View Poll Results: Should we construct more velodromes in the United States?
Yes, we are lagging behind other countries!
18
69.23%
No, we're fine with the 28 velodrome we already got.
2
7.69%
Undecided...
6
23.08%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll
Should we construct more velodromes in the United States?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 118
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times
in
11 Posts
Should we construct more velodromes in the United States?
I looked at the statistics of track cycling in the United States. And according to Wikipedia, it's pretty disturbing. There are only 28 velodromes in the US while Japan has 70. And of those, only two are indoor(one of them, the VELO Sports Center, will be used in the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles). The nearest velodrome from where I live is 150 miles away in Atlanta. That's a three-hour drive. We need the build more velodromes in this country. If the Japanese can cram 70 velodromes in an area the size of California, we should have at least one velodrome in each state. Federal and state funding for outdoor velodromes shouldn't be too much of a problem. Concrete for an olympic size velodrome(250 meters) is $22,000. So we're looking at $25,000-100,000 for the outdoor option. Indoor velodromes, on the other hand, are much more expensive, as their costs can easily go into the millions.
We have opportunity to do this before the 2028 Olympics start. It'll be a great opportunity to find new talent in track cycling, as well as adding recreational diversity.
We have opportunity to do this before the 2028 Olympics start. It'll be a great opportunity to find new talent in track cycling, as well as adding recreational diversity.
Last edited by satrain18; 04-08-18 at 12:06 PM. Reason: proofreading
#2
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Hi, Satrain,
I appreciate your enthusiasm. I, too, want more velodromes even though I live in Atlanta near one with probably the longest outdoor season in the US (a full 6 months) of racing and year-round training.
It's not exactly an, "If you build it, they will come." situation. I've learned through the years of watching (and helping a bit) that it's complicated.
Velodromes cost money and aren't exactly money-makers. Many are 100% volunteer-run (volunteer meaning no pay at all). I believe the lack of volunteer help led to the current pausing of events at Brian Piccolo Velodrome in South Florida. Boulder is a new velodrome...that is now for sale (If I remember correctly). Both are similar to that which you propose.
Track training and racing is awesome and exciting. IHMO, we have to figure out a way to communicate that to others and have capacity racing fields which will bring money in which will allow velodromes to pay staff which will allow for more racing, etc...
I don't know Rock Hill's story, but it seems to have started with enthusiasm for track racing like you have now. Like we all have. So, it's definitely possible.
I appreciate your enthusiasm. I, too, want more velodromes even though I live in Atlanta near one with probably the longest outdoor season in the US (a full 6 months) of racing and year-round training.
It's not exactly an, "If you build it, they will come." situation. I've learned through the years of watching (and helping a bit) that it's complicated.
Velodromes cost money and aren't exactly money-makers. Many are 100% volunteer-run (volunteer meaning no pay at all). I believe the lack of volunteer help led to the current pausing of events at Brian Piccolo Velodrome in South Florida. Boulder is a new velodrome...that is now for sale (If I remember correctly). Both are similar to that which you propose.
Track training and racing is awesome and exciting. IHMO, we have to figure out a way to communicate that to others and have capacity racing fields which will bring money in which will allow velodromes to pay staff which will allow for more racing, etc...
I don't know Rock Hill's story, but it seems to have started with enthusiasm for track racing like you have now. Like we all have. So, it's definitely possible.
#3
Senior Member
I'm for more velodromes in general... but Japan is a TERRIBLE comparison to make. There are tons of tracks in Japan because Keirin racing is a big deal in gambling.
Unfortunately with the number that are closing around the US, it's hard to get the ball rolling. (We tried to get interest built in East TN but it's a tough sell) Also, our numbers (and we were trying to go as "cheap" as possible) were way over $100k.
Personally, I think if you want a velodrome to succeed, it needs to be a "sport complex" that offers more than just cycling. OR it needs to be in the right location with the right support. Rock Hill has done pretty well (at least it looks it) because the entire area is focused on cycling (with the World class BMX venue, mtn bike trails, a crit course, etc) and the city is fully (again, seemingly) behind it. They also have a paid staff.
Unfortunately with the number that are closing around the US, it's hard to get the ball rolling. (We tried to get interest built in East TN but it's a tough sell) Also, our numbers (and we were trying to go as "cheap" as possible) were way over $100k.
Personally, I think if you want a velodrome to succeed, it needs to be a "sport complex" that offers more than just cycling. OR it needs to be in the right location with the right support. Rock Hill has done pretty well (at least it looks it) because the entire area is focused on cycling (with the World class BMX venue, mtn bike trails, a crit course, etc) and the city is fully (again, seemingly) behind it. They also have a paid staff.
Last edited by Morelock; 04-08-18 at 12:50 PM.
#4
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I'm sure that @Baby Puke can tell us more about how JP velodromes operate, from local facilities up to big gambling arenas. He races there.
Essentially, the Keirin racing are not unlike horse racing in the US.
Essentially, the Keirin racing are not unlike horse racing in the US.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
That would be a very rough price for the concrete only (at $90 a cubic yard for a 4" slab) for a track, not including the apron, infield, or any other formed concrete areas , sidewalks, bleachers, some kind of paddock area, Then add in costs for excavation, labor, forms, steel, land- land is a big one, permits, insurance, --- then the intangibles like local interest and support, a team of pumped up volunteers
--- its a pretty big job
Enjoy the DLV, - its only 150 miles away. My track was 180, but it closed and now the next closest is around 500.
Even if you can only make it once a month, its still worth it, -- get as many gate drops in as you can
--- its a pretty big job
Enjoy the DLV, - its only 150 miles away. My track was 180, but it closed and now the next closest is around 500.
Even if you can only make it once a month, its still worth it, -- get as many gate drops in as you can
#6
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Agreed.
satrain18, you can still have a very successful season being 150 miles away. When I lived in NOVA, I was about 200 miles away from TTown. A buddy and I trained religiously and went to TTown about once a month for training or racing. We still did well at Masters Nationals.
The way to approach it is:
- Get stronger and fitter in the gym and on the road and on the trainer.
- Go to the track periodically to get used to the curves at various speeds.
- Don't spend your track time doing workouts that you can do at home.
- Work on finding gearing that feels comfortable that allows you to hit the cadence ranges that you want to hit.
- Try to get down one day/month. The track is open from dawn to dusk for training unless there is a scheduled event (check the calendar). Even holidays. I was training on Easter last week.
EDIT:
I know this won't get you as much mass start experience as you would like as fast as you would like. But, it's a start.
satrain18, you can still have a very successful season being 150 miles away. When I lived in NOVA, I was about 200 miles away from TTown. A buddy and I trained religiously and went to TTown about once a month for training or racing. We still did well at Masters Nationals.
The way to approach it is:
- Get stronger and fitter in the gym and on the road and on the trainer.
- Go to the track periodically to get used to the curves at various speeds.
- Don't spend your track time doing workouts that you can do at home.
- Work on finding gearing that feels comfortable that allows you to hit the cadence ranges that you want to hit.
- Try to get down one day/month. The track is open from dawn to dusk for training unless there is a scheduled event (check the calendar). Even holidays. I was training on Easter last week.
EDIT:
I know this won't get you as much mass start experience as you would like as fast as you would like. But, it's a start.
Last edited by carleton; 04-08-18 at 04:04 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4340 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times
in
995 Posts
This question is more like "should we have more golf courses in the US". Because velodromes are such specialty spaces that they really require a fairly large paying customer base to make them worthwhile.
I don't think "if you build them, they will come" is enough of an argument to spend public funds on such a specialized sport.
I don't think "if you build them, they will come" is enough of an argument to spend public funds on such a specialized sport.
#8
Semi-Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 202
Bikes: ‘02 LeMond Tete De Course Titanium (road), ‘98 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo (mtb), ‘88 GT Mach One (BMX)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
That doesn’t cover seating, paddock, infield, parking and any utilities such as drainage, bathrooms, power, nor special site considerations, which could all double the budget.
But hey, we can all agree that we need more of them! And I’d LOVE one near me!
Last edited by RobotGuy; 04-08-18 at 05:24 PM.
#9
aka mattio
the notion that they should be worthwhile, or financially sustainable just based on the input of their users, betrays exactly why we don't have more in the USA.
a lot of countries invest public money into athletic facilities, including velodromes - because having them and running them is socially beneficial.
we're so far gone in the usa that we don't expect public investment in cultural projects like this.
a lot of countries invest public money into athletic facilities, including velodromes - because having them and running them is socially beneficial.
we're so far gone in the usa that we don't expect public investment in cultural projects like this.
#10
Senior Member
$1 to $1,5 millions for a 250m wood track, plus from $3 to $10 for the cover, without any additional system, and up to 700 - 1500 seated places.
Rio cost (corruption cost included) about $ 40 millions for the whole venue, with powerful aircon system (tropical weather, 45C summer days) and 4000 seated places, rooms, etc.
Concrete open venues can cost $2 to $4 millions only the track depending on the ground place. Add seats and infra, do the math..
Ok, we can build tracks on amateur way - good tracks anyway - wood or metal frames, naval (water resistant) plywood panels, etc., and without infra/seats.. but.. will it be capable of holding serious events, or it will be only for "local" use/competitions?
Rio cost (corruption cost included) about $ 40 millions for the whole venue, with powerful aircon system (tropical weather, 45C summer days) and 4000 seated places, rooms, etc.
Concrete open venues can cost $2 to $4 millions only the track depending on the ground place. Add seats and infra, do the math..
Ok, we can build tracks on amateur way - good tracks anyway - wood or metal frames, naval (water resistant) plywood panels, etc., and without infra/seats.. but.. will it be capable of holding serious events, or it will be only for "local" use/competitions?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 607
Bikes: Serotta steel track bike, Specialized MTB
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
BTW Velo Sports Center cannot be used for Olympic, because of two big columns
One of the workers told me that they have to rebuild the velodrome.
One of the workers told me that they have to rebuild the velodrome.
#12
Senior Member
I'm sure that @Baby Puke can tell us more about how JP velodromes operate, from local facilities up to big gambling arenas. He races there.
Essentially, the Keirin racing are not unlike horse racing in the US.
Essentially, the Keirin racing are not unlike horse racing in the US.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4340 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times
in
995 Posts
Yeah, pro keirin makes it an unfair comparison, but there are still a dozen or so public tracks in Japan, and more being built. Plus many pro keirin tracks now welcome non-pro's via club days, so there is a lot of access over here. As others have alluded, the difference is cultural, and specifically the culture of money in the US and what garners investment.
I'm not trying to be downer, but a big banked track is a specialized thing. The best model to look at is probably the Kenosha Velodrome, which is pretty much mounded earth, concrete, lights and grass in a larger park.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,569
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 678 Times
in
429 Posts
I think Rock Hill cost something like $4m to $5m total to construct.
There were probably areas they could have cut some costs, but not many.
Also, the Boulder Valley Velodrome was being sold for $4.5m, IIRC, though I think a large part of that cost was the value of the land.
There were probably areas they could have cut some costs, but not many.
Also, the Boulder Valley Velodrome was being sold for $4.5m, IIRC, though I think a large part of that cost was the value of the land.
#15
aka mattio
We've seen several of these tracks cropping up: 166m, because they're cheap. Plywood, because it's cheap; and no other accommodations, essentially. Maybe a trailer and a portapotty deposited on a piece of vacant land.
They're capable of turning a cycling scene with no track racing into a cycling scene with some track racing, but I have doubts that they're either optimized for beginners, or capable of contributing to a broader, nationwide track cycling scene. And both, I believe, are particularly important for really fertilizing track racing in the USA.
#16
Semi-Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 202
Bikes: ‘02 LeMond Tete De Course Titanium (road), ‘98 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo (mtb), ‘88 GT Mach One (BMX)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
In NJ, the local velodrome association doesn’t actually have a velodrome. They simply rent the local paved circle track on specified days (automotive racing). This is likely the solution in many locals where the $500,000 - $10 million construction cost simply isn’t doable.
$25 for the day (training), about $100-$200 per race or like $280 for the year. Much more economical business model.
$25 for the day (training), about $100-$200 per race or like $280 for the year. Much more economical business model.
#17
Idiot Emeritus
Here's my naive viewpoint. Las Vegas, to my way of thinking, would be a prime spot for an indoor 250. With the gaming, they could hold Japanese style keirin events on it. Gambling, that's the industry there. I'm surprised - once again, naively thinking - that the city or gaming commission hasn't already looked at that notion and that there isn't a velodrome there already.
__________________
"Can you add a signature line please? The lack of words makes me think you are being held hostage and being told to be quiet"
"Can you add a signature line please? The lack of words makes me think you are being held hostage and being told to be quiet"
#18
Senior Member
Here's my naive viewpoint. Las Vegas, to my way of thinking, would be a prime spot for an indoor 250. With the gaming, they could hold Japanese style keirin events on it. Gambling, that's the industry there. I'm surprised - once again, naively thinking - that the city or gaming commission hasn't already looked at that notion and that there isn't a velodrome there already.
But it may turn out to be like the Jai Alai surge in the 80s fueled by betting. Since then the sport has declined most places except it still takes place on Florida.
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Houston
Posts: 13
Bikes: Sworks 2012, Sworks 2016 2000 Corima Cougar
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hi, Satrain,
I appreciate your enthusiasm. I, too, want more velodromes even though I live in Atlanta near one with probably the longest outdoor season in the US (a full 6 months) of racing and year-round training.
It's not exactly an, "If you build it, they will come." situation. I've learned through the years of watching (and helping a bit) that it's complicated.
Velodromes cost money and aren't exactly money-makers. Many are 100% volunteer-run (volunteer meaning no pay at all). I believe the lack of volunteer help led to the current pausing of events at Brian Piccolo Velodrome in South Florida. Boulder is a new velodrome...that is now for sale (If I remember correctly). Both are similar to that which you propose.
Track training and racing is awesome and exciting. IHMO, we have to figure out a way to communicate that to others and have capacity racing fields which will bring money in which will allow velodromes to pay staff which will allow for more racing, etc...
I don't know Rock Hill's story, but it seems to have started with enthusiasm for track racing like you have now. Like we all have. So, it's definitely possible.
I appreciate your enthusiasm. I, too, want more velodromes even though I live in Atlanta near one with probably the longest outdoor season in the US (a full 6 months) of racing and year-round training.
It's not exactly an, "If you build it, they will come." situation. I've learned through the years of watching (and helping a bit) that it's complicated.
Velodromes cost money and aren't exactly money-makers. Many are 100% volunteer-run (volunteer meaning no pay at all). I believe the lack of volunteer help led to the current pausing of events at Brian Piccolo Velodrome in South Florida. Boulder is a new velodrome...that is now for sale (If I remember correctly). Both are similar to that which you propose.
Track training and racing is awesome and exciting. IHMO, we have to figure out a way to communicate that to others and have capacity racing fields which will bring money in which will allow velodromes to pay staff which will allow for more racing, etc...
I don't know Rock Hill's story, but it seems to have started with enthusiasm for track racing like you have now. Like we all have. So, it's definitely possible.
Multi-use is not an easy sell because you have a dirt BMX track that I can build with a dozer, nothing that compares to velodrome construction. I have also heard that Rock hill is open during the day with little use. We had that here in Houston but could not sustain paid management. Had we built the track in central Houston say Memorial park it might have stood a chance. Southside people do not want to fight traffic for 1.5 hours to get to west Houston. Location, Location, Location
#20
Senior Member
Criminals...
#22
Semi-Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 202
Bikes: ‘02 LeMond Tete De Course Titanium (road), ‘98 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo (mtb), ‘88 GT Mach One (BMX)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
1000%. In my years of heavy construction management, there is 1 mason I’ve run into that I’d hire to do this job - and they are not cheap. The last job was $40 million total and they got almost $10 million of that. But hey, your typical brick layer / sidewalk subcontractor just can’t produce the level of precision that a job like this demands. A single uneven joint or imperfection that is imperceptible to the eye can be a disaster at speed.
#23
Senior Member
Simple answer is yes. But you need to build them so that they will be utilised.
To embark on such a journey a lot of things have to be considered.
Location is the biggest one. Proximity to public transport in a large city with minimised travel is best, and unfortunately most elusive. Sydney is a perfect example of a great, world class Olympic level facility hamstrung by it's location.
The facility must be as multi-use as possible. The popularity of sports seems to ebb and flow in general. From my relatively limited experience, cycling doesn't appear to be a whole lot different. You need side lines of use to maintain a facility when only 20 people (or even less) are turning up to race. Tracks have a large infield area, and making that space usable for a multitude of court or field sports just seems to make sense.
On a controversial note, I think that tracks should be made more public use. I know such a thing is a sticking point for some here, but allowing the general public to use the facility outside of racing and training times eases the sting to the public. It also takes away the mystique of the sport and can help to facilitate procuring new riders
To embark on such a journey a lot of things have to be considered.
Location is the biggest one. Proximity to public transport in a large city with minimised travel is best, and unfortunately most elusive. Sydney is a perfect example of a great, world class Olympic level facility hamstrung by it's location.
The facility must be as multi-use as possible. The popularity of sports seems to ebb and flow in general. From my relatively limited experience, cycling doesn't appear to be a whole lot different. You need side lines of use to maintain a facility when only 20 people (or even less) are turning up to race. Tracks have a large infield area, and making that space usable for a multitude of court or field sports just seems to make sense.
On a controversial note, I think that tracks should be made more public use. I know such a thing is a sticking point for some here, but allowing the general public to use the facility outside of racing and training times eases the sting to the public. It also takes away the mystique of the sport and can help to facilitate procuring new riders
#24
Semi-Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 202
Bikes: ‘02 LeMond Tete De Course Titanium (road), ‘98 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo (mtb), ‘88 GT Mach One (BMX)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Interesting, considering it’s the home to the US Olympic team and just hosted the 2017 UCI track world championships. What would change so quickly?
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Simple answer is yes. But you need to build them so that they will be utilised.
On a controversial note, I think that tracks should be made more public use. I know such a thing is a sticking point for some here, but allowing the general public to use the facility outside of racing and training times eases the sting to the public. It also takes away the mystique of the sport and can help to facilitate procuring new riders
On a controversial note, I think that tracks should be made more public use. I know such a thing is a sticking point for some here, but allowing the general public to use the facility outside of racing and training times eases the sting to the public. It also takes away the mystique of the sport and can help to facilitate procuring new riders
The question of building velodromes - and what kind - seems to me to be an outcropping of some initial, important questions:
- How many people want to ride races that are very short?
- Are they willing to do the hard, painful training that requires?
Virtually every high school in the USA has a 400m running track, which sits unused 99% of the time. People come out and jog on them, walk their dogs, etc. The high-school track team trains a few hours a day for a stretch of weeks in the spring. But I know very few adults who participate, long-term, running 440s, 100s or the like. It's just too demanding. So right there is a small, self-selecting group, regardless of the facility. No offense to my 'gran fondo' friends, but riding hard for 3 hours is not nearly as taxing as riding at your absolute limit for 1, 2 or 3 minutes. But if people had more access to those short races, the sport might grow.
To build track cycling in this country, IMHO, you need access to more short races. Does anyone remember the Atlantic City Boardwalk sprints? Or grass-track cycling? Lots of easy ways of getting people into the sport of short races. If I recall my history, the 1960 Olympic track trials were held on a straightaway. Ask Jack Simes about that.
There's a difference between learning to race short distances and learning to ride a velodrome.
But that leads to the building of tracks.
What this country needs (other than "a good 5-cent cigar," as the old saying goes) are cheap, entry-level velodromes. Places where any rider can jump on the first time and not feel daunted. I've ridden Rock Hill many times, and it's a wonderful facility and a first-rate group of people managing it, but for non-track cyclists coming to have a look, that first glance is enough to walk away without ever trying it. I can only speculate on the number of lost chances on that first glance. Even experienced cyclists know that a crash on that track can be very, very serious.
But tracks with lower bankings and longer sweeps are not such a huge leap and don't nearly involve the money the Rock Hills require. The 250m, 45-degree track is built for world-class cyclists chasing world-class times, not newbies. They cost millions and largely go underused. I think the genius of T-Town was limiting the grade to 27 degrees - rideable by both the PeeWee Pedalers and the NZ National Team. I was once out there with both those groups on the track at the same time. And that, in itself, grows the sport. Dawkins, rolling at the top, exhorting some 9-year-old to "get on with it, then, get on with it!" as the kid churned to the finish line.
Dorais got built years ago by Mike Walden and a shoestring budget. In the early 80s, when I was riding at Dick Lane, the "lore and legend" was the builders had never even seen a velodrome - they'd just "looked at some photos." The track is a bunch of inlaid pre-cast concrete slabs dropped into the grade. Even when the track was nearly new, it had that undulating ride. But it was cheap, and it's still in use. But even there, and despite its teeming track-cycling scene, the banking is probably an inhibitor to people thinking about giving it a try. And the process of indemnity releases and limited access that go with the riskier tracks inhibits participation further: "We'd love to have you on our track, and enjoy the great sport of track cycling, but please take the two-day certification and then sign this form saying it's not our fault if you die or are maimed."
So I worry that US track cycling is extincting itself based on the perceived need for more state-of-the-art, expensive facilities, when maybe a larger body (USAC) could think about a network of "feeder events," "feeder tracks," "regional tracks" and "championship tracks" that work in concert.
Anyway, just two cents from a 2-bit rider. But when I hear $4 million and $5 million for a facility, I hear "unsustainable" because there just aren't that many people who can spend the time and effort to do this kind of racing, and the ones who might otherwise come forward would be too intimidated by those very tracks.