Why scooters may be more popular than bikes
#154
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
I worked for several years in social services for a hospital. I even did in-home visits. Perseverance was a necessity. But yes not everyone can be reasoned with.
#155
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
I'm for giving people legal/ethical options for making do with less money, with more affordable transportation as one such option.
I don’t believe you can connect scooters to mass transit in reality.
This sounds like the old conundrum of how can you fit an elephant into a refrigerator.
1. Open refrigerator door
2. Put Elephant in
3. Close door.
It's that simple really. With scooter/bike sharing, the steps are
1) check out share scooter/bike
2) ride to bus stop
3) leave scooter/bike for next user.
Maybe you can make it more complicated by adding another step where people have to ditch their cars before riding share vehicles to bus stops, like this:
Last edited by tandempower; 12-19-18 at 03:16 PM.
#156
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
For that data to be there, there would have to be significant numbers of people dealing with financial hardship by switching to more affordable transportation. What you should be looking at is how people deal with economic hardship when they run out of money, can't get a new job, get evicted, etc. Then, if you could go back through all their financial mistakes, you might find a moment where they could have forgone automotive expenses and made do with other costs of living by going car-free, instead of running drugs or doing something else illegal to afford to keep driving, for example.
I'm for giving people legal/ethical options for making do with less money, with more affordable transportation as one such option.
This sounds like the old conundrum of how can you fit an elephant into a refrigerator.
1. Open refrigerator door
2. Put Elephant in
3. Close door.
It's that simple really. With scooter/bike sharing, the steps are
1) check out share scooter/bike
2) ride to bus stop
3) leave scooter/bike for next user.
Maybe you can make it more complicated by adding another step where people have to ditch their cars before riding share vehicles to bus stops, like this:
I'm for giving people legal/ethical options for making do with less money, with more affordable transportation as one such option.
This sounds like the old conundrum of how can you fit an elephant into a refrigerator.
1. Open refrigerator door
2. Put Elephant in
3. Close door.
It's that simple really. With scooter/bike sharing, the steps are
1) check out share scooter/bike
2) ride to bus stop
3) leave scooter/bike for next user.
Maybe you can make it more complicated by adding another step where people have to ditch their cars before riding share vehicles to bus stops, like this:
But it this isn’t about the economy, or ecology, or sociology it is about e-scooters and who does or doesn’t use or want them.
There is a forum for social and political debate. This isn’t it. Many posters have listed many reasons for wanting to be car free. Loss of work, loss of a drivers license as reasons they are car free but this forum was supposed to be for those who prefer other forms of transportation and scooter simply have too many limitations to expand their usage.
I believe I have made my point. Transportation choices have been pretty steady for as many years as this forum has been in existence. There has been no information presented to date to make me believe more scooters will equal less cars.
#159
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,134
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1583 Post(s)
Liked 1,210 Times
in
613 Posts
Second, scooters and the users thereof are inevitably going to be competing for space with pedestrians, first and foremost, bicycles, and heavier vehicles (whether ICE or electric; driven or autonomous) on paved surfaces, on which 'scooters' are utterly dependent. Unlike bicycles, and unlike Shank's pony (one's legs), scooters are useless on anything other than perfectly smooth paved surfaces.
Third, the accelerating record of accidents/serious injury -- especially head injuries -- resulting from the use of these contraptions cannot be overlooked. You will no doubt come up with some specious conspiracy theory to explain these incidents away, but the simple fact is that persons using these stupid devices in dense urban environments are injuring themselves and others, at times severely.
Given that, the utility in real-world terms of these toys is at best severely limited: they require unobstructed paved surfaces and mild weather conditions. In other words, they are not the panacea you seem to think they are, and they in fact of their very nature work against your particular/peculiar vision of urban living.
Scooters -- whether 'kick' or "e" -- are toys; funny little contraptions that a few outliers might take a sort of misplaced pride in using, ostentatiously, to show off their facility/hardiness/defiance of convention and so on. In the longer term, they solve nothing in terms of the problems associated with overuse of motor vehicles etc. Their present proliferation in select cities in North America is the result of nothing more than the speculative ventures of a few start-ups using other people's money to attempt to profit short-term off of peoples' impulse to show off or to demonstrate some sort of 'awareness'.
No matter how one cuts it, these ventures are disgusting on every level given their complete disregard for user safety and of municipal authority.
#160
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
That is true, but you are ignoring several factors. First, the use of 'scooters' is weather-dependent. They are utterly useless in anything other than more or less perfect, temperate/mild conditions. No one in his/her right mind is going to use or depend upon 'scooters' in anything other than clement conditions, with the exception as always of a few outliers who will constitute a tiny percentage of potential users. So in North America, for example, they (scooters) are simply stupid anywhere outside the sun-belt (where, oddly enough, you live) as a 'serious' possible transportation mode.
Second, scooters and the users thereof are inevitably going to be competing for space with pedestrians, first and foremost, bicycles, and heavier vehicles (whether ICE or electric; driven or autonomous) on paved surfaces, on which 'scooters' are utterly dependent. Unlike bicycles, and unlike Shank's pony (one's legs), scooters are useless on anything other than perfectly smooth paved surfaces.
Third, the accelerating record of accidents/serious injury -- especially head injuries -- resulting from the use of these contraptions cannot be overlooked. You will no doubt come up with some specious conspiracy theory to explain these incidents away, but the simple fact is that persons using these stupid devices in dense urban environments are injuring themselves and others, at times severely.
Given that, the utility in real-world terms of these toys is at best severely limited: they require unobstructed paved surfaces and mild weather conditions. In other words, they are not the panacea you seem to think they are, and they in fact of their very nature work against your particular/peculiar vision of urban living.
Scooters -- whether 'kick' or "e" -- are toys; funny little contraptions that a few outliers might take a sort of misplaced pride in using, ostentatiously, to show off their facility/hardiness/defiance of convention and so on. In the longer term, they solve nothing in terms of the problems associated with overuse of motor vehicles etc. Their present proliferation in select cities in North America is the result of nothing more than the speculative ventures of a few start-ups using other people's money to attempt to profit short-term off of peoples' impulse to show off or to demonstrate some sort of 'awareness'.
No matter how one cuts it, these ventures are disgusting on every level given their complete disregard for user safety and of municipal authority.
Second, scooters and the users thereof are inevitably going to be competing for space with pedestrians, first and foremost, bicycles, and heavier vehicles (whether ICE or electric; driven or autonomous) on paved surfaces, on which 'scooters' are utterly dependent. Unlike bicycles, and unlike Shank's pony (one's legs), scooters are useless on anything other than perfectly smooth paved surfaces.
Third, the accelerating record of accidents/serious injury -- especially head injuries -- resulting from the use of these contraptions cannot be overlooked. You will no doubt come up with some specious conspiracy theory to explain these incidents away, but the simple fact is that persons using these stupid devices in dense urban environments are injuring themselves and others, at times severely.
Given that, the utility in real-world terms of these toys is at best severely limited: they require unobstructed paved surfaces and mild weather conditions. In other words, they are not the panacea you seem to think they are, and they in fact of their very nature work against your particular/peculiar vision of urban living.
Scooters -- whether 'kick' or "e" -- are toys; funny little contraptions that a few outliers might take a sort of misplaced pride in using, ostentatiously, to show off their facility/hardiness/defiance of convention and so on. In the longer term, they solve nothing in terms of the problems associated with overuse of motor vehicles etc. Their present proliferation in select cities in North America is the result of nothing more than the speculative ventures of a few start-ups using other people's money to attempt to profit short-term off of peoples' impulse to show off or to demonstrate some sort of 'awareness'.
No matter how one cuts it, these ventures are disgusting on every level given their complete disregard for user safety and of municipal authority.
#162
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
That is true, but you are ignoring several factors. First, the use of 'scooters' is weather-dependent. They are utterly useless in anything other than more or less perfect, temperate/mild conditions. No one in his/her right mind is going to use or depend upon 'scooters' in anything other than clement conditions, with the exception as always of a few outliers who will constitute a tiny percentage of potential users. So in North America, for example, they (scooters) are simply stupid anywhere outside the sun-belt (where, oddly enough, you live) as a 'serious' possible transportation mode.
The problem with size in US motor-vehicle trends has to do with many factors, but safety is a major issue. Even the smallest Smart cars and other (sub)compacts are designed with crumple zones for crashes. This, along with passenger seating, having a big motor with four car-sized tires, etc. wastes space. SUVs, cars, buses, and other highway-speed motor-vehicles are not going to be replaced by small vehicles, but for mobility and parking within municipalities a few miles across, they cause sprawl with all their pavement and parking space they consume. Then, the more the sprawl expands, the more people think they can deal with it by driving faster, which leads to more highways, etc. within an area that is meant to be used for human living space. We need to get back to Eisenhauer's vision when he launched the federal highway system to begin with, which is to keep the fast highway traffic out of the cities so people in inhabited areas are free to get around without driving and parking everywhere.
Second, scooters and the users thereof are inevitably going to be competing for space with pedestrians, first and foremost, bicycles, and heavier vehicles (whether ICE or electric; driven or autonomous) on paved surfaces, on which 'scooters' are utterly dependent. Unlike bicycles, and unlike Shank's pony (one's legs), scooters are useless on anything other than perfectly smooth paved surfaces.
Third, the accelerating record of accidents/serious injury -- especially head injuries -- resulting from the use of these contraptions cannot be overlooked. You will no doubt come up with some specious conspiracy theory to explain these incidents away, but the simple fact is that persons using these stupid devices in dense urban environments are injuring themselves and others, at times severely.
Given that, the utility in real-world terms of these toys is at best severely limited: they require unobstructed paved surfaces and mild weather conditions. In other words, they are not the panacea you seem to think they are, and they in fact of their very nature work against your particular/peculiar vision of urban living.
Scooters -- whether 'kick' or "e" -- are toys; funny little contraptions that a few outliers might take a sort of misplaced pride in using, ostentatiously, to show off their facility/hardiness/defiance of convention and so on. In the longer term, they solve nothing in terms of the problems associated with overuse of motor vehicles etc. Their present proliferation in select cities in North America is the result of nothing more than the speculative ventures of a few start-ups using other people's money to attempt to profit short-term off of peoples' impulse to show off or to demonstrate some sort of 'awareness'.
No matter how one cuts it, these ventures are disgusting on every level given their complete disregard for user safety and of municipal authority.
In short, we need to make more room for more people and more trees, so paved lanes and parking areas can be widdled down for better uses if more smaller vehicles are employed by more people instead of larger cars and trucks.
Last edited by tandempower; 12-20-18 at 06:56 AM.