How much do you care about bike weight?
#127
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
I think you guys are talking across each other.
If you are doing a 2 hour ride @ 200W, bike weight doesnt matter. You just ride a shorter distance.
However, if you are doing 60miles @ 200W, then a heavier bike will take a little longer (assuming you have some hills) and so you will have held 200W for a little longer*. So theoretically, a better workout - although not that much in practice, unless it is a very hilly route (weight really doesnt matter all that much, nor does a few extra minutes).
(*The idea of diminishing power with time only applies if you are riding at max effort.)
If you are doing a 2 hour ride @ 200W, bike weight doesnt matter. You just ride a shorter distance.
However, if you are doing 60miles @ 200W, then a heavier bike will take a little longer (assuming you have some hills) and so you will have held 200W for a little longer*. So theoretically, a better workout - although not that much in practice, unless it is a very hilly route (weight really doesnt matter all that much, nor does a few extra minutes).
(*The idea of diminishing power with time only applies if you are riding at max effort.)
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
However, if you are doing 60miles @ 200W, then a heavier bike will take a little longer (assuming you have some hills) and so you will have held 200W for a little longer*. So theoretically, a better workout - although not that much in practice, unless it is a very hilly route (weight really doesnt matter all that much, nor does a few extra minutes).
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,483
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,469 Times
in
1,832 Posts
What is a "better" workout? Go to a gym and you will see to dozen people working out in two dozen ways, and each might be getting a great workout.
If burning more calories is the "best" workout, why do weightlifters lift weight? Should they be doing aerobics?
If faster is better .... how do I apply that when I am on the weight machines in the gym?
If burning more calories is the "best" workout, why do weightlifters lift weight? Should they be doing aerobics?
If faster is better .... how do I apply that when I am on the weight machines in the gym?
Likes For Maelochs:
#130
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
That you do (negligibly) more work with a (slightly) heavier bike over the same course at the same output and/or pace isn't really being disputed. What's being disputed is "you get a better workout on heavier bike." The only thing that determines whether one gets a better or worse workout is the person pushing the pedals. Unless, of course, these guys are spinning their 53/11 @100+ rpm over their entire ride on their "light" bike and they need the extra kilo to, uh, slow 'em down, I guess.
#131
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
That you do (negligibly) more work with a (slightly) heavier bike over the same course at the same output and/or pace isn't really being disputed. What's being disputed is "you get a better workout on heavier bike." The only thing that determines whether one gets a better or worse workout is the person pushing the pedals. Unless, of course, these guys are spinning their 53/11 @100+ rpm over their entire ride on their "light" bike and they need the extra kilo to, uh, slow 'em down, I guess.
#132
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#133
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
That you do (negligibly) more work with a (slightly) heavier bike over the same course at the same output and/or pace isn't really being disputed. What's being disputed is "you get a better workout on heavier bike." The only thing that determines whether one gets a better or worse workout is the person pushing the pedals. Unless, of course, these guys are spinning their 53/11 @100+ rpm over their entire ride on their "light" bike and they need the extra kilo to, uh, slow 'em down, I guess.
#135
Full Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 425
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
163 Posts
Workouts for me vary but all are equally good for advancing towards my goals. For example, I did intervals yesterday, covered around 50km and it included 4x intervals up a 9% gradient of around a 1km stretch of road. Calories burned, a little over 1100. On Saturday I did a 106km ride, 1600m climbing, burned 2230 calories.
The interval training takes me longer to recover from than the greater calorie burner due to the intensity and effect on my legs from the sustained full gas efforts. Both great workouts. Different training. Today I'm soon going to do a ride focussing upon maintaining a good average (for me) circa 33/34km/h on a lumpy route and it'll burn a similar number of calories as the slow Zone 1/2 ride that I'll do on Thursday with a friend due to today's ride being shorter. Yet...if all I did was the longer, easier calorie burners, I'd not win any races. Different workout regimes for different goals - racing, fitness, weight loss. All good.
Likes For AlgarveCycling:
#136
Senior Member
I'm used to 14kg mountain bikes. So not a lot.
I usually do long climbs. I went from a 10kg road bike to an 8.5kg one and, frankly, the only time I notice the weight difference while riding is when sprinting like mad and, to be honest, I don't care. Both bikes allowed me to go where I wanted with similar amounts of suffering.
I usually do long climbs. I went from a 10kg road bike to an 8.5kg one and, frankly, the only time I notice the weight difference while riding is when sprinting like mad and, to be honest, I don't care. Both bikes allowed me to go where I wanted with similar amounts of suffering.
#137
Member
Big ups to all of you performance road riders. 59 year old clydesdale road rider here, bike weight is third on my list behind comfort and bike appearance. Therefore I ride 32mm tires on 32mm wide carbon rims on my SL 5. I'll lose the extra lbs off of my midsection.
#138
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Yeah, but that's pretty much the basis of the other argument - that the slightly more work on a slightly heavier bike = greater workout. Theoretically, it is true and this being Bikeforums, thems the guns people are sticking to. Better than admitting that their argument was wrong, i guess.
Which is the better workout? 200w for 90 minutes on a light road bike, 200w for 91 minutes on a heavy road bike, or 100w for the rest of your life on an indoor bike? Clearly the last one, according to the road forum. Because it's more work (and therefore more calories).
You guys have seen that chart with fitness and freshness, and how they're balanced, right?
More isn't always better. The right amount is better.
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,112
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 986 Post(s)
Liked 583 Times
in
438 Posts
As my massage therapist who is a triathlete always says; it's a lot cheaper to lose 1lbs of body weight (fat) than to shave 1lbs off your bike. I would like to believe that the weight freaks here all have 10% or less body fat and that therefore their quest to have the lightest bike possible is ''motivated''.
Regardless, I don't judge anyone and I respect everyone's personal decisions. My bike's value respects my budget and I would probably get an even lighter bike if my budget would be higher. There is no limit when it comes to spending money for a passion .
Regardless, I don't judge anyone and I respect everyone's personal decisions. My bike's value respects my budget and I would probably get an even lighter bike if my budget would be higher. There is no limit when it comes to spending money for a passion .