Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Wheels

Old 03-12-20, 05:14 PM
  #1  
Kedge
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Wheels

Stupid question,I have a waterford frame with 26"wheels set up for trail riding,I want to convert to my commuting bike,can I put bigger wheels on it,I am buying a nice lightweight set but there are more 27.5 options ,I did say it was a dumb question
Kedge is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 06:27 PM
  #2  
Bill Kapaun
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,824

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1774 Post(s)
Liked 1,231 Times in 852 Posts
Rim brakes? Is there enough adjustment for the larger diameter wheel?
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 06:29 PM
  #3  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,095 Times in 741 Posts
Unless your bike has disc brakes, the brake reach difference from the 26" (ISO 559) rims to 27.5" (ISO 584) rims is 12.5 mm (~1/2") and will probably be beyond your brake caliper's adjustability. Also will the fork and rear triangle accept the larger wheels and tires without rubbing?
HillRider is offline  
Likes For HillRider:
Old 03-12-20, 06:36 PM
  #4  
alcjphil
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,869
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1792 Post(s)
Liked 1,671 Times in 955 Posts
Rim or disc brakes? Answer this question and you can go on from there.
alcjphil is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 06:39 PM
  #5  
Kedge
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rim,I tried a 622 in the frame it fits but you are right brakes don't reach.
Kedge is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 06:44 PM
  #6  
noobinsf 
Senior Member
 
noobinsf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,291

Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,204 Times in 700 Posts
Cantilever brakes or caliper? If calipers, you could possibly swap out the calipers to some with longer shorter reach. If cantilever (which is what I'm guessing, given it's a trail bike), I think you're limited. Also, as noted above, the rear triangle may be the deal breaker if not the brakes.
noobinsf is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 06:46 PM
  #7  
Kedge
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Caliper,yeah I starting to realize the problem,I just can't find many 26" lightweight wheelsets
Kedge is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 07:21 PM
  #8  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,762

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 999 Times in 710 Posts
Where you located?
I know a shop around here that has a Mavic 217/XTR wheelset that's never been ridden, never asked the price just cool to see. Probably plenty of shops have similar options.

Last edited by Russ Roth; 03-12-20 at 08:21 PM.
Russ Roth is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 07:28 PM
  #9  
Kedge
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I will,thanks for 5he tip,I am in Minnesota
Kedge is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 07:51 PM
  #10  
Miele Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,655

Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 640 Posts
I guess that your wheels are decimal 26" ones aka MTB wheels. If so, you can put quite narrow slicks on them if the rim is narrow enough.

26 x 1" https://www.einradladen.com/26-x-10-...-Kenda-Konzept

It's really one inch not ten inches. LOL




Cheers
Miele Man is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 07:57 PM
  #11  
Kedge
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yeah I am leaning that way,been looking for a long time,no luck.Thanks for the link.
Kedge is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 08:15 PM
  #12  
JanMM
rebmeM roineS
 
JanMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,217

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times in 225 Posts
I found 26x1.25 tires to be a great size for suburban/urban commuting. More than a few tires to choose from, such as https://www.modernbike.com/panaracer...6-x-1.25-black
__________________
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
JanMM is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 08:30 PM
  #13  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,762

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 999 Times in 710 Posts
Just picked these up for my daughter's bike and I'm building up a pair of velocity A23 rims.
https://planetcyclery.com/michelin-w...1-black-tr8372

Forgot about these https://www.boxcomponents.com/Box-Two-Brake these brakes have 35mm of pad adjustment, might cover the jump to a 27.5
Russ Roth is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 08:37 PM
  #14  
Kedge
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Wow check out these brakes,pretty sure they will work,thanks
Kedge is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 08:55 PM
  #15  
tFUnK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,652

Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 424 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times in 303 Posts
Never tried these but: https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?m...Fp%2F895288265
tFUnK is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 09:12 PM
  #16  
Kedge
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks for the options,can't wait to check them out tomorrow, great options
Kedge is offline  
Old 03-12-20, 09:53 PM
  #17  
veganbikes
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,280

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4253 Post(s)
Liked 3,866 Times in 2,579 Posts
Why the need to switch from 26 to something else? If you want a lightweight wheelset find a wheel builder and get them to build you one. You can quite easily find hubs and spokes and there are at least a few decent rims still out there for 26". If you aren't a heavy person you could potentially go 28h or less (though finding rims in that drilling and size might be a bit tough especially in rim brake).

If I were building wheels I would probably go White Industries T11 or CLD hubs (depending on rear spacing) , Sapim Force spokes and Secure Lock nipples on a Velocity A23 rim (which you can get in 26 with machined sidewalls). If you wanted lighter and more performance oriented you might consider Sapim CX-Ray spokes and if you are truly weight weenie go with aluminum nipples. For tires I wouldn't go super narrow personally as I like the width for comfort and ease of rolling over stuff and also speed.
veganbikes is offline  
Likes For veganbikes:
Old 03-13-20, 07:48 AM
  #18  
Wilfred Laurier
Señor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,065
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 648 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times in 215 Posts
veganbikes 's advice is correct. Switching wheel sizes will not gain you anything but incompatibility hassles.

I disagree with the above advice to get ultra-narrow tires - wider tires, all other things being equal, have less rolling resistance, and also require less pressure, which gives a more comfortable ride and more traction. There are lots of good 26" tires in medium widts (1.5" or so). My favourite is the panaracer Pasela, which rolls like a racing tire, but for a low price.

Bikeman Panaracer Pasela ProTite Tire - 26 x 1.5, Clincher, Wire, Black/Tan, 60tpi

Also, you should know that moving your brake pads to match the braking surface when changing rim sizes will result in a significant change to brake performance. Generally speaking, if you are moving the pads away from the brake's pivot point - as you would have to do if going to a larger wheel size on your bike - you will have less braking power for the same force input at the lever. IF moving from 26" wheels to 650b (27.5), the 12.5mm pad movement required is a significant change over the original distance from the pivot to the pad, and will cut braking power greatly. It might be possible to use non-V-brake compatible levers, which pull less cable but with more tension, with the V brake model linked above. I wouldn't think it would work very well with V-brake 'long pull' levers.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Likes For Wilfred Laurier:
Old 03-13-20, 09:07 AM
  #19  
Miele Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,655

Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 640 Posts
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
veganbikes 's advice is correct. Switching wheel sizes will not gain you anything but incompatibility hassles.

I disagree with the above advice to get ultra-narrow tires - wider tires, all other things being equal, have less rolling resistance, and also require less pressure, which gives a more comfortable ride and more traction. There are lots of good 26" tires in medium widts (1.5" or so). My favourite is the panaracer Pasela, which rolls like a racing tire, but for a low price.

Bikeman Panaracer Pasela ProTite Tire - 26 x 1.5, Clincher, Wire, Black/Tan, 60tpi

Also, you should know that moving your brake pads to match the braking surface when changing rim sizes will result in a significant change to brake performance. Generally speaking, if you are moving the pads away from the brake's pivot point - as you would have to do if going to a larger wheel size on your bike - you will have less braking power for the same force input at the lever. IF moving from 26" wheels to 650b (27.5), the 12.5mm pad movement required is a significant change over the original distance from the pivot to the pad, and will cut braking power greatly. It might be possible to use non-V-brake compatible levers, which pull less cable but with more tension, with the V brake model linked above. I wouldn't think it would work very well with V-brake 'long pull' levers.
I have pretty narrow 26" rims on my MTB that is converted to a dropbar bike. When I switch out the 2.125 tries for smooth 1.25 tires I notice a HUGE difference in ease of pedaling with the narrow tires. In fact when I had 42 (or was it a 44?) large chainring on the bike I often spun out with the narrow tires because it was so much easier to pedal than with the wide tires. I put on a crankset with a 48 teeth large chainring to correct that spinning out problem.

Cheers
Miele Man is offline  
Old 03-13-20, 09:14 AM
  #20  
Wilfred Laurier
Señor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,065
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 648 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times in 215 Posts
Originally Posted by Miele Man
I have pretty narrow 26" rims on my MTB that is converted to a dropbar bike. When I switch out the 2.125 tries for smooth 1.25 tires I notice a HUGE difference in ease of pedaling with the narrow tires. In fact when I had 42 (or was it a 44?) large chainring on the bike I often spun out with the narrow tires because it was so much easier to pedal than with the wide tires. I put on a crankset with a 48 teeth large chainring to correct that spinning out problem.

Cheers
Part of the spinning out problem is likely because you actually made your wheel a smaller diameter. And part is likely because most 2.125 tires are not the lightweight supple-casing tires that most narrower slicks are. If you get the same make and model tire in a wider size it will generally roll easier. If I am wrong and you changed from brand A, Model X tires in 26 x 2.125 to brand A Model X tires in 26x1.25 then I am mistaken, but I am willing to be that the different sets of tires had nothing in common besides the rim they fit on.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 03-13-20, 09:28 AM
  #21  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,762

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 999 Times in 710 Posts
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
Part of the spinning out problem is likely because you actually made your wheel a smaller diameter. And part is likely because most 2.125 tires are not the lightweight supple-casing tires that most narrower slicks are. If you get the same make and model tire in a wider size it will generally roll easier. If I am wrong and you changed from brand A, Model X tires in 26 x 2.125 to brand A Model X tires in 26x1.25 then I am mistaken, but I am willing to be that the different sets of tires had nothing in common besides the rim they fit on.
Wheel diameter isn't that different between a 2.125 a 1.25, not enough to need a new chainring. Wider is better to an extent and then it isn't. I'm putting the 1.1's on my daughter's bike because its the narrowest tire I can find that's decent. But a 1.1 is equal to a 28mm tire, not really all that narrow. How much faster 28 is than a 23 isn't that significant a difference and 32 or 35mm aren't faster. There is a point where wider just adds more rolling resistance and enough extra weight to upend the whole thing not to mention any possibility of aerodynamics go out the window. For commuting a 1.2-1.4 tire is wide enough though I wouldn't go wider then 1.2 which is a 30mm tire and really after that things get slower and don't add much more to a commute then time.
Russ Roth is offline  
Old 03-13-20, 09:34 AM
  #22  
Wilfred Laurier
Señor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,065
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 648 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times in 215 Posts
Originally Posted by Russ Roth
There is a point where wider just adds more rolling resistance and enough extra weight to upend the whole thing not to mention any possibility of aerodynamics go out the window. For commuting a 1.2-1.4 tire is wide enough though I wouldn't go wider then 1.2 which is a 30mm tire and really after that things get slower and don't add much more to a commute then time.
This is not true. 'Rolling resistance', the energy lost to tire casing flex as you ride, is less for wider tires, if comparing otherwise identical tires. At higher speeds aerodynamics will play a part, especially if your rim is too narrow compared to the tire. And for climbs, the additional weight will play a part, although if the tires have identical construction then this will be pretty minor.. But if tire construction is the same, wider tires have less rolling resistance.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 03-13-20, 11:46 AM
  #23  
Miele Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,655

Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 640 Posts
Originally Posted by Russ Roth
Wheel diameter isn't that different between a 2.125 a 1.25, not enough to need a new chainring. Wider is better to an extent and then it isn't. I'm putting the 1.1's on my daughter's bike because its the narrowest tire I can find that's decent. But a 1.1 is equal to a 28mm tire, not really all that narrow. How much faster 28 is than a 23 isn't that significant a difference and 32 or 35mm aren't faster. There is a point where wider just adds more rolling resistance and enough extra weight to upend the whole thing not to mention any possibility of aerodynamics go out the window. For commuting a 1.2-1.4 tire is wide enough though I wouldn't go wider then 1.2 which is a 30mm tire and really after that things get slower and don't add much more to a commute then time.
Maybe not that much a difference in wheel diameter but I KNOW that when I put the narrower 26" tires on my MTB wheels my largest chainring was too small and I frequently spun out whilst pedaling on flat surfaces. The difference between the two sizes of tires was immense in the amount of effort i required to pedal.

YMMV and apparently does.

Cheers
Miele Man is offline  
Old 03-13-20, 12:09 PM
  #24  
Wilfred Laurier
Señor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,065
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 648 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times in 215 Posts
Russ Roth If we assume the cross section of the tire is round such that the increase in width corresponds to an equal increase in height, changing from 2.125" to 1.25", the difference to the radius is 0.875", and a difference to diameter of 1.75", which is approx. 7% of a nominally 26" wheel. To get the same drive ratio you would need to increase the size of the chainring by 7%. 44 x 1.07 = 47, so an increase of three teeth, which would explain Miele Man feeling the need to swap from 44 to 48.

Miele Man has not told us that his average speed went up when he changed tires, just that he was spinning out, and a smaller tire would definitely require an increase in cadence to achieve the same speed in the same gear.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 03-13-20, 12:38 PM
  #25  
Russ Roth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,762

Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 999 Times in 710 Posts
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
This is not true. 'Rolling resistance', the energy lost to tire casing flex as you ride, is less for wider tires, if comparing otherwise identical tires. At higher speeds aerodynamics will play a part, especially if your rim is too narrow compared to the tire. And for climbs, the additional weight will play a part, although if the tires have identical construction then this will be pretty minor.. But if tire construction is the same, wider tires have less rolling resistance.
I have seen the studies where this is true comparing 23 vs 25 and 28 though most seemed to find that while 28 had an advantage the difference in resistance between a 28 and 25 wasn't as great as the difference between 23 and 25 and was becoming a case of diminishing returns. I've yet to see one that claims a 32 or 35 has a smaller contact patch then a 23 or 28 and I suspect that's for a reason. I assume that once you get past a certain point the sidewall has to be stiffer tomaintain the shape of the larger casing and weight eliminates any advantage in any situation. Even for light tires the difference between 23 and 25 can be several ounces per tire.

Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
Russ Roth If we assume the cross section of the tire is round such that the increase in width corresponds to an equal increase in height, changing from 2.125" to 1.25", the difference to the radius is 0.875", and a difference to diameter of 1.75", which is approx. 7% of a nominally 26" wheel. To get the same drive ratio you would need to increase the size of the chainring by 7%. 44 x 1.07 = 47, so an increase of three teeth, which would explain Miele Man feeling the need to swap from 44 to 48.
Miele Man has not told us that his average speed went up when he changed tires, just that he was spinning out, and a smaller tire would definitely require an increase in cadence to achieve the same speed in the same gear.
Wouldn't have thought it would be that big a difference but it seems it might be.
Russ Roth is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.