Wheels: Zonda vs Shimano vs Fulcrum
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wheels: Zonda vs Shimano vs Fulcrum
I'm looking to upgrade my budget Axis 2.0 wheel set for something lighter and stiffer. I weigh 180lb and do 90% hilly roads and about 10% gravel/ chip seal roads. I want something that's fast but also durable and reliable. I want to run 28mm tire eventually too. A big priority is that the wheel lasts long and I don't have to service it often My choices are as folllows;
Shimano RS81 C24
Campangolo Zonda
Fulcrum Racing 3
1.Based on my needs, weight and terrain riding style which would you recommend?
2. Also anyone who has the above wheelsete would love to hear your opinion/review on it, even if it's a quick sentence or two.
Shimano RS81 C24
Campangolo Zonda
Fulcrum Racing 3
1.Based on my needs, weight and terrain riding style which would you recommend?
2. Also anyone who has the above wheelsete would love to hear your opinion/review on it, even if it's a quick sentence or two.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,932
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1821 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
977 Posts
The Zonda and the Racing 3 are similar in weight and quality. Fulcrum is a Campagnolo sub brand, many hub components from one will fit the other.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,932
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1821 Post(s)
Liked 1,697 Times
in
977 Posts
Oh, and both the Zondas and the Racing 3 are available in 2-Way Fit versions allowing the use of conventional or road tubeless clinchers
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Round Rock
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
I recently got a set of Shimano RS81 C24 wheels to replace the Mavic CXP22's that came with my bike. I chose Shimano wheels because their products are reliable - I couldn't find any complaints about them on the web except that the initial hub adjustment was occasionally too tight. The wheels were perfectly true out of the box. They are noticeably lighter and easier to accelerate than the original Mavic's. Also, they are noticeably stiffer laterally when leaning into turns. Their hubs can easily be "digitally adjusted" (i.e., adjusted by hand, no tools needed). I'm very pleased with them.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
I have a set of the RS81's and they're smooth as butter and I've put my share of miles on them. They're quiet, durable, they brake well and they're super lightweight. I'm actually looking at replacing them.. (just not 100% sure yet) for a set of custom wheels.. but You can't go wrong with them.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a set of the RS81's and they're smooth as butter and I've put my share of miles on them. They're quiet, durable, they brake well and they're super lightweight. I'm actually looking at replacing them.. (just not 100% sure yet) for a set of custom wheels.. but You can't go wrong with them.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a set of the RS81's and they're smooth as butter and I've put my share of miles on them. They're quiet, durable, they brake well and they're super lightweight. I'm actually looking at replacing them.. (just not 100% sure yet) for a set of custom wheels.. but You can't go wrong with them.
Have you ridden them on any gravel or chip seal roads and had any issues?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
I actually rode on a dirt/gravel road on Monday with a LBS ride group. The stretch was a good 2 miles and they were fine. I get nervous riding roads like that on a road bike with road tires.. but the Refuse tires have some good tread on them, as do all Maxxis tires.. so, it felt good. It's a durable wheel.. it's made for that purpose... and that's why I have them.. because I needed something durable, fast and light.. Which is kind of like a dream in the world of cycling wheels. lol
I wouldn't consider myself a typical road rider. I started out a few years back as a disabled VET trying to overcome some physical limitations through cycling with an organization called Project Hero. I don't count watts or cadence and I'm not trying to be a professional racer.. Although I really do enjoy cycling.. I'm not awesome at it.. especially the climbing portion. So, my needs may be different than most. What I needed was a durable, light bike that I could ride for years to come because I don't quite have the budget that some on here have with warehouses full of bikes and carbon wheels.. lol SO whatever I buy.. needs to last.. so, that's my #1 criteria.. If that makes any difference. OH and I should add that I'm 200lbs.. I fluctuate between 180 and 200lbs pretty regularly, lol)
Last edited by motosonic; 05-11-17 at 09:46 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 702
Bikes: 2015 CAAD 10; 2016 Felt Z85
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 156 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
I have the Fulcrum Racing 3 wheels. At about 155 lbs myself, I feel good about riding those. I believe they have less spokes than other wheels, so at 180 lbs I'm not sure how "durable" they will be for you. Not that 180 lbs is heavy - it's just that I know I wouldn't have to worry about spoke count - you may need to consider it...maybe not. Just throwing it out there.
Actually, after checking - it looks like they do put a "warning" in the description right at 82KG (180 lbs).
https://www.wiggle.com/fulcrum-racing...wheelset-2014/
Actually, after checking - it looks like they do put a "warning" in the description right at 82KG (180 lbs).
https://www.wiggle.com/fulcrum-racing...wheelset-2014/
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have the Fulcrum Racing 3 wheels. At about 155 lbs myself, I feel good about riding those. I believe they have less spokes than other wheels, so at 180 lbs I'm not sure how "durable" they will be for you. Not that 180 lbs is heavy - it's just that I know I wouldn't have to worry about spoke count - you may need to consider it...maybe not. Just throwing it out there.
Actually, after checking - it looks like they do put a "warning" in the description right at 82KG (180 lbs).
wiggle.com | Fulcrum Racing 3 Clincher Wheelset | Road Race Wheels
Actually, after checking - it looks like they do put a "warning" in the description right at 82KG (180 lbs).
wiggle.com | Fulcrum Racing 3 Clincher Wheelset | Road Race Wheels
#13
Senior Member
I was just going through this same decision making process just a few weeks ago. I ended going with the Zondas with price and the redesigned C17 rim being major factors. I'm 130 lbs tho, so I wanted a pretty low spoke count, but having said that the Shimanos are actually the lowest here, by 1 spoke. They are still sitting in the box, so unfortunately I can't offer any insight on how they ride.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,956
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3957 Post(s)
Liked 7,310 Times
in
2,950 Posts
I have a set of Zondas, a set of Fulcrum 3s, and a set of Fulcrum 3 two-way fit. They are, for all intents and purposes, the same wheels. I weigh the same as you and ride a lot in the mountains and on dirt roads. I have never broken a spoke and the wheels rarely need to be trued.
#15
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 380
Bikes: 2024 Specialized Tarmac SL8Pro, 2022 Specialized Epic Evo, 2021 Framed Alaskan Fatbike,2019 Trek Emonda SL6 Pro, 2018 Trek Stache 9.7, 2013 Specialized Roubaix SL4 Expert, 2009 Ritchey Breakaway Cross, 2016 Lynskey ProCross, 2008 Trek T1000 Tandem,
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I have a set of the RS81's and they're smooth as butter and I've put my share of miles on them. They're quiet, durable, they brake well and they're super lightweight. I'm actually looking at replacing them.. (just not 100% sure yet) for a set of custom wheels.. but You can't go wrong with them.
I've got a set of RS81s too. I notice no difference between these and the Dura Ace C24s that I've got over 25000 miles on. They both are very smooth and spin great. I'm 183 lbs.
The RS81s are something like 100-120 g heavier than the Dura-Ace but a few hundred dollars less .
I love Shimano wheels as they are easily serviceable.
Almost all the roads I ride are chip sealed and full of pot holes and cracks too, no issues with the ride on chip seal.
#16
Farmer tan
I've got Dura Ace C24s and Fulcrum Racing 5s.
Can't really feel a difference while riding.
The Fulcrum bearings have some lateral play after 10k miles.
Can't really feel a difference while riding.
The Fulcrum bearings have some lateral play after 10k miles.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree 100%.
I've got a set of RS81s too. I notice no difference between these and the Dura Ace C24s that I've got over 25000 miles on. They both are very smooth and spin great. I'm 183 lbs.
The RS81s are something like 100-120 g heavier than the Dura-Ace but a few hundred dollars less .
I love Shimano wheels as they are easily serviceable.
Almost all the roads I ride are chip sealed and full of pot holes and cracks too, no issues with the ride on chip seal.
I've got a set of RS81s too. I notice no difference between these and the Dura Ace C24s that I've got over 25000 miles on. They both are very smooth and spin great. I'm 183 lbs.
The RS81s are something like 100-120 g heavier than the Dura-Ace but a few hundred dollars less .
I love Shimano wheels as they are easily serviceable.
Almost all the roads I ride are chip sealed and full of pot holes and cracks too, no issues with the ride on chip seal.
#18
Farmer tan
I'm your weight, and the dura ace c24 have been bullet proof. They're essentially the same wheels as the rs81, except with dura ace hubs.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 430
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#20
Farmer tan
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 546
Bikes: colnago titanio oval master, pinarello treviso es, centurion prestige, tomac ti 26er, lemond buenos aires, mbk 753, vitus 992 and zx1, rocky mountain hammer disc,bd century titanium, specialized venge expert
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked 39 Times
in
20 Posts
I have both rs81 c35s and a couple of sets of zondas...both spin well. The zondas are similar to campys eurus without the aluminum spokes.
I'm really pleased with both.
I'm really pleased with both.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pstock
Road Cycling
5
06-03-14 04:20 AM
darraman
Manufacturer, Retailer, Survey and Consumer Feedback
0
03-15-14 03:11 AM