Black Hawk Judge Affirms Bike Ban
#26
Cycle Year Round
Critical bathroom breaks in the casinos.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#28
Crankenstein
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spokane
Posts: 4,037
Bikes: Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
What's really sad is that those super dangerous roads are all 15 mph speed limit, and there has NEVER been a recorded bike/car accident on any of them.
#29
Senior Member
The casinos give away free alcoholic beverages, they want everyone to be drunk. The drunker they are, the more money they put down. The house always wins.
#30
living with metabolic r8
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Some other planet
Posts: 5,644
Bikes: Giant OCR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The ordinance disallowed cycling on what I think are the main roads through town. The opinion states that the ordinance does not impede the constitutional right to travel because cyclists can walk their bikes through town. A bizarre and strained opinion. I trust it will be appealed.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Coast, Florida
Posts: 2,465
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
"As the Supreme Court notes in Saenz v Roe, 98-97 (1999), the Constitution does not contain the word "travel" in any context, let alone an explicit right to travel (except for members of Congress, who are guaranteed the right to travel to and from Congress). The presumed right to travel, however, is firmly established in U.S. law and precedent. In U.S. v Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966), the Court noted, "It is a right that has been firmly established and repeatedly recognized." In fact, in Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), Justice Stewart noted in a concurring opinion that "it is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. Like the right of association, ... it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all." It is interesting to note that the Articles of Confederation had an explicit right to travel; it is now thought that the right is so fundamental that the Framers may have thought it unnecessary to include it in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights."
The ninth amendment, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people," makes it clear that not all rights are included in the constitution. The right to travel has been determined to be one of them.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,470
Bikes: -1973 Motobecane Mirage -197? Velosolex L'Etoile -'71 Raleigh Super Course
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I would love to see the comparable anti-car ordinance that requires motorists to walk their cars. My city is trying to force cyclists to walk their bikes to the (few) bike racks found downtown while still allowing the motorists to drive their cars across the same sidewalks to access car-only parking structures. I'll walk my bike when they walk their cars.
#34
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
Replace the signs with "AUTOS, PEDESTRIANS, AND BICYCLES MUST OBEY TRAFFIC LAWS". Then stand back and watch nothing happen.
Hypocrites.