Need Bottom Bracket Recommendation
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 246
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Need Bottom Bracket Recommendation
The bottom bracket in this Lotus Odyssey has too much play in the spindle, and I'm sure the needle bearings need to be replaced. I'd like to install a modern cartridge type while I attempt to find and replace the needle bearings in the original. The crank is Sugino triple Mighty Tour and it's shifting thru all 6 cogs of a Suntour NW Ultra very nicely at this point even with the play in the crank.
Given the measurements my questions are; Should I get a UN55 in a 118 (use DS shim) or 122.5? (not sure if there's offset to these), Is there another BB choice I should consider? (not afraid to spend more money within reason), How do I go about replacing the needle bearings? Do I need special tools, Do I take the cups to a shop? I'm pretty handle and have home work shop, and where can I order them from?
Given the measurements my questions are; Should I get a UN55 in a 118 (use DS shim) or 122.5? (not sure if there's offset to these), Is there another BB choice I should consider? (not afraid to spend more money within reason), How do I go about replacing the needle bearings? Do I need special tools, Do I take the cups to a shop? I'm pretty handle and have home work shop, and where can I order them from?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Singapore
Posts: 470
Bikes: Voodoo Hoodoo, Linus Libertine
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 106 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
9 Posts
Get the same size spindle length. Unless you want to change the chainline.
Cartridge bearing type come in one unit. No need to reuse your old bearings.
Cartridge bearing type come in one unit. No need to reuse your old bearings.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 246
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
The original spindle length is 114, but, I have it installed offset to the driveside +5.7mm more than the non-drive side which sets the chainline appropriately. Also, there's approx 2mm between small chain ring and stay, so, not a lot of clearance but it shifts very well. The reason I'm going to replace the needle bearings in the original is the BB is that it is adjustable side to side via the cups, so, fine tuning is easily done.
Last edited by dwing; 10-11-18 at 07:53 AM.
#4
Banned
Bullseye after market BB?
was not what was on there from OEM, in Japan. you are not the original owner,
Right?
One advantage Phil Wood BB have is the spindle is a press fit within the inner bearing ID
so the offset is adjustable, by pulling the spindle towards the side you wish longer.
in addition , the mounting rings allow a further fine tuning of the chainline
MUSA... Phil continues Bullseye has not.
....
Symmetrical BB you pick the one with the drive side of the appropriate Length
and accept the NDS is not your ideal length..
Sugino triple Mighty Tour * used longer DS, (TA likewise),
newer cranks were designed to use shorter DS spindles ,
By having their profile coming in to meet them..
*All 3 chainrings on a 110 bcd.. so can be a 50 34 double too
<a modern option on many bikes>
...
Right?
One advantage Phil Wood BB have is the spindle is a press fit within the inner bearing ID
so the offset is adjustable, by pulling the spindle towards the side you wish longer.
in addition , the mounting rings allow a further fine tuning of the chainline
MUSA... Phil continues Bullseye has not.
....
Symmetrical BB you pick the one with the drive side of the appropriate Length
and accept the NDS is not your ideal length..
Sugino triple Mighty Tour * used longer DS, (TA likewise),
newer cranks were designed to use shorter DS spindles ,
By having their profile coming in to meet them..
*All 3 chainrings on a 110 bcd.. so can be a 50 34 double too
<a modern option on many bikes>
...
Last edited by fietsbob; 10-11-18 at 09:14 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, a new 114 that's symetrical won't work. Are the 114 bb's assyemtrical that much to the drive side???
You can use bottom bracket spacers, if you are OCD and want to micro adjust the chainline. Use the spacer on the bottom bracket to move the chainwheels out; use the space on the freewheel to effectively move the chainwheels in.
#6
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
Not a big fan of the double needle and double thrust bearing setup. It does give you some adjustment. Fietsbob pointed out that the Phil Wood BBs have some adjustability, and they're very high quality bearings.
If you do decided to replace the needles and cage, you should probably check the outer race and axle for wear, too.
Good luck, it looks like a really nice bike.
If you do decided to replace the needles and cage, you should probably check the outer race and axle for wear, too.
Good luck, it looks like a really nice bike.
#7
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, a new 114 that's symetrical won't work. Are the 114 bb's assyemtrical that much to the drive side???
The original spindle length is 114, but, I have it installed offset to the driveside +5.7mm more than the non-drive side which sets the chainline appropriately. Also, there's approx 2mm between small chain ring and stay, so, not a lot of clearance but it shifts very well. The reason I'm going to replace the needle bearings in the original is the BB is that it is adjustable side to side via the cups, so, fine tuning is easily done.
The original spindle length is 114, but, I have it installed offset to the driveside +5.7mm more than the non-drive side which sets the chainline appropriately. Also, there's approx 2mm between small chain ring and stay, so, not a lot of clearance but it shifts very well. The reason I'm going to replace the needle bearings in the original is the BB is that it is adjustable side to side via the cups, so, fine tuning is easily done.
What's the clearance of the cranks from the chainstays? If they're very close, or if the left one gets closer than the right one, you might do fine with a symmetrical "modern" cartridge BB with a longer axle length.
To put it in other words - I'd not assume that the current setup is an optimal one - that approach has saved me a lot of headache in the past.
#8
Senior Member
A system that uses only thrust bearings and needle bearings will have play unless all the space inside is taken up on installation. I would try cleaning, regreasing, and reassembling, first. Needle bearings are not typically pressed into place, unless they are part of a cartridge, and the race is pressed in. A firm push should dislodge them from the cups.
FWIW, thrust bearings and needle bearings in your application would be unlikely to wear excessively from use, more likely corrosion. If you had a micrometer, you could measure the wear area for any appreciable difference as opposed to the unworn spots.
FWIW, thrust bearings and needle bearings in your application would be unlikely to wear excessively from use, more likely corrosion. If you had a micrometer, you could measure the wear area for any appreciable difference as opposed to the unworn spots.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
While I agree with most all the advice I will suggest before any cost is incurred that you check out the crank arm taper fit and which of the current "standards" is the best choice, to keep the arms well secured to the new BB axle. Phil is the only brand that makes different tapers in a range of axle lengths AND can off set the axle WRT the bearings/retaining rings. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 246
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I checked and there was a little bit of lateral play (side to side), so, I snugged the cups real good on both sides... Now there's hardly a hint of lateral play, but, the radial play stayed the same. It's significant as in the chain ring teeth move (wobble) 3-4mm when I grab the cranks and shake them back n forth.
I don't think the bike is worth investing in a Phill Wood BB, so, I'm leaning toward a Shimano cartridge UN55. However, the dilema is I only see 68x118 and 68x122.5 and the way I have the current chainline set is indicating I need a 120mm. So, do I order a 118 and use a shim.. or take the chance on a 122.5? Current setup, I have 2mm clearance between small chainring and the stay.
Also, I don't know how much the placement of the crank will change due to the taper of a UN55 (or whatever bb I purchase). I'm leaning toward the 122.5mm and hope it doesn't move the chainline out too much.
I don't think the bike is worth investing in a Phill Wood BB, so, I'm leaning toward a Shimano cartridge UN55. However, the dilema is I only see 68x118 and 68x122.5 and the way I have the current chainline set is indicating I need a 120mm. So, do I order a 118 and use a shim.. or take the chance on a 122.5? Current setup, I have 2mm clearance between small chainring and the stay.
Also, I don't know how much the placement of the crank will change due to the taper of a UN55 (or whatever bb I purchase). I'm leaning toward the 122.5mm and hope it doesn't move the chainline out too much.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Llano Estacado
Posts: 3,702
Bikes: old clunker
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 684 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 105 Times
in
83 Posts
I checked and there was a little bit of lateral play (side to side), so, I snugged the cups real good on both sides... Now there's hardly a hint of lateral play, but, the radial play stayed the same. It's significant as in the chain ring teeth move (wobble) 3-4mm when I grab the cranks and shake them back n forth.
I don't think the bike is worth investing in a Phill Wood BB, so, I'm leaning toward a Shimano cartridge UN55. However, the dilema is I only see 68x118 and 68x122.5 and the way I have the current chainline set is indicating I need a 120mm. So, do I order a 118 and use a shim.. or take the chance on a 122.5? Current setup, I have 2mm clearance between small chainring and the stay.
Also, I don't know how much the placement of the crank will change due to the taper of a UN55 (or whatever bb I purchase). I'm leaning toward the 122.5mm and hope it doesn't move the chainline out too much.
I don't think the bike is worth investing in a Phill Wood BB, so, I'm leaning toward a Shimano cartridge UN55. However, the dilema is I only see 68x118 and 68x122.5 and the way I have the current chainline set is indicating I need a 120mm. So, do I order a 118 and use a shim.. or take the chance on a 122.5? Current setup, I have 2mm clearance between small chainring and the stay.
Also, I don't know how much the placement of the crank will change due to the taper of a UN55 (or whatever bb I purchase). I'm leaning toward the 122.5mm and hope it doesn't move the chainline out too much.
#14
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,509
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2746 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
2,053 Posts
SKF and White Ind make 121mm, probably some others too.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
Trying to get within a mm or two without actually trying the set up is a big expectation. The reality is that how the arm fits the taper, how close to "perfect" dimensions the bike's BB drive side from frame centerline is, where along the BB shell does the chainstay reside, how the chainstay is indented (or not) are all variables that one has a very hard time really nailing down without actually trying a set up. When in doubt go for more stay/ring clearance.
This is one of the situations that working with your LBS can make things go far quicker. Andy
This is one of the situations that working with your LBS can make things go far quicker. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#16
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
Trying to get within a mm or two without actually trying the set up is a big expectation. The reality is that how the arm fits the taper, how close to "perfect" dimensions the bike's BB drive side from frame centerline is, where along the BB shell does the chainstay reside, how the chainstay is indented (or not) are all variables that one has a very hard time really nailing down without actually trying a set up. When in doubt go for more stay/ring clearance.
This is one of the situations that working with your LBS can make things go far quicker. Andy
This is one of the situations that working with your LBS can make things go far quicker. Andy
On both your posts in this topic (and most others ).
Except Shimano, who state the required axle length for their cranks, specifying chainline, most other cranks are trial and error, for me at least. Keeping various axle length BBs, starting with the one I think is most likely to fit, then going size up, or down, depending on the results after test fitting the cranks. If there is a way to know up front as accurately as possible, I'm eager to learn. Also any rule of thumb charts for best possible starting point would be great. The best I have found so far is Sheldon Brown's Bottom bracket size database.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gatto karma
Bicycle Mechanics
9
02-15-17 04:04 AM
cal_gundert05
Bicycle Mechanics
5
11-27-10 08:51 PM