Light Bicycle Wheels
#576
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Depends a bit on location (winds) and weight and speed.
For the general rider 35mm is likely better. If you pump higher speeds, a deeper profile is likely better.
Wheel mass matters more for the general rider as the general rider is going under 20mph.
In all and every case a tubular will provide the better ride. It may not be worth the learning curve dealing with them. But in no case will a non tubular out perform a tubular except maybe a constant speed super smooth surface.
If you are a general rider - 25mm-35mm with an alloy clincher 25-28mm will give the best ride/$.
Carbon if you want to give up a bit of quality and performance to get the very best.
Tubular - carbon.
#577
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 752
Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 63 Times
in
45 Posts
I actually was referring specifically to LB wheels in 25x35 and 25x45 and have updated last my post to reflect this. My question is, what's the difference in ride quality between the two sizes? You commented that alloy wheels give the best ride/$. Can you explain?
The OP was @robbyville. I started along your topic and was corrected that this was about a brand.
Depends a bit on location (winds) and weight and speed.
For the general rider 35mm is likely better. If you pump higher speeds, a deeper profile is likely better.
Wheel mass matters more for the general rider as the general rider is going under 20mph.
In all and every case a tubular will provide the better ride. It may not be worth the learning curve dealing with them. But in no case will a non tubular out perform a tubular except maybe a constant speed super smooth surface.
If you are a general rider - 25mm-35mm with an alloy clincher 25-28mm will give the best ride/$.
Carbon if you want to give up a bit of quality and performance to get the very best.
Tubular - carbon.
Depends a bit on location (winds) and weight and speed.
For the general rider 35mm is likely better. If you pump higher speeds, a deeper profile is likely better.
Wheel mass matters more for the general rider as the general rider is going under 20mph.
In all and every case a tubular will provide the better ride. It may not be worth the learning curve dealing with them. But in no case will a non tubular out perform a tubular except maybe a constant speed super smooth surface.
If you are a general rider - 25mm-35mm with an alloy clincher 25-28mm will give the best ride/$.
Carbon if you want to give up a bit of quality and performance to get the very best.
Tubular - carbon.
Last edited by Robert A; 06-23-19 at 12:37 AM.
#578
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,509
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20801 Post(s)
Liked 9,448 Times
in
4,666 Posts
I don't follow why it's hard to understand. It's a manufacturer-direct brand and there's not a lot of spilled ink to be found on them, so this is a place for buyers to share their experiences and provide their thoughts for the benefit of others that are curious about the brand.
Likes For WhyFi:
#579
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504
Bikes: Speedvagen Steel
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 248 Times
in
156 Posts
I don't follow why it's hard to understand. It's a manufacturer-direct brand and there's not a lot of spilled ink to be found on them, so this is a place for buyers to share their experiences and provide their thoughts for the benefit of others that are curious about the brand.
#580
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
As alloy rims are extruded the thickness of the metal can be well controlled and makes a nice pronounced hook can be made to hold the tire well. Carbon is not extruded. The degree carbon takes bends or has differeent material thickness is based on the mold and hand layup. It is not unusual to have carbon rims with alloy brake tracks.
Then the brake track. This is more of an issue using rim brakes, but grit and rough pads are squeezing the outside of the carbon tracks while the air is pushing the walls out. Same is true of course for alloy, but this fatigue can cause side/brake tracks to splinter/blow out over time. So typically the carbon wall are thicker (or alloy) than the alloy ones to account for this. The clincher distance from inside the rim to the outside is further for carbon. The tire may be leaning on the edge of the rim more. Could you feel this? Don't know. It just doesn't mentally seem as right.
The net is in low profile clinchers - 25mm or so alloy rims are often lighter than the carbon ones, due to the brake track issues. Tubulars, not having the brake tracks are lighter in carbon.
Ride quality is based on the tire case material, tread, and width which affects the the cross section area, then the PSI. The width thing as another poster mentioned is having the same area of air in the cross section. Adjusting the PSI accordingly. Leaving the actual case material and where the air is is a mistake IMO. We also generally leave the PSI part out of many discussions. I think it is implied, wider gets lower PSI, but most the rolling resistance tests I have seen you have to be careful and see if the PSI was the same, or adjusted for cross sectional area. Also having air between rigid brake tracks vs floating on top of the rim can be felt.
Having air between rigid brake tracks vs floating on top of the rim can be felt.
#581
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Clinchers need a hooked brake track. Two things here - the brake track and the hook.
As alloy rims are extruded the thickness of the metal can be well controlled and makes a nice pronounced hook can be made to hold the tire well. Carbon is not extruded. The degree carbon takes bends or has differeent material thickness is based on the mold and hand layup. It is not unusual to have carbon rims with alloy brake tracks.
So typically the carbon wall are thicker (or alloy) than the alloy ones to account for this. The clincher distance from inside the rim to the outside is further for carbon. The tire may be leaning on the edge of the rim more. Could you feel this? Don't know. It just doesn't mentally seem as right.
As alloy rims are extruded the thickness of the metal can be well controlled and makes a nice pronounced hook can be made to hold the tire well. Carbon is not extruded. The degree carbon takes bends or has differeent material thickness is based on the mold and hand layup. It is not unusual to have carbon rims with alloy brake tracks.
So typically the carbon wall are thicker (or alloy) than the alloy ones to account for this. The clincher distance from inside the rim to the outside is further for carbon. The tire may be leaning on the edge of the rim more. Could you feel this? Don't know. It just doesn't mentally seem as right.
Vittoria - ENVE Compatiblity
#582
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Do think the characteristics you mention have something to do with the Vittoria/Enve 'spat'? OT: was there any further followup on this?
Vittoria - ENVE Compatiblity
Vittoria - ENVE Compatiblity
Some tires have a more pronounced bead that will slip in better under a smoother carbon hook. I use Veloflex Master 25s on my Mercury M5 carbon clinchers. They hook in better.
I do not know about these Light Bicycle Wheels but often wheel manufactures will swap out suppliers for one component to the next. The same Asian made rims will find their way to multiple brands, and the same model wheel may have a different rim from one year to the next.
#583
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 752
Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 63 Times
in
45 Posts
Clinchers need a hooked brake track. Two things here - the brake track and the hook.
As alloy rims are extruded the thickness of the metal can be well controlled and makes a nice pronounced hook can be made to hold the tire well. Carbon is not extruded. The degree carbon takes bends or has differeent material thickness is based on the mold and hand layup. It is not unusual to have carbon rims with alloy brake tracks.
Then the brake track. This is more of an issue using rim brakes, but grit and rough pads are squeezing the outside of the carbon tracks while the air is pushing the walls out. Same is true of course for alloy, but this fatigue can cause side/brake tracks to splinter/blow out over time. So typically the carbon wall are thicker (or alloy) than the alloy ones to account for this. The clincher distance from inside the rim to the outside is further for carbon. The tire may be leaning on the edge of the rim more. Could you feel this? Don't know. It just doesn't mentally seem as right.
The net is in low profile clinchers - 25mm or so alloy rims are often lighter than the carbon ones, due to the brake track issues. Tubulars, not having the brake tracks are lighter in carbon.
Ride quality is based on the tire case material, tread, and width which affects the the cross section area, then the PSI. The width thing as another poster mentioned is having the same area of air in the cross section. Adjusting the PSI accordingly. Leaving the actual case material and where the air is is a mistake IMO. We also generally leave the PSI part out of many discussions. I think it is implied, wider gets lower PSI, but most the rolling resistance tests I have seen you have to be careful and see if the PSI was the same, or adjusted for cross sectional area. Also having air between rigid brake tracks vs floating on top of the rim can be felt.
Having air between rigid brake tracks vs floating on top of the rim can be felt.
As alloy rims are extruded the thickness of the metal can be well controlled and makes a nice pronounced hook can be made to hold the tire well. Carbon is not extruded. The degree carbon takes bends or has differeent material thickness is based on the mold and hand layup. It is not unusual to have carbon rims with alloy brake tracks.
Then the brake track. This is more of an issue using rim brakes, but grit and rough pads are squeezing the outside of the carbon tracks while the air is pushing the walls out. Same is true of course for alloy, but this fatigue can cause side/brake tracks to splinter/blow out over time. So typically the carbon wall are thicker (or alloy) than the alloy ones to account for this. The clincher distance from inside the rim to the outside is further for carbon. The tire may be leaning on the edge of the rim more. Could you feel this? Don't know. It just doesn't mentally seem as right.
The net is in low profile clinchers - 25mm or so alloy rims are often lighter than the carbon ones, due to the brake track issues. Tubulars, not having the brake tracks are lighter in carbon.
Ride quality is based on the tire case material, tread, and width which affects the the cross section area, then the PSI. The width thing as another poster mentioned is having the same area of air in the cross section. Adjusting the PSI accordingly. Leaving the actual case material and where the air is is a mistake IMO. We also generally leave the PSI part out of many discussions. I think it is implied, wider gets lower PSI, but most the rolling resistance tests I have seen you have to be careful and see if the PSI was the same, or adjusted for cross sectional area. Also having air between rigid brake tracks vs floating on top of the rim can be felt.
Having air between rigid brake tracks vs floating on top of the rim can be felt.
#584
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I'm bigger and like 50mm. I ride mostly tubulars but have 50mm carbon clinchers too. My 25 clinchers are alloy. I own 25mm carbon, and I think they are inferior to the alloy.
#585
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 752
Bikes: 2019 CAAD12, 2015 Specialized Sirrus Comp
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 559 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 63 Times
in
45 Posts
For low profile - yes. The Ardennes are robust. I have the cheap Shimano, Mercury, DuraAce, and Ultegra in alloy. For hi profile you pretty much need a carbon rim. Maybe with an alloy brake track (Zipp, HED). Low profile alloy will be lighter and fit tires better.
I'm bigger and like 50mm. I ride mostly tubulars but have 50mm carbon clinchers too. My 25 clinchers are alloy. I own 25mm carbon, and I think they are inferior to the alloy.
I'm bigger and like 50mm. I ride mostly tubulars but have 50mm carbon clinchers too. My 25 clinchers are alloy. I own 25mm carbon, and I think they are inferior to the alloy.
#587
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
I don't follow why it's hard to understand. It's a manufacturer-direct brand and there's not a lot of spilled ink to be found on them, so this is a place for buyers to share their experiences and provide their thoughts for the benefit of others that are curious about the brand.
How is it possible that there’s a large thread, and he has nothing to add?
I have nothing to add, so I'll change the topic.
Last edited by noodle soup; 06-23-19 at 04:57 PM.
#588
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
For the sake of posterity, here is the progress of my order so far:
Monday 6/17: two rims ordered - RRU35C02 3k matte with grooved graphene brake track
Wednesday 6/19 (two days): Paypal charge appeared on bank account
Friday 6/21 (five days): Informed that rims were not in stock in North America and would be manufactured and shipped from China. Order status changed from Pending to step 1 of 10 "Material Prepare."
Wednesday 6/26 (nine days): Order status changed from step 1 of 10 "Material Prepare" to step 4 of 10 "CNC Machining."
Hubs still have to come from Poland so I'm not in a rush. Just posting for additional data points.
We now return you to our regularly scheduled argument. As you were, fellas. Carry on.
-Tim-
Monday 6/17: two rims ordered - RRU35C02 3k matte with grooved graphene brake track
Wednesday 6/19 (two days): Paypal charge appeared on bank account
Friday 6/21 (five days): Informed that rims were not in stock in North America and would be manufactured and shipped from China. Order status changed from Pending to step 1 of 10 "Material Prepare."
Wednesday 6/26 (nine days): Order status changed from step 1 of 10 "Material Prepare" to step 4 of 10 "CNC Machining."
Hubs still have to come from Poland so I'm not in a rush. Just posting for additional data points.
We now return you to our regularly scheduled argument. As you were, fellas. Carry on.
-Tim-
Last edited by TimothyH; 06-26-19 at 09:05 AM.
#589
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
For the sake of posterity, here is the progress of my order so far:
Monday 6/17: two rims ordered - RRU35C02 3k matte with grooved graphene brake track
Wednesday 6/19 (two days): Paypal charge appeared on bank account
Friday 6/21 (five days): Informed that rims were not in stock in North America and would be manufactured and shipped from China. Order status changed from Pending to step 1 of 10 "Material Prepare."
Wednesday 6/26 (nine days): Order status changed from step 1 of 10 "Material Prepare" to step 4 of 10 "CNC Machining."
Hubs still have to come from Poland so I'm not in a rush. Just posting for additional data points.
We now return you to our regularly scheduled argument. As you were, fellas. Carry on.
-Tim-
Monday 6/17: two rims ordered - RRU35C02 3k matte with grooved graphene brake track
Wednesday 6/19 (two days): Paypal charge appeared on bank account
Friday 6/21 (five days): Informed that rims were not in stock in North America and would be manufactured and shipped from China. Order status changed from Pending to step 1 of 10 "Material Prepare."
Wednesday 6/26 (nine days): Order status changed from step 1 of 10 "Material Prepare" to step 4 of 10 "CNC Machining."
Hubs still have to come from Poland so I'm not in a rush. Just posting for additional data points.
We now return you to our regularly scheduled argument. As you were, fellas. Carry on.
-Tim-
#592
staring at the mountains
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Castle Pines, CO
Posts: 4,560
Bikes: Obed GVR, Fairdale Goodship, Salsa Timberjack 29
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
112 Posts
In other words, I'm saying you're probably overthinking it a little. Go 45mm.
#593
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I've had mine for 2 weeks and have about 550 miles on them. Right now, I'm loving them. Haven't ridden them in the rain yet, but I quickly switched out the LB brake pads for Swisstop Black Prince and the dry braking is just fine. I've hit some potholes hard without a problem. It's my first pair of carbon wheels, and compared to more conventional alloy rims (I was riding HED Ardennes), the differences are very noticeable, especially above 25 mph. I'm not sure how much different the performance may be from your Reynolds.
I have a set of Ardennes, they came with the bike. I have a pair of $$$$$ carbon hoops and feel the same way about them that you described. Even at lower speeds they just feel like less work.
I would like to have another set of hoops, and do far everything I've read here is very encouraging.
#594
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
How much do you folks weigh?
#596
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
I would love to hear more about this, maybe it's hard to describe though.
I have a set of Ardennes, they came with the bike. I have a pair of $$$$$ carbon hoops and feel the same way about them that you described. Even at lower speeds they just feel like less work.
I would like to have another set of hoops, and do far everything I've read here is very encouraging.
I have a set of Ardennes, they came with the bike. I have a pair of $$$$$ carbon hoops and feel the same way about them that you described. Even at lower speeds they just feel like less work.
I would like to have another set of hoops, and do far everything I've read here is very encouraging.
#597
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
Don’t mind me. Just excited that my wheels are done.
492g and 494g for the (internal nipple drilled) rims. 1592g for the wheelset. Pretty much on the dot.
492g and 494g for the (internal nipple drilled) rims. 1592g for the wheelset. Pretty much on the dot.
Likes For smashndash: