. So:
1) Often one side of the road's on street parking is taken away and replaced with two way bike Lanes.
2) There is a low (18 inch) concrete barrier to separate cars.
Makes for a much safer and better experience. Only need to watch out for cars on cross roads
The Europeans treat cycling as an extra mode of transportation. So:
1) Often one side of the road's on street parking is taken away and replaced with two way bike Lanes.
2) There is a low (18 inch) concrete barrier to separate cars.
Makes for a much safer and better experience. Only need to watch out for cars on cross roads
#2
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Because in the US, stripes of paint have magical powers.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,938
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3769 Post(s)
Liked 1,036 Times
in
784 Posts
Have been in Europe for six months now.
The Europeans treat cycling as an extra mode of transportation. So:
1) Often one side of the road's on street parking is taken away and replaced with two way bike Lanes.
2) There is a low (18 inch) concrete barrier to separate cars.
Makes for a much safer and better experience. Only need to watch out for cars on cross roads
The Europeans treat cycling as an extra mode of transportation. So:
1) Often one side of the road's on street parking is taken away and replaced with two way bike Lanes.
2) There is a low (18 inch) concrete barrier to separate cars.
Makes for a much safer and better experience. Only need to watch out for cars on cross roads
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You're going to have to be more specific than to say "in Europe...". London doesn't have them and I believe much of Europe doesn't have them, but not absolutely sure; however, I know places like Denmark have them, but not in all locations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtV51NUtg4Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtV51NUtg4Y
To be sure, I'm not talking about country roads, rather inner-ish suburban areas.
It makes the world of difference. Lots of kids using bike paths.
#5
Senior Member
Because land of the free and home of the Brave.
#6
Senior Member
Did you say US as in United States....here, first, bicyclists would need to pay as much as car drivers in taxes.
Clean air is not important.
Good Health is not important.
Practical living is not a desired lifestyle.
Getting from point A to point B the fastest no matter who dies is top priority. If you don't believe me, just ask my wife.
Clean air is not important.
Good Health is not important.
Practical living is not a desired lifestyle.
Getting from point A to point B the fastest no matter who dies is top priority. If you don't believe me, just ask my wife.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
And there is probably your answer.
We do have areas like Manhattan that are friendly to cycling, but more often people on bikes are seen as pesky nuisances, and we are not seen as co-equal users of the road system.
We do have areas like Manhattan that are friendly to cycling, but more often people on bikes are seen as pesky nuisances, and we are not seen as co-equal users of the road system.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,791
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times
in
293 Posts
Most European countries have centralized governments with the power to pass across the board regulations.
Maybe local governments could elect to erect solid barriers. Not sure that you will see it from sea to shining sea though.
Besides, as someone else posted, painted lines, with pictographs at strategic locations, have super powers.
Maybe local governments could elect to erect solid barriers. Not sure that you will see it from sea to shining sea though.
Besides, as someone else posted, painted lines, with pictographs at strategic locations, have super powers.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
U.S. infrastructure is much sparser than Europe's in general (because of both geography and policy) and bicycle infrastructure in U.S. is in its infant stage.
#11
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
Did you say US as in United States....here, first, bicyclists would need to pay as much as car drivers in taxes.
Clean air is not important.
Good Health is not important.
Practical living is not a desired lifestyle.
Getting from point A to point B the fastest no matter who dies is top priority. If you don't believe me, just ask my wife.
Clean air is not important.
Good Health is not important.
Practical living is not a desired lifestyle.
Getting from point A to point B the fastest no matter who dies is top priority. If you don't believe me, just ask my wife.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18349 Post(s)
Liked 4,501 Times
in
3,346 Posts
There are several very different types of bike paths in Oregon, and I presume in most of the USA.
In particular on-street bike paths and off-street bike paths (dubbed MUPS for multi-use path systems).
I presume some places also have separate walking and riding off-street paths.
Here the MUPS are very popular for cyclists, joggers, and walkers. As a river city, the rivers are the natural place for the MUP system that not only allows uninterrupted paths, but shoots through the middle of the city, and are also very park-like in nature.
On-street paths are different, and solve different needs. In many senses, they simply allow cars to safely and quickly pass cyclists. I consider them like a standardized form of road shoulders. It also allows cyclists to easily make left turns, and merge into the traffic lanes as needs arise. It also allows the lanes to provide a buffer for car drivers, and potentially even a break-down lane. Yeah, nobody likes to swerve around cars, but perhaps easier and safer for cyclists to do than for car drivers to do.
Assuming cyclists and cars both move at the same time across intersections, the painted lines with cyclists moving with traffic may well allow the best visibility for cyclists. Separate pathways may trick drivers into dangerous complacency, and hide cyclists behind plants and landscaping.
Of course, it may also all depend on the number of cyclists... one per mile or so vs 100 per mile. I'm not sure that "make the infrastructure, and they'll come" always applies. With few cyclists, one might lean towards shared infrastructure, while with more, one might lean towards dedicated infrastructure.
Also keep in mind that many urban paths are retrofit into preexisting roads, thus space, structures, and other constraints are already determined. If new roads are being built, then building higher quality bike paths is an excellent idea.
In particular on-street bike paths and off-street bike paths (dubbed MUPS for multi-use path systems).
I presume some places also have separate walking and riding off-street paths.
Here the MUPS are very popular for cyclists, joggers, and walkers. As a river city, the rivers are the natural place for the MUP system that not only allows uninterrupted paths, but shoots through the middle of the city, and are also very park-like in nature.
On-street paths are different, and solve different needs. In many senses, they simply allow cars to safely and quickly pass cyclists. I consider them like a standardized form of road shoulders. It also allows cyclists to easily make left turns, and merge into the traffic lanes as needs arise. It also allows the lanes to provide a buffer for car drivers, and potentially even a break-down lane. Yeah, nobody likes to swerve around cars, but perhaps easier and safer for cyclists to do than for car drivers to do.
Assuming cyclists and cars both move at the same time across intersections, the painted lines with cyclists moving with traffic may well allow the best visibility for cyclists. Separate pathways may trick drivers into dangerous complacency, and hide cyclists behind plants and landscaping.
Of course, it may also all depend on the number of cyclists... one per mile or so vs 100 per mile. I'm not sure that "make the infrastructure, and they'll come" always applies. With few cyclists, one might lean towards shared infrastructure, while with more, one might lean towards dedicated infrastructure.
Also keep in mind that many urban paths are retrofit into preexisting roads, thus space, structures, and other constraints are already determined. If new roads are being built, then building higher quality bike paths is an excellent idea.
#13
Senior Member
Have been in Europe for six months now.
The Europeans treat cycling as an extra mode of transportation. So:
1) Often one side of the road's on street parking is taken away and replaced with two way bike Lanes.
2) There is a low (18 inch) concrete barrier to separate cars.
Makes for a much safer and better experience. Only need to watch out for cars on cross roads
The Europeans treat cycling as an extra mode of transportation. So:
1) Often one side of the road's on street parking is taken away and replaced with two way bike Lanes.
2) There is a low (18 inch) concrete barrier to separate cars.
Makes for a much safer and better experience. Only need to watch out for cars on cross roads
Why don't they use these for bike lanes? Because it makes too much sense. Motorists are always trying to find ways to get around and violate bollards. Can't do that with concrete barriers.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,950
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4337 Post(s)
Liked 1,521 Times
in
992 Posts
Have been in Europe for six months now.
The Europeans treat cycling as an extra mode of transportation. So:
1) Often one side of the road's on street parking is taken away and replaced with two way bike Lanes.
2) There is a low (18 inch) concrete barrier to separate cars.
Makes for a much safer and better experience. Only need to watch out for cars on cross roads
The Europeans treat cycling as an extra mode of transportation. So:
1) Often one side of the road's on street parking is taken away and replaced with two way bike Lanes.
2) There is a low (18 inch) concrete barrier to separate cars.
Makes for a much safer and better experience. Only need to watch out for cars on cross roads
#15
Banned
How many times have you gone to city, state and county public meetings of say the planning commissions and asked?
#16
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
Because they really hurt when you hit them.
Oh, and your city is broke and can't afford them.
A semi will still make mincemeat of one anyhow.
The last perfect world I saw was in a documentary about GM's Futurama at the 1939 World's Fair, then World War II intervened. After the war General Eisenhower and the GI's that saw the Autobahn were so smitten that the entire US Interstate Highway system (named after Eisenhower in 1969 was it?) was designed based on milder components of that road.
But no rails or electronic guidance, the entire base of cars wasn't scrapped and it became entrenched. Cities grew and faded with it just like with the railroad.
Oh, and your city is broke and can't afford them.
A semi will still make mincemeat of one anyhow.
The last perfect world I saw was in a documentary about GM's Futurama at the 1939 World's Fair, then World War II intervened. After the war General Eisenhower and the GI's that saw the Autobahn were so smitten that the entire US Interstate Highway system (named after Eisenhower in 1969 was it?) was designed based on milder components of that road.
But no rails or electronic guidance, the entire base of cars wasn't scrapped and it became entrenched. Cities grew and faded with it just like with the railroad.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,938
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3769 Post(s)
Liked 1,036 Times
in
784 Posts
But again, how much of the routes have protected bike lanes -- I don't know, but would be interested to see a map, but not sure if that's available. See here in France bikes riding with cars.
P.S. I understand you're not talking about rural areas, never was an issue...
BTW, I hate bike paths, slows me down too much
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The reason why bicycle safety is not progressing fast enough is that cyclists can never agree amongst themselves what they want.
It's no wonder our requests are not taken seriously when some cyclists complain they hate bike paths!
It's no wonder our requests are not taken seriously when some cyclists complain they hate bike paths!
Ok, now it's not Europe, but some selected countries in Europe....
But again, how much of the routes have protected bike lanes -- I don't know, but would be interested to see a map, but not sure if that's available. See here in France bikes riding with cars.
P.S. I understand you're not talking about rural areas, never was an issue...
BTW, I hate bike paths, slows me down too much
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTLpO2GmBUo
But again, how much of the routes have protected bike lanes -- I don't know, but would be interested to see a map, but not sure if that's available. See here in France bikes riding with cars.
P.S. I understand you're not talking about rural areas, never was an issue...
BTW, I hate bike paths, slows me down too much
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTLpO2GmBUo
Last edited by raria; 01-15-18 at 09:56 AM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,832
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2336 Post(s)
Liked 2,808 Times
in
1,534 Posts
should get some basic terms correct. OP is talking about segregated infrastructure not bike lanes.
People seem to forget North america is not Europe. Size and population density matters. What works in Europe will work only in densely populated urban areas. Also also public transportation matters as people not in cities tend to do bi-modal commutes.
average bike commute in California (per rivenddell) is 14 miles, average distance biked per day in the netherlands is 2.3 kilometers or ~ 1.5 miles.
take san jose as an example is the 10th largest city in the nation with 1 million people an area of 180 sq miles or 467 sq K, density of 5,776.3/sq mi (2,230.24/km2)
compare this with amsterdam with 850,000 people (85 % of san jose) and area of 165.76 km2 (64.00 sq mi) 33% of san jose, population density of 5,135/km2 (13,300/sq mi) 230% of san jose and with better mass transit
the problem to solve is simply different.
San jose has been pretty active, especially in road diets in hi impact areas, but there is no way segregated infrastructure is workable or even desirable for the entire area.
People seem to forget North america is not Europe. Size and population density matters. What works in Europe will work only in densely populated urban areas. Also also public transportation matters as people not in cities tend to do bi-modal commutes.
average bike commute in California (per rivenddell) is 14 miles, average distance biked per day in the netherlands is 2.3 kilometers or ~ 1.5 miles.
take san jose as an example is the 10th largest city in the nation with 1 million people an area of 180 sq miles or 467 sq K, density of 5,776.3/sq mi (2,230.24/km2)
compare this with amsterdam with 850,000 people (85 % of san jose) and area of 165.76 km2 (64.00 sq mi) 33% of san jose, population density of 5,135/km2 (13,300/sq mi) 230% of san jose and with better mass transit
the problem to solve is simply different.
San jose has been pretty active, especially in road diets in hi impact areas, but there is no way segregated infrastructure is workable or even desirable for the entire area.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Even in Amsterdam there are two-way bikelanes especially once you get out of Centrum.
In Frankfurt there are two-way separated bikelanes on some roads in the center, Hafenstraße under the train tracks for example.
Otherwise, separated bikelanes one-way on each side are common, either with parking on the sidewalk side, or parking on the street side. Salmons are not uncommon on these lanes. (And in some areas, pedestrians common too, even with the blue bikesymbol|mother-childsymbol separated paths.)
Also very common in the 30 kph zones were bikesymbol "frie" signs below do not enter signs, which allowed people on bikes to legally ride contra on one-way streets. In such zones, busier one-way streets had bikelanes marked, smaller and lighter traffic streets you just ride down the center, giving way to the right when a car approached. On smaller one-way streets with stop signs, there are no stop signs facing the contra direction, they expect people on bikes to be smart enough to figure it out.
-mr. bill
In Frankfurt there are two-way separated bikelanes on some roads in the center, Hafenstraße under the train tracks for example.
Otherwise, separated bikelanes one-way on each side are common, either with parking on the sidewalk side, or parking on the street side. Salmons are not uncommon on these lanes. (And in some areas, pedestrians common too, even with the blue bikesymbol|mother-childsymbol separated paths.)
Also very common in the 30 kph zones were bikesymbol "frie" signs below do not enter signs, which allowed people on bikes to legally ride contra on one-way streets. In such zones, busier one-way streets had bikelanes marked, smaller and lighter traffic streets you just ride down the center, giving way to the right when a car approached. On smaller one-way streets with stop signs, there are no stop signs facing the contra direction, they expect people on bikes to be smart enough to figure it out.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 01-15-18 at 12:32 PM.
#24
LET'S ROLL
Some bike lanes in New York City use parked cars as barriers for cyclists:
__________________
One day: www.youtube.com/watch?v=20X43026ukY&list=UUHyRS8bRu6zPoymgKaIoDLA&index=1
One day: www.youtube.com/watch?v=20X43026ukY&list=UUHyRS8bRu6zPoymgKaIoDLA&index=1
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,832
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2336 Post(s)
Liked 2,808 Times
in
1,534 Posts
average ride in Spain is .1 KM (from some EU statistics)
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)