Michelin tyre sizes accurate?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Michelin tyre sizes accurate?
I'm looking at buying some Michelin Pilot Sport tyres online & I was wondering if anyone knows how accurately Michelin label their tyre sizes. I bought a pair of 32mm Continental Top Contacts a while ago & when mounted they were waaay narrower than the 32mm Bontrager Race-Lites they were supposed to replace.
The Race-lites measure exactly 32mm mounted. The Pilot Sports come in 28, 32 & 35 apparently.
Thanks.
The Race-lites measure exactly 32mm mounted. The Pilot Sports come in 28, 32 & 35 apparently.
Thanks.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5792 Post(s)
Liked 2,582 Times
in
1,432 Posts
+1 Different manufacturers use different rim widths in determining their nominal widths, so there's no way to predict the true width (except with tubulars).
Then there's also a bit of rounding when converting true size to nominal size. No one wants to pioneer selling 24mm, 26mm, 27mm or 29mm tires so they tend to round to the nearest 1/8" (3mm or so) sticking with the common nominal sizes. One company's 28mm might really be 27mm while an other's might be 29mm.
Tire sizing is like shoe sizing, it's a good, but rough guide, but you never know until you try them on.
Then there's also a bit of rounding when converting true size to nominal size. No one wants to pioneer selling 24mm, 26mm, 27mm or 29mm tires so they tend to round to the nearest 1/8" (3mm or so) sticking with the common nominal sizes. One company's 28mm might really be 27mm while an other's might be 29mm.
Tire sizing is like shoe sizing, it's a good, but rough guide, but you never know until you try them on.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 1,180
Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is an ISO standard for tire widths, and it is based on standards for measurement such as ratios of rim inner width to ISO tire width. This assures you that for most rim/tire applications, if you follow the ISO width, you'll be close. For example, if a tire maker states they have ISO 32x622 size, then it's for a 700C wheel and the tire width was measure for a rim that was something over 16mm ISO (inner) width, probably more like 20mm. It's some ratio between 1.x - 2.0 for tire width to rim width. Can't remember off the top of my head what that ratio was, but it assures the end users and buyers of the actual profile of the tire. Maybe Sheldon Brown has some tips on tire sizing and measurement.
I haven't ridden Conti's in a long time. I don't know if they're still advertising 32C tires that run narrow by 5mm. But in the late 80's and early 90's, every maker practically did advertise tires that ran too narrow in reality - and that was to sell lighter tires than a competitor who might be honestly advertising the true width. I do recall that Michelin has been pretty good about honest sizing. And recent 32x622 for my 700c ran 32 1/2 mm wide on an old Mavic-MA40. Not sure if this is true of all their tires and can't remember the model name. But that's good enough for me.
I haven't ridden Conti's in a long time. I don't know if they're still advertising 32C tires that run narrow by 5mm. But in the late 80's and early 90's, every maker practically did advertise tires that ran too narrow in reality - and that was to sell lighter tires than a competitor who might be honestly advertising the true width. I do recall that Michelin has been pretty good about honest sizing. And recent 32x622 for my 700c ran 32 1/2 mm wide on an old Mavic-MA40. Not sure if this is true of all their tires and can't remember the model name. But that's good enough for me.
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks everyone.