Trek "400 Series":
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Trek "400 Series":
pretty aggressive riding position, no?
Compared to my Tricross and Roubaix anyways.
Compared to my Tricross and Roubaix anyways.
__________________
1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
"I'm built like a marine mammal. I love the cold! "-Cosmoline
"MTBing is cheap compared to any motorsport I've done. It's very expensive compared to jogging."-ColinL
Rides:1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
#2
2-Wheeled Fool
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,346
Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
457 Posts
The 400's were made from what, '83 to '92? Something like that.
I have an '85 460, and its a sweet bike. Other than them being a diamond-framed steel bike, what characterizes them (for you) to be aggressive riding?
I have an '85 460, and its a sweet bike. Other than them being a diamond-framed steel bike, what characterizes them (for you) to be aggressive riding?
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
In my un-profesional opinion and on my rather short ride, I found the bar level really low and the handling super sharp. It's a little too big for me at 60cm (I like a 56/58 in old steel and 54/56 in New Money bikes). I guess it could be pipe steel but it's light. Of all the bikes I have kicking around here it is lighter than all but my Trek FXs4 and my carbon Specialized, and its pretty much a push wiht the FX. I would need a scale to tell which is lighter. Oddly, the frame literally just says "400series" on it. There is no specific numerical model designator.
__________________
1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
"I'm built like a marine mammal. I love the cold! "-Cosmoline
"MTBing is cheap compared to any motorsport I've done. It's very expensive compared to jogging."-ColinL
Rides:1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
#4
PM me your cotters
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,241
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1137 Post(s)
Liked 590 Times
in
422 Posts
In my un-profesional opinion and on my rather short ride, I found the bar level really low and the handling super sharp. It's a little too big for me at 60cm (I like a 56/58 in old steel and 54/56 in New Money bikes). I guess it could be pipe steel but it's light. Of all the bikes I have kicking around here it is lighter than all but my Trek FXs4 and my carbon Specialized, and its pretty much a push wiht the FX. I would need a scale to tell which is lighter. Oddly, the frame literally just says "400series" on it. There is no specific numerical model designator.
I've ridden both the 460, 560 and 660, all mid-80s. I didn't enjoy any of them. I've owned multiple 80/81 Ishawata bikes, didn't like them either. Couldn't get comfortable for the life of me. I do love the mid-80s TrueTemper 410 I have. I'm sure there's probably something else out there in Trek I can get comfy on, I just didn't find it in the mid-80s x60 series or the Ishawata framed bikes around the turn of the 80s.
#5
2-Wheeled Fool
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,346
Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times
in
457 Posts
In my un-professional opinion and on my rather short ride, I found the bar level really low and the handling super sharp. It's a little too big for me at 60cm (I like a 56/58 in old steel and 54/56 in New Money bikes). I guess it could be pipe steel but it's light. Of all the bikes I have kicking around here it is lighter than all but my Trek FXs4 and my carbon Specialized, and its pretty much a push with the FX. I would need a scale to tell which is lighter. Oddly, the frame literally just says "400 series" on it. There is no specific numerical model designator.
As far as the model type goes, it was always printed on the chainstay protector. Helluva bad place to put it imho, but hey I'm just a crazy Irishman.
#6
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,378 Times
in
891 Posts
I've owned several Trek 400s. I find then to be utterly neutral in the handling dept.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,154
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2363 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
1,191 Posts
In this case, the fact that it uses the "x00 Series" scheme means that it's most likely an '85 or '86. We're fortunate to have the vintage-trek web site to guide us, using both serial numbers and color / livery schemes shown in the yearly brochures.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Back in Lincoln Sq, Chicago...🙄
Posts: 1,609
Bikes: '84 Miyata 610 ‘91 Cannondale ST600,'83 Trek 720 ‘84 Trek 520, 620, ‘91 Miyata 1000LT, '79 Trek 514, '78 Trek 706, '73 Raleigh Int. frame.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Liked 370 Times
in
219 Posts
There are 400 series frames that are racing and touring and sports geometry.
#9
missing in action
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,483
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times
in
29 Posts
Actually, no, it wasn't. Prior to 1984, there was no chainstay protector. There was no model designation in the livery at all. The only text was the TREK brand and what was on the frame material decals. Model designation was by inference, based on geometry, frame material, color way, features/components, etc. It's not unique to Trek; none of the Peugeots I've seen have had model designations as part of the livery.
In this case, the fact that it uses the "x00 Series" scheme means that it's most likely an '85 or '86. We're fortunate to have the vintage-trek web site to guide us, using both serial numbers and color / livery schemes shown in the yearly brochures.
In this case, the fact that it uses the "x00 Series" scheme means that it's most likely an '85 or '86. We're fortunate to have the vintage-trek web site to guide us, using both serial numbers and color / livery schemes shown in the yearly brochures.
#10
PM me your cotters
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,241
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1137 Post(s)
Liked 590 Times
in
422 Posts
This is why it's bad to deal in absolutes. There's always an exception hiding somewhere. That's why I was pretty vaguely-specific with "If still intact, the black chain guard sticker will sometimes reveal the model."
Seems the model number slapped off or rubbed off pretty easily on some models. I've seen more than my share of 80s models with the chain guard stickers that didn't have it anymore, or maybe they never came with a number on it. All I know is the bikes look better when it's removed
Seems the model number slapped off or rubbed off pretty easily on some models. I've seen more than my share of 80s models with the chain guard stickers that didn't have it anymore, or maybe they never came with a number on it. All I know is the bikes look better when it's removed
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,154
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2363 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
1,191 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
This is her. Campy components, Chromo frame and stays.
__________________
1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
"I'm built like a marine mammal. I love the cold! "-Cosmoline
"MTBing is cheap compared to any motorsport I've done. It's very expensive compared to jogging."-ColinL
Rides:1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Last edited by mr,grumpy; 11-05-19 at 02:35 PM.
#17
PM me your cotters
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,241
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1137 Post(s)
Liked 590 Times
in
422 Posts
Likely a 410. Did you run the serial number under the BB shell through the Vintage-Trek site?
Edit: I suspect it's an '85, but here are the serial number ranges for 84/85/86:
https://www.vintage-trek.com/SerialNos84.htm
https://www.vintage-trek.com/SerialNos85.htm
https://www.vintage-trek.com/SerialNos86.htm
Edit: I suspect it's an '85, but here are the serial number ranges for 84/85/86:
https://www.vintage-trek.com/SerialNos84.htm
https://www.vintage-trek.com/SerialNos85.htm
https://www.vintage-trek.com/SerialNos86.htm
#18
PM me your cotters
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,241
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1137 Post(s)
Liked 590 Times
in
422 Posts
PS - I have the twin to it, converted to a 6spd index-shift in-town cruiser. Was gutted of the Campy stuff when I got it. Used Campy Veloce sealed 115 BB, Veloce crank. Super fun to ride! Very light bike. Literally the only Trek bike I've owned that put a smile on my face!
Pics: https://imgur.com/a/ezztPaO
Pics: https://imgur.com/a/ezztPaO
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
If still intact, the black chain guard sticker will sometimes reveal the model. Other than that, it's either using the serial# to look it up, or trying to guesstimate date based on decal cues and cross-ref with the components to figure it out.
I've ridden both the 460, 560 and 660, all mid-80s. I didn't enjoy any of them. I've owned multiple 80/81 Ishawata bikes, didn't like them either. Couldn't get comfortable for the life of me. I do love the mid-80s TrueTemper 410 I have. I'm sure there's probably something else out there in Trek I can get comfy on, I just didn't find it in the mid-80s x60 series or the Ishawata framed bikes around the turn of the 80s.
I've ridden both the 460, 560 and 660, all mid-80s. I didn't enjoy any of them. I've owned multiple 80/81 Ishawata bikes, didn't like them either. Couldn't get comfortable for the life of me. I do love the mid-80s TrueTemper 410 I have. I'm sure there's probably something else out there in Trek I can get comfy on, I just didn't find it in the mid-80s x60 series or the Ishawata framed bikes around the turn of the 80s.
The x10 models were called "sport-touring" which means a compromise between a non-racking fast bike (the "sport") and a non-touring comfy bike. I have a 610 which is pretty darn comfortable. The geometries (tube lengths, frame angles, fork offsets) are pretty much the same across the x10 levels.
Trek used butted tubing across the board: double-butted top tubes and down tubes, with single-butted seat tubes. Tubesets were different, and this can make a difference.
The most comfortable Treks were the touring models, x20. In the '80s "touring" meant comfort (frame designed to give and absorb energy) and to be stable when carrying extra stuff. The best models were the 720, 620, and 520. 520 of the early/mid '80s had Reynolds 501 tubing for which the wall thicknesses (also called butting profiles) were .9/.6/.9 for the top tube and down tube, and .9/.6 mm wall thickness. My 610 and the 620 had Reynolds 531, with .8/.5./.8 TT, 1.0/.7/1.0 for the down tube, and .9/.6 for the seat tube. Note that for the 531 the TT is thinner-wall and the DT is thicker-wall. This in my opinion made the 610 (and possibly the 620 as well) a stiffer-riding bike than the 520.
You can nail down (with a few exceptions) the year, size, and model of a Trek frame based on the serial number.
Likes For Road Fan:
#20
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,509
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2746 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
2,053 Posts
My previous 87 and my current 91 400 were sport touring with longer chain stays and rack braze ons.
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
1985 24inch 410.
i think
i think
__________________
1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
"I'm built like a marine mammal. I love the cold! "-Cosmoline
"MTBing is cheap compared to any motorsport I've done. It's very expensive compared to jogging."-ColinL
Rides:1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, WI USA
Posts: 6,154
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2363 Post(s)
Liked 1,749 Times
in
1,191 Posts
Okay, a fastback. That, plus the decal style, makes it most likely an '85, and the "Scarlet" color and the Campag Triomphe bits are consistent with a 410.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
PS - I have the twin to it, converted to a 6spd index-shift in-town cruiser. Was gutted of the Campy stuff when I got it. Used Campy Veloce sealed 115 BB, Veloce crank. Super fun to ride! Very light bike. Literally the only Trek bike I've owned that put a smile on my face!
Pics: https://imgur.com/a/ezztPaO
Pics: https://imgur.com/a/ezztPaO
__________________
1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
"I'm built like a marine mammal. I love the cold! "-Cosmoline
"MTBing is cheap compared to any motorsport I've done. It's very expensive compared to jogging."-ColinL
Rides:1980ish Raleigh Marathon (Vintage Steel)
2006 Trek 820 (Captain Amazing)
2010 Specialized Tricross (Back in Black)
2008 Specialized Roubaix
#25
PM me your cotters
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,241
Mentioned: 80 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1137 Post(s)
Liked 590 Times
in
422 Posts
- Didn't bother with a heat gun, just put the frame in full sunlight to heat it up
- Peeled the chainstay sticker off
- Got some Turtle Wax sticker/adhesive remover for $7 at my auto parts store: https://www.amazon.com/Turtle-Wax-T-.../dp/B004M3F5CO
- It's non-corrosive. Spray on chainstay where adhesive is. Wait 2 minutes and enjoy the nice orange citrus smell.
- Take a credit card or other stiff card and scrape across the adhesive while holding at a 15° angle to the surface.
- Repeat that process until all goo is gone. Took me two treatments. Spray one last time, then buff with a terrycloth.
- Admire your hard work while cracking a beer. Wax chainstay. Let dry. Buff one last time.
- Finish beer. Then ride it like you stole it.