Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

24" kids bike -- upgrade?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

24" kids bike -- upgrade?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-15, 11:51 AM
  #1  
icepick_trotsky 
Aspiring curmudgeon
Thread Starter
 
icepick_trotsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 2,486

Bikes: Guerciotti, Serotta, Gaulzetti

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
24" kids bike -- upgrade?

Not C&V, but I trust your collective wrenching judgment, and maybe some of you have been through this. I picked up a Raleigh Mountain Scout on CL for my niece's birthday. It has 24" wheels, and ok components, especially for a kids' bike -- Shimano Tourney derailleurs, Tektro V-brakes, etc. It also is ready to pull double duty as a boat anchor. I attribute a lot of this to the suspension fork, as a lot of the weight feels up front. Also, the triple crankset seems heavy and potentially confusing for a seven year old just learning the concept of shifting.

Generic google image result for bike in question:



New Raleigh kids' bikes have gone to a 1x drivetrain and a rigid fork (in some models), both of which seem like good ideas to me, but were not around on my local CL.



So, should I make some changes? Would I see a noticeable weight reduction and uptick in rideability? Are there even 24" rigid forks available out there? I realize this might be a waste of time/money/etc., since the only thing kids care about is what color the bike is, but my inner tinkerer is curious on how best to use this thing.
__________________
"Party on comrades" -- Lenin, probably

Last edited by icepick_trotsky; 11-06-15 at 12:25 PM.
icepick_trotsky is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 12:02 PM
  #2  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
The handlebar is absurdly on one with suspension, and probably too high on the other one as well. You may be able to lower the stem, or change it to one with no rise, but I think you'll have a hard time setting it up for a small rider.

If you could find a non-suspension fork, you could lower the front end considerably, while also changing the frame geometry considerably. That might not be good; but I'd try it if I could find a suitable fork (which is not likely).
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 12:19 PM
  #3  
yooperbiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Upper Michigan USA
Posts: 186
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think that you are over thinking this. Your niece will love the bike as it is (well, maybe after seat is adjusted up some I hope - almost looks like a BMX bike as-is). Most likely she will never shift the front derailer out of the middle ring however unless climbing a big hill (I know I rarely do).
yooperbiker is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 12:20 PM
  #4  
hig4s
Senior Member
 
hig4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 662

Bikes: Evil Insurgent, Giant Stance, Wife has Liv Cypress, son has Motobecane HT529

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
you might be able find a non suspension fork from an old 26" bike that would be the same length as the one on the old bike.
hig4s is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 12:21 PM
  #5  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times in 3,353 Posts
The front suspension does add a bit to the front stack height, but the bars looking tall may also be an artifact from a very low seat position in the stock photo.

Leave the front triple. She'll learn, and if you want her to ride hills, she'll need the gears to do it.

Personally, I wouldn't change a thing on the bike other than tuning it and making sure everything works.

One note, however. I got a Fuji Ace for my nephew. He has a lot of troubles shifting on the fly with the paddle shifters. I'm not sure if it is a strength thing or coordination, or both. We borrowed a 24" MTB last summer. The grip shifters have a good location on the bars, but for some reason he lacked the strength to easily shift. I'm not quite sure what the solution is. More leverage? Schwinn used to have about 6" tall stem shifters, but those are a bit out of style, and still aren't located where the hands are.

Anyway, the only thing I might do is try a comparision of the ease of use of trigger shifters vs grip shifters. I got it. Try grips on the right and triggers on the left. And, ask her which works best.
CliffordK is online now  
Old 11-06-15, 12:22 PM
  #6  
icepick_trotsky 
Aspiring curmudgeon
Thread Starter
 
icepick_trotsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 2,486

Bikes: Guerciotti, Serotta, Gaulzetti

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by hig4s
you might be able find a non suspension fork from an old 26" bike that would be the same length as the one on the old bike.
But the canti studs would be in the wrong spot for the 24" wheel, right?
__________________
"Party on comrades" -- Lenin, probably
icepick_trotsky is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 12:40 PM
  #7  
cbutler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by icepick_trotsky
Not C&V, but I trust your collective wrenching judgment, and maybe some of you have been through this. I picked up a Raleigh Mountain Scout on CL for my niece's birthday. It has 24" wheels, and ok components, especially for a kids' bike -- Shimano Acera derailleurs, Tektro V-brakes, etc. It also is ready to pull double duty as a boat anchor. I attribute a lot of this to the suspension fork, as a lot of the weight feels up front. Also, the triple crankset seems heavy and potentially confusing for a seven year old just learning the concept of shifting.

So, should I make some changes? Would I see a noticeable weight reduction and uptick in rideability? Are there even 24" rigid forks available out there? I realize this might be a waste of time/money/etc., since the only thing kids care about is what color the bike is, but my inner tinkerer is curious on how best to use this thing.
Your goals as I understand you are; 1) weight reduction, 2) Ease of use, 3) Reliability and 4) My inference of easy & inexpensive.

So, replace the knobby tires with more slick tires. The benefits are weight reduction, ease of acceleration and less friction on smooth surfaces, this makes the bike more fun. Don't buy slicks, but tires that are more like road touring/racing tires. You can expect to trim off about 400 to 600 grams.

I'd replace the FD, FD shift, and triple steel with a single ring alloy crank. You may save as much as 1000g and simplify both the shifting and the maintenance. Your niece will appreciate the simplicity of the gear shifting and the weight loss. There's also less to go wrong. Naturally, the chain will have to be shortened also. Once your niece outgrows this bike, the original parts can be reinstalled.

Replacing the fork is a great idea, you could save an easy 1200g, however, as you have pointed-out rigid, cheap, forks that will fit will be difficult to find.

Best of luck with your project!
cbutler is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 01:08 PM
  #8  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times in 4,189 Posts
If she is 6 and about to turn 7, whatever changes you make must make it easier for her to ride and more enjoyable.
That's an obvious, but I think it's often times lost when adults decide to do a labor of love project for a relative.
So it's worth mentioning.

At her age, twist shifters may be difficult to use. They are more difficult when new, so hopefully these will be easier since they have been worked in a bit thru use.

A triple is total overkill at her age. Yes, what another poster said is true, she will have to learn eventually, but the complexity of properly utilizing a 3x7 drive is lost on many adults, so getting a just turned 7yo to understand and remember is more than necessary right now.
Perhaps a 2x7? My almost 9yo daughter rides a 2x7 and rarely changes the ring up front. The gearing is set so she often times doesn't have to and can handle neighborhood hills with the 7 cogs in back.

A suspension fork is overkill, but buying a rigid fork could be a lot of money versus taking the cost for the bike, plus updates, plus fork change into account. Would a different bike that already has this stuff be better?
My daughter rides this-https://www.amazon.com/Diamondback-Bicycles-Clarity-Performance-24-Inch/dp/B00FC1TOIQ
It was $150 last fall. Just saying that if costs to get your bike to a good level are too much, perhaps it's best to buy new or a more complete used?


If she is not a new rider, she can handle more than a 1x7 system, most likely. It'll probably just be that she doesn't touch the front rings unless an adult suggests to during a long flat or hilly climb(depending on which ring she defaults to).

Best of luck


ETA- forgot to totally agree on the slicks. A 32-38mm road/hybrid tire will roll so much better.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 01:10 PM
  #9  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times in 3,353 Posts
Originally Posted by cbutler
I'd replace the FD, FD shift, and triple steel with a single ring alloy crank. You may save as much as 1000g and simplify both the shifting and the maintenance. Your niece will appreciate the simplicity of the gear shifting and the weight loss. There's also less to go wrong. Naturally, the chain will have to be shortened also. Once your niece outgrows this bike, the original parts can be reinstalled.
You can do all that, but you'll need a 150mm to 165mm length crank which may not be in your junk pile. And, either a huge cluster in the rear, or you may teach her bad habits of getting off the bike and walking up hills because she just doesn't have the power to ride them. Add low enough gears for the hills, and she might be lacking top end for the flats.

Is the goal to ride on roads or trails?
CliffordK is online now  
Old 11-06-15, 01:19 PM
  #10  
icepick_trotsky 
Aspiring curmudgeon
Thread Starter
 
icepick_trotsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 2,486

Bikes: Guerciotti, Serotta, Gaulzetti

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
You can do all that, but you'll need a 150mm to 165mm length crank which may not be in your junk pile. And, either a huge cluster in the rear, or you may teach her bad habits of getting off the bike and walking up hills because she just doesn't have the power to ride them. Add low enough gears for the hills, and she might be lacking top end for the flats.

Is the goal to ride on roads or trails?
Definitely trails, to begin with at least. Good point on the crankset -- that may be just as difficult to source as the fork. The chainrings are definitely not removable.
__________________
"Party on comrades" -- Lenin, probably
icepick_trotsky is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 01:47 PM
  #11  
hig4s
Senior Member
 
hig4s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 662

Bikes: Evil Insurgent, Giant Stance, Wife has Liv Cypress, son has Motobecane HT529

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by icepick_trotsky
But the canti studs would be in the wrong spot for the 24" wheel, right?
I keep forgetting, I have disc brakes.
hig4s is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 04:06 PM
  #12  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times in 3,353 Posts
Full Carbon plus Through Axle

Sinz Stealth Elite Cruiser 24" Carbon Fiber BMX Race Fork Fit Haro Redline DK GT | eBay

Who needs brakes?

There are a few options for steel unicrown forks with cantis, and not too expensive. It would drop the whole frontend down quite a bit (changing quite a bit on the bike).

Tubular 24" Fork Chrome 1" Threaded Steer Tube Canti Bosses New | eBay

Just make sure you have the right steer tube size, 1" vs 1 1/8".
CliffordK is online now  
Old 11-06-15, 05:11 PM
  #13  
cbutler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
You can do all that, but you'll need a 150mm to 165mm length crank which may not be in your junk pile. And, either a huge cluster in the rear, or you may teach her bad habits of getting off the bike and walking up hills because she just doesn't have the power to ride them. Add low enough gears for the hills, and she might be lacking top end for the flats.

Is the goal to ride on roads or trails?

Strong point. 150 - 165mm cranks are hard to find.
cbutler is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 05:25 PM
  #14  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times in 3,353 Posts
Originally Posted by cbutler
Strong point. 150 - 165mm cranks are hard to find.
I'm not saying they are that hard to find.

Amazon.com : Origin8 Triple Alloy Crankarms, 155mm, Silver : Bike Cranksets And Accessories : Sports & Outdoors

But, as with everything, the price adds up on what was a fairly cheap kid's bike.

I got a good deal on a right 165, but will probably have to resort to E-Bay for the left for a project I'm working on.
CliffordK is online now  
Old 11-06-15, 05:41 PM
  #15  
Rocket-Sauce 
Port
 
Rocket-Sauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,654

Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 1,866 Times in 1,064 Posts
Leave it alone. Maybe switch out the seatpost for a (MUCH) lighter Kalloy. Probably save a bunch of grams.

Lighter tires would be a noticeable upgrade -even for a 7yo. Maybe something a little less knobby. Conti Tour Rides or Schwalbe Marathon both come in 24 x 1.75" sizes are much better for road riding, sidewalks, multi-use paths and are fine for trails.

If she is anything like my daughter, a front basket is a necessity. A cool bell or horn is nice too.

I'd advise restraint when upgrading this bike. This is a kids bike that will be abused (hopefully!), and outgrown.
Rocket-Sauce is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 05:42 PM
  #16  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
FYI, FWIW, etc, my daughter has outgrown her trash picked "Motiv" MTB, 24" wheels, no suspension, cantilever brakes, POS. It is not high end. If anyone wants it, I can ship cheap. That is all. Unless you want photos, which I can provide... sooner or later.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 05:43 PM
  #17  
markk900
Senior Member
 
markk900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,648
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times in 336 Posts
My two cents: you are overthinking it. I understand the desire to make sure a loved one gets the "best", but remember she's a kid! Tell her the gears up front are for later and leave it on the middle ring until she sees she needs more gears. Weight is a non-issue for a 7 year old - how many on this list started with single gear 20" or 24" bikes that weighed as much or more, and never knew we should be disappointed?

I think the biggest thing to remember is she will be thrilled with such a cool bike.
markk900 is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 06:09 PM
  #18  
Roger M
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Snohomish, WA.
Posts: 2,866
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 469 Post(s)
Liked 2,443 Times in 646 Posts
My son is 7 years old, and near the end of fitting his 20" Specialized Hotrock. I am going to a small 26" wheeled bike for him next, probably a 13" ridged frame(rockhopper/stumpjumper or similar). As fast as the kids grow, a small 26" will last longer than a 24"(in my opinion).
Roger M is offline  
Old 11-06-15, 06:19 PM
  #19  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by Roger M
... As fast as the kids grow, a small 26" will last longer than a 24"(in my opinion).
I value your opinion, really, I do , just keep the target in mind. In my daughter's case, I had my doubts she would ever outgrow a 24" wheel. As it is, she has, though only just barely. If your son is destined to be a reasonably tall man, you will be right. My daughter is destined to be petite, though, and she got plenty of use out of this bike.

Edit, I'm not sure how long she rode the 24" mtb, probably about five years. She has now outgrown it at age 16. Obviously this is anecdotal evidence with no bearing on anyone else's kid. What can I say, mine is little, and is likely to stay that way. Be that as it may, I don't think it's good to put a kid on a bike that cannot fit them.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.

Last edited by rhm; 11-07-15 at 08:04 PM.
rhm is offline  
Old 11-07-15, 09:01 AM
  #20  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times in 4,189 Posts
Originally Posted by Roger M
My son is 7 years old, and near the end of fitting his 20" Specialized Hotrock. I am going to a small 26" wheeled bike for him next, probably a 13" ridged frame(rockhopper/stumpjumper or similar). As fast as the kids grow, a small 26" will last longer than a 24"(in my opinion).
Yeah...my daughter is tall for her age, regardless of gender, and her seat was slammed for the first few months on the 24" she started riding this year.
It's now proper height for her legs, and the bike fits well but is big. She will have it for another couple years most likely until she is 10.5yo.
At that point we will look at 26" bikes and even then it'll probably be a sloping tube or step thru.

Everyone is different in skill and height, but a 26" wheeled mtb just seems like a large bike for a 7yo, even with that frame size.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 06-06-19, 11:52 AM
  #21  
JohnSteven123
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi everyone. I know this is an old post, but I had to struggle myself trying to find suggestions and ended up going with trial and error. Here's a video from my 2015 Specialized Hotrock 24 upgrades. This can be done to the 2013 models and up since they have the rear disc brake mount. Also works for the 20" models but of course the fork and crankarm length will be different. Also, I don't think a 11-42 will be good for that size, maybe an 11-36 with a 34T chainring.

That being said, for anyone looking for a decent cheap bike worth upgrading or looking to find out just how much a hotrock can be upgraded, go to youtube and type "hotrock upgrades" and look for a video titled "2015 Specialized Hotrock 24" Upgrades". Because I am new here it won't let me post the URL.

Hotrocks can be found used on craiglist between $80 to $150, my kids loved the upgrades and were able to enjoy the trails instead of struggling through them.

Parts list:
Upgrades include:
- SR Suntour XCT crankset
- 34t narrow-wide chainring
- 11-42 Shimano deore cassette 10 speed
- Shimano deore m8000 hydraulic disc brakes
- Sram x9 10 speed derailleur and shifter
- SunRingle MTX-33 wheelset
- Schwalbe Rocket Ron 2.1
- Fox Float 32 100mm travel(26")
- ScudGood platform pedals

I would really recommend changing the handlebar since the stock one is heavy. Also a shorter them.

Also, since the new fork brings the bottom bracket up a little bit I would also change the crankset to a 165mm instead of 152mm for better leverage. I changed the fork after I did the crankset. And lastly, I would go for a wider tire, maybe 2.25 or 2.3. I asked specialized and 2.3 is the max size they recommend.

After swapping the stem upside down the handlebar height was the same as the stock setup(compared side by side). The bike is what every adult wants on a bike, but meant for kids.

I wanted to be fair to my kids and let them experience the trail the same way I do, and they loved it.
JohnSteven123 is offline  
Old 06-06-19, 08:44 PM
  #22  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times in 2,092 Posts
^
John's video:


Doesn't look like it's any lighter as the OP was looking for, but it sounded like @Icepick_trotski wanted that little Raleigh to be something it never would be - a kid's-sized Raleigh Sports Tourer.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 06-06-19, 09:05 PM
  #23  
ryansu
Senior Member
 
ryansu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841

Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times in 367 Posts
My daughter seemingly outgrew her 24" bike before she really settled into it so I would advise not doing a ton of work because this bike is just a way point it won't fit for all that long make it work for her but don't swap forks etc on a bike that will soon be out grown. That's my girl flying along during a Portland Parkways I love how confident and at ease she is and as you can see she is just about outgrown the bike and we hadn't had it much more than a year iirc. That might be the 20 and not the 24 but the point is the same, they get outgrown quickly

Have fun and take your niece on a nice flat ride on a quiet route to the ice cream shop or a park and instill that riding is fun!

ryansu is offline  
Old 06-07-19, 06:37 AM
  #24  
JohnSteven123
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
^
Doesn't look like it's any lighter as the OP was looking for

-Kurt
As far as weight loss I didn't really do much or care so much about it. But the air fork(even though its bigger) did drop some weight compared to the stock fork, it's amazing how heavy that small fork can be. Even the 26" RockShox Dart 3 on my oldest daughter's Rockhopper was heavier than the fox. The stock handlebar in the Hotrock is unbelievable heady too.
JohnSteven123 is offline  
Old 06-07-19, 08:22 AM
  #25  
bark_eater 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 2,107

Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 753 Post(s)
Liked 737 Times in 422 Posts
My son is 6 and is riding 16" bikes. They don't look to small, but I guess I keep my eyes open for the next size up bike. To circle back to C+V, I did pick up a 24" wheel late 70's Fuji. The plan is to convert it to 24" mountain wheels with long reach brakes. I was assuming I had three years before I needed to get it together..
bark_eater is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wheels78
Mountain Biking
16
12-25-18 02:05 PM
bexiesbruv
Bicycle Mechanics
10
01-14-15 06:49 AM
HunHarcos
Bicycle Mechanics
34
05-30-14 02:14 PM
Netdewt
Mountain Biking
6
09-14-13 08:13 PM
trailz
Mountain Biking
3
07-06-10 01:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.