Why are Giant bikes so competitively priced?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,785
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Liked 1,017 Times
in
719 Posts
As far as what @Russ Roth was saying: Anyone who lists bike weights is generally lying to you in some way. Usually the bike is missing some key components to make it functional or it is the lowest weight they were able to get it and production is not near it. Now some companies are relatively close but I don't trust much unless I put it on the scale. Rodriguez Bicycles out of Seattle actually had a great story about that: https://www.rodbikes.com/articles/we...-a-minute.html. Always makes me laugh. Also they make a verified 13.5 pound steel bike which isn't too shabby.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437
Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times
in
414 Posts
As mentioned, economy of scale. And more expensive doesn't always mean better, regardless of what some brands would like you to believe.
Love my Revolt, might be adding another Giant to the stable. Great bikes, and their warranty service is really good too. I know of two people who were in crashes and had their frames replaced, no questions asked.
Love my Revolt, might be adding another Giant to the stable. Great bikes, and their warranty service is really good too. I know of two people who were in crashes and had their frames replaced, no questions asked.
Likes For Rides4Beer:
#28
Very Slow Rider
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274
Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times
in
101 Posts
^ This is bait to chase you down a rabbit hole and I am not going to take it.
I don't know if there is even a way to quantify such things but I think Shimano is way underrated because they're not 'cool' and don't lack the pinache of a a euro brand like SRAM or Campy.
Just because Shimano is ubiquitous, doesn't make their stuff bad. Any rate. You can have your Campy stuff for your coffee shop conversations. You can find me riding. (Full disclosure, my current bike has a SRAM groupset LOL)
I don't know if there is even a way to quantify such things but I think Shimano is way underrated because they're not 'cool' and don't lack the pinache of a a euro brand like SRAM or Campy.
Just because Shimano is ubiquitous, doesn't make their stuff bad. Any rate. You can have your Campy stuff for your coffee shop conversations. You can find me riding. (Full disclosure, my current bike has a SRAM groupset LOL)
Likes For davei1980:
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,212
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18397 Post(s)
Liked 15,485 Times
in
7,316 Posts
Srsly, dude?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRAM_Corporation
"SRAM LLC is a privately owned bicycle component manufacturer based in Chicago, Illinois, United States, founded in 1987."
I'm not a tech head and even I knew that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRAM_Corporation
"SRAM LLC is a privately owned bicycle component manufacturer based in Chicago, Illinois, United States, founded in 1987."
I'm not a tech head and even I knew that.
Likes For indyfabz:
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
That's their thing, though. Their bikes are just like Toyota Corollas: they're not particularly innovative or exciting, but they offer decent quality for a slightly better price than many competitors, they're readily available in a lot of markets and they work just fine. To me it's not really an elephant in the room; it's their whole brand identity. Decent, non-exciting bikes for a reasonable price.
Likes For Leinster:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
Srsly, dude?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRAM_Corporation
"SRAM LLC is a privately owned bicycle component manufacturer based in Chicago, Illinois, United States, founded in 1987."
I'm not a tech head and even I knew that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRAM_Corporation
"SRAM LLC is a privately owned bicycle component manufacturer based in Chicago, Illinois, United States, founded in 1987."
I'm not a tech head and even I knew that.
Likes For Leinster:
#33
Very Slow Rider
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274
Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times
in
101 Posts
Says the guy who thinks Campy is the end all and be all.... ever tried actually stopping on their brakes? There was a time in which they themselves referred to their brakes as "speed modulators"
How many 2019 TDF teams ran DA groups vs. all the rest?
And yes, SRAM has Euro roots and is popular among white American dudes who think it's cool because it's not Shimano.
As for which is the best component supplier, it's not really something you can objectively measure but I would suggest Shimano's market share and the sheer number of pro teams running DA groups puts them solidly #1 ; SRAM has some really innovative thinking, especially in the gravel/MTB world which I think earns them #2 , Campy may have the history but nostagia can only get you so far so I think they're #3 three but hey, at least you're still on the podium bud!
How many 2019 TDF teams ran DA groups vs. all the rest?
And yes, SRAM has Euro roots and is popular among white American dudes who think it's cool because it's not Shimano.
As for which is the best component supplier, it's not really something you can objectively measure but I would suggest Shimano's market share and the sheer number of pro teams running DA groups puts them solidly #1 ; SRAM has some really innovative thinking, especially in the gravel/MTB world which I think earns them #2 , Campy may have the history but nostagia can only get you so far so I think they're #3 three but hey, at least you're still on the podium bud!
Last edited by davei1980; 01-23-20 at 11:56 AM.
Likes For davei1980:
#34
Very Slow Rider
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274
Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times
in
101 Posts
SRAM is modern day Sachs, for all intents and purposes.....
Likes For davei1980:
#35
Senior Member
Been in the retail end of bike biz since 1982. Have sold every major brand out there and anyone who says Giant underspecs bikes to get the price point down is simply mistaken. When comparing apples to apples, it is plain to see that the brands are all similarily spec'd. For example, a Specialized brand stem is not better or less than a Giant brand stem. Not here to defend Giant, they can stand on their own quite easily, just want to voice what I have experienced in the biz since 82.
Simply put, Giant is a manufacturer of many things bicycle related. They are very vertically integrated when it comes to the production of bike frames and forks. Trek, Specialized, Raleigh, etc. are not manufacturers. They are design and marketing companies. They do not have the capacity to manufacture the majority of their products, and some are unable to manufacture anything at all.
In 1992 when our shop picked up Giant Bicycles, we had the same question. How is it we can sell the same machine as Trek, but at a lower price. The answer was simple: it comes direct to you from the manufacturer. Yep, that simple.
Simply put, Giant is a manufacturer of many things bicycle related. They are very vertically integrated when it comes to the production of bike frames and forks. Trek, Specialized, Raleigh, etc. are not manufacturers. They are design and marketing companies. They do not have the capacity to manufacture the majority of their products, and some are unable to manufacture anything at all.
In 1992 when our shop picked up Giant Bicycles, we had the same question. How is it we can sell the same machine as Trek, but at a lower price. The answer was simple: it comes direct to you from the manufacturer. Yep, that simple.
Likes For TiHabanero:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,935
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3942 Post(s)
Liked 7,279 Times
in
2,940 Posts
SRAM purchased Sachs, just like it purchased RockShox, QUARQ, Avid, Truvativ, and Zipp. That hardly gives it Euro roots.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times
in
44 Posts
Says the guy who thinks Campy is the end all and be all.... ever tried actually stopping on their brakes? There was a time in which they themselves referred to their brakes as "speed modulators"
How many 2019 TDF teams ran DA groups vs. all the rest?
And yes, SRAM has Euro roots and is popular among white American dudes who think it's cool because it's not Shimano.
As for which is the best component supplier, it's not really something you can objectively measure but I would suggest Shimano's market share and the sheer number of pro teams running DA groups puts them solidly #1 ; SRAM has some really innovative thinking, especially in the gravel/MTB world which I think earns them #2 , Campy may have the history but nostagia can only get you so far so I think they're #3 three but hey, at least you're still on the podium bud!
How many 2019 TDF teams ran DA groups vs. all the rest?
And yes, SRAM has Euro roots and is popular among white American dudes who think it's cool because it's not Shimano.
As for which is the best component supplier, it's not really something you can objectively measure but I would suggest Shimano's market share and the sheer number of pro teams running DA groups puts them solidly #1 ; SRAM has some really innovative thinking, especially in the gravel/MTB world which I think earns them #2 , Campy may have the history but nostagia can only get you so far so I think they're #3 three but hey, at least you're still on the podium bud!
You keep doubling down and digging deeper.
Likes For rebel1916:
#38
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3649 Post(s)
Liked 5,382 Times
in
2,732 Posts
Likes For shelbyfv:
#39
Senior Member
My frame doesn't have a name on it, how are others supposed to judge if my bike is good or bad?
Last edited by u235; 01-23-20 at 05:04 PM.
Likes For u235:
Likes For Flip Flop Rider:
#41
Senior Member
That's their thing, though. Their bikes are just like Toyota Corollas: they're not particularly innovative or exciting, but they offer decent quality for a slightly better price than many competitors, they're readily available in a lot of markets and they work just fine. To me it's not really an elephant in the room; it's their whole brand identity. Decent, non-exciting bikes for a reasonable price.
Giant may not be the "sexiest" brand out there, but arguing that their bikes are middling or nondescript just isn't correct.
Likes For Hiro11:
#42
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Or just take it at face value and dont try to create controversy. Studies continually show that enthusiast hobby cyclists are overwhelmingly white and average higher than the median income. This means the disposable income available can be marketed to, so things can be 'cool'.
Im not saying the other poster is right, but sometimes when a stereotype is said and it doesnt help or hurt anyone, it can just be said without others needing to take issue.
Im not saying the other poster is right, but sometimes when a stereotype is said and it doesnt help or hurt anyone, it can just be said without others needing to take issue.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#43
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Likes For mstateglfr:
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
Giant does use its fair share of non-standard parts. D-fuse seatposts, the Conduct hybrid mechanical-hydraulic disk braking system, their own power meter, 1-1/4" oversized steerers that make buying stems a bit more annoying, just to name some off the top of my head. Cost-cutting is definitely a reason behind some of those designs- e.g., the Conduct meant they could use mechanical brake hoods with hydro brakes.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,100
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 1,955 Times
in
941 Posts
Giant does use its fair share of non-standard parts. D-fuse seatposts, the Conduct hybrid mechanical-hydraulic disk braking system, their own power meter, 1-1/4" oversized steerers that make buying stems a bit more annoying, just to name some off the top of my head. Cost-cutting is definitely a reason behind some of those designs- e.g., the Conduct meant they could use mechanical brake hoods with hydro brakes.
I do not want to get into a pissing match and I am not an apologist for how bike companies build and market their products. I will likely never buy a new bike because at my pricepoint, most bikes are crap! Better off buying used.
Likes For CAT7RDR:
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: South Korea
Posts: 783
Bikes: Merida Speeder
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 233 Post(s)
Liked 165 Times
in
115 Posts
This is just not true. As one counter-example, a couple of decades ago Giant defined the look of a modern road bike with the TCR. (edit: noticed this point was made above). If you look at most outlet's "best of the year" awards, Giant always features heavily. For example, last year the TCR, Propel, Reign and Defy all won tons of awards in their respective categories. Giant carbon construction is common cited as the highest quality and most technically advanced in the industry (they actually weave their own carbon, for example). Giant also doesn't use a lot of proprietary weirdness like Trek or Specialized, making their bikes more reliable and much easier to work on.
Giant may not be the "sexiest" brand out there, but arguing that their bikes are middling or nondescript just isn't correct.
Giant may not be the "sexiest" brand out there, but arguing that their bikes are middling or nondescript just isn't correct.
Likes For PDKL45:
#47
Senior Member
I view a complete new bicycle as a frame/fork with a bunch of stuff on it. In general, if the name on the frame is also making the wheels, cranks, brakes, and such they maybe on the lower end or risk some proprietary to it. The frame geometry is important as the combination of everything attached to it. That "everything attached" I end up swapping out to meet my needs and at some point it barely resembles the bike it once was except for the frame/fork. I wonder how so many people are happy with the bike as it is. Maybe I am just odd sized or picky about my components. Not really level of components but the size and fit. For example.. I'd take a Tiagra of my preferred size and chain rings over the wrong Ultegra every time. I want very specific drop bar style and size, I want a very specific MTB bar size, grips, bar tape, tires, crank size, gears, pedals and seat (last two are obvious). How are so many people buying a bike and it is just perfect? I could not image buying a bike and tossing off the cranks, wheels, bars, and some smaller things like a new stem and tires. The one with the bars I like or crank size I desire has 3 other things I wouldn't like. I'd think I'd be forcing myself to like it as is or use some type of fallacy to trick myself into thinking it is perfect. The grumpy old man just wishes frame/fork selections and select components were the norm and a general more cost effective option but I understand the market and why it's not. Done with my rant that is not related to this thread.
#48
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,458
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4330 Post(s)
Liked 3,955 Times
in
2,644 Posts
I tend to trust it when they specify a size, just don't expect the weight to include pedals or a seat pack which you won't find on any bike on the floor unless they're test ride pedals. In my case one of the kid's bikes was exactly the claimed weight the other was a tenth overweight according to my scale and despite both being 24" with front suspension they were lighter then the 20" giant we bought last year. While the wife's bike was a quarter lb underweight but that might be a difference in size. Tires, tubes, and frame can have a lot of variables to weight that can produce a moderate difference. Being bored in a shop one winter with a new park scale we spent a day weighing everything. Drivetrain and most parts only have a couple grams variance to one another across the same like. So 3 of the same der were within a couple of grams, most parts didn't match published weight. Tires, tubes, and rims had a good deal of variance that could mess up the results.
I would never expect to have the weight of a seatbag of any sort. Some people pack light and some people pack heavy. For my normal road kit I have kept pretty minimal but for touring I have a ton of extra stuff and then I also have a bike packing seat bag which I sometimes use for commuting as well which can have all sorts of different weight.
Underweight is always nice unless you are in UCI competition!
#49
Senior Member
Giant's carbon technology (r/d, production methods, etc.) is second to absolutely no one's.
As others have pointed out, economies of scale come into play as well, in two senses. First, Giant produces massive numbers of frames, not only for their own brand but for many others, including many of the 'cachet' names. For example, the Treks that have been suggested to you as alternatives will have frames made by ... Giant, for Trek.
Second, as pointed out also here, economies of scale mean that Giant gets preferential supplier pricing from the likes of Shimano for components.
The result: if you like a particular Giant bike, and it fits you, you lose absolutely nothing at all by going with that rather than a competitor's equivalent, and you will typically pay significantly less.
Disclaimer: I have only a very small dog in this fight. My two main bikes are Specialized, but I do own an older (2005) Giant mtb that I still use throughout the summer. It has been and still is a great bike. I like Specialized, but wouldn't hesitate to buy another Giant bike if it was right for me.
As others have pointed out, economies of scale come into play as well, in two senses. First, Giant produces massive numbers of frames, not only for their own brand but for many others, including many of the 'cachet' names. For example, the Treks that have been suggested to you as alternatives will have frames made by ... Giant, for Trek.
Second, as pointed out also here, economies of scale mean that Giant gets preferential supplier pricing from the likes of Shimano for components.
The result: if you like a particular Giant bike, and it fits you, you lose absolutely nothing at all by going with that rather than a competitor's equivalent, and you will typically pay significantly less.
Disclaimer: I have only a very small dog in this fight. My two main bikes are Specialized, but I do own an older (2005) Giant mtb that I still use throughout the summer. It has been and still is a great bike. I like Specialized, but wouldn't hesitate to buy another Giant bike if it was right for me.
But there are others that don't use Giant. Look and Time make their own carbon. BMC weave their own carbon for the Impec (now discontinued).
Time and Look have superb quality control, probably best in the business.
If we're talking about manufacturing your low to mid level carbon fiber bikes, then Giant is superb here because this is the bulk of what their factories produce. But if we're talking about leading edge and quality control at the higher end bikes, I will take Look and Time over Giant and everybody else.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,119
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1577 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times
in
602 Posts
ugh second to no one? that's a bold claim! Giant is second to no one only if that no one uses Giant factory.
But there are others that don't use Giant. Look and Time make their own carbon. BMC weave their own carbon for the Impec (now discontinued).
Time and Look have superb quality control, probably best in the business.
If we're talking about manufacturing your low to mid level carbon fiber bikes, then Giant is superb here because this is the bulk of what their factories produce. But if we're talking about leading edge and quality control at the higher end bikes, I will take Look and Time over Giant and everybody else.
But there are others that don't use Giant. Look and Time make their own carbon. BMC weave their own carbon for the Impec (now discontinued).
Time and Look have superb quality control, probably best in the business.
If we're talking about manufacturing your low to mid level carbon fiber bikes, then Giant is superb here because this is the bulk of what their factories produce. But if we're talking about leading edge and quality control at the higher end bikes, I will take Look and Time over Giant and everybody else.