High HR diminishing with age- your experience?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,734
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4265 Post(s)
Liked 2,937 Times
in
1,811 Posts
High HR diminishing with age- your experience?
We all know, the ability to reach high heart rates goes down with age. But for a long time, I saw no change. Then in the last 2 years, and particularly in the last year, I've seen a significant decrease. I expected it would go down gradually, but instead it held steady throughout most of my 50s, and then....
What's been your experience?
More detail. I'm 59. I first started riding and having info for my HR at age 48. I don't know where I was at before then.
At age 48-50, the max HR I observed was 178, and I easily got up to 175 doing intervals on stationary bikes at the gym.
At age 50-58, I saw readings above 180 at least a few times a year, and each year, my MHR observed was 182-184.
At age 58, though I still saw readings above 180 (highest 183), I found that it was hard to get my HR much above 175, except in extreme efforts. I could do intervals or all-out on a hill climb and top out in the low 170s.
This year (age 159), I have on very few occasions reached the mid 170s, but it's very unusual. I went out on an all-out hill climb ride a few weeks ago, and the highest I could get was 168.
Also, my HR for modest efforts has gone down. Whereas a spinning flat ride of say, 30 miles, 17 mph, would be an average HR in the high 120s previously, now it's typically 115 bpm.
I don't think my fitness has diminished (it went down for a time this summer because I was off the bike owing to an injury, but it's mostly back now). And I'm not worried about it, except that I wonder how things will change in the future.
Curious about others' experiences.
What's been your experience?
More detail. I'm 59. I first started riding and having info for my HR at age 48. I don't know where I was at before then.
At age 48-50, the max HR I observed was 178, and I easily got up to 175 doing intervals on stationary bikes at the gym.
At age 50-58, I saw readings above 180 at least a few times a year, and each year, my MHR observed was 182-184.
At age 58, though I still saw readings above 180 (highest 183), I found that it was hard to get my HR much above 175, except in extreme efforts. I could do intervals or all-out on a hill climb and top out in the low 170s.
This year (age 159), I have on very few occasions reached the mid 170s, but it's very unusual. I went out on an all-out hill climb ride a few weeks ago, and the highest I could get was 168.
Also, my HR for modest efforts has gone down. Whereas a spinning flat ride of say, 30 miles, 17 mph, would be an average HR in the high 120s previously, now it's typically 115 bpm.
I don't think my fitness has diminished (it went down for a time this summer because I was off the bike owing to an injury, but it's mostly back now). And I'm not worried about it, except that I wonder how things will change in the future.
Curious about others' experiences.
Last edited by MinnMan; 10-15-20 at 12:33 PM.
#2
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,809
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
Few years ago I read on a website that those that do higher levels of cardio won't see a drop in HR as they age. Don't remember where it was. Nor did I consider it anything more than some authors anecdotal experience as I don't remember any studies or such offered for support.
However it was matching with my anecdotal experience. And for comparing what your HR is for certain efforts, are you looking at just the HR or has your time to do those efforts also increased and speed decreased?
If you do a particular effort in the same time, distance and weight as another and find you have a lower HR. I'd attribute that to your cardiovascular system being better able to do what it does and you simply don't require your heart to beat as fast to pump the volume of blood required.
I have noted now at 62 and having several lay offs from cycling that my max HR might not be what it was. I haven't really investigated to be certain as I do have occasional peak HR in and over, but maybe not as many as I've seen on rides long past. I still find myself besting my performance on some ride segments. Might all be equipment weight which recently changed, but not completely certain.
However it was matching with my anecdotal experience. And for comparing what your HR is for certain efforts, are you looking at just the HR or has your time to do those efforts also increased and speed decreased?
If you do a particular effort in the same time, distance and weight as another and find you have a lower HR. I'd attribute that to your cardiovascular system being better able to do what it does and you simply don't require your heart to beat as fast to pump the volume of blood required.
I have noted now at 62 and having several lay offs from cycling that my max HR might not be what it was. I haven't really investigated to be certain as I do have occasional peak HR in and over, but maybe not as many as I've seen on rides long past. I still find myself besting my performance on some ride segments. Might all be equipment weight which recently changed, but not completely certain.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,964
Bikes: Habanero Titanium Team Nuevo
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times
in
120 Posts
Like OP I am 59. My max heartrate that I know even when I was in my prime running and marathon PR shape was only in the 180's. Right now I can at times get it to 150 but it takes a lot of work and I have to be rested. My resting HR is 40 sometimes 39 and generally has always been this. In the past 5 years it does seem as I cycle and run my overall HR is simply not as high. Now if I do a 50 mile ride at say 17-19 mph my HR will average between 108-123 for the ride. That is down from what is was 5 years ago. Running I can get my heart rate higher and now if I am running and it averages over 122 that is pretty high. Maybe even 4-5 years ago that would have been my low end. I don't what it means but I do know I don't rest enough but I am retired and like to be active daily. If I am really tired my heart rate will be lower those days riding or running.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I think so, although it's been gradual. In my 30s and 40s I used to see 190s fairly regularly during crits and the occasional 200, but in the last year I have maxed in the high 180s.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,337
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2428 Post(s)
Liked 2,883 Times
in
1,645 Posts
At 69 as of September, I rarely push myself hard enough to reach much above 170, but riding the indoor trainer using BigRingVR's virtual routes last year, I saw 180 and over a number of times and 190-plus a few times. I have no idea what to make of that.
Likes For Trakhak:
#6
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,500
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3872 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Yes, it drops.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,734
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4265 Post(s)
Liked 2,937 Times
in
1,811 Posts
Few years ago I read on a website that those that do higher levels of cardio won't see a drop in HR as they age. Don't remember where it was. Nor did I consider it anything more than some authors anecdotal experience as I don't remember any studies or such offered for support.
However it was matching with my anecdotal experience. And for comparing what your HR is for certain efforts, are you looking at just the HR or has your time to do those efforts also increased and speed decreased?
If you do a particular effort in the same time, distance and weight as another and find you have a lower HR. I'd attribute that to your cardiovascular system being better able to do what it does and you simply don't require your heart to beat as fast to pump the volume of blood required.
I have noted now at 62 and having several lay offs from cycling that my max HR might not be what it was. I haven't really investigated to be certain as I do have occasional peak HR in and over, but maybe not as many as I've seen on rides long past. I still find myself besting my performance on some ride segments. Might all be equipment weight which recently changed, but not completely certain.
However it was matching with my anecdotal experience. And for comparing what your HR is for certain efforts, are you looking at just the HR or has your time to do those efforts also increased and speed decreased?
If you do a particular effort in the same time, distance and weight as another and find you have a lower HR. I'd attribute that to your cardiovascular system being better able to do what it does and you simply don't require your heart to beat as fast to pump the volume of blood required.
I have noted now at 62 and having several lay offs from cycling that my max HR might not be what it was. I haven't really investigated to be certain as I do have occasional peak HR in and over, but maybe not as many as I've seen on rides long past. I still find myself besting my performance on some ride segments. Might all be equipment weight which recently changed, but not completely certain.
It would be more quantitative to compare HR for efforts of similar average power, but I haven't been using my power meter pedals outside for a while - they're on the trainer. And as I have yet to use the trainer much this season, I don't have a lot of recent data. When I get more Zwift time in (soon, unfortunately), I can compare, say, a steady 180 watt hour with a similar effort last year.
#8
Let's do a Century
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,316
Bikes: Cervelo R3 Disc, Pinarello Prince/Campy SR; Cervelo R3/Sram Red; Trek 5900/Duraace, Lynskey GR260 Ultegra
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 651 Post(s)
Liked 879 Times
in
408 Posts
Mine has noticeably decreased but I'm thinking it's more related to effort and not doing the interval work I used to do to really jump it up. All of this occurred after my crash/hip replacement so I'm attributing it to a combination of things: age, effort and lack of riding with much faster riders where I really had to push myself. If I were riding with a power meter or still doing Time Trials I would be able to narrow it down to a more specific cause.
__________________
Ride your Ride!!
Ride your Ride!!
#9
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,809
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
That's what I focus on. So I'm unsure why others seem to worry about max HR. There are too many other factors that determine how well you perform. And a decrease in HR with age is the expectation of the general population from everything I've read. I also can't think that I've ever read about a correlation that directly links it to decreasing performance with age as the end all reason for that decrease.
And I do have some data that suggests when I was taking a drug that made my average HR and max HR a little more than 10 bpm faster, that I didn't perform as well as I did in the times immediately before and since I stopped taking that amphetamine. But I only cherry picked a few instances to look at, so I didn't do what I'd call a thorough review of my data.
And I do have some data that suggests when I was taking a drug that made my average HR and max HR a little more than 10 bpm faster, that I didn't perform as well as I did in the times immediately before and since I stopped taking that amphetamine. But I only cherry picked a few instances to look at, so I didn't do what I'd call a thorough review of my data.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,734
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4265 Post(s)
Liked 2,937 Times
in
1,811 Posts
#11
Full Member
198 max heart rate at age 35
176 max heart rate at age 64
And a big drop in max average speed on rides between those two ages. We are mortal, eh?
176 max heart rate at age 64
And a big drop in max average speed on rides between those two ages. We are mortal, eh?
Last edited by randallr; 10-15-20 at 04:45 PM.
#12
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,500
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3872 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
My average speed on a 154 mile, 10,000' course has dropped by 1 mph over the past 20 years. It's all about adjusting your training to emphasize your strengths and minimize your weaknesses.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,604
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1063 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times
in
499 Posts
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 685
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Liked 376 Times
in
210 Posts
I am 52 and thought was noticing the same thing. On most rides, at max effort, I could go above 175 and get close to 180+ (186 on Tuesday). However, I realized that when I took an Advil (2) before the ride, my max was always 10 beats lower. In fact my overall ride is 10 beats lower. I have tested now many times and am 100% sure there is a correlation. This does not happen with Tylenol.
So, as many of us take things like statins, Advil, etc, as we age, I wonder how much of an impact these agents are having on our HR.
So, as many of us take things like statins, Advil, etc, as we age, I wonder how much of an impact these agents are having on our HR.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,668
Bikes: '06 Bianchi Pista; '57 Maclean; '10 Scott CR1 Pro; 2005 Trek 2000 Tandem; '09 Comotion Macchiato Tandem; 199? Novara Road; '17 Circe Helios e-tandem:1994 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
60 Posts
With all that stress some are putting on their hearts, the next thing we’ll be discussing is atrial fibrillation, which is often associated with long-term, intense athletic activity.☹️.
At close to age 80, it’s hard for me to get to 140bpm, whereas 20 years ago I could easily exceed 150. Do I care? No. My Afib is now almost non-existent, a side benefit of a pacemaker after my resting HR became 34 with up to 10 second pauses!
At close to age 80, it’s hard for me to get to 140bpm, whereas 20 years ago I could easily exceed 150. Do I care? No. My Afib is now almost non-existent, a side benefit of a pacemaker after my resting HR became 34 with up to 10 second pauses!
Last edited by Artmo; 10-16-20 at 07:21 AM. Reason: Afterthought
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 1,668
Bikes: '06 Bianchi Pista; '57 Maclean; '10 Scott CR1 Pro; 2005 Trek 2000 Tandem; '09 Comotion Macchiato Tandem; 199? Novara Road; '17 Circe Helios e-tandem:1994 Trek 2300
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
60 Posts
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,734
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4265 Post(s)
Liked 2,937 Times
in
1,811 Posts
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: SW Fl.
Posts: 5,604
Bikes: Day6 Semi Recumbent "FIREBALL", 1981 Custom Touring Paramount, 1983 Road Paramount, 2013 Giant Propel Advanced SL3, 2018 Specialized Red Roubaix Expert mech., 2002 Magna 7sp hybrid, 1976 Bassett Racing 45sp Cruiser
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1063 Post(s)
Liked 771 Times
in
499 Posts
Likes For OldTryGuy:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,765
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,872 Times
in
4,637 Posts
I only started wearing a HR monitor a few years ago. Last year, at 56, I hit 186bpm several times. This year, with no racing (due to Covid) I have only hit maybe 183 while killing myself on a couple Strava segments.
But I'm not really sure why it matters. I've read (could be wrong) that max HR is not really trainable and not indicative of fitness...It's just an individual thing.
But I'm not really sure why it matters. I've read (could be wrong) that max HR is not really trainable and not indicative of fitness...It's just an individual thing.
Likes For Koyote:
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,734
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4265 Post(s)
Liked 2,937 Times
in
1,811 Posts
As to it being individual, definitely. (For a long time, it was said that Chris Froome's MHR was 161 bpm, but he's released data on climbs where he hits as high as 174. Still rather low for someone his age, but obviously not related to his performance. Then again, his resting heart rate is 32.....)
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,765
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,872 Times
in
4,637 Posts
I had a friend whose resting HR was in the low 30s. Once, at a doctor's office, they checked his pulse and immediately brought in a crash cart - they thought his heart was about to stop. He explained that he just had a low resting HR.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Beats me and I think it's a good question. Conventional thought is that maximum heart rate declines with age, because HR measurements in the general population show this effect. We also know that it's more complex than just age, and I'm skeptical that it holds as more than a general rule of thumb.
In my own case, I can't say with any confidence. Even with a chest strap and when I was in pretty good shape, I've never come up with a consistent maximum heart rate.
In my own case, I can't say with any confidence. Even with a chest strap and when I was in pretty good shape, I've never come up with a consistent maximum heart rate.
#25
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,054 Times
in
634 Posts
The general rule I have always heard was your age subtracted from 220. So at about 60 your max should be around 160.