Asking for a Friend - Touring Bike for 5'-1" Individual
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Wheat Ridge, CO
Posts: 11
Bikes: 2021 Canyon Ultimate, 2016 Kona Precept 130, 2014 Novara Safari, 2004 Cannondale R600, 1991 Giant Sedona
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Asking for a Friend - Touring Bike for 5'-1" Individual
I'm seeking a touring specific bike, preferably in the $800-$1200 range for someone 5'-1" tall. This bike will will travel mostly on pavement and some dirt, touring for a week in Northern Michigan this summer and through a few countries in Europe next year. I'm looking for something that rolls at a good pace with a large gear range. Here is my list so far (no particular order):
Breezer Doppler Pro - $745, 2x, no rack, fenders, size 49
Specialized AWOL - $1,200, 3x, no rack, no fenders, size XS
2018 Fuji Touring - $810, 3x, rack, no fenders, size 49
Jamis Aurora - $929, 3x, rack, no fenders, size 47-51
2019 Kona Sutra - $1,200, 3x, rack, fenders and Brooks Saddle, size 46
KHS TR101 - $900, 3x, rack, no fenders, size 49
Surly LHT - $1,350, 3x, no rack, no fenders, size 46-50
Does anyone have experience with any of these bikes and/or have any input?
My friend has a Specialized AWOL and loves it and I have experience with the Surly LHT, but I'm curious about the sub $1,000 bikes and the Kona Sutra because of the great reviews and the stock rack, fenders and brooks saddle, which would be added anyway easily tacking on $250+ to a bike without those features.
Breezer Doppler Pro - $745, 2x, no rack, fenders, size 49
Specialized AWOL - $1,200, 3x, no rack, no fenders, size XS
2018 Fuji Touring - $810, 3x, rack, no fenders, size 49
Jamis Aurora - $929, 3x, rack, no fenders, size 47-51
2019 Kona Sutra - $1,200, 3x, rack, fenders and Brooks Saddle, size 46
KHS TR101 - $900, 3x, rack, no fenders, size 49
Surly LHT - $1,350, 3x, no rack, no fenders, size 46-50
Does anyone have experience with any of these bikes and/or have any input?
My friend has a Specialized AWOL and loves it and I have experience with the Surly LHT, but I'm curious about the sub $1,000 bikes and the Kona Sutra because of the great reviews and the stock rack, fenders and brooks saddle, which would be added anyway easily tacking on $250+ to a bike without those features.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,173
Bikes: Surly Disk Trucker, 2014 w/Brooks Flyer Special saddle, Tubus racks - Duo front/Logo Evo rear, 2019 Dahon Mariner D8, Both bikes share Ortlieb Packer Plus series panniers, Garmin Edge 1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times
in
99 Posts
My girlfriend is in the same "short" boat and even 26" bikes are mostly too big for her. We've looked around a bit, not too serious just yet. Her bike is a 24", not anything fancy - older economy bike.
If it were me - the primary focus would be ergonomics and ridability. There are a lot of bike shops that do bike fitting, however I am not too fond of that myself. For someone not knowledgeable on riding ergonomics a fitting session with a reputable bike shop can be well worth the $, though. The main thing is everyone is different and tuning the set up to the person riding it is absolutely critical.
To add to the point - what anyone feels on a bike sitting on it in a shop or taking a quick spin around a parking lot is not what anyone is going to feel after 84 miles in to a tour and half way through day 2...
There are a lot of adjustments that you can make to a bike, but frame size is one of those that you can't adjust for. As to accessories - yeah they are accessories and would be nice to be included in a package, however that shouldn't be a deciding factor at the end of the day. Getting a bike that is going to be the best fit for the rider would make more sense to me than looking at a "package deal".
On the subject of saddles - I would recommend trying a few. You will probably find a lot of people that will share the sentiments that their rear end is the limiting factor in endurance while on tour. A good saddle can go a long ways to helping with that. The converse is also true - a poor saddle design/fit can ruin a ride. To that point - a saddle, to me, that comes with a bike is a moot point. It may or may not fit.
Racks - I wouldn't put too much weight on a bike coming with them or not, however it can be a plus so long as what ever bike you are looking at is a good fit physically for the rider. If not - I wouldn't think twice about another, better fitting, bike.
Another thought on racks - I rode for 3 years with a $15 rear rack from Amazon. I still have it. The paint is wore off in places, but its in good shape. The point is - you can get by with inexpensive options if you need to stretch out purchases. A front rack might be a bit more of a challenge.
Last comment - if buying a new bike is in the cards - have the bike shop leave the steer tube high - like a good 4" above where you have the bars "set" to in the fitting. This does 2 things - it gives you room to adjust the bars (again - 84 miles in to a tour on day 2 things might feel funky) if you need to. I've been there done that a few times on my early rides while I was tuning gear. Secondly - the extra height gives you several new gear mounting options - namely the option of a 2nd stem and dummy bar. This will let you drop a handlebar bag down off the main bar and give another level of bar mounting for a phone mount, bike computer, etc. freeing up your main bar for hand positions.
The tall steer tube was the best idea I got from a riding buddy when I was studying bikes before I got mine. Some say it is dangerous being up high, but I've never had a problem. The extra gear mounting options far out weigh any negatives.
Hope this helps.
If it were me - the primary focus would be ergonomics and ridability. There are a lot of bike shops that do bike fitting, however I am not too fond of that myself. For someone not knowledgeable on riding ergonomics a fitting session with a reputable bike shop can be well worth the $, though. The main thing is everyone is different and tuning the set up to the person riding it is absolutely critical.
To add to the point - what anyone feels on a bike sitting on it in a shop or taking a quick spin around a parking lot is not what anyone is going to feel after 84 miles in to a tour and half way through day 2...
There are a lot of adjustments that you can make to a bike, but frame size is one of those that you can't adjust for. As to accessories - yeah they are accessories and would be nice to be included in a package, however that shouldn't be a deciding factor at the end of the day. Getting a bike that is going to be the best fit for the rider would make more sense to me than looking at a "package deal".
On the subject of saddles - I would recommend trying a few. You will probably find a lot of people that will share the sentiments that their rear end is the limiting factor in endurance while on tour. A good saddle can go a long ways to helping with that. The converse is also true - a poor saddle design/fit can ruin a ride. To that point - a saddle, to me, that comes with a bike is a moot point. It may or may not fit.
Racks - I wouldn't put too much weight on a bike coming with them or not, however it can be a plus so long as what ever bike you are looking at is a good fit physically for the rider. If not - I wouldn't think twice about another, better fitting, bike.
Another thought on racks - I rode for 3 years with a $15 rear rack from Amazon. I still have it. The paint is wore off in places, but its in good shape. The point is - you can get by with inexpensive options if you need to stretch out purchases. A front rack might be a bit more of a challenge.
Last comment - if buying a new bike is in the cards - have the bike shop leave the steer tube high - like a good 4" above where you have the bars "set" to in the fitting. This does 2 things - it gives you room to adjust the bars (again - 84 miles in to a tour on day 2 things might feel funky) if you need to. I've been there done that a few times on my early rides while I was tuning gear. Secondly - the extra height gives you several new gear mounting options - namely the option of a 2nd stem and dummy bar. This will let you drop a handlebar bag down off the main bar and give another level of bar mounting for a phone mount, bike computer, etc. freeing up your main bar for hand positions.
The tall steer tube was the best idea I got from a riding buddy when I was studying bikes before I got mine. Some say it is dangerous being up high, but I've never had a problem. The extra gear mounting options far out weigh any negatives.
Hope this helps.
#3
Easily Led Astray
My wife is petite (~5'1") and rides a 47cm frame Trek Madone road bike. We fitted it with a handlebar bag and a rear rack carrying two small Ortlieb rolltop panniers (<12 lbs. packed), plus a bundle of campchairs, etc. (<5 lbs.) and rode across France and into Germany last summer. It worked for us but I was willing to carry most of the camping gear and food on my LHT. If we tour together in the future I plan to get her an LHT so she will have better gearing.
__________________
Opinions are like noses, everybody has one.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,243
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18419 Post(s)
Liked 15,560 Times
in
7,332 Posts
My ex-GF is 5' even. I once bought her the smallest size LHT. She loves it. Even on dirt.
#5
Miles to Go
I currently have a 2010 LHT, and have had a Y2K Jamis Aurora. I found the Aurora to be too flexy, but newer ones may be better. When I bought the LHT (for 1/2 new on Craigslist), my search for a road touring bike was over - this one's a keeper.
For sub $1000, I read good things about the Fuji Touring. Also for even less, the Windsor Tourist could be a candidate for $700, although it looks like they have limited stock right now.
For sub $1000, I read good things about the Fuji Touring. Also for even less, the Windsor Tourist could be a candidate for $700, although it looks like they have limited stock right now.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,467 Times
in
1,144 Posts
Do not rule out a non-touring bike, there are smaller mixte or step through frame hybrids that you might be able to adapt for touring.
If she is used to road riding with drop bars, a hybrid would likely not be the best option but if she is not already accustomed to drop bars then a hybrid might work well for her.
If you could find one with 26 inch wheels instead of 700c, that would be better.
Many communities have bike charities that take in donations, fix them up and re-sell them. I have seen some nice mixte frame bikes with steel frames that would work well for touring. They lack the mounts for front low rider rack, but otherwise would work well for touring.
Or, if you both already know that she enjoys cycling, perhaps if you can boost your budget, a Bike Friday folding bike? That could also be a plus if you flew somewhere later.
If she is used to road riding with drop bars, a hybrid would likely not be the best option but if she is not already accustomed to drop bars then a hybrid might work well for her.
If you could find one with 26 inch wheels instead of 700c, that would be better.
Many communities have bike charities that take in donations, fix them up and re-sell them. I have seen some nice mixte frame bikes with steel frames that would work well for touring. They lack the mounts for front low rider rack, but otherwise would work well for touring.
Or, if you both already know that she enjoys cycling, perhaps if you can boost your budget, a Bike Friday folding bike? That could also be a plus if you flew somewhere later.
#7
Senior Member
my wife is in this height range, and she loves her Surly Troll XS
As mentioned, 26in wheeled bikes have the advantage of not having toe overlap in small frames, but either a LHT or a Troll or a Bridge Club (27.5 wheels) are not cheap bikes, so dont know if its out of the price range.
A good quality bike is always a plus long term anyway, so in the long run I believe its worth it.
None of the bikes I mention are light though, although riding comfort etc tends to be more important, and my wife really likes how her Troll rides on all kinds of surfaces.
there are of course 700 wheeled bikes in XS sizes, but you're going to probably always have some toe strike going on, which may or mayt not be an issue for the rider.....
As mentioned, 26in wheeled bikes have the advantage of not having toe overlap in small frames, but either a LHT or a Troll or a Bridge Club (27.5 wheels) are not cheap bikes, so dont know if its out of the price range.
A good quality bike is always a plus long term anyway, so in the long run I believe its worth it.
None of the bikes I mention are light though, although riding comfort etc tends to be more important, and my wife really likes how her Troll rides on all kinds of surfaces.
there are of course 700 wheeled bikes in XS sizes, but you're going to probably always have some toe strike going on, which may or mayt not be an issue for the rider.....
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,173
Bikes: Surly Disk Trucker, 2014 w/Brooks Flyer Special saddle, Tubus racks - Duo front/Logo Evo rear, 2019 Dahon Mariner D8, Both bikes share Ortlieb Packer Plus series panniers, Garmin Edge 1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times
in
99 Posts
I'm seeking a touring specific bike, preferably in the $800-$1200 range for someone 5'-1" tall. This bike will will travel mostly on pavement and some dirt, touring for a week in Northern Michigan this summer and through a few countries in Europe next year. I'm looking for something that rolls at a good pace with a large gear range. Here is my list so far (no particular order):
.
.
However, if the terrain is relatively flat with mild hills and you can get by with walking the tougher hills - you can certainly get by with a folder. I got a Dahon Mariner D8 last year as a travel bike and enjoy it a lot. For lighter touring it will hold up with 2 panniers and a handlebar bag. However, it does not do well climbing hills of any size.
On a side note, the folding bike variety can be quite "twitchy" when compared to a regular size bigger wheel bike. I find when I load mine it actually gets better riding as the low weight (panniers on the rear namely) give the bike more inertia that absorbs the twitchyness. That helps when cruising down hill, though I still don't like to go too fast on any bike. Down hill at 25mph with an unloaded bike (mariner in this case) is a bit scary. Down hill at 30mph loaded is much more comfortable.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times
in
435 Posts
I have 2 daughters who ride Surly LHTs. One is 4'11 or 5' and rides the 42 cm, and the other is 5' 5" and rides the 50 cm frame. They have toured 1000s of miles on those bikes, and are very happy with them. I also ride a LHT, and am happy with mine.
The 50cm LHT frame is in the back, and the 42 cm LHT is in the front. My 5' 3" wife is in the middle, and is riding a custom built 47cm frame.
The 50cm LHT frame is in the back, and the 42 cm LHT is in the front. My 5' 3" wife is in the middle, and is riding a custom built 47cm frame.
Last edited by Doug64; 03-13-20 at 10:32 PM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,467 Times
in
1,144 Posts
If you are not familiar with one of those, it is a three speed internally geared hub with a freehub that can take a cassette. More info here.
https://www.bikeforums.net/folding-b...ual-drive.html
I am running a 39T chainring on my folder with 24 inch wheels, an eight speed 11/32 cassette. The Dual Drive makes the drive train equivalent to a bike with a triple with the gearing equivalent to a triple that is approximately 53/39/29. Note that the high gear on the Dual Drive is an overdrive. Thus, my folder has gearing very similar to my rando bike that is running a road triple of 52/42/30 and that same eight speed cassette. But, having 24 inch wheels, it is geared slightly lower than my rando bike which is 700c.
I have not researched the Sturmey Archer equivalent to the discontinued Dual Drive, so maybe there is a reason not to use one, but if it is just as good, I would think it is perfectly adequate for touring.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,173
Bikes: Surly Disk Trucker, 2014 w/Brooks Flyer Special saddle, Tubus racks - Duo front/Logo Evo rear, 2019 Dahon Mariner D8, Both bikes share Ortlieb Packer Plus series panniers, Garmin Edge 1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times
in
99 Posts
Sturmey-Archer | CS-RF3 Silver
For 135mm dropouts. The Mariner has 130mm. That isn't to say a little bending couldn't be done to accommodate the extra 5mm. But it is a consideration - that isn't a "drop in" solution, in other words.
Interesting idea though.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,243
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18419 Post(s)
Liked 15,560 Times
in
7,332 Posts
Uh... I own a BikeFriday NWT. Bought it when I had to commute to flat NJ most days. The thought was that I could more easily get a ride to the train if the weather went south. It’s poorly geared for flat terrain. Aside from the few hills on my route, I would ride in the big ring and far down on the cassette. People ride mountain passes with those bikes. In 2000 I ran into a guy who climbed Logan Pass in Glacier National Park pulling a trailer on his way to Alaska. Also climbed Hoosier Pass above Breckinridge, CO, with a couple on a BF tandem. They were riding across the country pulling a trailer.
Last edited by indyfabz; 03-12-20 at 04:46 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,173
Bikes: Surly Disk Trucker, 2014 w/Brooks Flyer Special saddle, Tubus racks - Duo front/Logo Evo rear, 2019 Dahon Mariner D8, Both bikes share Ortlieb Packer Plus series panniers, Garmin Edge 1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times
in
99 Posts
Uh... I own a BikeFriday NWT. Bought it when I had to commute to flat NJ most days. The thought was that I could more easily get a ride to the train if the weather went south. It’s poorly geared for flat terrain. Aside from the few hills on my route, I would ride in the big ring and far down on the cassette. People ride mountain passes with those bikes. In 2000 I ran into a guy who climbed Logan Pass in Glacier National Park pulling a trailer on his way to Alaska. Also climbed Hoosier Pass above Breckinridge, CO, with a couple on a BF tandem. They were riding across the country pulling a trailer.
So with that taken in to account, the sub-$1000 price range of folding bikes gets you in to the usual Dahon range. My Mariner was around $650. So with that having been said, it would even be well within the realm of possibilities in the price range to upgrade to more gearing options. However, boosting the gear range on a folder isn't going to be a "drop in" part replacement or "stock gear swap". It is going to require some fabrication and "making things work" to get there. That would be within the realm of a suitable bike shop that is up to the task, or if the OP has the means, skill, and "go at it" attitude to tackle it him/herself - all the better.
Things to consider when adding gearing:
- New wheel set (the Sturmey Archer hub mentioned earlier) - either an entire wheel set or just the hub + original rim (if the same hole count, of course new spokes too)
*also to take in to consideration here is the rear dropout width. If it doesn't match the desire hub modifying the spread would be required, the more the change the harder the mod is to the frame
- Front double or triple chain ring (if triple - the short chain length may cause driveline angle issues spanning all 3 chain rings = hard shifting an excess side loading on the chain/ring causing quicker wear of the teeth)
* requiring new parts = crank set, chain rings, perhaps a new BB if the crank set doesn't come with or isn't compatible with what is there
- FD mounting if using multiple chain rings - this is very likely to require custom fabrication
Lots of options, but ordering a small wheel folder set up for the task is going to be pricey. Or - find a used one on Craigslist etc. and take a chance on condition, unless it is local and you can see before you buy.
If the smallest LHT will suit I highly recommend it. Some days I wish I got a 26" as you can go wider on the tire clearance than you can on a 700c. For road/hard surface touring it is a bit of a moot point, but if you get in to trails - dirt, gravel, converted railroad bed, etc - wider tires (55mm or so, not sure what the 26" frame LHT clearance is though) will be awesome to have. I max out on the 700c at around 43mm and that just doesn't cut the mustard a lot of times.
I met a fellow rider from Duluth, MN last summer up in the UP of Michigan that was on a small LHT. I don't recall the frame size, but he was much shorter than I am. They are very popular bikes - all sizes. They might be the most common "touring" class bike out there. Trek 520's are quite ubiquitous also, but you don't get the flexibility in size that you do on the LHT's.
Although there are ways around this, one of the nice things about the LHT's is the braze-on selections front and rear. You have a lot of options for gear mounting. Although, I will comment that with the combination of fenders you may need to get creative for getting everything to "fit". Case-in-point - I have fenders front/rear. The front fender takes up one of the two pairs of holes in the front drop-outs. The rack goes in the other. However, you can not get the rack flange to clear the axle skewer. So you have to add about 10mm space. I did this with 2x 1/4-20 galvanized nuts. The trick - getting a long enough replacement cap screw or bolt. I want to say I needed a 20-25mm thread length and of all the bike shops in town I found one that had some in the shorter portion of the range. They work, but cutting it very close. If you do not have the mounting locations on a bike stock there are ways to add braze-ons where you need them with clamp-on styles, however if you can get a frame set with them already there (like the LHT, among other Surly frame sets) then there is a lot less to figure out and make work.
Lots of options!
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,207
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3461 Post(s)
Liked 1,467 Times
in
1,144 Posts
I mentioned above the option of touring on a non-touring bike like a hybrid. On my five week tour in Canadian Maritimes last summer, I was surprised that more than half of the other bike tourists I saw were on hybrids that were not designed for touring, and several of them were women. They were mostly larger sized bikes than what the OP is looking for but it certainly is a viable option in my opinion. An example is the gal I met on Cabot Trail in the photo, she had ridden that bike from Toronto, through Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia before I met her.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,243
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18419 Post(s)
Liked 15,560 Times
in
7,332 Posts
I wasn't addressing price, but since you brought it up....A stock NWT retails for less than $1,400, which is about what an LHT (I have owned two) goes for these days.
#16
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
215 Posts
Mrs. Laurier is about 5'3 and rides a 47cm road bike with 700c wheels. I would expect a 26" wheel touring bike (like the LHT) in its smallest size to be worth a look for someone 5'1".
#17
Full Member
My wife is 5'3" as well and rides a Rocky Mountain Sherpa - I believe the frame size is 48cm and it has 700C wheels. If anything I'd say she could almost go down a frame-size.
#18
QR-disc must die!!!
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Northern Virginia.
Posts: 703
Bikes: '99 Trek 520, '20 Kona Sutra (FOR SALE 48cm), '21 Simon-Bikes mini-velo and a chromoly-framed folding bicycle with drop-bars and V-brakes, that rolls even while folded.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 397 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 199 Times
in
147 Posts
I have a Kona Sutra in size 46. Kona has really understated the size of this bicycle. It's probably equal to the next size up of another brand. I wouldn't be surprised if your 5'1" friend can't stand over it comfortably. If your friend is set on a 700c bicycle, I think the REI Co-op Adv 1.1 should be considered as well. It's speced with hydrolic disc brakes but, I found a nice pair of cable-actuated calipers when I checked out the bicycle in person. To me, it's a better buy. I would've bought it instead of the Sutra, had REI speced it with cable-actuated disc.
Last edited by Nyah; 03-13-20 at 10:10 PM.