Distance btwn derailleur jockey wheel arm and spoke
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Southeast US
Posts: 921
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 318 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
104 Posts
Distance btwn derailleur jockey wheel arm and spoke
What would you consider a minimum safe distance between the jockey wheel arm and the spokes?
I assume that with a correctly shaped frame and hanger and a correctly adjusted RD designed to go with it, everything should just work, but as a check step - how close is too close?
I assume that with a correctly shaped frame and hanger and a correctly adjusted RD designed to go with it, everything should just work, but as a check step - how close is too close?
Last edited by rseeker; 03-19-18 at 03:07 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5793 Post(s)
Liked 2,585 Times
in
1,433 Posts
As close as 2mm in low is fairly typical and fine. On some bikes it's more like 1mm.
Keep in mind that you have no say in this. It's determined by the distance between the innermost sprocket and the spokes. If you feel the clearance seems too close, check that the hanger isn't bent, and the RD cage is straight.
Keep in mind that you have no say in this. It's determined by the distance between the innermost sprocket and the spokes. If you feel the clearance seems too close, check that the hanger isn't bent, and the RD cage is straight.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 03-19-18 at 03:59 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Shift your bike into a gear combination that makes the derailleur arm point straight downward. Prop your bike against something so that it's standing up vertically. Now walk around and look at your derailleur from the back of the bike. If it looks like it's pointing toward the rear tire - that's it.
Cheap bike, you can probably bend it back with your hands. Quality bike you'll probably be better served by having a shop align it with a gauge. That's about a $15.00 service.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,096
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4210 Post(s)
Liked 3,878 Times
in
2,315 Posts
What would you consider a minimum safe distance between the jockey wheel arm and the spokes?
I assume that with a correctly shaped frame and hanger and a correctly adjusted RD designed to go with it, everything should just work, but as a check step - how close is too close?
I assume that with a correctly shaped frame and hanger and a correctly adjusted RD designed to go with it, everything should just work, but as a check step - how close is too close?
Too close is when the der catches on the spokes during riding. Enough clearance is when it doesn't. There's no spec that's commonly quoted to my knowledge. Having said that a lot of people will say it should be this or that amount.
Also don't confuse what's happening on a stand with actual riding. The added forces acting of the chain, der and spokes will change the static clearance. Andy
#6
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
The derailleur should be set up in relation to the largest sprocket on the cassette, not the spokes.
The derailleur will not be near enough to the spokes to cause a problem if this is done properly and everything else is in working order.
-Tim-
The derailleur will not be near enough to the spokes to cause a problem if this is done properly and everything else is in working order.
-Tim-
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,071
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4412 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times
in
1,028 Posts
But a derailleur that is "too close" will pluck the spokes when climbing out of the saddle, announcing that it is "too close" without doing any damage. This is just one of those things where even the tiniest clearance is enough if there is no real way for the derailleur to actually hook a spoke - which requires considerable overlap. If the derailleur and spoke don't appear to touch in the stand and you can't get them to touch while climbing forcefully, there really isn't a way that they can interfere with each other.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,071
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4412 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times
in
1,028 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
I haven't done any surveys but I have observed different maker's derailleurs differ in how likely they are to be grabbed by a passing spoke. The older SunTours were quite tolerant of real contact. My triples using a wide range in front, a GT derailleur and a racing FW regularly rubbed in low gear, esp on the granny in front. Never an issue. I've had other derailleurs where minor contact was bad. I've even taken to grinding the bolt head on offending derailleurs to a shape the spoke couldn't grab.
An option you can play with to minimize spoke contact, esp when you are 'honking" is to lace the rear wheel with the
pulling" spokes laced from the outside to the inside, ie so the heads face out and have the spoke crossing outside the last static spoke on the outside as would be done normally. (Pulling spokes - those that come off the top of the hub flange and point back.) Laced this way, the inside spokes will do their best to straighten as you pedal hard, pulling the outboard spokes in and improving clearance with your derailleur. Lacing in the opposite direction will have the opposite effect, making contact more likely.
Ben
An option you can play with to minimize spoke contact, esp when you are 'honking" is to lace the rear wheel with the
pulling" spokes laced from the outside to the inside, ie so the heads face out and have the spoke crossing outside the last static spoke on the outside as would be done normally. (Pulling spokes - those that come off the top of the hub flange and point back.) Laced this way, the inside spokes will do their best to straighten as you pedal hard, pulling the outboard spokes in and improving clearance with your derailleur. Lacing in the opposite direction will have the opposite effect, making contact more likely.
Ben
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,071
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4412 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times
in
1,028 Posts
Depends on the disc. The oldest ones had a sheet metal part that went under the freewheel. But most of them for the last 30 years just attach to the spokes.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
Ben
#15
Banned
I have some made years ago by Huret, for freewheels , center is aluminum the , disc-ring around it molded plastic .
lays close, touching the drive side spokes ..
My Long distance solo touring bike , veteran of several multi month EU tours..
lays close, touching the drive side spokes ..
My Long distance solo touring bike , veteran of several multi month EU tours..
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times
in
1,103 Posts
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,071
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4412 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times
in
1,028 Posts
And uses up several millimeters of extra clearance on top of the spokes, even after accounting for the thin metal center.
Adding more stuff between the spokes and derailleur isn't going to solve a clearance problem.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,249
Bikes: 1964 Legnano Roma Olympiade, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Peugeot PR10, 2002 Specialized Allez, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2013 Culprit Croz Blade
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 818 Times
in
421 Posts
I had a spoke ticking the RD on my Super Course with a Suntour GT Luxe and 6 speed freewheel. I used a modern 1.37" id cassette spacer on the inside of the Shimano Megarange freewheel. It moved the whole chain and rd cage out just enough to clear the spokes. I also used the same size spacer under the fixed bearing cup to move the crank out and away from the frame so the inner chain ring bolts clear the frame. These spacers are very useful little devices, and look a lot cleaner than a dork ... sorry, ... spoke protector.
Last edited by Slightspeed; 03-21-18 at 07:51 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,071
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4412 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times
in
1,028 Posts
I had a spoke ticking the RD on my Super Course with a Suntour GT Luxe and 6 speed freewheel. I used a modern 1.37" id spacer on the inside of the Shimano Megarange freewheel. It moved the whole chain and rd cage out just enough to clear the spokes. I also used the same size spacer under the fixed bearing cup to move the crank out and away from the frame so the inner chain ring bolts clear the frame.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,249
Bikes: 1964 Legnano Roma Olympiade, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Peugeot PR10, 2002 Specialized Allez, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2013 Culprit Croz Blade
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 818 Times
in
421 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Except that a dork disk isn't going to grab the RD and rip it around over the cogs.
#23
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
No, but the dork disk presents other, very real dangers. -Tim-
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Indeed. Far be it from me to advocate actually employing one; I'd do everything possible to ensure one of these damn fuglifiers was redundant, myself.
I have a 10s billet cassette that I had a mate machine a few mm off the back of. It sits on a 7s cassette body I mounted on my RS-81 wheel, with the axle at 132mm. Non-drive spokes tightened a turn and a half or something like that. The Red RD clears the spokes by 3-4mm, even with the cassette overhanging the hub flange, partially due to the greater angle on the drive-side spokes.
I have a 10s billet cassette that I had a mate machine a few mm off the back of. It sits on a 7s cassette body I mounted on my RS-81 wheel, with the axle at 132mm. Non-drive spokes tightened a turn and a half or something like that. The Red RD clears the spokes by 3-4mm, even with the cassette overhanging the hub flange, partially due to the greater angle on the drive-side spokes.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,071
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4412 Post(s)
Liked 1,566 Times
in
1,028 Posts