Cadence and/or HR Monitor?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 236
Bikes: Orbea Aqua 105
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cadence and/or HR Monitor?
Hi,
I'm looking to upgrade my cycling computer. Right now I have Cateye Strada which I am happy with, but it has neither cadence nor hr monitor. I want to start actually training and have a work out regime.
The question is, is it necessary to have cadence AND HR, or just Cadence, or just HR? I read some training books that say "keep at x RPM for y min" and some say "keep at HR of x BMP for y min". Which is better to have?
I was looking at Polar CS200, Cateye V3, and Garmin Edge 200. So far Polar seems to be a bad buy. Anything wrong with the other two?
I'm looking to upgrade my cycling computer. Right now I have Cateye Strada which I am happy with, but it has neither cadence nor hr monitor. I want to start actually training and have a work out regime.
The question is, is it necessary to have cadence AND HR, or just Cadence, or just HR? I read some training books that say "keep at x RPM for y min" and some say "keep at HR of x BMP for y min". Which is better to have?
I was looking at Polar CS200, Cateye V3, and Garmin Edge 200. So far Polar seems to be a bad buy. Anything wrong with the other two?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 550
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
technically your computer doesnt need HR - you can get a separate HR monitor for that and just wear the watch on your hand. might be cheaper. you definitely want cadence, though, as you get more serious in your training.
#5
Still can't climb
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Limey in Taiwan
Posts: 23,024
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
my legs are my cadence meter.
actually i like having both. it gives a fuller picture of how much effort you are exerting.
actually i like having both. it gives a fuller picture of how much effort you are exerting.
__________________
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer
No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
coasting, few quotes are worthy of him, and of those, even fewer printable in a family forum......quote 3alarmer
No @coasting, you should stay 100% as you are right now, don't change a thing....quote Heathpack
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 696
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I disagree. The cadence is a great thing to have. I have the Cateye V3 and love it. It has cadence and heart rate. Wonderful computer that will not break the bank........Many times your cadence is much lower than you perceive.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Off the bike trainer, cadence sucks. Who the heck cares if you're pedaling 50 rpm or 120, so long as you're hauling it? Anyone who tells you it's somehow magically easier to pedal up a 5% hill at cadence 100 vs cadence 70 full of it - keep your speed the same, and you'll find out that cadence doesn't give you anything for free - it'll hurt equally bad at either cadence.
The main reason to have a cadence-worthy speedo in my opinion, is if you have a bike trainer and rear-wheel mount the cadence sensor so you can get mph estimates on the bike trainer. That is analogous to a poor man's Powermeter, and is excellent for training, with speed subbing for power.
The HRM is useful. On intervals and/or long sustained climbs, you can get a good sense of how hard you're working at any point with that number.
The main reason to have a cadence-worthy speedo in my opinion, is if you have a bike trainer and rear-wheel mount the cadence sensor so you can get mph estimates on the bike trainer. That is analogous to a poor man's Powermeter, and is excellent for training, with speed subbing for power.
The HRM is useful. On intervals and/or long sustained climbs, you can get a good sense of how hard you're working at any point with that number.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 550
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Off the bike trainer, cadence sucks. Who the heck cares if you're pedaling 50 rpm or 120, so long as you're hauling it? Anyone who tells you it's somehow magically easier to pedal up a 5% hill at cadence 100 vs cadence 70 full of it - keep your speed the same, and you'll find out that cadence doesn't give you anything for free - it'll hurt equally bad at either cadence.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ohio
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i would say get a computer with both cadence and heart rate. you'd bbe surprised how useful cadence can actually be, and of course heart rate is really useful.
#10
Century bound
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mesa Arizona
Posts: 2,262
Bikes: Felt AR4 and Cannondale hybrid
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
You can get a Garmin watch type for cheep. and it does all of that and more. I have the forerunner 305 and love it. You can download your rides and check out your ride data. You can add your own input to the ride, and share it with others too. just a thought. good luck.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mestizoracer310
Training & Nutrition
21
08-22-10 01:15 PM
jasandalb
Road Cycling
28
05-22-10 09:46 AM