Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Driver intentionally hits 4 cyclists @Jens grand fondo

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Driver intentionally hits 4 cyclists @Jens grand fondo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-17, 12:00 AM
  #1  
Hapsmo911
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Hapsmo911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 854
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 18 Posts
Driver intentionally hits 4 cyclists @Jens grand fondo

The world has gone mad. I hope this wont be another light sentence..

Four Marin bicyclists injured when hit by vehicle; driver flees

Last edited by Hapsmo911; 10-09-17 at 12:04 AM.
Hapsmo911 is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 05:12 AM
  #2  
02Giant 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,977
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1638 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 495 Posts
Cyclists recall hit-and-run crash that injured 4 south of Petaluma | The Press Democrat -
__________________
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
02Giant is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 05:44 AM
  #3  
mcours2006
Senior Member
 
mcours2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,204

Bikes: ...a few.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times in 234 Posts
Glad they were able to identify and arrest the driver, and that they got footage from a motorcycle helmet was great. That's exactly why I wear on. It's not going to keep me from any incident but may help identify drivers and vehicles after the fact if it is a hit and run situation.
mcours2006 is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 07:06 AM
  #4  
BillyD
Administrator
 
BillyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 32,996

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92

Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11966 Post(s)
Liked 6,632 Times in 3,478 Posts
Moved to A&S from Road.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
BillyD is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 07:10 AM
  #5  
carl7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by mcours2006
Glad they were able to identify and arrest the driver, and that they got footage from a motorcycle helmet was great. That's exactly why I wear on. It's not going to keep me from any incident but may help identify drivers and vehicles after the fact if it is a hit and run situation.
Me too. And there are a lot of hit and runs these days, both bikes and peds. Without any kind of visual proof, the cops will probably believe and go on it was the cyclists fault as usual letting a killer go free.

I hope all four Marin injured sues and makes this killer pay the rest of his life in settlements.
carl7 is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 07:34 AM
  #6  
Capo72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 164

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix SL4 Disc SRAM eTap

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's getting much easier for me to justify the cost of cameras like the Fly6/12. It's hard to put a price on piece of mind that someone could do something like this and not get away with it.
Capo72 is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 07:44 AM
  #7  
carl7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Capo72
It's getting much easier for me to justify the cost of cameras like the Fly6/12. It's hard to put a price on piece of mind that someone could do something like this and not get away with it.
And having a camera visible might make a errant driver think twice before doing something rash.
carl7 is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 08:42 AM
  #8  
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,516

Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by mcours2006
...they got footage from a motorcycle helmet was great. That's exactly why I wear one. It's not going to keep me from any incident...
Originally Posted by carl7
Me too. And there are a lot of hit and runs these days...
Nearly every day you guys reinforce my decision to quit recreational cycling. I am SO much happier now without all the worry and drama. Every now and then I get the urge to go out for a long ride, so I come here first and get over it. You folks probably, LITERALLY, are saving my life.
.
.
.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 09:27 AM
  #9  
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
Nearly every day you guys reinforce my decision to quit recreational cycling. I am SO much happier now without all the worry and drama. Every now and then I get the urge to go out for a long ride, so I come here first and get over it. You folks probably, LITERALLY, are saving my life.
.
.
.

Your profile pic looks very safe.
woodcraft is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 09:45 AM
  #10  
mcours2006
Senior Member
 
mcours2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,204

Bikes: ...a few.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times in 234 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
Nearly every day you guys reinforce my decision to quit recreational cycling. I am SO much happier now without all the worry and drama. Every now and then I get the urge to go out for a long ride, so I come here first and get over it. You folks probably, LITERALLY, are saving my life.
.
.
.
Well, good for you!
mcours2006 is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 10:13 AM
  #11  
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,516

Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by woodcraft
Your profile pic looks very safe.
Ancient history. Fond memories.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 10:19 AM
  #12  
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
What I wonder is were not four witnesses enough to bring this guy to justice? How is it that one motorist can say "I didn't do that" when there are four cyclists saying "he did that."

Sure, I see the advantage of the various helmet cams, but really, I wonder about the word of 4 verses 1... shouldn't that be enough for police to act?
genec is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 10:39 AM
  #13  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,903

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times in 2,553 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
What I wonder is were not four witnesses enough to bring this guy to justice? How is it that one motorist can say "I didn't do that" when there are four cyclists saying "he did that."

Sure, I see the advantage of the various helmet cams, but really, I wonder about the word of 4 verses 1... shouldn't that be enough for police to act?
The camera is what got the details the police used to find the guy. Maybe there was a legible license plate. None of those cyclists would be able to say anything more than it was a blue pickup truck, maybe a a model so-and-so, year roughly 20xx. The California database would show 2,386 pickups with that description. (Made up number.) And if that video shows an askew bumper or even just a dent for some other incident, the police now have hard evidence that this particular truck was the one and a prosecutor has a solid case. (The police really don't like bringing people in, only to see them walk with "you cannot prove it was me".)

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 10:51 AM
  #14  
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by 79pmooney
The camera is what got the details the police used to find the guy. Maybe there was a legible license plate. None of those cyclists would be able to say anything more than it was a blue pickup truck, maybe a a model so-and-so, year roughly 20xx. The California database would show 2,386 pickups with that description. (Made up number.) And if that video shows an askew bumper or even just a dent for some other incident, the police now have hard evidence that this particular truck was the one and a prosecutor has a solid case. (The police really don't like bringing people in, only to see them walk with "you cannot prove it was me".)

Ben
I understand the advantage of the camera... clearly shown here.

I just question whether 4 cyclists as witnesses would be enough to bring this case to justice.

Think of the Doctor involved in the Mandeville Canyon Road incident in 2008. The cyclists had a GPS to prove their case... but was not the testimony of 2 cyclists enough?

And then we have the situation of the Kalamazoo cyclists killed by a drugged driver (has not gone to court yet)... will the testimony of the survivors be enough?

Also pending is the Natchez Trace Parkway case, caught with a gopro... would there be a case without the camera... in spite of the two cycling witnesses?

Sure in a 1:1 situation there is that he said/she said issue... but any time there are more witness/victims, is there any reason to not to go with their word?
genec is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 11:57 AM
  #15  
mr_bill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
I understand the advantage of the camera... clearly shown here.

I just question whether 4 cyclists as witnesses would be enough to bring this case to justice.
One person on a bicycle "could not remember anything," according to Jim Elias, the executive director who arrived shortly after the incident. One was taken by helicopter to the hospital. The three others were taken by ambulance. How much did *any* of them see of the driver who intentionally hit them FROM BEHIND?

Do you really believe that *any* of those witnesses could give a description of the vehicle as anything other than a "dark pickup truck," let alone a slightly lifted midnight blue, circa 2007 Dodge Ram crew cab with black rims that protrude past the bodywork and missing a front license plate? How about a description of the driver?

-mr. bill

Last edited by mr_bill; 10-09-17 at 12:04 PM.
mr_bill is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 12:03 PM
  #16  
nayr497
Senior Member
 
nayr497's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nilbog
Posts: 1,705

Bikes: How'd I get this many?

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ah, sounds like a great person. 21 years old and potentially hitting four cyclists on purpose and fleeing the scene. Oh jeez.
nayr497 is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 12:32 PM
  #17  
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_bill
One person on a bicycle "could not remember anything," according to Jim Elias, the executive director who arrived shortly after the incident. One was taken by helicopter to the hospital. The three others were taken by ambulance. How much did *any* of them see of the driver who intentionally hit them FROM BEHIND?

Do you really believe that *any* of those witnesses could give a description of the vehicle as anything other than a "dark pickup truck," let alone a slightly lifted midnight blue, circa 2007 Dodge Ram crew cab with black rims that protrude past the bodywork and missing a front license plate? How about a description of the driver?

-mr. bill
No.

And again I acknowledge the camera as "the ultimate witness..."

But to a more open ended question... without cameras, do groups of cyclists still fall below the single driver as credible witnesses? This is probably best as a new thread...

I am just wondering... we've seen a number of situations here that were "resolved" thanks to video... perhaps the most classic was that of the cyclist accused of running a light, then being hit by a motorist. The cyclist held that the light was in his favor... the PD held that the cyclist was wrong, in spite of the video they had... the cyclist was ultimately able to retrieve the video and prove that the PD were not only wrong but lied.

https://ggwash.org/view/31600/it-mus...ou-are-a-biker

In the ambulance, Carlos Carter, a DC police officer, asked me what happened, and I told him.

Officer Carter entered the room. He asked me to sign a ticket for running a red light. I asked him to take a look at footage since I was certain I hadn’t. He wasn’t interested and asked me to sign the ticket and admit fault. I didn’t. He left.

I returned to the Third District police station, where a supervisor told me that only the officer who wrote the report and the ticket could change it. He asked me to tell my story again.
"Wait, you mean, you were biking and you want a ticket canceled?” he said, incredulous. “We all know how bikers behave. It must have been your fault. C’mon. You are a biker.”

Without the video, it would’ve been nearly impossible to prove that I did everything right.

I learned that if you get hit by someone while bicycling, check for cameras. Without them, you’ll have to fight against the assumption that you were operating in an unsafe way, no matter what the driver did.
Sure in the case of the OP... the testimony of the cyclists would not be enough... they were clearly disabled by the collision... but I just wonder, how often are cyclists pleas of innocence ignored... Because "the man" does not consider them credible witnesses against a driver.

I will start a new thread.
genec is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 12:35 PM
  #18  
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_bill
One person on a bicycle "could not remember anything," according to Jim Elias, the executive director who arrived shortly after the incident. One was taken by helicopter to the hospital. The three others were taken by ambulance. How much did *any* of them see of the driver who intentionally hit them FROM BEHIND?

Do you really believe that *any* of those witnesses could give a description of the vehicle as anything other than a "dark pickup truck," let alone a slightly lifted midnight blue, circa 2007 Dodge Ram crew cab with black rims that protrude past the bodywork and missing a front license plate? How about a description of the driver?
Agreed. We had a hit-and-run crash on one of our club rides awhile back. Two riders were a little ahead of the rest of the group when one of them was hit from behind by an SUV that came over the fog line. But the only description anyone could give was that it was a silverish SUV. We were later able to determine the make/model/year from the mirror that was left behind but the driver was never identified. The incident led to several camera sales in our group. Fortunately the rider made a full recovery but it was a lengthy process due to the severity of his injuries.
Originally Posted by genec
Think of the Doctor involved in the Mandeville Canyon Road incident in 2008. The cyclists had a GPS to prove their case... but was not the testimony of 2 cyclists enough?

And then we have the situation of the Kalamazoo cyclists killed by a drugged driver (has not gone to court yet)... will the testimony of the survivors be enough?

Also pending is the Natchez Trace Parkway case, caught with a gopro... would there be a case without the camera... in spite of the two cycling witnesses?

Sure in a 1:1 situation there is that he said/she said issue... but any time there are more witness/victims, is there any reason to not to go with their word?
I doubt that the testimony of multiple cyclists riding together would have been sufficient in any of these cases. The doctor in Mandeville Cyn. was convicted mainly on the basis of his own statements at the time as well as the pattern shown by previous independent reports. The Kalamazoo case also has multiple independent witnesses besides the cyclists as well as toxicology and other physical evidence.

Testimony by multiple cyclists riding together is a little better than just a single witness, but is likely to be viewed by at least some jurors as not really independent - i.e. they're riding together so they might be friends backing each other up. If it's just their word vs. the driver's without any clear physical evidence then the 'beyond reasonable doubt' bar is a hard one to overcome. Without the video I doubt the Natchez Trace case would have even merited much of an investigation.
prathmann is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 12:40 PM
  #19  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,535 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_bill
Do you really believe that *any* of those witnesses could give a description of the vehicle as anything other than a "dark pickup truck," let alone a slightly lifted midnight blue, circa 2007 Dodge Ram crew cab with black rims that protrude past the bodywork and missing a front license plate? How about a description of the driver?
Why not? One of our BF comrades was even able to provide a psychological profile, see https://www.bikeforums.net/19917708-post8.html
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 12:46 PM
  #20  
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
Agreed. We had a hit-and-run crash on one of our club rides awhile back. Two riders were a little ahead of the rest of the group when one of them was hit from behind by an SUV that came over the fog line. But the only description anyone could give was that it was a silverish SUV. We were later able to determine the make/model/year from the mirror that was left behind but the driver was never identified. The incident led to several camera sales in our group. Fortunately the rider made a full recovery but it was a lengthy process due to the severity of his injuries.

I doubt that the testimony of multiple cyclists riding together would have been sufficient in any of these cases. The doctor in Mandeville Cyn. was convicted mainly on the basis of his own statements at the time as well as the pattern shown by previous independent reports. The Kalamazoo case also has multiple independent witnesses besides the cyclists as well as toxicology and other physical evidence.

Testimony by multiple cyclists riding together is a little better than just a single witness, but is likely to be viewed by at least some jurors as not really independent - i.e. they're riding together so they might be friends backing each other up. If it's just their word vs. the driver's without any clear physical evidence then the 'beyond reasonable doubt' bar is a hard one to overcome. Without the video I doubt the Natchez Trace case would have even merited much of an investigation.
I borrowed some of your response... and moved the thread to here...
https://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-...-motorist.html
genec is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 04:53 PM
  #21  
no motor?
Unlisted member
 
no motor?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 6,192

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1376 Post(s)
Liked 432 Times in 297 Posts
Here's another article on catching the driver.
GoPro video helps California police catch driver who injured four | VeloNews.com
no motor? is offline  
Old 10-09-17, 05:09 PM
  #22  
mr_bill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Why not? One of our BF comrades was even able to provide a psychological profile, see https://www.bikeforums.net/19917708-post8.html
Then reply to them. Buh-bye!

-mr. bill
mr_bill is offline  
Old 10-10-17, 07:19 AM
  #23  
bikecrate
Senior Member
 
bikecrate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LF, APMAT
Posts: 2,752
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 623 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 397 Times in 226 Posts
RE: some of the talk about cyclist testimony not being enough to convict a driver. There maybe some other forensic evidence too. Damage to the vehicle. Paint or blood from the cyclist left behind on the vehicle. Also cops can be pretty good at interrogating people and getting them to incriminate themselves once they start lying and contradicting their stories.
bikecrate is offline  
Old 10-10-17, 08:30 AM
  #24  
jefnvk
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
If it is proven to be intentional, I hope something in the state laws allows the drivers license to be revoked for life, along with actually serving a hefty prison sentence.

While I am not as up on imprisonment as some, I have a hard time understanding why we can't create better legislation to take licenses and highly incentivise not allowing unlicensed drivers access to vehicles.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 10-10-17, 09:51 AM
  #25  
goenrdoug
Senior Member
 
goenrdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,416

Bikes: 2019 Supersix Evo, 2002 Trek 2000

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 273 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 32 Posts
so... a guy is accused if attempting to run four people down with his vehicle (evidence: 4 injured people, video of the incident) and is released on $50,000 bail (paying only $5,000, of course.) And remember, this is a guy who, apparently, only a week or two ago was issued a DUI after he was accused of attempting to run over a woman in a parking lot and, failing to strike her, struck a CVS drug store instead (using this very same blue truck in the incident!)

So, to recap, an unhinged, dangerous-to-himself-and-society individual is on a multi-week murderous rampage and he's just going to be released to continue it?
goenrdoug is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.