Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Question about Brooks saddle

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Question about Brooks saddle

Old 04-02-20, 12:09 AM
  #26  
elcruxio
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,487

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 859 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times in 220 Posts
My hypothesis about brooks saddles is that the hammocking effect of the stretched leather does work extremely well for some but in reality the parameters which allow it to work are quite narrow, ie. a brooks or any other stretched leather saddle allows for only a very limited range of pelvic postures. However these pelvic postures are also relatively common which in turn allows the brooks and leather saddles to be comfortable.

This posture I talk about is the upright pelvic posture where the pelvis is level in the same manner as it would be when one was standing. In this posture an individual will reach for the bars and bend at the back. These kinds of postures were quite pronounced in the Eddy Merckx time of bicycle racing, likely due to saddles being what they were. In this posture the pelvic bone structures contacting the saddle are the ischial tuberosities or more commonly sit bones. These are the ones you measure with a butt'o'meter.

However if you were to adopt a more forward leaning pelvic posture with a brooks saddle it would likely cause quite a bit of issues in terms of discomfort and numbness. Of course there is variation here as pelvic bone structure and variation is high. But as a rule of thumb, if you're a male and are riding a brooks saddle that is not significantly too wide for you, too much forward lean will likely cause issues as the nose of the saddle will push in between the pelvic bones.

While much of the above applies to saddles in general, the stretched leather component of brooks saddles emphasizes the requirement for a upright pelvic posture. Because the brooks mold to one's bone structure, in more pronounced molding instances dimples are formed where the sib bones reside. This is excellent for pressure distribution but dimples going down also means that the center of the saddle also pushes up in between the sit bones, which in turn increases numbness issues. Hence any forward lean at the pelvis exaggerates these issues even more and well, it's a no go at that point.

To not make this wall of text any longer, I'll sum it up: if you know your pelvic posture is forward leaning, there is a good chance that a brooks won't work for you. If you know your pelvic posture is upright, there is a good chance a brooks will work for you. If you don't know which you are, well try it out. You'll know soon enough.

Additional tip for those who have a forward leaning pelvic postures: Sit bone width is not a factor for you, at least not the one measured with a butt'o'meter. For you the most important parameter is saddle shape and how it corresponds to your pelvic arch angle. If you look at your pelvic bones from below, they form a triangle shape. The saddle you choose will have to correspond to that triangle in terms of shape and the angle of the triangle. Men have sharper triangle shapes (My angle is around 55 degrees I think) and women have less sharp shapes (women have angles closer to 90 degrees). Also for forward leaning to achieve that shape correspondence, noseless saddles and saddles with a pronounced pear shape (as opposed to T-shape) are a good starting point, especially for men.
elcruxio is offline  
Old 04-02-20, 12:39 AM
  #27  
robow
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,861
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
Liked 278 Times in 189 Posts
May I make a few comments in regards to several of the above posts. But before I do that, again, I don't think Brooks saddles are for everyone ! but if you can't find a saddle that you really like, it is often worth a try. If you don't like it, you can always sell it and not take a huge hit. And now:

The reason Brooks saddles are more popular now post internet (if that is true) is simply because they are more available to many of us that otherwise would not have had a chance to purchase one (think small town rural America). I don't think it's hype, or it wouldn't still be around in large numbers.

As to down playing Brooks popularity, I know of and ride with a lot of tourists that love their Brooks and many that don't, BUT, I can't name any ONE other specific saddle that will out number the Brooks that I see. Are there others that collectively outnumber Brooks... probably, but again there is no other single saddle that you can hang your hat on. The reason you don't see more after market saddles is likely the fact that most people simply don't change out the saddle that came on the bike as original equipment as they're happy with it. It's true, Brooks is old technology and hard to market the boat anchor like saddles on a new lightweight bike where the frame weighs the same as your saddle. They simply don't scream "Modern cool" As Sheldon once said, human butts haven't changed in 100 years and if it was comfortable then, great chance it might be comfortable now.

And finally, as far as them being expensive, I've got B17's that are over 20 years old that have enough miles on them to circle the earth and in the long run have been a good value.
Damn that was a long boring post and I'm betting if you're still reading, then you're stuck inside much like me.
robow is offline  
Likes For robow:
Old 04-02-20, 01:19 AM
  #28  
elcruxio
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,487

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 859 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times in 220 Posts
I believe large part of the popularity of brooks is also aesthetics. Not many would like to consider themselves vain especially in something a utilitarian as a touring, but yet many eschew the idea of using a minimalist "racing" saddle or a non conventional "ugly" saddle like an ISM or Selle SMP on a touring bike. I've also seen lots of posts about people matching their bar tape with their brooks saddle for no other reason than looks (leather bar tape just isn't that great of an idea). And it is true, brooks and other leather saddles look fantastic. I have one on my shopping bike and it fits the style of it perfectly.

It's also not so hard to believe that there's at least some hype in the mix. When people ask for which seat to use for touring, Brooks is always recommended even by people who don't actually use brooks saddles or by people who haven't even tried a brooks. They've heard brooks are great for touring so they must be. Probably not so common in here, but on other more popular social media platforms it's actually quite common. Combine that with the incredibly good availability of brooks saddles and it's no wonder people try them out a lot. And then there's the myth of breaking in. But saddles are like shoes. If it fits, it won't need breaking in, not even a little bit. However new riders are told to keep riding until the brooks become comfortable. For some maybe they do but I'd wager that for a larger proportion they don't as the issues they experience are more likely to do with general fit and pelvic shape incompatability rather than breaking in issues.

And then there's the by far most egregious false advice given which is in response to people experiencing numbness with a Brooks. They are told by some to stand up and pedal every 15 minutes or so and it's normal to go numb if you just sit all day. It is NEVER ok to go numb with any saddle. Any numbness always points to a serious issue with saddle fit and it won't go away with standing up every once in a while or taking breaks.

It is true that Brooks and its style of saddles would have gone away if they were just bad. They do have some definite positives and for a lot of riders they remove the need to use chamois, which for me would be a huge bonus. But I believe the population who can properly use them is lower than it would currently seem. But that would require some serious study with data that to my knowledge is currently unavailable, ie. MRI data from large cycling population as well as fitting records of said population.
elcruxio is offline  
Old 04-02-20, 05:40 AM
  #29  
PedalingWalrus
Senior Member
 
PedalingWalrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,612

Bikes: Corvid Sojourner, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Co-Motion Divide, Co-Motion Java Tandem, Salsa Warbird, Salsa Beargrease, Carver Tandem

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked 435 Times in 227 Posts
I like Brooks saddle. It lasts a long time unlike foam/plastic junk that deteriorates too soon and is thrown into a landfill afterwards.

B17 is not for everyone - makes sense - Brooks makes various widths for different models. I also like the Cambium model, surprisingly works well for me.

Last edited by PedalingWalrus; 04-02-20 at 05:48 AM.
PedalingWalrus is offline  
Old 04-02-20, 06:57 PM
  #30  
DropBarFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150

Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 43 Posts
Originally Posted by KC8QVO
I have a Flyer Special - sprung saddle (snip)
Something to consider - the springs on the Flyer Special do absorb shock, like the unexpected pothole or joint between asphalt and concrete that ends up being more than you anticipated. I am a light weight and find the springs actually too stiff. I did look for softer springs a couple years back but didn't have too much luck. They still do absorb hard hits, though, and I'm glad I have them. The combination between padded bike shorts and the sprung saddle is a winner for me.

Good luck with what ever you choose.
Bike guru Sheldon Brown was a big fan of sprung leather saddles! Sprung saddles (or good suspension seat-posts like the Thudbuster) can absorb shock w/o excess saddle padding that can increase chafing & heat. A sprung saddle or suspension seat-post might even allow narrower higher-pressure tires, lowering that critical rotating weight.
DropBarFan is offline  
Likes For DropBarFan:
Old 04-03-20, 01:05 PM
  #31  
BCDrums
Recreational Road Cyclist
 
BCDrums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MetroWest, Mass.
Posts: 546

Bikes: 1990 Peter Mooney road bike

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 254 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times in 134 Posts
Originally Posted by DropBarFan
Bike guru Sheldon Brown was a big fan of sprung leather saddles! Sprung saddles (or good suspension seat-posts like the Thudbuster) can absorb shock w/o excess saddle padding that can increase chafing & heat. A sprung saddle or suspension seat-post might even allow narrower higher-pressure tires, lowering that critical rotating weight.
Sheldon was a big guy, though, maybe he benefitted from a little more give for the glutes.
BCDrums is offline  
Old 04-04-20, 04:19 AM
  #32  
staehpj1
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,837
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 744 Times in 554 Posts
Originally Posted by PedalingWalrus
I like Brooks saddle. It lasts a long time unlike foam/plastic junk that deteriorates too soon and is thrown into a landfill afterwards.
That may be true for some, but it hasn't been for me. I still am using the "foam/plastic junk" saddle that came on my 1990 Cannondale crit bike and was planning to use it again on my spring tour on that bike before the pandemic cancelled the tour. After 30 years the cover does have a ton of micro cracks, but it is still pretty comfortable after at least a hundred thousand miles. The Brooks B17 that preceded it didn't suit my bottom after it broke in and was the Brooks was pitched after a very short life. That was in the late 80s so my memory is hazy, but it was probably about 2 years old.

In general I have gotten good life out of the most foam/plastic saddles I have used unless they were damaged by catastrophic contact with asphalt or concrete in a crash or otherwise subjected to something other than normal wear and tear. A few of the cheapest ones on family member's bikes didn't do as well, but even they lasted many years.

I have broken the rails on a few mountain bike saddles, but that is a different issue.

Here is that "foam/plastic junk" saddle when it was 22 years old getting ready for a ride on the Southern Tier. It is now 30 years old and still comfortable, but has a few more micro cracks. I am not sure who made the saddle, but it was rebadged as "Cannondale Competition".

Last edited by staehpj1; 04-04-20 at 04:35 AM.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 04-04-20, 01:27 PM
  #33  
robow
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,861
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
Liked 278 Times in 189 Posts
Let me pose a question for y'all
Do you think heavier riders seem to be more successful with a Brooks B17 ? Are there a lot of light weights out there that have tried a Brooks but didn't care for it as it seemed too stiff ? or are my anecdotal observations just random ?
robow is offline  
Old 04-04-20, 04:33 PM
  #34  
boomhauer
Senior Member
 
boomhauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 780
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 32 Posts
I'm a lightweight and Brooks flyer was fine right out of the box. However, I've just purchased my third one in 8 years. They seemed to only last about 4 years for me before a ridge would form down the center of the saddle. Tightening ( or loosening) didn't help. It seemed to be some sort of permanent deformation. I didn't use proof-hide.
I realize they are suppose to last longer but i don't really care. My previous tours prior to the Brooks Saddle were way more uncomfortable.
boomhauer is offline  
Old 04-04-20, 08:24 PM
  #35  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,112

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3426 Post(s)
Liked 1,441 Times in 1,122 Posts
A B17 works poorly for me for touring. I can use a B17 when setting more upright like on a bike with flat bars. But for touring I prefer drop bars and use the drops when I have a headwind, and a B 17 is too wide and too flat in the back for me when I use the drops. But a Brooks Pro has the perfect shape for me.

The Brooks Conquest is basically a sprung Brooks Pro. I have Conquests on most of my bikes, but I have a Brooks Pro on my road bike and on a vintage racing bike.

I do not think it is weight that makes a person more or less likely to like a Brooks, I think it is the shape of their bum and their posture. I recall several years ago on this forum someone was saying there are B17 butts and there are (Brooks) Professional butts, based on that I have a Professional butt. I fluctuate from about 175 to 190 pounds.

One of my Brooks Conquests is on the bike in the photo. That one started as a honey color one.




I have met several rando riders that like the Brooks Cambium saddles. I tried a couple and they are too hard for me. I have ridden 12 to 14 hours a few times on Brooks leather saddles, including on the trip where I took the above photo. But an hour and a half on the Cambium was not for me. But some of the rando riders that have the Cambium and love it, it clearly works for some people.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 04-04-20, 10:36 PM
  #36  
ups
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
A B17 works poorly for me for touring. I can use a B17 when setting more upright like on a bike with flat bars. But for touring I prefer drop bars and use the drops when I have a headwind, and a B 17 is too wide and too flat in the back for me when I use the drops. But a Brooks Pro has the perfect shape for me.

The Brooks Conquest is basically a sprung Brooks Pro. I have Conquests on most of my bikes, but I have a Brooks Pro on my road bike and on a vintage racing bike.

I do not think it is weight that makes a person more or less likely to like a Brooks, I think it is the shape of their bum and their posture. I recall several years ago on this forum someone was saying there are B17 butts and there are (Brooks) Professional butts, based on that I have a Professional butt. I fluctuate from about 175 to 190 pounds.

One of my Brooks Conquests is on the bike in the photo. That one started as a honey color one.




I have met several rando riders that like the Brooks Cambium saddles. I tried a couple and they are too hard for me. I have ridden 12 to 14 hours a few times on Brooks leather saddles, including on the trip where I took the above photo. But an hour and a half on the Cambium was not for me. But some of the rando riders that have the Cambium and love it, it clearly works for some people.
I have a Conquest as well. It's my most comfortable saddle.

Is your bike a Thorn Nomad MKII? How do you like it?
ups is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 03:51 AM
  #37  
staehpj1
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,837
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 744 Times in 554 Posts
Originally Posted by robow
Let me pose a question for y'all
Do you think heavier riders seem to be more successful with a Brooks B17 ? Are there a lot of light weights out there that have tried a Brooks but didn't care for it as it seemed too stiff ? or are my anecdotal observations just random ?
I forget what I weighed when I had the Brooks, but I was never a little guy even when pretty lean. My issue with the Brooks was never that it was too stiff. I actually liked mine best when it was new and liked it less as it broke in much beyond the very most initial break in period. These days I only know one guy who is a Brooks user but he isn't a big guy. My observations are not a statistically significant sample though.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 07:03 AM
  #38  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,112

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3426 Post(s)
Liked 1,441 Times in 1,122 Posts
Originally Posted by ups
...
Is your bike a Thorn Nomad MKII? How do you like it?
Yup. Very happy with it. It is quite heavy, but it was built to carry a load so you need a robust bike for that. I built it up in 2013.

Thorn now has replaced the Mk II with a Mk III that is very different. There are some major changes in the new design. A few things that are lost in the change, mine as you probably noted in the photo has S&S couplers, they have dropped that as an option from the Mk III. On a couple trips I used a 100mm suspension fork on mine, the Mk II frame was designed so that the geometry was compatible with such a fork, the Mk III is not. Those are the two things that I noticed were dropped in the re-design. But there are lots of improvements, but I will not go into those.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Likes For Tourist in MSN:
Old 04-05-20, 07:09 AM
  #39  
erudite
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
How long do Brooks saddles take to break in and are they generally quite painful to ride on at first?
erudite is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 07:13 AM
  #40  
Unca_Sam
The dropped
 
Unca_Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,406

Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times in 696 Posts
Originally Posted by staehpj1
I forget what I weighed when I had the Brooks, but I was never a little guy even when pretty lean. My issue with the Brooks was never that it was too stiff. I actually liked mine best when it was new and liked it less as it broke in much beyond the very most initial break in period. These days I only know one guy who is a Brooks user but he isn't a big guy. My observations are not a statistically significant sample though.
No joy after adjusting saddle tension? The professional models use thicker leather for high mileage use.
Unca_Sam is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 07:19 AM
  #41  
Unca_Sam
The dropped
 
Unca_Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,406

Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times in 696 Posts
Originally Posted by erudite
How long do Brooks saddles take to break in and are they generally quite painful to ride on at first?
Mine was comfortable out of the box after the initial waterproof treatment. It's only starting to break in after around 24 hrs of saddle time.
Unca_Sam is offline  
Likes For Unca_Sam:
Old 04-05-20, 07:20 AM
  #42  
tomtomtom123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,064
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 350 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Originally Posted by boomhauer
I'm a lightweight and Brooks flyer was fine right out of the box. However, I've just purchased my third one in 8 years. They seemed to only last about 4 years for me before a ridge would form down the center of the saddle. Tightening ( or loosening) didn't help. It seemed to be some sort of permanent deformation. I didn't use proof-hide.
I realize they are suppose to last longer but i don't really care. My previous tours prior to the Brooks Saddle were way more uncomfortable.
If you're getting a ridge down the centerline, then why not cut a slot to imitate the imperial? That's what I did to my old flyer. It's extremely easy to cut leather with an exacto knife. The slot was not enough for me so I took an imperial and cut down the bridge until it was parallel with the ground, as you see in the previous photos.
tomtomtom123 is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 07:43 AM
  #43  
Unca_Sam
The dropped
 
Unca_Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,406

Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times in 696 Posts
Originally Posted by tomtomtom123
If you're getting a ridge down the centerline, then why not cut a slot to imitate the imperial? That's what I did to my old flyer. It's extremely easy to cut leather with an exacto knife. The slot was not enough for me so I took an imperial and cut down the bridge until it was parallel with the ground, as you see in the previous photos.
Or sell it on and buy an imperial, or another carved version. Or a Selle Anatomica?
Unca_Sam is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 07:44 AM
  #44  
erudite
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Doesn't sound too bad then, I'll have to start saving for one.
erudite is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 07:52 AM
  #45  
staehpj1
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,837
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 744 Times in 554 Posts
Originally Posted by Unca_Sam
No joy after adjusting saddle tension? The professional models use thicker leather for high mileage use.
It never really suited me all that well. Even when new it was just okay, so I was fairly quick to give up on it, but no, adjusting tension didn't give me any joy when it was getting sagged out. It seemed like it kind of pinched in from the sides and took on a shape I didn't like and I didn't find the much sought after dimples to be a good thing in my case at least on that saddle. Perhaps I just got a dud, but I am about the least fussy guy there is when it comes to saddles and I think that is about the only saddle I ever really hated. That is after it had some miles on it. As I said it was okay at first.

To be fair, that was quite a few decades ago (I was in my late teens and am now pushing 70) so I can't say for sure that I'd even feel the same if I tried one now, but I am definitely not inclined to given that I am happy with the saddles on my current bikes and generally not very fussy about saddles in general. Given that I find my current preferred saddle (WTB Volt Comp) very comfy and it weighs and costs a fraction of what the Brooks Professional does I see no reason to experiment with one now.

Edit:
Oh, and yeah a Professional model would have had a much better chance of success given my particular complaints. Not sure if they even had them at the time, but I was just a kid with a limited budget and wasn't aware of them if they were an option. The regular B17 was a pretty big splurge for me at the time so when it failed it was a big disappointment.

Last edited by staehpj1; 04-05-20 at 07:59 AM.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 08:09 AM
  #46  
staehpj1
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,837
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 744 Times in 554 Posts
Originally Posted by boomhauer
I'm a lightweight and Brooks flyer was fine right out of the box. However, I've just purchased my third one in 8 years. They seemed to only last about 4 years for me before a ridge would form down the center of the saddle. Tightening ( or loosening) didn't help. It seemed to be some sort of permanent deformation.
That sounds a little like part of what I hated about the one I had. I recall it taking a good bit less than 4 years on mine though. I'd think that a saddle that can't hold it's shape might be worse with a cut out, but I may be wrong. A cut out might be a fix, it could be worth a try. The saddle is ruined any way so why not give the cut out a shot? It just might give you a few more years of life for the saddle.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 09:09 AM
  #47  
acantor
Macro Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,362

Bikes: True North tourer (www.truenorthcycles.com), 2004; Miyata 1000, 1985

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
How long do Brooks saddles take to break in and are they generally quite painful to ride on at first?
I've had three Brooks B17 saddles on two different touring bikes. All were comfortable from the start. There was no break-in period.

My first B17 was put into position by a professional bike fitter. Based on that experience, I understood just enough to be able to adjust the position myself for the other two.
acantor is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 09:14 AM
  #48  
robow
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,861
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
Liked 278 Times in 189 Posts
Originally Posted by erudite
How long do Brooks saddles take to break in and are they generally quite painful to ride on at first?
Some people find them as stated above, "comfortable right out of the box" but I have found that most of mine required 250-400 miles before I felt they were "broken in". One saddle many years ago in particular took much longer but the hide thickness was noticeably greater than any Brooks before or after.

Btw, here's a photo from a couple years ago that proves leather saddles do exist in the real world, 6 of the 7 cyclists I was riding with opted for leather saddles. Two of these fellows lead ACA trips across country but all do a lot of touring.


Last edited by robow; 04-05-20 at 10:52 AM.
robow is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 11:20 AM
  #49  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,112

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3426 Post(s)
Liked 1,441 Times in 1,122 Posts
Originally Posted by staehpj1
...
To be fair, that was quite a few decades ago (I was in my late teens and am now pushing 70) ...
Oh, and yeah a Professional model would have had a much better chance of success given my particular complaints. Not sure if they even had them at the time, but I was just a kid with a limited budget and wasn't aware of them if they were an option. The regular B17 was a pretty big splurge for me at the time so when it failed it was a big disappointment.
I worked in a Raleigh shop in early 70s, all the higher end Raleigh bikes had Brooks Pro saddles, the lower end Raleighs had other off-brand leather saddles. Somewhere in storage I have a Wright saddle that came new on my Raleigh Grand Prix back then.

I think the French bikes mostly had Ideale leather saddles.

I bought a used higher end Italian bike in the late 70s or maybe early 80s, it was mostly Campy equipped, brakes were Mafac, silver solder and Columbus tubing. The Brooks Pro had a date code of 1963 and the Campy rear hub had a date code for 1962. That saddle was in bad shape when I bought that used bike, I promptly put a newer Brooks Pro on it.

The Pro saddles were around, but probably beyond the reach of a teenager budget.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 04-05-20, 12:09 PM
  #50  
gstein
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 40 Posts
Been using the B17 Standard model for the last 600-700 miles (including a 3-day Katy Trail ride across MO where I rode about 170 miles). Absolutely love the saddle, did not require a break-in period for me.
gstein is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.