Lugged Carbon Frames
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Lugged Carbon Frames
They are out there, classic lugged and variations on that theme of tube-to-tube.
The Colnago C40 was perhaps one of the top five most important bikes in cycling history. It continues with the brilliant C64.
My prediction is that lugged carbon frames come back, and there are many reasons for this.
From an engineering standpoint they are superior.
Ciao
The Colnago C40 was perhaps one of the top five most important bikes in cycling history. It continues with the brilliant C64.
My prediction is that lugged carbon frames come back, and there are many reasons for this.
From an engineering standpoint they are superior.
Ciao
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,000
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7069 Post(s)
Liked 11,142 Times
in
4,754 Posts
They are out there, classic lugged and variations on that theme of tube-to-tube.
The Colnago C40 was perhaps one of the top five most important bikes in cycling history. It continues with the brilliant C64.
My prediction is that lugged carbon frames come back, and there are many reasons for this.
From an engineering standpoint they are superior.
Ciao
The Colnago C40 was perhaps one of the top five most important bikes in cycling history. It continues with the brilliant C64.
My prediction is that lugged carbon frames come back, and there are many reasons for this.
From an engineering standpoint they are superior.
Ciao
Likes For Koyote:
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Don't be so hard on yourself. You will see Specialized and Trek introduce carbon lugged frames within the next two years. Remember where you heard it.
There are advantages to this approach from a manufacturing standpoint, besides the superiority of the design.
Have you ever ridden a C Series Colnago? Or even seen one?
There are advantages to this approach from a manufacturing standpoint, besides the superiority of the design.
Have you ever ridden a C Series Colnago? Or even seen one?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,487
Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1514 Post(s)
Liked 735 Times
in
456 Posts
If we do, we do; but I'm not holding my breath. One advantage of carbon as a frame material is that you can engineer it to have specific qualities in different areas. You give that up if you go to round frame tubes. The first carbon bikes were lugged round tubes and they were reported as 'whippy.' Or are you talking about massive lugs and non-round tubes?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,833
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1953 Post(s)
Liked 2,192 Times
in
1,335 Posts
It is old technology so I can’t see a Specialized or a Trek making the kind of investment for such a high priced frame (C64).
I would think the major frame mfg’s are looking for advanced dampening systems and more adjustability in geometry.
For me, it is not unlike modern sports car handling and suspensions in that the driver/rider gets all the feedback and feeling attached to the road without the harshness.
John
I would think the major frame mfg’s are looking for advanced dampening systems and more adjustability in geometry.
For me, it is not unlike modern sports car handling and suspensions in that the driver/rider gets all the feedback and feeling attached to the road without the harshness.
John
Likes For 70sSanO:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,473
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,946 Posts
injection molding composites to a digitized profile is more likely to happen.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
Likes For Troul:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,004
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3982 Post(s)
Liked 7,433 Times
in
2,989 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,434
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1584 Post(s)
Liked 1,754 Times
in
987 Posts
What advantages does it have? The only advantage is it's cheaper for a small time frame-builder to build a custom frame using carbon tubes and lugs. Aside from that I see no advantage and plenty of disadvantages- like the glue coming undone a few years down the road. The other problem is that when carbon comes in contact with aluminum or steel, it causes galvanic corrosion. So inherently it's not a good combo.
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,473
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,946 Posts
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,000
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7069 Post(s)
Liked 11,142 Times
in
4,754 Posts
And I'm guessing that "digitized profile" is just a fancy way of describing a cad/cam process, but not sure.
Even if it is a longshot, it's probably more likely than the OP's prediction.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
They are out there, classic lugged and variations on that theme of tube-to-tube.
The Colnago C40 was perhaps one of the top five most important bikes in cycling history. It continues with the brilliant C64.
My prediction is that lugged carbon frames come back, and there are many reasons for this.
From an engineering standpoint they are superior.
Ciao
The Colnago C40 was perhaps one of the top five most important bikes in cycling history. It continues with the brilliant C64.
My prediction is that lugged carbon frames come back, and there are many reasons for this.
From an engineering standpoint they are superior.
Ciao
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,473
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,946 Posts
The thing I dislike about most CF bikes is that they're so "big" - fat frame members, huge BBs - they just seem to occupy so much space. In contrast, lugged CF frames look like standard tubed frames, which are much more pleasing to my eye. Note that this is not a comment on how they perform - simply how they look to me.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#14
Senior Member
I prefer the lugged look over the molded look, however the one piece carbon frame is superior in performance to the lugged carbon frames. I have had both (still have a one piece road frame hanging around) and can tell you there is a difference in weight and BB stiffness. Oddly enough, I prefer the lateral flex of the lugged ones I had before this one, and I prefer lugged steel over anything carbon. The flex in the BB works with my riding style.
#15
Full Member
They are out there, classic lugged and variations on that theme of tube-to-tube.
The Colnago C40 was perhaps one of the top five most important bikes in cycling history. It continues with the brilliant C64.
My prediction is that lugged carbon frames come back, and there are many reasons for this.
From an engineering standpoint they are superior.
Ciao
The Colnago C40 was perhaps one of the top five most important bikes in cycling history. It continues with the brilliant C64.
My prediction is that lugged carbon frames come back, and there are many reasons for this.
From an engineering standpoint they are superior.
Ciao
#16
Senior Member
#17
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,625
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
509 Posts
I'm waiting for the OP to outline how lugged carbon frames are better. Does it make a bike faster, lighter, stronger, cheaper, or something else? Genuinely curious as to why the OP made his claim.
I'm not worried about the corrosion aspect, since there's no rule that says the lugs need to be metal. Injection molded (insert scientific name here).
I'm not worried about the corrosion aspect, since there's no rule that says the lugs need to be metal. Injection molded (insert scientific name here).
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,434
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1584 Post(s)
Liked 1,754 Times
in
987 Posts
The Calfee style carbon lugs/ carbon tubes construction method was good for small time frame builders. But you are still left with an uncompressed epoxy glue joint and a heavy glob of epoxy. Contrast that to the modern dry carbon layup- it's extremely light because there is very little epoxy.
The future for small time builders is probably in 3-D printed open molds and dry carbon layup. I think the tube/lug method is a dead end.
The future for small time builders is probably in 3-D printed open molds and dry carbon layup. I think the tube/lug method is a dead end.
#19
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,356
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3910 Post(s)
Liked 4,866 Times
in
2,245 Posts
Calfee TetraPro ‘semi-custom’
Not sure about better today, but 20 years ago I would have absolutely agreed with you after trying Trek, Aegis, Kestrel, etc.
This one was purchased after much research and riding. The Look bikes of the day were wonderful to test ride, but even more $$$. Never got to test ride a Colnago, just as well, given the budget.
Lugged carbon, gusseted for stiffness and long term reliability. Ti BB sleeve. It has been converted to 1" threadless fork/HS, Ergo 10, with 2nd factory paint job.
ridden by G Lemond in a couple of stages.
This one was purchased after much research and riding. The Look bikes of the day were wonderful to test ride, but even more $$$. Never got to test ride a Colnago, just as well, given the budget.
Lugged carbon, gusseted for stiffness and long term reliability. Ti BB sleeve. It has been converted to 1" threadless fork/HS, Ergo 10, with 2nd factory paint job.
ridden by G Lemond in a couple of stages.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 11-25-20 at 06:10 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 970
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Liked 265 Times
in
214 Posts
I assume the lugs would be CF too in which case there should be no issues gluing the tubes into them. I think that's how Colnagos are made.
Monocoques supposedly have all the variable layup etc but do we know that's not just marketing? Everyone talks up whatever process they're using. A round tube is actually a very good shape for a lot of things including part of a bike frame.
#21
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,356
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3910 Post(s)
Liked 4,866 Times
in
2,245 Posts
i don't mean to answer for OP, but when someone tells me = "It's better", regarding a bike - that usually means their hands, feet, or buttocks liked it more. Or some combination of same.
We all have different bodies, experiences and expectations.
Just 4 the record.
The only absolutes are:
Early Ti was noodly
Early Al was stiff and harsh (with 20-22mm race tires)
Early monocoque rode like dead wood between your legs
There are no 'ride quality' experts.
N+1 = the only road to cycling's 'true enlightenment'.
Next year's bikes will be faster, better and improved. But don't quote me about Why.
If the shifter is not on the downtube, it can't be called vintage or classic.
The ride is only as fast as the engine/transmission, the frame has almost nothing to add.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, not the shape of the thing.
My bikes are better than your bikes, if not better then more numerous, if not better or more numerous then all bets are off and I respectfully&quietly listen to you.
We all have different bodies, experiences and expectations.
Just 4 the record.
The only absolutes are:
Early Ti was noodly
Early Al was stiff and harsh (with 20-22mm race tires)
Early monocoque rode like dead wood between your legs
There are no 'ride quality' experts.
N+1 = the only road to cycling's 'true enlightenment'.
Next year's bikes will be faster, better and improved. But don't quote me about Why.
If the shifter is not on the downtube, it can't be called vintage or classic.
The ride is only as fast as the engine/transmission, the frame has almost nothing to add.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, not the shape of the thing.
My bikes are better than your bikes, if not better then more numerous, if not better or more numerous then all bets are off and I respectfully&quietly listen to you.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 11-25-20 at 06:17 PM.
Likes For Wildwood:
#22
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,723 Times
in
2,540 Posts
Lugged carbon is never coming back. People are still building ti/carbon hybrid frames and tube on tube carbon frames. I want to say the last carbon lug has already been made, but all ideas get recycled.
Likes For unterhausen:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,709
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1624 Post(s)
Liked 2,656 Times
in
1,249 Posts