Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

NYPD Slaps Cyclist With The Biggest Red Light Ticket We've Seen Read more: http://ww

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

NYPD Slaps Cyclist With The Biggest Red Light Ticket We've Seen Read more: http://ww

Old 10-12-12, 09:16 AM
  #1  
Dannydyn
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dannydyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 57

Bikes: Canondale CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
NYPD Slaps Cyclist With The Biggest Red Light Ticket We've Seen

https://www.businessinsider.com/nypd-...t%202012-10-12
Dannydyn is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 09:28 AM
  #2  
PatrickGSR94
Senior Member
 
PatrickGSR94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Memphis TN area
Posts: 7,391

Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Cyclist was in the wrong, but so was the cop for not stopping dude after the first offense.
PatrickGSR94 is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 09:46 AM
  #3  
DaveWC
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Why is that? I was ticketed twice on one trip at the same photo radar for speeding. They weren't progressively larger tickets, but the fact that I broke the law two times earned me two tickets. Cyclists would think twice about breaking laws if they knew that they were being monitored. If I rob 10 stores in a row on a single day & the police simply monitor my behavior and the nab me in the end I'm guilty of all 10 robberies.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 09:51 AM
  #4  
tagaproject6
Senior Member
 
tagaproject6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550

Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 276 Times in 144 Posts
Great revenue maker.
tagaproject6 is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 09:56 AM
  #5  
David Bierbaum
Senior Member
 
David Bierbaum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: St. Louis Metro East area
Posts: 1,633

Bikes: 1992 Specialized Crossroads (red)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked 35 Times in 19 Posts
Here in Illinoisy, outside of Chicago (where all lights are on timers, evidently), the State has recognised that bicyclists and motocyclists are incapable of registering on the magnetic sensors that will trigger a light change, so we have a 120 second "go if traffic is clear" law. Our State is stupid in many respects, but at least is helpful.

I think that story is along the lines of "giving him enough rope to hang himself." He had two extra chances to redeem himself and get off scott free. Also, how did he not know there was a police car behind him? He was NOT maintaining full situational awareness, there, but then, the headphones were a dead giveaway about that! If I were a police officer, I'd have let this guy wrack up the fines as well, on the theory that a whopping economic hardship will drive home a lesson that a lesser fine might not.
David Bierbaum is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 09:56 AM
  #6  
fly:yes/land:no
abandoning
 
fly:yes/land:no's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
i don't think the question was if he was breaking the law. i think the question is whether it is ethical for a cop to allow someone to break the law several times (a law btw that is intended to keep the offender and pedestrians safe) before pulling them over, apparently for the purpose of ratcheting up the fines.

perhaps the cop was hindered by one of the red lights or traffic, hence why it took several violations before he caught the cyclist. that would certainly be reasonable to me. letting violations happen in front of you without stopping the violations is not chill simply as a matter of policy.
fly:yes/land:no is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 10:29 AM
  #7  
DaveWC
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fly:yes/land:no
letting violations happen in front of you without stopping the violations is not chill simply as a matter of policy.
But it is one of the aspects of photo radar that can have an identical impact on motorists. Using the logic presented in this thread, a motorist who runs 3 red lights and is caught on all 3 by photo radar should only be fined once since he wasn't warned after the first offence. Once I became aware that I had no way of knowing I'd just been caught speeding & could be caught again & again on one trip, it slowed me down. There should be no requirement for any method of catching lawbreakers to warn these people that they are breaking the law so they can limit their fines & be more wary in the future. I don't believe for a minute that this cyclist was unaware that he was breaking the law. He ran all 3 lights knowing that it was illegal and should suffer the consequences.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 10:39 AM
  #8  
fly:yes/land:no
abandoning
 
fly:yes/land:no's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveWC
But it is one of the aspects of photo radar that can have an identical impact on motorists. Using the logic presented in this thread, a motorist who runs 3 red lights and is caught on all 3 by photo radar should only be fined once since he wasn't warned after the first offence. Once I became aware that I had no way of knowing I'd just been caught speeding & could be caught again & again on one trip, it slowed me down. There should be no requirement for any method of catching lawbreakers to warn these people that they are breaking the law so they can limit their fines & be more wary in the future. I don't believe for a minute that this cyclist was unaware that he was breaking the law. He ran all 3 lights knowing that it was illegal and should suffer the consequences.
i think you missed the point. there is a BIG difference between the radar and the officer - the photo radar cannot stop the next violation from happening. the officer can. i am not talking about this from only the cyclist's perspective - perhaps the opposite. imagine if you are legally walking across the street and get hit by the cyclist running the third red light. you require hospitalization, and the bill is pretty hefty. if you found out that the reason that the cop didn't stop him was because he was hoping to increase the cyclist's fines, wouldn't you be mad? using the robbery example from above, if you were the owner of the 2nd through 10th store that was robbed, wouldn't you be mad that the officer didn't arrest the guy after the first violation witnessed?
fly:yes/land:no is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 11:03 AM
  #9  
bigbadwullf
Senior Member
 
bigbadwullf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: West, Tn.
Posts: 1,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
1) Cyclist was in the wrong.
2) Sounds like NY Police have a chip on their shoulder about cyclists and that may be well-founded BUT to cite 3 instances 'just because' is out of line....unless the person is a repeat-offender and mouthy(imagine a New Yorker being that way).

My guess is the cyclist deserved it.
bigbadwullf is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 11:08 AM
  #10  
DaveWC
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fly:yes/land:no
i think you missed the point. there is a BIG difference between the radar and the officer - the photo radar cannot stop the next violation from happening. the officer can. i am not talking about this from only the cyclist's perspective - perhaps the opposite. imagine if you are legally walking across the street and get hit by the cyclist running the third red light. you require hospitalization, and the bill is pretty hefty. if you found out that the reason that the cop didn't stop him was because he was hoping to increase the cyclist's fines, wouldn't you be mad? using the robbery example from above, if you were the owner of the 2nd through 10th store that was robbed, wouldn't you be mad that the officer didn't arrest the guy after the first violation witnessed?
You're right, I'm approaching this from the perspective of the guy running 3 lights & deserving 3 tickets. I'm not that concerned that in this case, the cop let him repeatedly break the law. I'm guessing the cop figured given the current road conditions the likelihood of the cyclist causing an accident was low.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 11:13 AM
  #11  
patentcad
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Road cyclists are a menace, what with their deadly killer 20lb bicycles and all.
__________________
https://www.cotsiscad.com
patentcad is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 01:08 PM
  #12  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times in 2,026 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveWC
I'm guessing the cop figured given the current road conditions the likelihood of the cyclist causing an accident was low.
So of course the most important thing is to follow and punish him for not being a threat? Nothing more important to do?
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 01:17 PM
  #13  
fly:yes/land:no
abandoning
 
fly:yes/land:no's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
yeah it does seem a bit strange that behavior apparently so inconsequential as to not require the officer to pull him over until there are three violations should necessitate a $1500 fine.
fly:yes/land:no is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 01:23 PM
  #14  
DaveWC
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
So of course the most important thing is to follow and punish him for not being a threat? Nothing more important to do?
What does being a threat have to do with breaking the law? I agree that $1,500 is an unreasonable fine.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 01:28 PM
  #15  
ahsposo 
Artificial Member
 
ahsposo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 7,163

Bikes: Retrospec Judd, Dahon Boardwalk, Specialized Langster

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6731 Post(s)
Liked 5,441 Times in 3,198 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Road cyclists are a menace, what with their deadly killer 20lb bicycles and all.
Yeah, and that big old fat dentist on top.
__________________
ahsposo is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 01:54 PM
  #16  
banerjek
Portland Fred
 
banerjek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveWC
You're right, I'm approaching this from the perspective of the guy running 3 lights & deserving 3 tickets. I'm not that concerned that in this case, the cop let him repeatedly break the law. I'm guessing the cop figured given the current road conditions the likelihood of the cyclist causing an accident was low.
The cop is onto something. He could follow a car for a few miles, rack up all the speeding and rolling stop violations, and Bingo! 10 tickets in a few minutes would make the $1500 look like chump change
banerjek is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 02:03 PM
  #17  
sstang13
Riding the bike I love.
 
sstang13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,011

Bikes: Marinano Delta

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveWC
Why is that? I was ticketed twice on one trip at the same photo radar for speeding. They weren't progressively larger tickets, but the fact that I broke the law two times earned me two tickets. Cyclists would think twice about breaking laws if they knew that they were being monitored. If I rob 10 stores in a row on a single day & the police simply monitor my behavior and the nab me in the end I'm guilty of all 10 robberies.
Yes, although if the cop was in the store that you robbed first, he wouldn't let you keep robbing stores and then arrest you at the end of the day. You would be busted the moment you stepped outside the door.
sstang13 is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 02:07 PM
  #18  
ChevDog1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NW Oregon
Posts: 22

Bikes: 2008 Felt F3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
He broke the law (multiple times),got caught, and desrves the punishment.

I work in an area where the cyclists have taken over. The local laws are in favor of the bikes, and they have actually stated that they are trying to rid the city of automobiles! Cyclists here are rarely seen obeying any traffic or pedestrian laws. As a fellow cyclist, I am apalled an embarrased by their behavior. As a result, I refuse to ride anywhere near Portland, because I do not wish to be associated with these people. They give our sport/hobby a bad name. I am all for sharing the roads - and that means that I am courteous and safe when in a car, or on my bike.
ChevDog1 is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 02:07 PM
  #19  
TheOtherBob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 134

Bikes: 2012 CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The interesting question here is whether this is within the intent of the legislature's escalating penalty requirement. The fine is so high because of a requirement that re-offenders pay escalating fines, on the theory that the first fine clearly was not enough of a deterrent. So his initial fine was low -- $150 or so -- but by the third one it was $900 or something.

To me, that's the problem here. As I read it, the escalating penalty requirement was meant to apply only if you keep re-offending after getting caught -- if the original fine was not enough deterrent. What the legislature apparently meant to cover was the guy who just wouldn't learn his lesson -- who would get caught, pay the fine, shrug, and do it again. Here, the guy ran three red lights -- which, alright, is pretty brazen. But he never re-offended after getting the first fine -- he just got three tickets at once. So is it right that the escalating penalty applied in this situation, where you don't have a repeat offender?

Well, that's the other curious thing. Apparently judges consider this sort of ticket writing to be "double-dipping" -- technically they're separate crimes, but if a guy runs three red lights in a row a judge usually won't allow three tickets. So all this guy had to do was contest the tickets, and he'd be off with the fine that a person might normally get for running a single red light -- the court likely would not treat him like a three-time loser. But he didn't want to contest the tickets in part because he really and truly was guilty. So the facte that he gets worse treatment by rightfully owning up to it and admitting guilty just seems backwards.
TheOtherBob is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 02:54 PM
  #20  
Doug5150
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Posts: 1,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I don't know what the going rate for a lawyer in NYC is (maybe it was cheaper to just pay the whole $1550?) but the cyclist should have only had one ticket against him, not multiples at the same time. If he did something wrong (which we assume he did) then it was the cop's responsibility to stop him after the first one.
Doug5150 is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 03:19 PM
  #21  
Seattle Forrest
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,645 Times in 6,054 Posts
To the guy who started that thread asking where he should go for a road bike vacation: not NYC.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 03:35 PM
  #22  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times in 2,026 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveWC
What does being a threat have to do with breaking the law? I agree that $1,500 is an unreasonable fine.
The moral imperative for the police force, and laws, is to protect the rights of citizens. In this case, that would imply there was no greater issue that might have been dealt with in the time he was following the cyclist. See the infraction, write the ticket, move on. I am quite certain that if an officer followed you around for a while, you could be handed a substantial stack of tickets by the end of a day, or less.

Hell, do we even get drug users on a three strikes law if they have three "doses" in their possession?

I love my NY sports teams. The rest of the city... let's just say, not so much.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 05:52 PM
  #23  
dalava
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,247

Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Colnago C60, Santa Cruz Stigmata CC, and too many other bikes I don't ride

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by bigbadwullf
1) Cyclist was in the wrong.
2) Sounds like NY Police have a chip on their shoulder about cyclists and that may be well-founded BUT to cite 3 instances 'just because' is out of line....unless the person is a repeat-offender and mouthy(imagine a New Yorker being that way).

My guess is the cyclist deserved it.
Really? I think most New Yorkers imagine most people marry their cousins in Tennessee.
dalava is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 07:43 PM
  #24  
kraftwerk 
my nice bike is at home
 
kraftwerk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Posts: 954

Bikes: 2011 BMC Race Machine / 2012 BMC Road Machine / Trek 2300 / '90's Merlin/ '70's Raleigh 20/ Ti-'swift' folder / Erickson w/S&S couplers

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 66 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times in 24 Posts
I heard about the same thing happening in the late 80's to a messenger except it was 8 red lights and the guy got 8 tickets.
Don't know how it panned out in the end.
In NYC cars run them quite a bit actually, I see it everyday.

A reasonable Judge will reduce it to one ticket. The rider will also pay for the headphone thing which is actually pretty stupid, and he deserves to learn from.
Biking thru red lights though: Meh... They are optional, as long as its safe, if you stop at each one you might as well be driving car.

Last edited by kraftwerk; 10-12-12 at 08:17 PM.
kraftwerk is offline  
Old 10-12-12, 11:13 PM
  #25  
roker
Member
 
roker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 34

Bikes: Bianchi Imola, Canondale Quick 5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I, as well as thousands upon thousands of New Yorkers run red lights everyday and in front of Police cars and officers.

The thing is, you have to be smart about it. You don't do it on the busy, heavily trafficked streets. But if you're in an everyday Brooklyn/Manhattan neighborhood and you come to a light, 9 times out of 10 people/police/etc. won't even look at you wrong.

I bet this guy was on Broadway or something like that.

Last edited by roker; 10-13-12 at 08:25 AM.
roker is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.