High Speed Rail: what do other know that we don't?
#26
☢
Nice set of videos and some HSR press releases. But if we are thinking about the future isn't HSR simply looking at old technology that easily could prove obsolete if Elon Musk had his way? After all SpaceX is working and he has a plan that would be even greener than electric generated power for a HSR. And there would be lots more private investment and less increased taxes. Does he know something other countries don't? If you are going to tie HSR to being Green some things are even greener and faster.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLd7pXhIZQo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLd7pXhIZQo
The hyperloop sounds ideal particularly in regions of long expanse across a whole lot of nothing (Kansas comes to mind). But over the complex terrain switch to a more conventional systems. The greatest advantage of trains is that they're modular so we can add or subtract to suit the environment.
Remember, planes aren't all the same either. For long intercontinental travel we use wide-body jets. But on short jaunts across the state we still use pro driven aircraft which are more efficient. The best of both worlds.
#27
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
Nice set of videos and some HSR press releases. But if we are thinking about the future isn't HSR simply looking at old technology that easily could prove obsolete if Elon Musk had his way? After all SpaceX is working and he has a plan that would be even greener than electric generated power for a HSR. And there would be lots more private investment and less increased taxes. Does he know something other countries don't? If you are going to tie HSR to being Green some things are even greener and faster.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLd7pXhIZQo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLd7pXhIZQo
I wonder how tube security would be accomplished? I mean, one terrorist bomb on the tube somewhere while the train is on its way would be catastrophic.
#28
☢
I like how there are windows on the cars, but the Hyperloop train will be traveling in a tube. Maybe the train is outside the tube at the start and finish?
I wonder how tube security would be accomplished? I mean, one terrorist bomb on the tube somewhere while the train is on its way would be catastrophic.
I wonder how tube security would be accomplished? I mean, one terrorist bomb on the tube somewhere while the train is on its way would be catastrophic.
#30
☢
#31
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
If it's only one car at a time, it seems like we got ourselves a case of the Concorde in a tube. Which would mean seats won't be cheap.
It it would be no harder to derail a HSR full of passengers at 200 mph than attacking a hyper loop.
This is all bench racing because we don’t have a HSR or Hyper Loop. I am just saying as long as you are dreaming you should add the newest technology.
I would much rather Musk find a way of financing the Hyper Loop than taxing my neighbor through the nose for a train they don’t really seem to want.
Likes For Mobile 155:
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
To answer this question you only have to look at what people do. They look at their own comfort first and then if there is any excess they might think about some future they will not live to see.
When it comes to public sacrifice people what someone else to carry the load. We fight wars with people that want something different than we do. Every country and every government wants to believe they are the best and their ideas are worth more than any other country or government. It has been that way since someone was putting drawings on cave walls. It isn’t likely to change now.
As as long as people believe technology can keep us going sustainability becomes just a word. People will gamble against sustainability by living on an island made by an active volcano. They will believe scientists that say we have climate change but when the same people hear from the same scientists that the largest Caldera in the world is over due for an eruption they will give tours there and build s national park.
That at is how the human race is. We bet against the future. We aren’t as likely to invest in something that will not benefit our group directly, that goes for HSR when we had higher speed planes.
When it comes to public sacrifice people what someone else to carry the load. We fight wars with people that want something different than we do. Every country and every government wants to believe they are the best and their ideas are worth more than any other country or government. It has been that way since someone was putting drawings on cave walls. It isn’t likely to change now.
As as long as people believe technology can keep us going sustainability becomes just a word. People will gamble against sustainability by living on an island made by an active volcano. They will believe scientists that say we have climate change but when the same people hear from the same scientists that the largest Caldera in the world is over due for an eruption they will give tours there and build s national park.
That at is how the human race is. We bet against the future. We aren’t as likely to invest in something that will not benefit our group directly, that goes for HSR when we had higher speed planes.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
My my observations are only relativism in that they do not see your wishes regarding trains, Buses, dense living and lack of sprawl as absolute truths. I see your solutions as dreaming about a society that no longer exists, if it ever did.
#37
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
My my observations are only relativism in that they do not see your wishes regarding trains, Buses, dense living and lack of sprawl as absolute truths. I see your solutions as dreaming about a society that no longer exists, if it ever did.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
Assumptions of overpopulation are just that, assumptions. Let me ask you this: do you think it is possible for engineers to build a space station/vehicle that can sustain human life in a self-contained system outside of Earth's biosphere? If you do, why wouldn't you think humans can live sustainably within the biosphere? If not, then what do you think it is about the biosphere that makes human life possible, when it isn't possible to sustain outside the atmosphere?You're talking in circles. Relativism is asserting that the truth about anything is subjective to avoid dealing with that truth. It's an escape hatch when you're failing to win an argument against truth.
rel·a·tiv·ism/ˈrelədəˌvizəm/Learn to pronounce: Noun: the doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society, or historical context, and are not absolute.
is this what you meant to say I believe?
Last edited by Mobile 155; 05-11-19 at 11:26 AM.
#39
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
My point is that people who don't want to deal with truth as a real thing resort to relativism to deny it. They say one person's truth is another's lie or whatever, instead of acknowledging that there is such a thing as what's true and that those who are denying the truth are accepting lies in its place.
#40
☢
I sense ulterior motives at work here. Which is typically the case when obvious advancements are hindered due to frivolous arguments against it.
After all, an entire civil war was fought over the advancement to industrialization purely for the cause of greed and wealth. Once people become dependent on machines, the economy based on slave labor becomes obsolete.
After all, an entire civil war was fought over the advancement to industrialization purely for the cause of greed and wealth. Once people become dependent on machines, the economy based on slave labor becomes obsolete.
#41
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
I sense ulterior motives at work here. Which is typically the case when obvious advancements are hindered due to frivolous arguments against it.
After all, an entire civil war was fought over the advancement to industrialization purely for the cause of greed and wealth. Once people become dependent on machines, the economy based on slave labor becomes obsolete.
After all, an entire civil war was fought over the advancement to industrialization purely for the cause of greed and wealth. Once people become dependent on machines, the economy based on slave labor becomes obsolete.
In fact, I think you can look at the HSR question in terms of how different economies manage travel in relation to the broader economy. In the US, the automotive economy has become established as a growth engine for investors both domestic and around the world. So there is resistance to HSR or other forms of transportation that could change the demand for driving; whereas there is less interest around the world for converting other transportation systems to being fully automotive and devoid of passenger rail as a choice, because it is more difficult to change what's established than to obstruct change when it is sought for whatever reasons.
Passenger trains were fairly common in the past, I've heard. Ironically, highways and sprawl were railroaded through to replace passenger rail and render it obsolete. Now we're stuck with highways and many of the rail corridors have been converted into lovely rail-trails, which is a good thing imo. So I would say keep the rail-trails and work on using buses as a type of 'train' that runs on highways instead of rails. In that way, highway expansion can be avoided by consolidating travelers into less vehicles overall.
#42
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,396 Times
in
2,056 Posts
Passenger trains were fairly common in the past, I've heard. Ironically, highways and sprawl were railroaded through to replace passenger rail and render it obsolete. Now we're stuck with highways and many of the rail corridors have been converted into lovely rail-trails, which is a good thing imo. So I would say keep the rail-trails and work on using buses as a type of 'train' that runs on highways instead of rails. In that way, highway expansion can be avoided by consolidating travelers into less vehicles overall.
Likes For dedhed:
#43
☢
It's not that simple, but this thread is drifting away from high speed rail. If you want to continue on the 19th century, though, it was the beginning of railroads. Westward expansion created more economic opportunities for commerce/trade on/with the east coast. Human labor and its use/exploitation were changing, but it's not like everyone was liberated from work by the machines taking over and providing for them.
In fact, I think you can look at the HSR question in terms of how different economies manage travel in relation to the broader economy. In the US, the automotive economy has become established as a growth engine for investors both domestic and around the world. So there is resistance to HSR or other forms of transportation that could change the demand for driving; whereas there is less interest around the world for converting other transportation systems to being fully automotive and devoid of passenger rail as a choice, because it is more difficult to change what's established than to obstruct change when it is sought for whatever reasons.
Passenger trains were fairly common in the past, I've heard. Ironically, highways and sprawl were railroaded through to replace passenger rail and render it obsolete. Now we're stuck with highways and many of the rail corridors have been converted into lovely rail-trails, which is a good thing imo. So I would say keep the rail-trails and work on using buses as a type of 'train' that runs on highways instead of rails. In that way, highway expansion can be avoided by consolidating travelers into less vehicles overall.
In fact, I think you can look at the HSR question in terms of how different economies manage travel in relation to the broader economy. In the US, the automotive economy has become established as a growth engine for investors both domestic and around the world. So there is resistance to HSR or other forms of transportation that could change the demand for driving; whereas there is less interest around the world for converting other transportation systems to being fully automotive and devoid of passenger rail as a choice, because it is more difficult to change what's established than to obstruct change when it is sought for whatever reasons.
Passenger trains were fairly common in the past, I've heard. Ironically, highways and sprawl were railroaded through to replace passenger rail and render it obsolete. Now we're stuck with highways and many of the rail corridors have been converted into lovely rail-trails, which is a good thing imo. So I would say keep the rail-trails and work on using buses as a type of 'train' that runs on highways instead of rails. In that way, highway expansion can be avoided by consolidating travelers into less vehicles overall.
#44
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
Passenger trains were fairly common in the past, I've heard. Ironically, highways and sprawl were railroaded through to replace passenger rail and render it obsolete. Now we're stuck with highways and many of the rail corridors have been converted into lovely rail-trails, which is a good thing imo. So I would say keep the rail-trails and work on using buses as a type of 'train' that runs on highways instead of rails. In that way, highway expansion can be avoided by consolidating travelers into less vehicles overall.
That right there tells you how the USA views rail, whether freight or passenger. In my town, one old rail line was pulled up to make space for freeway expansion. Not enough freight or passenger traffic on that rail line to keep it. A rail to trail would have been nice, or even a commuter train, but this city doesn't have commuter trains that come in from the burbs.
Here, as well as other places, it's the USA's diminished manufacturing that has reduced freight rail. It used to be the manufacturing companies had rail service directly to their plant for bringing in raw materials. There are plenty of old manufacturing plants around here that have shuttered and the rail service spur to their building has been cut off from the main line.
What direct freight rail service we still have here is mostly related to oil, gas, petrochem, and the Houston ship channel delivering imported autos and container cars full of whatever came in from overseas.
By the way, many of the old manufacturing plants I have mentioned have been turned into new neighborhoods full of narrow 3 story condos. Those people that live close to the center of the city are the people that high speed rail will be serving if all goes as planned here.
#46
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
So far, the USA still isn't like this.
https://japantoday.com/category/feat...cated-in-japan
https://www.citylab.com/transportati...ations/560822/
https://japantoday.com/category/feat...cated-in-japan
https://www.citylab.com/transportati...ations/560822/
#47
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
You have to share planes with other passengers when you fly.
The difference with trains and buses is that you can stand up and use the bathroom without pulling off the road. Flying would be fine if it didn't burn so much fuel and make so much noise and fill up the skies with traffic.
Trains would ultimately be better, but there's just no way to stop them from becoming cancelled projects that ultimately served no other purpose than to put money in people's pockets to spend on driving.
Somehow buses have to evolve as a bridge between flying and trains, but it's a huge cultural challenge for people who just can't understand the limitations of air-travel and driving because that's what they see as normal and thus accept uncritically.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
Assumptions of overpopulation are just that, assumptions. Let me ask you this: do you think it is possible for engineers to build a space station/vehicle that can sustain human life in a self-contained system outside of Earth's biosphere? If you do, why wouldn't you think humans can live sustainably within the biosphere? If not, then what do you think it is about the biosphere that makes human life possible, when it isn't possible to sustain outside the atmosphere?
You're talking in circles. Relativism is asserting that the truth about anything is subjective to avoid dealing with that truth. It's an escape hatch when you're failing to win an argument against truth.
You're talking in circles. Relativism is asserting that the truth about anything is subjective to avoid dealing with that truth. It's an escape hatch when you're failing to win an argument against truth.
Making a point for HSR against planes is one thing. Trying to add sustainability to the argument is not going to prove we need HSR. Once again my opinion based on population studies.
#49
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
That right there tells you how the USA views rail, whether freight or passenger. In my town, one old rail line was pulled up to make space for freeway expansion. Not enough freight or passenger traffic on that rail line to keep it. A rail to trail would have been nice, or even a commuter train, but this city doesn't have commuter trains that come in from the burbs.
Here, as well as other places, it's the USA's diminished manufacturing that has reduced freight rail. It used to be the manufacturing companies had rail service directly to their plant for bringing in raw materials. There are plenty of old manufacturing plants around here that have shuttered and the rail service spur to their building has been cut off from the main line.
What direct freight rail service we still have here is mostly related to oil, gas, petrochem, and the Houston ship channel delivering imported autos and container cars full of whatever came in from overseas.
By the way, many of the old manufacturing plants I have mentioned have been turned into new neighborhoods full of narrow 3 story condos. Those people that live close to the center of the city are the people that high speed rail will be serving if all goes as planned here.
Here, as well as other places, it's the USA's diminished manufacturing that has reduced freight rail. It used to be the manufacturing companies had rail service directly to their plant for bringing in raw materials. There are plenty of old manufacturing plants around here that have shuttered and the rail service spur to their building has been cut off from the main line.
What direct freight rail service we still have here is mostly related to oil, gas, petrochem, and the Houston ship channel delivering imported autos and container cars full of whatever came in from overseas.
By the way, many of the old manufacturing plants I have mentioned have been turned into new neighborhoods full of narrow 3 story condos. Those people that live close to the center of the city are the people that high speed rail will be serving if all goes as planned here.
Umm, things are a bit insane in Harris County though lately, somebody hit a barge and made it look like a missing slice of pie with gasoline filling. It's raining everything but Ozzy Osbourne's Crazy Babies, kid got shot trying to commit a robbery, maybe you need a train.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
Likes For Rollfast:
#50
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
Umm, things are a bit insane in Harris County though lately, somebody hit a barge and made it look like a missing slice of pie with gasoline filling. It's raining everything but Ozzy Osbourne's Crazy Babies, kid got shot trying to commit a robbery, maybe you need a train.
That took 4.75 hours including a quick dinner stop and I got stopped by A TRAIN in Hearne, Texas on the way up. Filled up my gas tank while everyone else waited for that TRAIN.