Dumb question about mid-foot cleat position
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dumb question about mid-foot cleat position
On the assumption that a more mid foot position spreads the pedal load more evenly across the whole foot........
When we leg press or row a boat (or use a rowing machine), we have more strength when the whole foot is supported on a platform, so why is it so different on a bike? Why is it acceptable to only have the front third of the foot supported on a bike?
Is it because of the higher cadence?
Stiff soles only do so much.
I suspect we'd be much weaker doing a leg press if only the front third of the foot was supported
When we leg press or row a boat (or use a rowing machine), we have more strength when the whole foot is supported on a platform, so why is it so different on a bike? Why is it acceptable to only have the front third of the foot supported on a bike?
Is it because of the higher cadence?
Stiff soles only do so much.
I suspect we'd be much weaker doing a leg press if only the front third of the foot was supported
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Point Pleasant Boro, NJ
Posts: 258
Bikes: Voodoo Canzo, BMC Granfondo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think its better for spinning and you get more leverage which works better for your hamstring while pulling upwards.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 389
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think it has more to do with limiting use of the calf muscles than distributing load. Also keep in mind that biomechanically pedaling is a very different motion than what your legs do when rowing.
#4
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,448
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3148 Post(s)
Liked 1,714 Times
in
1,034 Posts
I've never thought about it before, and have no idea of the what, why, and when of it. I do have BMX/freeride platform pedals on one bike, though, and while they're definitely comfy when standing, I don't know if they're conferring any other benefit over a standard cage pedal.
Have you seen these https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...-fit-your-feet ?
Have you seen these https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...-fit-your-feet ?
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: NoVa
Posts: 105
Bikes: 1993 GT Corrado, 1999 Kona Explosif, 2014 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It works for some people. Steve Hogg has an interesting article that's worth a read.
https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com...leat-position/
https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com...leat-position/
#6
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
On the assumption that a more mid foot position spreads the pedal load more evenly across the whole foot........
When we leg press or row a boat (or use a rowing machine), we have more strength when the whole foot is supported on a platform, so why is it so different on a bike? Why is it acceptable to only have the front third of the foot supported on a bike?
Is it because of the higher cadence?
Stiff soles only do so much.
I suspect we'd be much weaker doing a leg press if only the front third of the foot was supported
When we leg press or row a boat (or use a rowing machine), we have more strength when the whole foot is supported on a platform, so why is it so different on a bike? Why is it acceptable to only have the front third of the foot supported on a bike?
Is it because of the higher cadence?
Stiff soles only do so much.
I suspect we'd be much weaker doing a leg press if only the front third of the foot was supported
There is no assumption that forces are spread more evenly.
Why is the strength different from leg pressess? Cycling requires power and energy more than absolute strength.
On the downside, sprinting seems impaired, the shoes are not really available and toeclip overlap is unavoidable,
#7
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,538
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3890 Post(s)
Liked 1,939 Times
in
1,384 Posts
I've always used the standard placement: pedal spindle under the big toe joint. Never had a problem with it, but my longest ride was only 18 hours. Calf flexion is desirable when pedaling IME, hence the standard placement. Imagine hiking uphill with some sort of narrow 3" high block attached to your instep. That's center cleat placement. Completely removes calf action from the pedal stroke. Some people need that, either because their feet aren't strong enough or they haven't learned to modulate their calf action when pedaling.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
i think, if rowing machines had bearing mounted foot supports it could be a valid comparison. but pedals, due to their construction, offer little, if any, opportunity to exert fore/aft leverage.
i suppose a full platform pedal, sans bearings, could be devised that may well give one an advantage, but you'd only get one pedal stroke using one leg to prove it's superiority.
i suppose a full platform pedal, sans bearings, could be devised that may well give one an advantage, but you'd only get one pedal stroke using one leg to prove it's superiority.
Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 06-10-15 at 10:10 AM.
#10
Climbing: Ropes or Wheels
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Unied States, Maine
Posts: 384
Bikes: 2012 Scott Foil 30, Homebrew Windsor Fens Build, 2015 Fuji Touring, 1980 Univega
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Full disclosure, there is NO SCIENCE BEHIND THIS ANSWER WHATSOEVER.
When doing leg presses or playing on a rowing machine, I feel a lot more equivalent to doing squats. When I'm biking, I feel like I'm using more of a "running" set of muscles for the most part. When we walk or run, we mostly support out weight on the front ball of our foot. Squats are a single-direction motion where running and cycling both include a 2-dimensional motion.
So maybe for that forward push, we need the ball of our feet, not the heel.
Also, these look ridiculous. I can't imagine them feeling good.
When doing leg presses or playing on a rowing machine, I feel a lot more equivalent to doing squats. When I'm biking, I feel like I'm using more of a "running" set of muscles for the most part. When we walk or run, we mostly support out weight on the front ball of our foot. Squats are a single-direction motion where running and cycling both include a 2-dimensional motion.
So maybe for that forward push, we need the ball of our feet, not the heel.
Have you seen these https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...-fit-your-feet ?
#12
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,470 Posts
I think you're on to something there. I'm a long time runner but got injured once and only had cycling. Pushing off on the balls of my feet hurt do I resorted to mid-foot position similar to what Friel and Hogg suggests. That was fine for just easy spinning but it lacked power for accelerations, climbing, and just a faster pace. I think most people need a position where the ball of the foot is used for power.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
I think you're on to something there. I'm a long time runner but got injured once and only had cycling. Pushing off on the balls of my feet hurt do I resorted to mid-foot position similar to what Friel and Hogg suggests. That was fine for just easy spinning but it lacked power for accelerations, climbing, and just a faster pace. I think most people need a position where the ball of the foot is used for power.
#14
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Anything I've read on the subject has been pretty honest that, for all the benefits of midfoot positioning, they really only recommend it for TT and Tri, disciplines where long, steady power output is the primary aim and it's not ideal for frequent short-burst accelerations (ie, road racing, sprinting).
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I appreciate all the replies and links.
It just dawned on me that it (not having full foot platform on a bike) likely has a lot to do with not extending the knee quite near as much as we do when we use a leg press, which probably has a lot to do with the trunk being more flexed on the bike. Reduced knee extension may require more ankle extension and flexion..
Why is it easier to extend the knee far more during a very intense leg press than it is when cycling intensely?
Well, it is for me, not that I've done leg weights recently. Less hip flexion?
Does the "preference" for calf/ankle movement have something to do with cadence (contraction rate/minute)? I suppose cycling is more about speed/power instead of absolute force.
How about because the legs work one at a time?
Interesting comparison to running, and one I should have thought of. The thought of running without ankle movement is horrible, even though it's very different to cycling.
I still have little idea
It just dawned on me that it (not having full foot platform on a bike) likely has a lot to do with not extending the knee quite near as much as we do when we use a leg press, which probably has a lot to do with the trunk being more flexed on the bike. Reduced knee extension may require more ankle extension and flexion..
Why is it easier to extend the knee far more during a very intense leg press than it is when cycling intensely?
Well, it is for me, not that I've done leg weights recently. Less hip flexion?
Does the "preference" for calf/ankle movement have something to do with cadence (contraction rate/minute)? I suppose cycling is more about speed/power instead of absolute force.
How about because the legs work one at a time?
Interesting comparison to running, and one I should have thought of. The thought of running without ankle movement is horrible, even though it's very different to cycling.
I still have little idea
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Have you seen these https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...-fit-your-feet ?
#17
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I center the head of the 5th metatarsal on the pedal spindle
#18
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
^^^ And for those that don't speak metatarsal, the 5th is behind the first so this position is closer to mid foot position.
One of the many reasons I ride Speedplay pedals is they offer a rearward extension plate that allows cleat location up to 15mm or so back of std position. I don't ride precisely with mid arch position which is way back...but rather about 15mm or so back of pedal in line with first metatarsal.
I find this position takes pressure off the heel and reduces hot spots as mentioned. I have been riding this way for about 5 years. A couple of years ago, I tried a more conventional position and no way for me. This more rearward position works great. I prefer it out of the saddle and all around. I am a spinner and not a masher as well and no problem keeping the RPM up.
One of the many reasons I ride Speedplay pedals is they offer a rearward extension plate that allows cleat location up to 15mm or so back of std position. I don't ride precisely with mid arch position which is way back...but rather about 15mm or so back of pedal in line with first metatarsal.
I find this position takes pressure off the heel and reduces hot spots as mentioned. I have been riding this way for about 5 years. A couple of years ago, I tried a more conventional position and no way for me. This more rearward position works great. I prefer it out of the saddle and all around. I am a spinner and not a masher as well and no problem keeping the RPM up.
#19
GATC
You're not pushing the pedal like you are a leg press machine or rowing machine, you are turning a crank. The pedal is just there to take up space around the spindle that you are attaching your foot to.
#20
Emondafied
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My feet are big, and with my Speedplays I always end up with the cleat as far back as it'll go.
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#21
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
Cycling is more like walking up stairs. Try walking upstairs with your whole foot instead of the ball of your foot.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
I've wondered about midfoot cleat placement, but haven't done it yet. Maybe this summer. I noticed some of Specialized Touring Shoes have more rearward cleat placement than other shoes.
There may be some benefit of using the toes to increase the dynamic range of one's pedal stroke. But I wonder if cycling is like a ballerina walking on her toes all day.
There may be some benefit of using the toes to increase the dynamic range of one's pedal stroke. But I wonder if cycling is like a ballerina walking on her toes all day.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I did say it was a dumb question
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,380
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 2,957 Times
in
1,680 Posts
Midfoot cleat position (aka paperboy style) = power applied through both the ball of the foot and the heel. However, your foot is constructed such that the heel is for shock absorption and the ball is for power transmission. The biomechanics involved in cycling, running, etc., can only be understood on the basis of those fundamental facts.
It may be possible that under certain conditions, use of the midfoot cleat wouldn't be obviously inefficient, but it's doubtful that much more than that can be said in its favor.
It may be possible that under certain conditions, use of the midfoot cleat wouldn't be obviously inefficient, but it's doubtful that much more than that can be said in its favor.
Last edited by Trakhak; 06-14-15 at 11:20 AM.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
Midfoot cleat position (aka paperboy style) = power applied through both the ball of the foot and the heel. However, your foot is constructed such that the heel is for shock absorption and the ball is for power transmission. The biomechanics involved in cycling, running, etc., can only be understood on the basis of those fundamental facts.
It may be possible that under certain conditions, use of the midfoot cleat wouldn't be obviously inefficient, but it's doubtful that much more than that can be said in its favor.
It may be possible that under certain conditions, use of the midfoot cleat wouldn't be obviously inefficient, but it's doubtful that much more than that can be said in its favor.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Juan Foote
Adaptive Cycling: Handcycles, Amputee Adaptation, Visual Impairment, and Other Needs
8
02-22-15 11:07 AM
RandoneeRider
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
3
07-25-11 06:49 AM